[ovirt-devel] Re: GlusterFS rebase for oVirt 4.3

2018-11-28 Thread Sandro Bonazzola 
Il giorno mer 28 nov 2018 alle ore 17:56 Sandro Bonazzola <
sbona...@redhat.com> ha scritto:

>
>
> Il giorno mer 28 nov 2018 alle ore 17:39 Niels de Vos 
> ha scritto:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 05:22:32PM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
>> > Il giorno mer 28 nov 2018 alle ore 17:13 Niels de Vos <
>> nde...@redhat.com>
>> > ha scritto:
>> >
>> > > On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 10:42:18AM -0500, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
>> > > > Top posting
>> > > >
>> > > > 1) Glusterd2 is not yet the default in release-5, and in all
>> probability
>> > > > will not be in release-6 as well. So that concern can be avoided for
>> > > > this decision. (as Niels stated)
>> > > >
>> > > > 2) In the provided mirror links I see release-5 now, so Niels this
>> is
>> > > > now published? If so we can ask ovirt to move to 5 directly and
>> possibly
>> > > > the best outcome for this issue
>> > >
>> > > Well, I guess so. oVirt does not seem to use the
>> centos-release-gluster*
>> > > packages, so they can consume the gluster-5 repository just like they
>> do
>> > > now. Gluster 5 has not been announced on the CentOS lists as the
>> > > centos-release-gluster* packages still need to be pushed to CentOS
>> > > Extras (and that will be done when CentOS 7.6 is available).
>> > >
>> > >
>> > Only issue I see with consuming Gluster 5 is that it's not available in
>> > Fedora 28, so in order to consume it we need either to switch to Fedora
>> 29
>> > or backport it on Fedora 28
>>
>> We don't update the versions in Fedora releases. However we do provide
>> the packages here:
>>   https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/5/LATEST/
>>
>> Can you use that repository?
>>
>
> Yes, thanks
>

here's the patch for switching to Gluster 5:
https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95833/



>
>
>>
>> Niels
>>
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > > Niels
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Shyam
>> > > >
>> > > > On 11/27/2018 09:11 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
>> > > > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 07:12:30PM +0530, Sahina Bose wrote:
>> > > > >> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 3:48 PM Niels de Vos 
>> > > wrote:
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 10:01:15AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola
>> wrote:
>> > > >  According to Sahina we dropped dependency on gluster-gnfs and
>> it's
>> > > safe to
>> > > >  move on from the unsupported 3.12 version to a newer one 4.1 /
>> 5.0.
>> > > > 
>> > > >  This is for getting an agreement on what we should require in
>> oVirt
>> > > 4.3:
>> > > >  CentOS Storage SIG provides bot 4.1 and 5 for x86_64[1] and
>> > > ppc64le[2]
>> > > > 
>> > > >  If I understood correctly, 5 is shipping glusterd2 which
>> requires a
>> > > >  significant effort to get support for while 4.1 is still on
>> > > glusterd which
>> > > >  should work with current oVirt code.
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> Also Gluster 5 still offers the traditional glusterd service.
>> > > glusterd2
>> > > > >>> is available for both 4.1 and 5, but it is still an opt-in.
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> HTH,
>> > > > >>> Niels
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> PS: Gluster 5 is not announced for CentOS yet, the
>> > > > >>> centos-release-gluster5 package is not yet publicly
>> available
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> I think we should move to latest version, i.e Gluster 5.
>> > > > >> Niels, is there any ETA for when the package will be available in
>> > > CentOS?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > We're waiting for CentOS 7.6 to be released. After that the
>> updates for
>> > > > > the SIGs can be pushed again. ETA is not known yet, but Twitter
>> feeds
>> > > > > from the CentOS developers are positive and may suggest a release
>> in a
>> > > > > few days?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Niels
>> > > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > SANDRO BONAZZOLA
>> >
>> > MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV
>> >
>> > Red Hat EMEA 
>> >
>> > sbona...@redhat.com
>> > 
>>
>
>
> --
>
> SANDRO BONAZZOLA
>
> MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV
>
> Red Hat EMEA 
>
> sbona...@redhat.com
> 
>


-- 

SANDRO BONAZZOLA

MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV

Red Hat EMEA 

sbona...@redhat.com

___
Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
oVirt Code of Conduct: 
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives: 
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/HWDFIPQ3UUMCPFOY7WNW6XVYPFGM25TK/

[ovirt-devel] Re: GlusterFS rebase for oVirt 4.3

2018-11-28 Thread Sandro Bonazzola 
Il giorno mer 28 nov 2018 alle ore 17:39 Niels de Vos 
ha scritto:

> On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 05:22:32PM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> > Il giorno mer 28 nov 2018 alle ore 17:13 Niels de Vos  >
> > ha scritto:
> >
> > > On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 10:42:18AM -0500, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
> > > > Top posting
> > > >
> > > > 1) Glusterd2 is not yet the default in release-5, and in all
> probability
> > > > will not be in release-6 as well. So that concern can be avoided for
> > > > this decision. (as Niels stated)
> > > >
> > > > 2) In the provided mirror links I see release-5 now, so Niels this is
> > > > now published? If so we can ask ovirt to move to 5 directly and
> possibly
> > > > the best outcome for this issue
> > >
> > > Well, I guess so. oVirt does not seem to use the
> centos-release-gluster*
> > > packages, so they can consume the gluster-5 repository just like they
> do
> > > now. Gluster 5 has not been announced on the CentOS lists as the
> > > centos-release-gluster* packages still need to be pushed to CentOS
> > > Extras (and that will be done when CentOS 7.6 is available).
> > >
> > >
> > Only issue I see with consuming Gluster 5 is that it's not available in
> > Fedora 28, so in order to consume it we need either to switch to Fedora
> 29
> > or backport it on Fedora 28
>
> We don't update the versions in Fedora releases. However we do provide
> the packages here:
>   https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/5/LATEST/
>
> Can you use that repository?
>

Yes, thanks


>
> Niels
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> > > Niels
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Shyam
> > > >
> > > > On 11/27/2018 09:11 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 07:12:30PM +0530, Sahina Bose wrote:
> > > > >> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 3:48 PM Niels de Vos 
> > > wrote:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 10:01:15AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> > > >  According to Sahina we dropped dependency on gluster-gnfs and
> it's
> > > safe to
> > > >  move on from the unsupported 3.12 version to a newer one 4.1 /
> 5.0.
> > > > 
> > > >  This is for getting an agreement on what we should require in
> oVirt
> > > 4.3:
> > > >  CentOS Storage SIG provides bot 4.1 and 5 for x86_64[1] and
> > > ppc64le[2]
> > > > 
> > > >  If I understood correctly, 5 is shipping glusterd2 which
> requires a
> > > >  significant effort to get support for while 4.1 is still on
> > > glusterd which
> > > >  should work with current oVirt code.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Also Gluster 5 still offers the traditional glusterd service.
> > > glusterd2
> > > > >>> is available for both 4.1 and 5, but it is still an opt-in.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> HTH,
> > > > >>> Niels
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> PS: Gluster 5 is not announced for CentOS yet, the
> > > > >>> centos-release-gluster5 package is not yet publicly available
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I think we should move to latest version, i.e Gluster 5.
> > > > >> Niels, is there any ETA for when the package will be available in
> > > CentOS?
> > > > >
> > > > > We're waiting for CentOS 7.6 to be released. After that the
> updates for
> > > > > the SIGs can be pushed again. ETA is not known yet, but Twitter
> feeds
> > > > > from the CentOS developers are positive and may suggest a release
> in a
> > > > > few days?
> > > > >
> > > > > Niels
> > > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > SANDRO BONAZZOLA
> >
> > MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV
> >
> > Red Hat EMEA 
> >
> > sbona...@redhat.com
> > 
>


-- 

SANDRO BONAZZOLA

MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV

Red Hat EMEA 

sbona...@redhat.com

___
Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
oVirt Code of Conduct: 
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives: 
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/GNBYUJKDIWXY7KJOZEVLR7RKCIXVV2NK/

[ovirt-devel] Re: GlusterFS rebase for oVirt 4.3

2018-11-28 Thread Niels de Vos 
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 05:22:32PM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> Il giorno mer 28 nov 2018 alle ore 17:13 Niels de Vos 
> ha scritto:
> 
> > On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 10:42:18AM -0500, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
> > > Top posting
> > >
> > > 1) Glusterd2 is not yet the default in release-5, and in all probability
> > > will not be in release-6 as well. So that concern can be avoided for
> > > this decision. (as Niels stated)
> > >
> > > 2) In the provided mirror links I see release-5 now, so Niels this is
> > > now published? If so we can ask ovirt to move to 5 directly and possibly
> > > the best outcome for this issue
> >
> > Well, I guess so. oVirt does not seem to use the centos-release-gluster*
> > packages, so they can consume the gluster-5 repository just like they do
> > now. Gluster 5 has not been announced on the CentOS lists as the
> > centos-release-gluster* packages still need to be pushed to CentOS
> > Extras (and that will be done when CentOS 7.6 is available).
> >
> >
> Only issue I see with consuming Gluster 5 is that it's not available in
> Fedora 28, so in order to consume it we need either to switch to Fedora 29
> or backport it on Fedora 28

We don't update the versions in Fedora releases. However we do provide
the packages here:
  https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/5/LATEST/

Can you use that repository?

Niels


> 
> 
> 
> > Niels
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Shyam
> > >
> > > On 11/27/2018 09:11 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 07:12:30PM +0530, Sahina Bose wrote:
> > > >> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 3:48 PM Niels de Vos 
> > wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 10:01:15AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> > >  According to Sahina we dropped dependency on gluster-gnfs and it's
> > safe to
> > >  move on from the unsupported 3.12 version to a newer one 4.1 / 5.0.
> > > 
> > >  This is for getting an agreement on what we should require in oVirt
> > 4.3:
> > >  CentOS Storage SIG provides bot 4.1 and 5 for x86_64[1] and
> > ppc64le[2]
> > > 
> > >  If I understood correctly, 5 is shipping glusterd2 which requires a
> > >  significant effort to get support for while 4.1 is still on
> > glusterd which
> > >  should work with current oVirt code.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Also Gluster 5 still offers the traditional glusterd service.
> > glusterd2
> > > >>> is available for both 4.1 and 5, but it is still an opt-in.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> HTH,
> > > >>> Niels
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> PS: Gluster 5 is not announced for CentOS yet, the
> > > >>> centos-release-gluster5 package is not yet publicly available
> > > >>
> > > >> I think we should move to latest version, i.e Gluster 5.
> > > >> Niels, is there any ETA for when the package will be available in
> > CentOS?
> > > >
> > > > We're waiting for CentOS 7.6 to be released. After that the updates for
> > > > the SIGs can be pushed again. ETA is not known yet, but Twitter feeds
> > > > from the CentOS developers are positive and may suggest a release in a
> > > > few days?
> > > >
> > > > Niels
> > > >
> >
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> SANDRO BONAZZOLA
> 
> MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV
> 
> Red Hat EMEA 
> 
> sbona...@redhat.com
> 
___
Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
oVirt Code of Conduct: 
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives: 
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/C3VFG4EGU7FYSYGNKUHOZHBTI2GFMKST/

[ovirt-devel] Re: GlusterFS rebase for oVirt 4.3

2018-11-28 Thread Sandro Bonazzola 
Il giorno mer 28 nov 2018 alle ore 17:13 Niels de Vos 
ha scritto:

> On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 10:42:18AM -0500, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
> > Top posting
> >
> > 1) Glusterd2 is not yet the default in release-5, and in all probability
> > will not be in release-6 as well. So that concern can be avoided for
> > this decision. (as Niels stated)
> >
> > 2) In the provided mirror links I see release-5 now, so Niels this is
> > now published? If so we can ask ovirt to move to 5 directly and possibly
> > the best outcome for this issue
>
> Well, I guess so. oVirt does not seem to use the centos-release-gluster*
> packages, so they can consume the gluster-5 repository just like they do
> now. Gluster 5 has not been announced on the CentOS lists as the
> centos-release-gluster* packages still need to be pushed to CentOS
> Extras (and that will be done when CentOS 7.6 is available).
>
>
Only issue I see with consuming Gluster 5 is that it's not available in
Fedora 28, so in order to consume it we need either to switch to Fedora 29
or backport it on Fedora 28



> Niels
>
>
> >
> > Shyam
> >
> > On 11/27/2018 09:11 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 07:12:30PM +0530, Sahina Bose wrote:
> > >> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 3:48 PM Niels de Vos 
> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 10:01:15AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> >  According to Sahina we dropped dependency on gluster-gnfs and it's
> safe to
> >  move on from the unsupported 3.12 version to a newer one 4.1 / 5.0.
> > 
> >  This is for getting an agreement on what we should require in oVirt
> 4.3:
> >  CentOS Storage SIG provides bot 4.1 and 5 for x86_64[1] and
> ppc64le[2]
> > 
> >  If I understood correctly, 5 is shipping glusterd2 which requires a
> >  significant effort to get support for while 4.1 is still on
> glusterd which
> >  should work with current oVirt code.
> > >>>
> > >>> Also Gluster 5 still offers the traditional glusterd service.
> glusterd2
> > >>> is available for both 4.1 and 5, but it is still an opt-in.
> > >>>
> > >>> HTH,
> > >>> Niels
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> PS: Gluster 5 is not announced for CentOS yet, the
> > >>> centos-release-gluster5 package is not yet publicly available
> > >>
> > >> I think we should move to latest version, i.e Gluster 5.
> > >> Niels, is there any ETA for when the package will be available in
> CentOS?
> > >
> > > We're waiting for CentOS 7.6 to be released. After that the updates for
> > > the SIGs can be pushed again. ETA is not known yet, but Twitter feeds
> > > from the CentOS developers are positive and may suggest a release in a
> > > few days?
> > >
> > > Niels
> > >
>


-- 

SANDRO BONAZZOLA

MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV

Red Hat EMEA 

sbona...@redhat.com

___
Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
oVirt Code of Conduct: 
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives: 
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/4MMC6YG6ESE6YYR2EGVKVXPZL3DY7S5C/

[ovirt-devel] Re: GlusterFS rebase for oVirt 4.3

2018-11-28 Thread Niels de Vos 
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 10:42:18AM -0500, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
> Top posting
> 
> 1) Glusterd2 is not yet the default in release-5, and in all probability
> will not be in release-6 as well. So that concern can be avoided for
> this decision. (as Niels stated)
> 
> 2) In the provided mirror links I see release-5 now, so Niels this is
> now published? If so we can ask ovirt to move to 5 directly and possibly
> the best outcome for this issue

Well, I guess so. oVirt does not seem to use the centos-release-gluster*
packages, so they can consume the gluster-5 repository just like they do
now. Gluster 5 has not been announced on the CentOS lists as the
centos-release-gluster* packages still need to be pushed to CentOS
Extras (and that will be done when CentOS 7.6 is available).

Niels


> 
> Shyam
> 
> On 11/27/2018 09:11 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 07:12:30PM +0530, Sahina Bose wrote:
> >> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 3:48 PM Niels de Vos  wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 10:01:15AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
>  According to Sahina we dropped dependency on gluster-gnfs and it's safe 
>  to
>  move on from the unsupported 3.12 version to a newer one 4.1 / 5.0.
> 
>  This is for getting an agreement on what we should require in oVirt 4.3:
>  CentOS Storage SIG provides bot 4.1 and 5 for x86_64[1] and ppc64le[2]
> 
>  If I understood correctly, 5 is shipping glusterd2 which requires a
>  significant effort to get support for while 4.1 is still on glusterd 
>  which
>  should work with current oVirt code.
> >>>
> >>> Also Gluster 5 still offers the traditional glusterd service. glusterd2
> >>> is available for both 4.1 and 5, but it is still an opt-in.
> >>>
> >>> HTH,
> >>> Niels
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> PS: Gluster 5 is not announced for CentOS yet, the
> >>> centos-release-gluster5 package is not yet publicly available
> >>
> >> I think we should move to latest version, i.e Gluster 5.
> >> Niels, is there any ETA for when the package will be available in CentOS?
> > 
> > We're waiting for CentOS 7.6 to be released. After that the updates for
> > the SIGs can be pushed again. ETA is not known yet, but Twitter feeds
> > from the CentOS developers are positive and may suggest a release in a
> > few days?
> > 
> > Niels
> > 
___
Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
oVirt Code of Conduct: 
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives: 
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/BFQWAX6XVJUXRAGHOU6QYDBAMVR3KM7N/

[ovirt-devel] Re: GlusterFS rebase for oVirt 4.3

2018-11-28 Thread Shyam Ranganathan 
Top posting

1) Glusterd2 is not yet the default in release-5, and in all probability
will not be in release-6 as well. So that concern can be avoided for
this decision. (as Niels stated)

2) In the provided mirror links I see release-5 now, so Niels this is
now published? If so we can ask ovirt to move to 5 directly and possibly
the best outcome for this issue

Shyam

On 11/27/2018 09:11 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 07:12:30PM +0530, Sahina Bose wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 3:48 PM Niels de Vos  wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 10:01:15AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
 According to Sahina we dropped dependency on gluster-gnfs and it's safe to
 move on from the unsupported 3.12 version to a newer one 4.1 / 5.0.

 This is for getting an agreement on what we should require in oVirt 4.3:
 CentOS Storage SIG provides bot 4.1 and 5 for x86_64[1] and ppc64le[2]

 If I understood correctly, 5 is shipping glusterd2 which requires a
 significant effort to get support for while 4.1 is still on glusterd which
 should work with current oVirt code.
>>>
>>> Also Gluster 5 still offers the traditional glusterd service. glusterd2
>>> is available for both 4.1 and 5, but it is still an opt-in.
>>>
>>> HTH,
>>> Niels
>>>
>>>
>>> PS: Gluster 5 is not announced for CentOS yet, the
>>> centos-release-gluster5 package is not yet publicly available
>>
>> I think we should move to latest version, i.e Gluster 5.
>> Niels, is there any ETA for when the package will be available in CentOS?
> 
> We're waiting for CentOS 7.6 to be released. After that the updates for
> the SIGs can be pushed again. ETA is not known yet, but Twitter feeds
> from the CentOS developers are positive and may suggest a release in a
> few days?
> 
> Niels
> 
___
Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
oVirt Code of Conduct: 
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives: 
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/7XF4H32F4HJ3FL5PMPJWIYOA3ZH266IW/

[ovirt-devel] Re: GlusterFS rebase for oVirt 4.3

2018-11-27 Thread Niels de Vos 
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 02:02:42PM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> Il giorno lun 19 nov 2018 alle ore 14:42 Sahina Bose  ha
> scritto:
> 
> > On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 3:48 PM Niels de Vos  wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 10:01:15AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> > > > According to Sahina we dropped dependency on gluster-gnfs and it's
> > safe to
> > > > move on from the unsupported 3.12 version to a newer one 4.1 / 5.0.
> > > >
> > > > This is for getting an agreement on what we should require in oVirt
> > 4.3:
> > > > CentOS Storage SIG provides bot 4.1 and 5 for x86_64[1] and ppc64le[2]
> > > >
> > > > If I understood correctly, 5 is shipping glusterd2 which requires a
> > > > significant effort to get support for while 4.1 is still on glusterd
> > which
> > > > should work with current oVirt code.
> > >
> > > Also Gluster 5 still offers the traditional glusterd service. glusterd2
> > > is available for both 4.1 and 5, but it is still an opt-in.
> > >
> > > HTH,
> > > Niels
> > >
> > >
> > > PS: Gluster 5 is not announced for CentOS yet, the
> > > centos-release-gluster5 package is not yet publicly available
> >
> > I think we should move to latest version, i.e Gluster 5.
> > Niels, is there any ETA for when the package will be available in CentOS?
> >
> > Also, for oVirt 4.2 due to dependency on gluster-gnfs we are still
> > dependent on gluster 3.12 which is EOL. What's our best option here?
> > Shyam, Amar, looking for your inputs.
> >
> 
> Raising this again since we are in a bit of a hurry for this to be changed.
> this change already missed 4.3.0 Alpha, it would be nice to get it in by
> beta release.

I think we can keep gluster-3.12 on the CentOS mirrors, but without
centos-release-gluster312 in CentOS Extras?

If there is a demand for NFS, then integrating NFS-Ganesha is your best
option. But this is not a drop-in replacement and will need some work.
In case there is no need for NFS, then it will be easier to move to a
FUSE mount or libgfapi application.

Niels
___
Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
oVirt Code of Conduct: 
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives: 
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/LAROSS5JPXTMIXCMKZRMXOVOOR6QDHTZ/

[ovirt-devel] Re: GlusterFS rebase for oVirt 4.3

2018-11-27 Thread Niels de Vos 
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 07:12:30PM +0530, Sahina Bose wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 3:48 PM Niels de Vos  wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 10:01:15AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> > > According to Sahina we dropped dependency on gluster-gnfs and it's safe to
> > > move on from the unsupported 3.12 version to a newer one 4.1 / 5.0.
> > >
> > > This is for getting an agreement on what we should require in oVirt 4.3:
> > > CentOS Storage SIG provides bot 4.1 and 5 for x86_64[1] and ppc64le[2]
> > >
> > > If I understood correctly, 5 is shipping glusterd2 which requires a
> > > significant effort to get support for while 4.1 is still on glusterd which
> > > should work with current oVirt code.
> >
> > Also Gluster 5 still offers the traditional glusterd service. glusterd2
> > is available for both 4.1 and 5, but it is still an opt-in.
> >
> > HTH,
> > Niels
> >
> >
> > PS: Gluster 5 is not announced for CentOS yet, the
> > centos-release-gluster5 package is not yet publicly available
> 
> I think we should move to latest version, i.e Gluster 5.
> Niels, is there any ETA for when the package will be available in CentOS?

We're waiting for CentOS 7.6 to be released. After that the updates for
the SIGs can be pushed again. ETA is not known yet, but Twitter feeds
from the CentOS developers are positive and may suggest a release in a
few days?

Niels
___
Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
oVirt Code of Conduct: 
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives: 
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/HOQHSAKCUJ764LZKTEJJNG5DHVCM4RSS/

[ovirt-devel] Re: GlusterFS rebase for oVirt 4.3

2018-11-27 Thread Sandro Bonazzola 
Il giorno lun 19 nov 2018 alle ore 14:42 Sahina Bose  ha
scritto:

> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 3:48 PM Niels de Vos  wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 10:01:15AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> > > According to Sahina we dropped dependency on gluster-gnfs and it's
> safe to
> > > move on from the unsupported 3.12 version to a newer one 4.1 / 5.0.
> > >
> > > This is for getting an agreement on what we should require in oVirt
> 4.3:
> > > CentOS Storage SIG provides bot 4.1 and 5 for x86_64[1] and ppc64le[2]
> > >
> > > If I understood correctly, 5 is shipping glusterd2 which requires a
> > > significant effort to get support for while 4.1 is still on glusterd
> which
> > > should work with current oVirt code.
> >
> > Also Gluster 5 still offers the traditional glusterd service. glusterd2
> > is available for both 4.1 and 5, but it is still an opt-in.
> >
> > HTH,
> > Niels
> >
> >
> > PS: Gluster 5 is not announced for CentOS yet, the
> > centos-release-gluster5 package is not yet publicly available
>
> I think we should move to latest version, i.e Gluster 5.
> Niels, is there any ETA for when the package will be available in CentOS?
>
> Also, for oVirt 4.2 due to dependency on gluster-gnfs we are still
> dependent on gluster 3.12 which is EOL. What's our best option here?
> Shyam, Amar, looking for your inputs.
>

Raising this again since we are in a bit of a hurry for this to be changed.
this change already missed 4.3.0 Alpha, it would be nice to get it in by
beta release.




> >
> >
> > > Sahina, can you give directions on what we should move to?
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > [1] http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/storage/x86_64/
> > > [2] http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/storage/ppc64le/
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > SANDRO BONAZZOLA
> > >
> > > MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV
> > >
> > > Red Hat EMEA 
> > >
> > > sbona...@redhat.com
> > > 
> >
> > > ___
> > > Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org
> > > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@ovirt.org
> > > Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
> > > oVirt Code of Conduct:
> https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
> > > List Archives:
> https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/IQYAWSN5KLO5OQJ4TT75BYB3GZFECVE2/
> >
>


-- 

SANDRO BONAZZOLA

MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV

Red Hat EMEA 

sbona...@redhat.com

___
Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
oVirt Code of Conduct: 
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives: 
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/EW5JHIOFF5L3M2YN2ZO4YW72NPSDMWKO/

[ovirt-devel] Re: GlusterFS rebase for oVirt 4.3

2018-11-19 Thread Sahina Bose 
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 3:48 PM Niels de Vos  wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 10:01:15AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> > According to Sahina we dropped dependency on gluster-gnfs and it's safe to
> > move on from the unsupported 3.12 version to a newer one 4.1 / 5.0.
> >
> > This is for getting an agreement on what we should require in oVirt 4.3:
> > CentOS Storage SIG provides bot 4.1 and 5 for x86_64[1] and ppc64le[2]
> >
> > If I understood correctly, 5 is shipping glusterd2 which requires a
> > significant effort to get support for while 4.1 is still on glusterd which
> > should work with current oVirt code.
>
> Also Gluster 5 still offers the traditional glusterd service. glusterd2
> is available for both 4.1 and 5, but it is still an opt-in.
>
> HTH,
> Niels
>
>
> PS: Gluster 5 is not announced for CentOS yet, the
> centos-release-gluster5 package is not yet publicly available

I think we should move to latest version, i.e Gluster 5.
Niels, is there any ETA for when the package will be available in CentOS?

Also, for oVirt 4.2 due to dependency on gluster-gnfs we are still
dependent on gluster 3.12 which is EOL. What's our best option here?
Shyam, Amar, looking for your inputs.
>
>
> > Sahina, can you give directions on what we should move to?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > [1] http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/storage/x86_64/
> > [2] http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/storage/ppc64le/
> >
> > --
> >
> > SANDRO BONAZZOLA
> >
> > MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV
> >
> > Red Hat EMEA 
> >
> > sbona...@redhat.com
> > 
>
> > ___
> > Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@ovirt.org
> > Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
> > oVirt Code of Conduct: 
> > https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
> > List Archives: 
> > https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/IQYAWSN5KLO5OQJ4TT75BYB3GZFECVE2/
>
___
Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
oVirt Code of Conduct: 
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives: 
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/SLC6IX7DME4QINQKFMCSPA6LW72YD3J4/

[ovirt-devel] Re: GlusterFS rebase for oVirt 4.3

2018-11-13 Thread Niels de Vos 
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 10:01:15AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> According to Sahina we dropped dependency on gluster-gnfs and it's safe to
> move on from the unsupported 3.12 version to a newer one 4.1 / 5.0.
> 
> This is for getting an agreement on what we should require in oVirt 4.3:
> CentOS Storage SIG provides bot 4.1 and 5 for x86_64[1] and ppc64le[2]
> 
> If I understood correctly, 5 is shipping glusterd2 which requires a
> significant effort to get support for while 4.1 is still on glusterd which
> should work with current oVirt code.

Also Gluster 5 still offers the traditional glusterd service. glusterd2
is available for both 4.1 and 5, but it is still an opt-in.

HTH,
Niels


PS: Gluster 5 is not announced for CentOS yet, the
centos-release-gluster5 package is not yet publicly available


> Sahina, can you give directions on what we should move to?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> [1] http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/storage/x86_64/
> [2] http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/storage/ppc64le/
> 
> -- 
> 
> SANDRO BONAZZOLA
> 
> MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV
> 
> Red Hat EMEA 
> 
> sbona...@redhat.com
> 

> ___
> Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@ovirt.org
> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
> oVirt Code of Conduct: 
> https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/IQYAWSN5KLO5OQJ4TT75BYB3GZFECVE2/
___
Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
oVirt Code of Conduct: 
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives: 
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/GS6I45244RJAEQNDCHXDEXZYBPR6CMY7/