Re: [Server-devel] DanGuardian and XS Plans

2008-10-26 Thread Martin Langhoff
2008/10/24 Anna [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 I haven't been keeping up with this list as well as I should have, but I
 just noticed some discussion regarding internet filtering in Birmingham.

Good info thanks! I'm trying to understand more aobut what people are
doing, what tools are useful from an educational perspective and what
tools are not.

All the http proxy and filtering space is a bit of a complicated area
at the moment. I'm not particularly happy with any of the available
tools. Proxies aren't as good as I'd want them to be, and the filters
seem inefficient (in terms of cpu/memory) and stupid.

 Part of the parent's contract is to monitor
 their children's internet usage, anyway.

Can you tell me a bit more about that? It does sound interesting. Do
you mean that there is an agreement / social contract where parents
look over the logs of their kids? Age groups? What tools are used? Is
this done at a specific time? What is the general result of the
practice over time?

cheers,



m
-- 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- School Server Architect
 - ask interesting questions
 - don't get distracted with shiny stuff  - working code first
 - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
___
Server-devel mailing list
Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel


Re: [Server-devel] DanGuardian and XS Plans

2008-10-24 Thread Anna
I haven't been keeping up with this list as well as I should have, but I
just noticed some discussion regarding internet filtering in Birmingham.

At our XS testbed school, Glen Iris, when I set up the 0.4 box, I edited
/etc/named.conf and /etc/named.conf.in to use the OpenDNS IPs.  SInce the
DSL connection there has a static IP, it was really easy to set up on the
OpenDNS site.  It is CIPA compliant and a lot of other schools and libraries
use it, we figure we're safe as far as internet filtering goes.

Per the administrators' request, I set the filter on high which means it
blocks timewasters - pretty much everything fun like myspace and even
gmail.  I haven't gotten any requests to whitelist anything yet.  As far as
when the XOs are away from the school, I installed the Foxfilter plugin for
FF3, which is the best I could think of.  It's certainly not perfect, but
it's better than nothing.  Part of the parent's contract is to monitor
their children's internet usage, anyway.

So, unless there's a better option, we're going to plan on using OpenDNS on
the XS's here.

Anna Schoolfield
Birmingham
___
Server-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel


Re: [Server-devel] DanGuardian and XS Plans

2008-10-07 Thread John Watlington

On Oct 7, 2008, at 3:06 AM, Martin Langhoff wrote:

 On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 4:17 AM, John Watlington [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
 wrote:
In existing deployments (not trials) content filtering
 is being done upstream in the internet connection.

 Interesting! I didn't know that -

 Content filtering is a very sensitive subject, and any
 offering made by OLPC should make it VERY CLEAR
 that the country is responsible for the filtering -- both
 the initial setup and maintaining the filter.

 Yup. And also very clear that we believe that filters are quite leaky
 -- meaning that they will have problems with it, and a plan / process
 to deal with it. Some local teams may find planning for such
 situations hard.

 Squid has been supported since build 161, long before
 Martin started wholesale improvements.Easier to install ?
 Right now you have to type one command line:
 /etc/sysconfig/olcp-scripts/TURN_SQUID_ON
 to permanently enable Squid.   This was done simply
 because not all installation will want it.

 Yep - TURN_SQUID_ON works well on the current xs-0.5 dev version.
 However, I'm not very happy with it due to memory footprint, and
 considering replacing it with a apache + mod_cache_disk which - from
 what I've seen - plays to the strengths of linux's disk i/o handling.

No disagreement as to the desirability of the change, but
last time I looked, apache did not support use as a transparent proxy.
Using it to replace squid would require setting the browsers on all  
laptops
to point to it.   Have they changed that ?

Cheers,
wad

___
Server-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel


Re: [Server-devel] DanGuardian and XS Plans

2008-10-07 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 4:17 AM, John Watlington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In existing deployments (not trials) content filtering
 is being done upstream in the internet connection.

Interesting! I didn't know that -

 Content filtering is a very sensitive subject, and any
 offering made by OLPC should make it VERY CLEAR
 that the country is responsible for the filtering -- both
 the initial setup and maintaining the filter.

Yup. And also very clear that we believe that filters are quite leaky
-- meaning that they will have problems with it, and a plan / process
to deal with it. Some local teams may find planning for such
situations hard.

 Squid has been supported since build 161, long before
 Martin started wholesale improvements.Easier to install ?
 Right now you have to type one command line:
 /etc/sysconfig/olcp-scripts/TURN_SQUID_ON
 to permanently enable Squid.   This was done simply
 because not all installation will want it.

Yep - TURN_SQUID_ON works well on the current xs-0.5 dev version.
However, I'm not very happy with it due to memory footprint, and
considering replacing it with a apache + mod_cache_disk which - from
what I've seen - plays to the strengths of linux's disk i/o handling.

cheers,



m
-- 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- School Server Architect
 - ask interesting questions
 - don't get distracted with shiny stuff  - working code first
 - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
___
Server-devel mailing list
Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel


Re: [Server-devel] DanGuardian and XS Plans

2008-10-07 Thread Stefan Reitz


Hello List

Just from my (not too recent) experience with the Birmingham deployment:
There are two competing interests:
- As long as the Board of Education (BoE) receives federal funds under the No 
Child Left Behind Act they are responsible for providing internet only in a 
filtered manner (certified, lots of signatures and red tape ...). The 
Birmingham BoE is *very* broke so they rely on these funds. Effectively this 
means upstream filtering in the BoE's IT department's realm (this also helps 
them - gets abused for - demands for additional funding).
- To provide a cost effective solution (without lots of additional funding for 
overhead / BoE infrastructure) the XS could provide a filtering solution of its 
own and thus provide a daring principal with a way of providing parallel 
infrastructure just for XO/XS purposes.

This means as long as the BoE does not agree to a two tiered IT infrastructure 
(which they in my opinion can't), DansGuardian is not needed. Yet it might be 
helpfull in increasing acceptance for olpc products in a less messed up 
environment.

In previous discussions I understood that olpc did not want get in a place 
where it could be held responsible for content filtering (with no resources and 
mandate to manage the servers remotely a very understandable stand).  I do 
think though that olpc can only provide the tools currently available and 
should not worry too much about whether local admins put them to good use.
(And I personally favour Brasil's teachers union's stand to turn filtering off. 
Life filtered is not life. Encounter the problems, use them for contents of 
lessons, and get on with reality.)

just my 2cts (and keep up the great work!)
Stefan

Btw: I just relocated  from Alabama to Germany for job reasons and have no 
personal stakes in the Birmingham deployment (nor any other deployments for 
that matter).

 Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 20:06:25 +1300
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 CC: server-devel@lists.laptop.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [Server-devel] DanGuardian and XS Plans
 
 On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 4:17 AM, John Watlington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 In existing deployments (not trials) content filtering
  is being done upstream in the internet connection.
 
 Interesting! I didn't know that -
 
  Content filtering is a very sensitive subject, and any
  offering made by OLPC should make it VERY CLEAR
  that the country is responsible for the filtering -- both
  the initial setup and maintaining the filter.
 
 Yup. And also very clear that we believe that filters are quite leaky
 -- meaning that they will have problems with it, and a plan / process
 to deal with it. Some local teams may find planning for such
 situations hard.
 
  Squid has been supported since build 161, long before
  Martin started wholesale improvements.Easier to install ?
  Right now you have to type one command line:
  /etc/sysconfig/olcp-scripts/TURN_SQUID_ON
  to permanently enable Squid.   This was done simply
  because not all installation will want it.
 
 Yep - TURN_SQUID_ON works well on the current xs-0.5 dev version.
 However, I'm not very happy with it due to memory footprint, and
 considering replacing it with a apache + mod_cache_disk which - from
 what I've seen - plays to the strengths of linux's disk i/o handling.
 
 cheers,
 
 
 
 m
 -- 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- School Server Architect
  - ask interesting questions
  - don't get distracted with shiny stuff  - working code first
  - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
 ___
 Server-devel mailing list
 Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
 http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel

_
MSN Toolbar: Alle Infos sehen, ohne die Website auf der Sie gerade sind zu 
verlassen.
http://www.msn.de/toolbar___
Server-devel mailing list
Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel


[Server-devel] DanGuardian and XS Plans

2008-10-06 Thread Greg Smith
Hi Bryan, Martin et al,

Good input on content filtering, thanks.

Here's my take on the current state of affairs:

1 - We have a release called 0.5 which is almost done and should be 
available in October. It does not include DanGuardian. The following URL 
lists the work that is in or close to in:
https://dev.laptop.org/query?group=statusmilestone=xs-0.5

Hopefully we can write a nice release note for it shortly, giving a 
better explanation of the new features.

2 - We can consider DansGuardian for 0.6 but there is not a firm date 
for 0.6 at this time. Looks like we have agreement on the need for a 
Content Filtering solution but not quite locked down on which one.

I will work with Martin to try and get it on the roadmap. That said, 
looking at your deployment dates, you should plan on taking 0.5 and 
setting up the content filtering yourself.

One question for Martin,

Is Squid in and supported? Will it be configured/configurable and easier 
to install in the 0.5 release?

I think I have asked that before and I'm pretty sure that the answer is 
Yes Squid is part of the XS image. Just double checking and seeing if we 
have made it any easier to configure.

Thanks for the details on your plans from Tony and Bryan. Let me know if 
you have any other questions or need any more info. If Nepal can be a 
lead user for XS 0.5 that will help us burn it in for use in Birmingham 
and Paraguay and elsewhere.

Thanks,

Greg S


___
Server-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel


Re: [Server-devel] DanGuardian and XS Plans

2008-10-06 Thread John Watlington

On Oct 6, 2008, at 10:43 AM, Greg Smith wrote:

 Hi Bryan, Martin et al,

 Good input on content filtering, thanks.

Greg,
In existing deployments (not trials) content filtering
is being done upstream in the internet connection.

Content filtering is a very sensitive subject, and any
offering made by OLPC should make it VERY CLEAR
that the country is responsible for the filtering -- both
the initial setup and maintaining the filter.

I'm very worried that a deployment would just turn on
DansGuardian without making sure that the filtering met
local requirements, if it is provided in the build.
Installing DansGuardian onto XS-0.4 shouldn't be difficult.
As mentioned before, the difficult part is configuring the filter.

Squid has been supported since build 161, long before
Martin started wholesale improvements.Easier to install ?
Right now you have to type one command line:
/etc/sysconfig/olcp-scripts/TURN_SQUID_ON
to permanently enable Squid.   This was done simply
because not all installation will want it.

Cheers,
wad

 Here's my take on the current state of affairs:

 1 - We have a release called 0.5 which is almost done and should be
 available in October. It does not include DanGuardian. The  
 following URL
 lists the work that is in or close to in:
 https://dev.laptop.org/query?group=statusmilestone=xs-0.5

 Hopefully we can write a nice release note for it shortly, giving a
 better explanation of the new features.

 2 - We can consider DansGuardian for 0.6 but there is not a firm date
 for 0.6 at this time. Looks like we have agreement on the need for a
 Content Filtering solution but not quite locked down on which one.

 I will work with Martin to try and get it on the roadmap. That said,
 looking at your deployment dates, you should plan on taking 0.5 and
 setting up the content filtering yourself.

 One question for Martin,

 Is Squid in and supported? Will it be configured/configurable and  
 easier
 to install in the 0.5 release?

 I think I have asked that before and I'm pretty sure that the  
 answer is
 Yes Squid is part of the XS image. Just double checking and seeing  
 if we
 have made it any easier to configure.

 Thanks for the details on your plans from Tony and Bryan. Let me  
 know if
 you have any other questions or need any more info. If Nepal can be a
 lead user for XS 0.5 that will help us burn it in for use in  
 Birmingham
 and Paraguay and elsewhere.

 Thanks,

 Greg S


 ___
 Server-devel mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel

___
Server-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel