Re: Orphaning java-1.5.0-gcj
On 04/30/2014 12:07 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 04/07/2014 07:29 PM, Andrew Haley wrote: > >> As of JDK8, OpenJDK can be cross-compiled. Not before time, either. > > It seems to me that support is fairly limited—you cannot compile Hotspot > across different operating systems, but perhaps across CPU architectures. I didn't know that. It makes some sense, though, given that differ OSs have different toolsets. Andrew. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Orphaning java-1.5.0-gcj
On 04/07/2014 07:29 PM, Andrew Haley wrote: As of JDK8, OpenJDK can be cross-compiled. Not before time, either. It seems to me that support is fairly limited—you cannot compile Hotspot across different operating systems, but perhaps across CPU architectures. In the context of GCJ obsolescence, it might be good enough, but it's still a bit disappointing. -- Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security Team -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Orphaning java-1.5.0-gcj
> > Ok the patch worked fine for building on my F20, which I did as a test, > > however it failed the build in rawhide. > > > > The only clue I can get is this: > > configure: WARNING: unable to include > > > What's in the configure log file regarding this? This is solved now, AFAIK. The configure script had some custom code to detect Java version by parsing output of "java -version", which didn't work because OpenJDK >= 8 has slightly different output format. An analogous change was needed in javapackages: https://github.com/mizdebsk/javapackages/commit/494fea0 -- Mikolaj -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Orphaning java-1.5.0-gcj
On 04/14/2014 07:32 AM, Simo Sorce wrote: Ok the patch worked fine for building on my F20, which I did as a test, however it failed the build in rawhide. The only clue I can get is this: configure: WARNING: unable to include What's in the configure log file regarding this? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Orphaning java-1.5.0-gcj
On Mon, 2014-04-14 at 09:44 +0200, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: > On Sun 13 Apr 2014 08:42:43 PM CEST Simo Sorce wrote: > > [snip] I know little to nothing about java bindings so if it is > > substantial work I will just remove the java binding and ask rel eng to > > pull the subpackage. > > You can't just "pull" packages. You'll have to properly "Obsoletes: > lasso-java" it. I am attaching a patch which worked for me (including a > scratchbuild with openjdk). I haven't actually tested the code, but I > guess it should work (it's JNI though so...meh) > > A side note: I believe we generally start release numbering at 1 instead > of 0, but of course it doesn't hurt anything... Ok the patch worked fine for building on my F20, which I did as a test, however it failed the build in rawhide. The only clue I can get is this: configure: WARNING: unable to include however I got the same warning in F20 w/o causing the build to fail. Here build fails in the sense that the configure script thinks there is no java available at all and just skips building the jni stuff and then rpm fails to find the .so and .jar files. Help ? Simo. -- Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Orphaning java-1.5.0-gcj
On Mon, 2014-04-14 at 09:24 +0100, Mat Booth wrote: > On 14 April 2014 08:44, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: > > > On Sun 13 Apr 2014 08:42:43 PM CEST Simo Sorce wrote: > > > [snip] I know little to nothing about java bindings so if it is > > > substantial work I will just remove the java binding and ask rel eng to > > > pull the subpackage. > > > > You can't just "pull" packages. You'll have to properly "Obsoletes: > > lasso-java" it. I am attaching a patch which worked for me (including a > > scratchbuild with openjdk). I haven't actually tested the code, but I > > guess it should work (it's JNI though so...meh) > > > > > > > Not "Requires: java-headless" ? It may be better I guess, I will change it before pushing a build unless someone tells me otherwise. Simo. -- Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Orphaning java-1.5.0-gcj
Thanks a lot,
I will push this patch and rebuild in rawhide.
Simo.
On Mon, 2014-04-14 at 09:44 +0200, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> On Sun 13 Apr 2014 08:42:43 PM CEST Simo Sorce wrote:
> > [snip] I know little to nothing about java bindings so if it is
> > substantial work I will just remove the java binding and ask rel eng to
> > pull the subpackage.
>
> You can't just "pull" packages. You'll have to properly "Obsoletes:
> lasso-java" it. I am attaching a patch which worked for me (including a
> scratchbuild with openjdk). I haven't actually tested the code, but I
> guess it should work (it's JNI though so...meh)
>
> A side note: I believe we generally start release numbering at 1 instead
> of 0, but of course it doesn't hurt anything...
>
> differences between files attachment
> (0001-Use-OpenJDK-instead-of-GCJ-for-java-bindings.patch)
> From ef5fd12e46974858b25c2aa032e943514a0bf921 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Stanislav Ochotnicky
> Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 09:42:19 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] Use OpenJDK instead of GCJ for java bindings
>
> ---
> lasso.spec | 11 ---
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lasso.spec b/lasso.spec
> index e96e39b..d060cf0 100644
> --- a/lasso.spec
> +++ b/lasso.spec
> @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
> Summary: Liberty Alliance Single Sign On
> Name: lasso
> Version: 2.4.0
> -Release: 0%{?dist}
> +Release: 1%{?dist}
> License: GPLv2+
> Group: System Environment/Libraries
> Source:
> https://dev.entrouvert.org/attachments/download/3874/lasso-2.4.0.tar.gz
> @@ -55,8 +55,10 @@ Perl language bindings for the lasso (Liberty Alliance
> Single Sign On) library.
> %package java
> Summary: Liberty Alliance Single Sign On (lasso) Java bindings
> Group: Development/Libraries
> -BuildRequires: java-devel, jpackage-utils
> -Requires: jre-gcj, jpackage-utils
> +BuildRequires: java-devel
> +BuildRequires: jpackage-utils
> +Requires: java
> +Requires: jpackage-utils
> Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
>
> %description java
> @@ -197,6 +199,9 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot}%{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}
> %endif
>
> %changelog
> +* Mon Apr 14 2014 Stanislav Ochotnicky - 2.4.0-1
> +- Use OpenJDK instead of GCJ for java bindings
> +
> * Sat Jan 11 2014 Simo Sorce 2.4.0-0
> - Update to final 2.4.0 version
> - Drop all patches, they are now included in 2.4.0
>
> --
> Stanislav Ochotnicky
> Software Engineer - Developer Experience
>
> PGP: 7B087241
> Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com
--
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Orphaning java-1.5.0-gcj
On Mon 14 Apr 2014 10:24:46 AM CEST Mat Booth wrote: > On 14 April 2014 08:44, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: > >> On Sun 13 Apr 2014 08:42:43 PM CEST Simo Sorce wrote: >> > [snip] I know little to nothing about java bindings so if it is >> > substantial work I will just remove the java binding and ask rel eng to >> > pull the subpackage. >> >> You can't just "pull" packages. You'll have to properly "Obsoletes: >> lasso-java" it. I am attaching a patch which worked for me (including a >> scratchbuild with openjdk). I haven't actually tested the code, but I >> guess it should work (it's JNI though so...meh) >> >> >> > Not "Requires: java-headless" ? Haha, you are right. I am violating guidelines I myself proposed :-) A -- Stanislav Ochotnicky Software Engineer - Developer Experience PGP: 7B087241 Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com pgpJ2aJH7ilE7.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Orphaning java-1.5.0-gcj
On 14 April 2014 08:44, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: > On Sun 13 Apr 2014 08:42:43 PM CEST Simo Sorce wrote: > > [snip] I know little to nothing about java bindings so if it is > > substantial work I will just remove the java binding and ask rel eng to > > pull the subpackage. > > You can't just "pull" packages. You'll have to properly "Obsoletes: > lasso-java" it. I am attaching a patch which worked for me (including a > scratchbuild with openjdk). I haven't actually tested the code, but I > guess it should work (it's JNI though so...meh) > > > Not "Requires: java-headless" ? -- Mat Booth http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Orphaning java-1.5.0-gcj
On Sun 13 Apr 2014 08:42:43 PM CEST Simo Sorce wrote:
> [snip] I know little to nothing about java bindings so if it is
> substantial work I will just remove the java binding and ask rel eng to
> pull the subpackage.
You can't just "pull" packages. You'll have to properly "Obsoletes:
lasso-java" it. I am attaching a patch which worked for me (including a
scratchbuild with openjdk). I haven't actually tested the code, but I
guess it should work (it's JNI though so...meh)
A side note: I believe we generally start release numbering at 1 instead
of 0, but of course it doesn't hurt anything...
pgp5kMEDIZEET.pgp
Description: PGP signature
>From ef5fd12e46974858b25c2aa032e943514a0bf921 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stanislav Ochotnicky
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 09:42:19 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Use OpenJDK instead of GCJ for java bindings
---
lasso.spec | 11 ---
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lasso.spec b/lasso.spec
index e96e39b..d060cf0 100644
--- a/lasso.spec
+++ b/lasso.spec
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
Summary: Liberty Alliance Single Sign On
Name: lasso
Version: 2.4.0
-Release: 0%{?dist}
+Release: 1%{?dist}
License: GPLv2+
Group: System Environment/Libraries
Source: https://dev.entrouvert.org/attachments/download/3874/lasso-2.4.0.tar.gz
@@ -55,8 +55,10 @@ Perl language bindings for the lasso (Liberty Alliance Single Sign On) library.
%package java
Summary: Liberty Alliance Single Sign On (lasso) Java bindings
Group: Development/Libraries
-BuildRequires: java-devel, jpackage-utils
-Requires: jre-gcj, jpackage-utils
+BuildRequires: java-devel
+BuildRequires: jpackage-utils
+Requires: java
+Requires: jpackage-utils
Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
%description java
@@ -197,6 +199,9 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot}%{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}
%endif
%changelog
+* Mon Apr 14 2014 Stanislav Ochotnicky - 2.4.0-1
+- Use OpenJDK instead of GCJ for java bindings
+
* Sat Jan 11 2014 Simo Sorce 2.4.0-0
- Update to final 2.4.0 version
- Drop all patches, they are now included in 2.4.0
--
1.9.0
--
Stanislav Ochotnicky
Software Engineer - Developer Experience
PGP: 7B087241
Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Orphaning java-1.5.0-gcj
On Mon, 2014-04-07 at 18:29 +0100, Andrew Haley wrote: > On 04/07/2014 03:23 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > >> There have been a few discussions about this in the past but no action. > >> With feature freeze approaching for F21, I think this is a good time to > >> address this. > >> > >> I will be orphaning java-1.5.0-gcj in Fedora on April 8th. If anyone > >> wants to take over, please let me know. Please do keep in mind though > >> that we really should just remove GCJ (despite the effect it will have > >> on pdftk) as preferred by one of the primary authors of it (Andrew > >> Haley): > > > > How does this affect the bring up of new architectures, I seem to > > remember when doing the various variants of ARM we needed this for > > bringup of the newer releases, is that still the case or is there > > other means of achieving that? > > As of JDK8, OpenJDK can be cross-compiled. Not before time, either. > > Andrew. I just got mails that this broke the lasso-java package I maintain. I do not know the java bindings much, I care only for the python bindings and the C library really, but I compiled the java bindings in if someone wanted to use it. What is the path forward here ? Should I just drop the java bindings ? Or do I just get some other dependency in ? note I know little to nothing about java bindings so if it is substantial work I will just remove the java binding and ask rel eng to pull the subpackage. Simo. -- Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Orphaning java-1.5.0-gcj
* Andrew Haley [2014-04-07 13:29]: > On 04/07/2014 03:23 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > >> There have been a few discussions about this in the past but no action. > >> With feature freeze approaching for F21, I think this is a good time to > >> address this. > >> > >> I will be orphaning java-1.5.0-gcj in Fedora on April 8th. If anyone > >> wants to take over, please let me know. Please do keep in mind though > >> that we really should just remove GCJ (despite the effect it will have > >> on pdftk) as preferred by one of the primary authors of it (Andrew > >> Haley): > > > > How does this affect the bring up of new architectures, I seem to > > remember when doing the various variants of ARM we needed this for > > bringup of the newer releases, is that still the case or is there > > other means of achieving that? > > As of JDK8, OpenJDK can be cross-compiled. Not before time, either. > Ownership released, package retired in rawhide. I accidentally hit retire on F20 as well. I'll get that addressed, as we will support it for the length for F19/20. Deepak > Andrew. > > -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Orphaning java-1.5.0-gcj
On 04/07/2014 03:23 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: >> There have been a few discussions about this in the past but no action. >> With feature freeze approaching for F21, I think this is a good time to >> address this. >> >> I will be orphaning java-1.5.0-gcj in Fedora on April 8th. If anyone >> wants to take over, please let me know. Please do keep in mind though >> that we really should just remove GCJ (despite the effect it will have >> on pdftk) as preferred by one of the primary authors of it (Andrew >> Haley): > > How does this affect the bring up of new architectures, I seem to > remember when doing the various variants of ARM we needed this for > bringup of the newer releases, is that still the case or is there > other means of achieving that? As of JDK8, OpenJDK can be cross-compiled. Not before time, either. Andrew. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Orphaning java-1.5.0-gcj
> There have been a few discussions about this in the past but no action. > With feature freeze approaching for F21, I think this is a good time to > address this. > > I will be orphaning java-1.5.0-gcj in Fedora on April 8th. If anyone > wants to take over, please let me know. Please do keep in mind though > that we really should just remove GCJ (despite the effect it will have > on pdftk) as preferred by one of the primary authors of it (Andrew > Haley): How does this affect the bring up of new architectures, I seem to remember when doing the various variants of ARM we needed this for bringup of the newer releases, is that still the case or is there other means of achieving that? Peter -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Orphaning java-1.5.0-gcj
- Original Message - > From: "Deepak Bhole" > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Friday, April 4, 2014 2:01:18 PM > Subject: Orphaning java-1.5.0-gcj > > Hi, > > There have been a few discussions about this in the past but no action. > With feature freeze approaching for F21, I think this is a good time to > address this. > > I will be orphaning java-1.5.0-gcj in Fedora on April 8th. If anyone > wants to take over, please let me know. Hi, I've been quiet on this so far, but since we are finally at the "take action" point, I should chime in. I (jvanalte in FAS) am currently a committer for this package, but it is not useful to me and so I don't intend to take it over. In fact, I am not even interested in staying on as co-maintainer if someone else does take it over. Just didn't want anyone to have expectations otherwise. I tend to agree that its time has passed and would be happy to see it retired from Fedora. cheers, jon -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Orphaning java-1.5.0-gcj
Hi, There have been a few discussions about this in the past but no action. With feature freeze approaching for F21, I think this is a good time to address this. I will be orphaning java-1.5.0-gcj in Fedora on April 8th. If anyone wants to take over, please let me know. Please do keep in mind though that we really should just remove GCJ (despite the effect it will have on pdftk) as preferred by one of the primary authors of it (Andrew Haley): https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-March/196535.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-March/196895.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-March/197157.html Deepak -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
