Fwd: Re: [Techteam] 12.1.0 devel build 1 released, for XO-1.5 and XO-1
-- Forwarded message -- From: Kevin Gordon kgordon...@gmail.com Date: Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 5:33 AM Subject: Re: Re: [Techteam] 12.1.0 devel build 1 released, for XO-1.5 and XO-1 To: fors...@ozonline.com.au On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 8:35 PM, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote: Some XO-1's can't handle ubifs http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/11094 Is there any chance this is related? It would appear to be unrelated. All three of these XO-1's can run all previous ubifs developer builds. They just cannot boot the 12.1.0 os/1. Kidding aside on my quasi technical comment, on the previous ubifs, the blue squares on the re-flash install animation started on line 1, and continued for almost an entire row, On this one, the squares now start mid-row 2 and are less than a quarter of a row long. Perhaps in an effort to optimize the ubifs file system and reduce the footprint of the install, some important component necessary to boot has been omitted? KG Tony No joy on the XO-1 install. After the update-nand, the machine only boots to the OFW OK prompt. Tried again with Q2E47 (the one that ships with the build), Q2E48, and Q2F05. Tried on multiple XO-1's, CSN7, SHC7, SHF8 assemblies, same symptoms. Doing a check-mark boot gives Can't open boot device message. Tried another download, another USB key, same symptoms. Now here's where my incredibly detailed technical analytical skills come to the fore: There seem to be a lot less of those little blue squares that come up during the install process, and they seem to come up in a different spot than they used to, compared to the previous os# ubifs developer builds. :-) Cheers. ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: Re: [Techteam] 12.1.0 devel build 1 released, for XO-1.5 and XO-1
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Kevin Gordon kgordon...@gmail.com wrote: Perhaps in an effort to optimize the ubifs file system and reduce the footprint of the install, some important component necessary to boot has been omitted? No changes were planned or expected on the ubifs front -- can you confirm your downloaded uim/onu files are not corrupt? m -- martin.langh...@gmail.com mar...@laptop.org -- Software Architect - OLPC - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: Re: [Techteam] 12.1.0 devel build 1 released, for XO-1.5 and XO-1
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Kevin Gordon kgordon...@gmail.com wrote: -- Forwarded message -- From: Kevin Gordon kgordon...@gmail.com Date: Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 5:33 AM Subject: Re: Re: [Techteam] 12.1.0 devel build 1 released, for XO-1.5 and XO-1 To: fors...@ozonline.com.au On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 8:35 PM, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote: Some XO-1's can't handle ubifs http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/11094 Is there any chance this is related? It would appear to be unrelated. All three of these XO-1's can run all previous ubifs developer builds. They just cannot boot the 12.1.0 os/1. I believe this was a problem with the build. I'll review and ensure the next one will work Kidding aside on my quasi technical comment, on the previous ubifs, the blue squares on the re-flash install animation started on line 1, and continued for almost an entire row, On this one, the squares now start mid-row 2 and are less than a quarter of a row long. Perhaps in an effort to optimize the ubifs file system and reduce the footprint of the install, some important component necessary to boot has been omitted? No, I think we actually got the wrong kernel. There's also some boot issues with the 3.2 pre kernel in general that makes it look like the kernel actually crashed before it got very far at all. Basically wait until I build and announce os2. The build is primarily aimed at core sugar developers at the moment to allow them to build and test the latest gtk3 version of sugar. Peter KG Tony No joy on the XO-1 install. After the update-nand, the machine only boots to the OFW OK prompt. Tried again with Q2E47 (the one that ships with the build), Q2E48, and Q2F05. Tried on multiple XO-1's, CSN7, SHC7, SHF8 assemblies, same symptoms. Doing a check-mark boot gives Can't open boot device message. Tried another download, another USB key, same symptoms. Now here's where my incredibly detailed technical analytical skills come to the fore: There seem to be a lot less of those little blue squares that come up during the install process, and they seem to come up in a different spot than they used to, compared to the previous os# ubifs developer builds. :-) Cheers. ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: Re: [Techteam] 12.1.0 devel build 1 released, for XO-1.5 and XO-1
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.comwrote: On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Kevin Gordon kgordon...@gmail.com wrote: Perhaps in an effort to optimize the ubifs file system and reduce the footprint of the install, some important component necessary to boot has been omitted? No changes were planned or expected on the ubifs front -- can you confirm your downloaded uim/onu files are not corrupt? Well, I have downloaded three different times from three different workstations - mac at my office, windows at my home, and even F16 wirelessly at a Starbucks :-o) - and created three different sticks. All perform identically. The entire 'animation' process finishes, it goes back to the OK prompt, then either a 'reboot', or a cold restart, immediately boots to OFW OK prompt. Also I downloaded some old ubifs developer builds and they all still work marvellously on these machines. Do we have any others who have successfully used the update-nand technique using the uim and onu files on machines with disabled security out and about? I'm willing to continue to try to isolate. m -- martin.langh...@gmail.com mar...@laptop.org -- Software Architect - OLPC - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: [Techteam] 12.1.0 devel build 1 released, for XO-1.5 and XO-1
I dont have an XO-1 with me, but I presume if it's ubifs, the files will also be the same (i.e. os1.onu and os1.uim), adn one will use the update-nand ofw command, instead of the jffs2 copy-nand command. But, I'm presuming that. Will let you know tonight. KG No joy on the XO-1 install. After the update-nand, the machine only boots to the OFW OK prompt. Tried again with Q2E47 (the one that ships with the build), Q2E48, and Q2F05. Tried on multiple XO-1's, CSN7, SHC7, SHF8 assemblies, same symptoms. Doing a check-mark boot gives Can't open boot device message. Tried another download, another USB key, same symptoms. Now here's wherer my incredibly detailed technical analytical skills come to the fore: There seem to be a lot less of those little blue squares that come up during the install process, and they seem to come up in a different spot than they used to, compared to the previous os# ubifs developer builds. :-) Cheers. KG ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: [Techteam] 12.1.0 devel build 1 released, for XO-1.5 and XO-1
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:43 AM, Kevin Gordon kgordon...@gmail.com wrote: It booted with a transient black screen, brings up the little arrow, then goes to sugar arrow and boots into the sugar home screen, but has a little black square on the screen in the bottom left corner. Filed as #11407 - it is due to bootanim. Shutdown from sugar doesnt immediately shutdown. Goes to text mode, seems to go into a loop, then after about 2 minutes finishes the shutdown. Switch to gnome - being a fool, i cant find the shutdown icon, or an entry on a menu. So, I go to terminal, enter shutdown, it broadcasts a 1 minute delay, message, then shuts down. The delays are due to https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=660637 The fix should fall into rawhide at some point in the near future. Thanks, Daniel ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: Re: [Techteam] 12.1.0 devel build 1 released, for XO-1.5 and XO-1
Some XO-1's can't handle ubifs http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/11094 Is there any chance this is related? Tony I dont have an XO-1 with me, but I presume if it's ubifs, the files will also be the same (i.e. os1.onu and os1.uim), adn one will use the update-nand ofw command, instead of the jffs2 copy-nand command. But, I'm presuming that. Will let you know tonight. KG No joy on the XO-1 install. After the update-nand, the machine only boots to the OFW OK prompt. Tried again with Q2E47 (the one that ships with the build), Q2E48, and Q2F05. Tried on multiple XO-1's, CSN7, SHC7, SHF8 assemblies, same symptoms. Doing a check-mark boot gives Can't open boot device message. Tried another download, another USB key, same symptoms. Now here's wherer my incredibly detailed technical analytical skills come to the fore: There seem to be a lot less of those little blue squares that come up during the install process, and they seem to come up in a different spot than they used to, compared to the previous os# ubifs developer builds. :-) Cheers. KG brdiv class=gmail_quoteblockquote class=gmail_quote style=margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;div class=gmail_quotediv class=imblockquote class=gmail_quote style=margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);padding-left:1ex div class=gmail_quotediv�brbrI dont have an XO-1 with me, but I presume if it's ubifs, the files will also be the same (i.e. os1.onu and os1.uim), adn one will use the update-nand ofw command, instead of the jffs2 copy-nand command.� But, I'm presuming that.� Will let you know tonight.spanfont color=#88br brKGbr/font/span/divbr/div/blockquote/div/div/blockquotedivbrNo joy on the XO-1 install.� After the update-nand,� the machine only boots to the OFW� OK prompt.� Tried again with Q2E47 (the one that ships with the build), Q2E48, and Q2F05.� Tried on multiple XO-1's, CSN7, SHC7, SHF8 assemblies, same symptoms.br brDoing a check-mark boot gives Can't open boot device message.� Tried another download, another USB key, same symptoms.brbrNow here's wherer my incredibly detailed technical analytical skills come to the fore: There seem to be a lot less of those little blue squares that come up during the install process, and they seem to come up in a different spot than they used to, compared to the previous os# ubifs developer builds.� :-)br brCheers.brbrKGbrbr/div/div ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: [Techteam] 12.1.0 devel build 1 released, for XO-1.5 and XO-1
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Martin Langhoff mar...@laptop.org wrote: Excellent! Thanks for this! I am pretty worried with the removal of gnome fallback -- I can't see sw rendering being usable on XO-1, and probably a lot of magic will be required for a bearable user experience on XO-1.5. I don't think its the case for F17, but likely will be in the future. Hmmm, ajax and Adam Williamson are talking about rawhide. Rawhide hasn't forked for F17, so when I read: On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote: As of tomorrow's rawhide [1], gnome-session will no longer treat llvmpipe as an unsupported driver. This means gnome-shell will run even on hardware without a native 3D driver, including virt guests. I read it's coming to F17. No maybes; unless we organize a big browhaha on fedora-devel, file tearful bugs, and generally stage a drama about this to lobby for a reversal. Not my style really. m -- mar...@laptop.org -- Software Architect - OLPC - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: [Techteam] 12.1.0 devel build 1 released, for XO-1.5 and XO-1
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Martin Langhoff mar...@laptop.org wrote: On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Martin Langhoff mar...@laptop.org wrote: Excellent! Thanks for this! I am pretty worried with the removal of gnome fallback -- I can't see sw rendering being usable on XO-1, and probably a lot of magic will be required for a bearable user experience on XO-1.5. I don't think its the case for F17, but likely will be in the future. Hmmm, ajax and Adam Williamson are talking about rawhide. Rawhide hasn't forked for F17, so when I read: On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote: As of tomorrow's rawhide [1], gnome-session will no longer treat llvmpipe as an unsupported driver. This means gnome-shell will run even on hardware without a native 3D driver, including virt guests. I read it's coming to F17. No maybes; unless we organize a big browhaha on fedora-devel, file tearful bugs, and generally stage a drama about this to lobby for a reversal. Yes, its coming to F17 as a feature, as I said previously, that doesn't mean that Fallback mode is going away in F17. I suspect depending on how this process goes as part of F17 the fallback mode will then likely disappear in F18. The FPL already has a XO-1 and from the merge the big XO F7 fork back into Fedora that happened around F9/10 there were around 50 odd XO-1s distributed through the community then. What is the state of merging out VIA driver back into mainline? That would certainly help from the XO 1.5 PoV. Peter ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: [Techteam] 12.1.0 devel build 1 released, for XO-1.5 and XO-1
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, its coming to F17 as a feature, as I said previously, that doesn't mean that Fallback mode is going away in F17. There's nothing in that discussion thread about keeping a knob to enable fallback mode. The title of the thread says it all. I was just going to send Ajax your build, I see you're one step ahead of me :-) -- one thing is missing -- instructions on how to install it, for someone who's gotten rusty (like Ajax who hasn't updated his XOs in a while). And the XO-1 install process is different with UBIFS. What is the state of merging out VIA driver back into mainline? That would certainly help from the XO 1.5 PoV. That's for Jon to answer... m -- mar...@laptop.org -- Software Architect - OLPC - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: [Techteam] 12.1.0 devel build 1 released, for XO-1.5 and XO-1
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Martin Langhoff mar...@laptop.org wrote: There's nothing in that discussion thread about keeping a knob to enable fallback mode. The title of the thread says it all. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Gnome_shell_software_rendering states clearly that the fallback knob will still exist (and will actually be converted to a tristate for some setups) and that fallback mode will still be available for a while. It also details the significant amount of work needed before it can be totally removed. I don't doubt that the long term plan is to drop the fallback mode, but for Fedora 17 it seems clear that fallback mode will still be present. Daniel ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: [Techteam] 12.1.0 devel build 1 released, for XO-1.5 and XO-1
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Gnome_shell_software_rendering states clearly that the fallback knob will still exist You are right. Thanks. I had just reacted to Ajax's email, and the thread that follows. Unfortunate that in Fedora-devel nobody points out that useful fact. It's more fun (and a whole lot less productive) to crank up the drama with a binary outlook rather than a tristate. cheers, m -- martin.langh...@gmail.com mar...@laptop.org -- Software Architect - OLPC - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: [Techteam] 12.1.0 devel build 1 released, for XO-1.5 and XO-1
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Kevin Gordon kgordon...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Martin Langhoff mar...@laptop.org wrote: On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, its coming to F17 as a feature, as I said previously, that doesn't mean that Fallback mode is going away in F17. There's nothing in that discussion thread about keeping a knob to enable fallback mode. The title of the thread says it all. I was just going to send Ajax your build, I see you're one step ahead of me :-) -- one thing is missing -- instructions on how to install it, for someone who's gotten rusty (like Ajax who hasn't updated his XOs in a while). And the XO-1 install process is different with UBIFS. I was fortunate enough to have DSD install an F17 build on an XO 1.5 when in SF. So, I'm up for anything you want me to test. I downloaded the xo 1.5 files from build.laptop.org On a new XO 1.5, i just used the same proc as previously for developer build installs: boot to OFW, enter 'disable-security' to verify no wp tag so the install doesn't scrub mu ability to boot back into ofw :-) copy os1.zd4 onto a usb stick insert usb stick into XO 1.5 fs-update u:\os1.zd4. The 'f'ile updated only 1 chunk' message is back, which means one enters 'reboot', but otherwise things were actually copied correctly. The firmware updated to Q3B22. It booted with a transient black screen, brings up the little arrow, then goes to sugar arrow and boots into the sugar home screen, but has a little black square on the screen in the bottom left corner. Switched desktop to gnome. Pretty b/g image, no desktop icons:-) Wireless connected in gnome Switched back to sugar (using menu) Switched bac to sugar, little black square is gone. Wireless network persists on Sugar side :-) Shutdown from sugar doesnt immediately shutdown. Goes to text mode, seems to go into a loop, then after about 2 minutes finishes the shutdown. Subsequent startup in sugar now does the unexpeceted full black screen transition, and the little black square in the bottom left corner re-appears. Switch to gnome - being a fool, i cant find the shutdown icon, or an entry on a menu. So, I go to terminal, enter shutdown, it broadcasts a 1 minute delay, message, then shuts down. Reboot brings up prettyboot, then does the black screen transition again, and even on the gnome side, the little black square in the bottom left appears. That's about all the time I have this morning to play. I'll try the XO-1 once I get home Cheers KG ' Further to the above, installed on a second XO 1.5 same results. I knew I could find the shutdown, it's under the user name in the top right corner. Still a fool, but a little less of one. Also, the screen goes to black after the first dot of the pretty boot comes up - (the o first dot, not the initial ox first dot.) Not at the end of a pretty boot as previously stated. Also 'restart' from sugar also seems to hang up for a minute in text-console land before completely executing. KG I dont have an XO-1 with me, but I presume if it's ubifs, the files will also be the same (i.e. os1.onu and os1.uim), adn one will use the update-nand ofw command, instead of the jffs2 copy-nand command. But, I'm presuming that. Will let you know tonight. KG What is the state of merging out VIA driver back into mainline? That would certainly help from the XO 1.5 PoV. That's for Jon to answer... m -- mar...@laptop.org -- Software Architect - OLPC - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: [Techteam] 12.1.0 devel build 1 released, for XO-1.5 and XO-1
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Kevin Gordon kgordon...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Martin Langhoff mar...@laptop.org wrote: On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, its coming to F17 as a feature, as I said previously, that doesn't mean that Fallback mode is going away in F17. There's nothing in that discussion thread about keeping a knob to enable fallback mode. The title of the thread says it all. I was just going to send Ajax your build, I see you're one step ahead of me :-) -- one thing is missing -- instructions on how to install it, for someone who's gotten rusty (like Ajax who hasn't updated his XOs in a while). And the XO-1 install process is different with UBIFS. I was fortunate enough to have DSD install an F17 build on an XO 1.5 when in SF. So, I'm up for anything you want me to test. I downloaded the xo 1.5 files from build.laptop.org On a new XO 1.5, i just used the same proc as previously for developer build installs: boot to OFW, enter 'disable-security' to verify no wp tag so the install doesn't scrub mu ability to boot back into ofw :-) copy os1.zd4 onto a usb stick insert usb stick into XO 1.5 fs-update u:\os1.zd4. Correct. The 'f'ile updated only 1 chunk' message is back, which means one enters 'reboot', but otherwise things were actually copied correctly. The firmware updated to Q3B22. It booted with a transient black screen, brings up the little arrow, then Yes, no pretty boot just yet. goes to sugar arrow and boots into the sugar home screen, but has a little black square on the screen in the bottom left corner. I have that on mine, we're at the beginning of the dev cycle to gtk3 so we might get weird bits here and there. Switched desktop to gnome. Pretty b/g image, no desktop icons:-) As expected. Wireless connected in gnome Switched back to sugar (using menu) Switched bac to sugar, little black square is gone. Wireless network persists on Sugar side :-) Shutdown from sugar doesnt immediately shutdown. Goes to text mode, seems to go into a loop, then after about 2 minutes finishes the shutdown. Subsequent startup in sugar now does the unexpeceted full black screen transition, and the little black square in the bottom left corner re-appears. Switch to gnome - being a fool, i cant find the shutdown icon, or an entry on a menu. So, I go to terminal, enter shutdown, it broadcasts a 1 minute Top right, click on the olpc user and you get the shutdown option. delay, message, then shuts down. Reboot brings up prettyboot, then does the black screen transition again, and even on the gnome side, the little black square in the bottom left appears. Thanks, it was about what I expected. We're about 3-4 months out from the spit and polish side of things, more aimed at developers to get a platform with systemd and all the libraries/tools needed for the port to gtk3 etc. Peter That's about all the time I have this morning to play. I'll try the XO-1 once I get home Cheers KG ' I dont have an XO-1 with me, but I presume if it's ubifs, the files will also be the same (i.e. os1.onu and os1.uim), adn one will use the update-nand ofw command, instead of the jffs2 copy-nand command. But, I'm presuming that. Will let you know tonight. KG What is the state of merging out VIA driver back into mainline? That would certainly help from the XO 1.5 PoV. That's for Jon to answer... m -- mar...@laptop.org -- Software Architect - OLPC - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: [Techteam] 12.1.0 devel build 1 released, for XO-1.5 and XO-1
2011/11/7 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com:
Thanks, it was about what I expected. We're about 3-4 months out from
the spit and polish side of things, more aimed at developers to get a
platform with systemd and all the libraries/tools needed for the port
to gtk3 etc.
Testing if activities ported to gtk3 work in build os1.. they don't
work at the moment. Tested with browse-gtk3 and helloworld mainline,
same error:
[olpc@xo-a7-35-af browse-gtk3]$ sugar-launch org.laptop.WebActivity
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/sugar-activity, line 21, in module
main.main()
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sugar/activity/main.py,
line 121, in main
module = __import__(module_name)
File /home/olpc/Activities/Browse.activity/webactivity.py, line
24, in module
from gi.repository import GObject
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gi/__init__.py, line 23, in module
from ._gi import _API, Repository
ImportError: could not import gobject (error was:
ImportError('When using gi.repository you must not import static
modules like gobject. Please change all occurrences of import
gobject to from gi.repository import GObject.',))
--
.. manuq ..
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: [Techteam] 12.1.0 devel build 1 released, for XO-1.5 and XO-1
2011/11/7 Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org: 2011/11/7 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com: Thanks, it was about what I expected. We're about 3-4 months out from the spit and polish side of things, more aimed at developers to get a platform with systemd and all the libraries/tools needed for the port to gtk3 etc. Testing if activities ported to gtk3 work in build os1.. they don't work at the moment. Tested with browse-gtk3 and helloworld mainline, same error: That's because we have sugar 0.95.1. Please read the release notes to find out what is there, there is no sugar release with it in yet, so its not in a build. Peter ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Re: [Techteam] 12.1.0 devel build 1 released, for XO-1.5 and XO-1
El día 7 de noviembre de 2011 16:38, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com escribió: 2011/11/7 Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org: 2011/11/7 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com: Thanks, it was about what I expected. We're about 3-4 months out from the spit and polish side of things, more aimed at developers to get a platform with systemd and all the libraries/tools needed for the port to gtk3 etc. Testing if activities ported to gtk3 work in build os1.. they don't work at the moment. Tested with browse-gtk3 and helloworld mainline, same error: That's because we have sugar 0.95.1. Please read the release notes to find out what is there, there is no sugar release with it in yet, so its not in a build. Oh, ok. Thanks. -- .. manuq .. ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
