Re: ceph/rbd broken deps Re: [HEADS UP] lttng-ust 2.13 soname bump
On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 09:54:47PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrangé wrote on 2021/11/02 21:33:
> > On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 09:22:06PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> > > Daniel P. Berrangé wrote on 2021/11/02 20:50:
> > > > On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 05:35:45PM -0400, Michael Jeanson wrote:
> > > > > I have started the process of updating lttng-ust to 2.13 in rawhide
> > > > > which
> > > > > implies a soname bump of liblttng-ust to 1 and liblttng-ust-ctl to 5.
> > > > >
> > > > > From what I understand, the following packages will need to be
> > > > > rebuilt:
> > > > >
> > > > > libcamera
> > > > > mir-server-libs
> > > > >
> > > > > These packages might also be impacted:
> > > > >
> > > > > ceph-base
> > > > > dotnet-runtime
> > > > > librados2
> > > > > librbd1
> > > > > librgw2
> > > > > lttng-tools
> > > > > mir-test-tools
> > > > >
> > > > > I have created a side tag 'f36-build-side-47029' and built lttng-ust
> > > > > and
> > > > > lttng-tools. I plan to have the side-tag merged in rawhide in about a
> > > > > week.
> > > >
> > > > What's the status of the dependant builds for the side tag ?
> > > >
> > > > I've just tried to build libvirt in rawhide and it fails to install
> > > > the build root because librbd is still linking against the old soname
> > > > for liblttng-ust
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/8499/78208499/root.log
> > > >
> > > > Error:
> > > > Problem 1: package librbd-devel-2:16.2.6-2.fc36.x86_64 requires
> > > > librbd.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
> > > > - package librbd-devel-2:16.2.6-2.fc36.x86_64 requires
> > > > librbd_tp.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
> > > > - package librbd-devel-2:16.2.6-2.fc36.x86_64 requires librbd1 =
> > > > 2:16.2.6-2.fc36, but none of the providers can be installed
> > > > - conflicting requests
> > > > - nothing provides liblttng-ust.so.0()(64bit) needed by
> > > > librbd1-2:16.2.6-2.fc36.x86_64
> > > > Problem 2: package librados-devel-2:16.2.6-2.fc36.x86_64 requires
> > > > librados.so.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
> > > > - package librados-devel-2:16.2.6-2.fc36.x86_64 requires
> > > > librados_tp.so.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
> > > > - package librados-devel-2:16.2.6-2.fc36.x86_64 requires
> > > > librados2 = 2:16.2.6-2.fc36, but none of the providers can be installed
> > > > - conflicting requests
> > > > - nothing provides liblttng-ust.so.0()(64bit) needed by
> > > > librados2-2:16.2.6-2.fc36.x86_64
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Daniel
> > > >
> > >
> > > Looks like only lttng-ust and lttng-tools are built on the side tag and
> > > they are merged:
> > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-758d58d74f
> > >
> > > So perhaps the dependant packages needs rebuilding...
> >
> > Sigh.
> >
> > I long for a day when rawhide gating CI blocks RPM updates that
> > break soname until all affected packages are re-built...
> >
> > soname bump breakage is what makes rawhide so unpleasant use or
> > work with.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Daniel
> >
>
> $ dnf repoquery --qf
> '%{name}-%{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}.%{arch}\t%{sourcerpm}' --whatrequires
> "liblttng-ust.so.0()(64bit)"
> ceph-base-2:16.2.6-2.fc36.x86_64 ceph-16.2.6-2.fc36.src.rpm
> dotnet-runtime-3.1-0:3.1.17-2.fc35.x86_64 dotnet3.1-3.1.117-2.fc35.src.rpm
> dotnet-runtime-5.0-0:5.0.8-1.fc35.x86_64 dotnet5.0-5.0.205-1.fc35.src.rpm
> libcamera-0:0.0.0~git.20210928.e00149f-1.fc36.x86_64
> libcamera-0.0.0~git.20210928.e00149f-1.fc36.src.rpm
> librados2-2:16.2.6-2.fc36.x86_64 ceph-16.2.6-2.fc36.src.rpm
> librbd1-2:16.2.6-2.fc36.x86_64ceph-16.2.6-2.fc36.src.rpm
> librgw2-2:16.2.6-2.fc36.x86_64ceph-16.2.6-2.fc36.src.rpm
> mir-server-libs-0:2.4.0-3.fc35.x86_64 mir-2.4.0-3.fc35.src.rpm
> mir-test-tools-0:2.4.0-3.fc35.x86_64 mir-2.4.0-3.fc35.src.rpm
>
> ceph - currently rebuilding
> dotnet3.1 - rebuild fails, looks like bootstrapping is needed
> dotnet5.0 - rebuild fails, looks like bootstrapping is needed
> libramera - currently rebuilding
> mir - rebuild failed - looks like wlcs needs rebuild against new gtest first
Great, thanks for kicking off the rebuilds for ceph.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o-https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o-https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org-o-https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
Re: ceph/rbd broken deps Re: [HEADS UP] lttng-ust 2.13 soname bump
Daniel P. Berrangé wrote on 2021/11/02 21:33:
On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 09:22:06PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
Daniel P. Berrangé wrote on 2021/11/02 20:50:
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 05:35:45PM -0400, Michael Jeanson wrote:
I have started the process of updating lttng-ust to 2.13 in rawhide which
implies a soname bump of liblttng-ust to 1 and liblttng-ust-ctl to 5.
From what I understand, the following packages will need to be rebuilt:
libcamera
mir-server-libs
These packages might also be impacted:
ceph-base
dotnet-runtime
librados2
librbd1
librgw2
lttng-tools
mir-test-tools
I have created a side tag 'f36-build-side-47029' and built lttng-ust and
lttng-tools. I plan to have the side-tag merged in rawhide in about a week.
What's the status of the dependant builds for the side tag ?
I've just tried to build libvirt in rawhide and it fails to install
the build root because librbd is still linking against the old soname
for liblttng-ust
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/8499/78208499/root.log
Error:
Problem 1: package librbd-devel-2:16.2.6-2.fc36.x86_64 requires
librbd.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- package librbd-devel-2:16.2.6-2.fc36.x86_64 requires
librbd_tp.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- package librbd-devel-2:16.2.6-2.fc36.x86_64 requires librbd1 =
2:16.2.6-2.fc36, but none of the providers can be installed
- conflicting requests
- nothing provides liblttng-ust.so.0()(64bit) needed by
librbd1-2:16.2.6-2.fc36.x86_64
Problem 2: package librados-devel-2:16.2.6-2.fc36.x86_64 requires
librados.so.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- package librados-devel-2:16.2.6-2.fc36.x86_64 requires
librados_tp.so.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- package librados-devel-2:16.2.6-2.fc36.x86_64 requires librados2 =
2:16.2.6-2.fc36, but none of the providers can be installed
- conflicting requests
- nothing provides liblttng-ust.so.0()(64bit) needed by
librados2-2:16.2.6-2.fc36.x86_64
Regards,
Daniel
Looks like only lttng-ust and lttng-tools are built on the side tag and
they are merged:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-758d58d74f
So perhaps the dependant packages needs rebuilding...
Sigh.
I long for a day when rawhide gating CI blocks RPM updates that
break soname until all affected packages are re-built...
soname bump breakage is what makes rawhide so unpleasant use or
work with.
Regards,
Daniel
$ dnf repoquery --qf '%{name}-%{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}.%{arch}\t%{sourcerpm}'
--whatrequires "liblttng-ust.so.0()(64bit)"
ceph-base-2:16.2.6-2.fc36.x86_64ceph-16.2.6-2.fc36.src.rpm
dotnet-runtime-3.1-0:3.1.17-2.fc35.x86_64 dotnet3.1-3.1.117-2.fc35.src.rpm
dotnet-runtime-5.0-0:5.0.8-1.fc35.x86_64dotnet5.0-5.0.205-1.fc35.src.rpm
libcamera-0:0.0.0~git.20210928.e00149f-1.fc36.x86_64
libcamera-0.0.0~git.20210928.e00149f-1.fc36.src.rpm
librados2-2:16.2.6-2.fc36.x86_64ceph-16.2.6-2.fc36.src.rpm
librbd1-2:16.2.6-2.fc36.x86_64 ceph-16.2.6-2.fc36.src.rpm
librgw2-2:16.2.6-2.fc36.x86_64 ceph-16.2.6-2.fc36.src.rpm
mir-server-libs-0:2.4.0-3.fc35.x86_64 mir-2.4.0-3.fc35.src.rpm
mir-test-tools-0:2.4.0-3.fc35.x86_64mir-2.4.0-3.fc35.src.rpm
ceph - currently rebuilding
dotnet3.1 - rebuild fails, looks like bootstrapping is needed
dotnet5.0 - rebuild fails, looks like bootstrapping is needed
libramera - currently rebuilding
mir - rebuild failed - looks like wlcs needs rebuild against new gtest first
Regards,
Mamoru
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: ceph/rbd broken deps Re: [HEADS UP] lttng-ust 2.13 soname bump
On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 09:22:06PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > Daniel P. Berrangé wrote on 2021/11/02 20:50: > > On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 05:35:45PM -0400, Michael Jeanson wrote: > > > I have started the process of updating lttng-ust to 2.13 in rawhide which > > > implies a soname bump of liblttng-ust to 1 and liblttng-ust-ctl to 5. > > > > > > From what I understand, the following packages will need to be rebuilt: > > > > > > libcamera > > > mir-server-libs > > > > > > These packages might also be impacted: > > > > > > ceph-base > > > dotnet-runtime > > > librados2 > > > librbd1 > > > librgw2 > > > lttng-tools > > > mir-test-tools > > > > > > I have created a side tag 'f36-build-side-47029' and built lttng-ust and > > > lttng-tools. I plan to have the side-tag merged in rawhide in about a > > > week. > > > > What's the status of the dependant builds for the side tag ? > > > > I've just tried to build libvirt in rawhide and it fails to install > > the build root because librbd is still linking against the old soname > > for liblttng-ust > > > >https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/8499/78208499/root.log > > > >Error: > > Problem 1: package librbd-devel-2:16.2.6-2.fc36.x86_64 requires > > librbd.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > > - package librbd-devel-2:16.2.6-2.fc36.x86_64 requires > > librbd_tp.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > > - package librbd-devel-2:16.2.6-2.fc36.x86_64 requires librbd1 = > > 2:16.2.6-2.fc36, but none of the providers can be installed > > - conflicting requests > > - nothing provides liblttng-ust.so.0()(64bit) needed by > > librbd1-2:16.2.6-2.fc36.x86_64 > > Problem 2: package librados-devel-2:16.2.6-2.fc36.x86_64 requires > > librados.so.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > > - package librados-devel-2:16.2.6-2.fc36.x86_64 requires > > librados_tp.so.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > > - package librados-devel-2:16.2.6-2.fc36.x86_64 requires librados2 = > > 2:16.2.6-2.fc36, but none of the providers can be installed > > - conflicting requests > > - nothing provides liblttng-ust.so.0()(64bit) needed by > > librados2-2:16.2.6-2.fc36.x86_64 > > > > Regards, > > Daniel > > > > Looks like only lttng-ust and lttng-tools are built on the side tag and > they are merged: > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-758d58d74f > > So perhaps the dependant packages needs rebuilding... Sigh. I long for a day when rawhide gating CI blocks RPM updates that break soname until all affected packages are re-built... soname bump breakage is what makes rawhide so unpleasant use or work with. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o-https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o-https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org-o-https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: ceph/rbd broken deps Re: [HEADS UP] lttng-ust 2.13 soname bump
Daniel P. Berrangé wrote on 2021/11/02 20:50: On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 05:35:45PM -0400, Michael Jeanson wrote: I have started the process of updating lttng-ust to 2.13 in rawhide which implies a soname bump of liblttng-ust to 1 and liblttng-ust-ctl to 5. From what I understand, the following packages will need to be rebuilt: libcamera mir-server-libs These packages might also be impacted: ceph-base dotnet-runtime librados2 librbd1 librgw2 lttng-tools mir-test-tools I have created a side tag 'f36-build-side-47029' and built lttng-ust and lttng-tools. I plan to have the side-tag merged in rawhide in about a week. What's the status of the dependant builds for the side tag ? I've just tried to build libvirt in rawhide and it fails to install the build root because librbd is still linking against the old soname for liblttng-ust https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/8499/78208499/root.log Error: Problem 1: package librbd-devel-2:16.2.6-2.fc36.x86_64 requires librbd.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package librbd-devel-2:16.2.6-2.fc36.x86_64 requires librbd_tp.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package librbd-devel-2:16.2.6-2.fc36.x86_64 requires librbd1 = 2:16.2.6-2.fc36, but none of the providers can be installed - conflicting requests - nothing provides liblttng-ust.so.0()(64bit) needed by librbd1-2:16.2.6-2.fc36.x86_64 Problem 2: package librados-devel-2:16.2.6-2.fc36.x86_64 requires librados.so.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package librados-devel-2:16.2.6-2.fc36.x86_64 requires librados_tp.so.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package librados-devel-2:16.2.6-2.fc36.x86_64 requires librados2 = 2:16.2.6-2.fc36, but none of the providers can be installed - conflicting requests - nothing provides liblttng-ust.so.0()(64bit) needed by librados2-2:16.2.6-2.fc36.x86_64 Regards, Daniel Looks like only lttng-ust and lttng-tools are built on the side tag and they are merged: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-758d58d74f So perhaps the dependant packages needs rebuilding... Regards, Mamoru ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
