Re: Fw: [Bug 2066129] mingw-libgsf-1_14_52 is available
On Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 11:12:42PM -0600, Greg Hellings wrote: > Looks like I'm not allowed to retire on the f39 branch. It was already > retired in Rawhide before I could get there. > > $ fedpkg retire "MinGW support merged to native package in Fedora 39 > release" > Fedora release (f39) is in state 'current' - retire operation is not > allowed. Oh well, it should be harmless as long as no one ever updates that branch with new versions, nor does any new builds from that branch. The NEVR from the native package should be newer and thus the mingw sub-RPMs from the native build are what should get into the yum repos. With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o-https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o-https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org-o-https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Fw: [Bug 2066129] mingw-libgsf-1_14_52 is available
On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 1:42 PM Dan Horák wrote: > > On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 13:11:55 +0100 > Sandro Mani wrote: > > > > > On 06.02.24 8:50 AM, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > > > Hi > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 8:52 PM Daniel P. Berrangé > > > wrote: > > >> On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 05:34:06PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote: > > >>> Hi, > > >>> > > >>> could someone in the mingw team look at mingw-libgsf / libgsf (please > > >>> see the bug forwarded below)? If I see right, then the standalone > > >>> mingw-libgsf package should be retired as there are mingw builds from > > >>> the regular libgsf package, which seems to be regularly updated. > > >> Copying Marc-André who added the mingw sub-RPMs to the native > > >> package. > > >> > > >> The mingw-libgsf should have been retired on rawhide, as soon > > >> as the libgsf native had a successful build with mingw packages. > > >> > > >> At this point I guess it'll need retiring on both rawhide > > >> and f39 > > > Correct, I missed that. Geg, Sandro, can you retire the mingw-libgsf > > > package? > > > > > I've retired the package, but not sure if it worked 100% as I'm not > > listed as package admin. > > I suspect it hasn't finished the retiring, mingw-libgfs is still active > in koji and in pagure ... Likely it needs either Greg (who seems to be > inactive) or a releng ticket. No, processing package retirements happens during the compose process, so it takes up to 24 hours. Fabio -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Fw: [Bug 2066129] mingw-libgsf-1_14_52 is available
On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 08:27:33AM -0600, Greg Hellings wrote: > I'm happy to pass the project off to whomever needs it, if you give me the > user name and a quick reference. Or retire it, if you have a link with > instructions on how to do that. It should not require more than the first step in the docs[1] fedpkg retire "Merged mingw support into native package" un in the 'rawhide' branch of dist-git for mingw-libgsf and then push. Normally you would never retire in a fedora release branch, but that's ok in this place as the content isn't going away, it just moved to the native package. So I think its ok to run fedpkg retire in the f39 branch too, unless something blocks that. Blocking from koji isn't needed, as the sub-RPMs from the native build should be newer and thus take priority in the compose too. With regards, Daniel [1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Retirement_Process/ -- |: https://berrange.com -o-https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o-https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org-o-https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Fw: [Bug 2066129] mingw-libgsf-1_14_52 is available
On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 13:11:55 +0100 Sandro Mani wrote: > > On 06.02.24 8:50 AM, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > > Hi > > > > On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 8:52 PM Daniel P. Berrangé > > wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 05:34:06PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> could someone in the mingw team look at mingw-libgsf / libgsf (please > >>> see the bug forwarded below)? If I see right, then the standalone > >>> mingw-libgsf package should be retired as there are mingw builds from > >>> the regular libgsf package, which seems to be regularly updated. > >> Copying Marc-André who added the mingw sub-RPMs to the native > >> package. > >> > >> The mingw-libgsf should have been retired on rawhide, as soon > >> as the libgsf native had a successful build with mingw packages. > >> > >> At this point I guess it'll need retiring on both rawhide > >> and f39 > > Correct, I missed that. Geg, Sandro, can you retire the mingw-libgsf > > package? > > > I've retired the package, but not sure if it worked 100% as I'm not > listed as package admin. I suspect it hasn't finished the retiring, mingw-libgfs is still active in koji and in pagure ... Likely it needs either Greg (who seems to be inactive) or a releng ticket. Dan -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Fw: [Bug 2066129] mingw-libgsf-1_14_52 is available
On 06.02.24 8:50 AM, Marc-André Lureau wrote: Hi On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 8:52 PM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 05:34:06PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote: Hi, could someone in the mingw team look at mingw-libgsf / libgsf (please see the bug forwarded below)? If I see right, then the standalone mingw-libgsf package should be retired as there are mingw builds from the regular libgsf package, which seems to be regularly updated. Copying Marc-André who added the mingw sub-RPMs to the native package. The mingw-libgsf should have been retired on rawhide, as soon as the libgsf native had a successful build with mingw packages. At this point I guess it'll need retiring on both rawhide and f39 Correct, I missed that. Geg, Sandro, can you retire the mingw-libgsf package? I've retired the package, but not sure if it worked 100% as I'm not listed as package admin. Sandro -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Fw: [Bug 2066129] mingw-libgsf-1_14_52 is available
On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 05:34:06PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote: > Hi, > > could someone in the mingw team look at mingw-libgsf / libgsf (please > see the bug forwarded below)? If I see right, then the standalone > mingw-libgsf package should be retired as there are mingw builds from > the regular libgsf package, which seems to be regularly updated. Copying Marc-André who added the mingw sub-RPMs to the native package. The mingw-libgsf should have been retired on rawhide, as soon as the libgsf native had a successful build with mingw packages. At this point I guess it'll need retiring on both rawhide and f39 > > > Thanks, > > Dan > > > > Begin forwarded message: > > Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2024 00:09:44 + > From: bugzi...@redhat.com > Subject: [Bug 2066129] mingw-libgsf-1_14_52 is available > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2066129 > > Upstream Release Monitoring > changed: > >What|Removed |Added > > Summary|mingw-libgsf-1_14_51 is |mingw-libgsf-1_14_52 is >|available |available > > > > --- Comment #8 from Upstream Release Monitoring > --- Releases retrieved: > 1_14_52 Upstream release that is considered latest: 1_14_52 > Current version/release in rawhide: 1.14.48-7.fc40 > URL: http://www.gnome.org/projects/libgsf/ > > Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to > a stable branch: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ > > > More information about the service that created this bug can be found > at: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring > > > Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be > packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember > that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that > the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally > problematic items have been added upstream. > > > Based on the information from Anitya: > https://release-monitoring.org/project/1980/ > > > To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mingw-libgsf > > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You are on the CC list for the bug. > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2066129 > > Report this comment as SPAM: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202066129%23c8 > -- > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o-https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o-https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org-o-https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Fw: [Bug 2066129] mingw-libgsf-1_14_52 is available
Hi, could someone in the mingw team look at mingw-libgsf / libgsf (please see the bug forwarded below)? If I see right, then the standalone mingw-libgsf package should be retired as there are mingw builds from the regular libgsf package, which seems to be regularly updated. Thanks, Dan Begin forwarded message: Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2024 00:09:44 + From: bugzi...@redhat.com Subject: [Bug 2066129] mingw-libgsf-1_14_52 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2066129 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|mingw-libgsf-1_14_51 is |mingw-libgsf-1_14_52 is |available |available --- Comment #8 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Releases retrieved: 1_14_52 Upstream release that is considered latest: 1_14_52 Current version/release in rawhide: 1.14.48-7.fc40 URL: http://www.gnome.org/projects/libgsf/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/1980/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mingw-libgsf -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2066129 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202066129%23c8 -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
