from:"Tobias Guggemos"

Re: [riot-devel] IPSEC/IKEv2

2018-07-04 Thread Tobias Guggemos

Hey

Tobias Heider implemented G-IKEv2 [1], which should be fairly easy to port to 
IKEv2 as the messages are more the less the same.
It has some a dependency on gnrc_pktbuf_merge [2], which has not yet included 
in RIOT (hopefully he will finish this soon).
If you're interested I'm pretty sure that we can share the code with you.

I had several students starting a RIOT port of ESP, but none finished it. I 
probably have to do it myself when time allows...
I heard that Olaf Bergmann had a student who wanted to implement Diet-ESP [3], 
but I don't know a state of that. (obviously that would require an ESP port)

Cheers
Tobias

[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-yeung-g-ikev2-13
[2] https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/pull/6487 
[3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mglt-ipsecme-diet-esp/ 

> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: devel  Im Auftrag von Thomas C. Schmidt
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 3. Juli 2018 12:53
> An: devel@riot-os.org
> Betreff: Re: [riot-devel] IPSEC/IKEv2
> 
> Hi Baptiste,
> 
> as far as I remember, Tobias Guggemos http://www.mnm-
> team.org/~guggemos/
> from LMU Munich was working on this.
> 
> Plese back check with him.
> 
> Cheers,
>   Thomas
> 
> On 03/07/2018 08:50, Baptiste Clenet wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Is there any implementation of IPSEC/IKEv2 in RIOT network stack? Has
> > anyone planned to implement it?
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> 
> --
> 
> Prof. Dr. Thomas C. Schmidt
> ° Hamburg University of Applied Sciences  Berliner Tor 7 °
> ° Dept. Informatik, Internet Technologies Group   20099 Hamburg, Germany °
> ° http://inet.haw-hamburg.de/members/schmidt  Fon: +49-40-42875-8452
> °
> 
> ___
> devel mailing list
> devel@riot-os.org
> https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

___
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [riot-devel] SPI on Arduino Zero for AT86RF233

2018-03-06 Thread Tobias Guggemos

Hey,

thanks, GPIO_MUX_C was the missing puzzle.

There is still a bug when receiving frames, but at least I can now initialize 
it correctly.

Thanks

Tobias

 

Von: devel [mailto:devel-boun...@riot-os.org] Im Auftrag von Alexandre Abadie
Gesendet: Montag, 5. März 2018 18:23
An: RIOT OS kernel developers <devel@riot-os.org>
Betreff: Re: [riot-devel] SPI on Arduino Zero for AT86RF233

 

Hi,

 

Not sure it will help but I recently tried to use a Semtech LoRa radio with an 
Arduino Zero and using a second SPI (for the radio) was working with the 
following configuration:

{
.dev  = >SPI,
.miso_pin = GPIO_PIN(PA, 19),
.mosi_pin = GPIO_PIN(PA, 16),
.clk_pin  = GPIO_PIN(PA, 17),
.miso_mux = GPIO_MUX_C,
.mosi_mux = GPIO_MUX_C,
.clk_mux  = GPIO_MUX_C,
.miso_pad = SPI_PAD_MISO_3,
.mosi_pad = SPI_PAD_MOSI_0_SCK_1
}

 

in the driver params, I had this line for the SPI: 

#define SX127X_PARAM_SPI(SPI_DEV(1))

 

Let us know if it works for you.

 

Alex

 

 

  _  

Hey,

I’m trying to use the AT86RF233 with the Arduino M0 Pro (using the Arduino Zero 
configuration).

Using the default SPI configuration (and pins) didn’t work, why I tried to 
change the SPI to the Arduino_Pins 11,12,13 in order to have CS (PIN 10) using 
the same SERCOM as the other SPI pins.

However, I didn’t get it to work and it seems that using SPI with SERCOM1 does 
not initialize.

Is there anything I did completely wrong or is it just a stupid idea to connect 
the AT86RF233 with an Arduino M0?

 

SPI Config in arduino/periph_conf.h:

static const spi_conf_t spi_config[] = {
   {
.dev  = >SPI,
.miso_pin = ARDUINO_PIN_ICSP_MISO,
.mosi_pin = ARUDINO_PIN_ICSP_MOSI,
.clk_pin  = ARUDINO_PIN_ICSP_CLK,
.miso_mux = GPIO_MUX_D,
.mosi_mux = GPIO_MUX_D,
.clk_mux  = GPIO_MUX_D,
.miso_pad = SPI_PAD_MISO_0,
.mosi_pad = SPI_PAD_MOSI_2_SCK_3
}
   ,
{
.dev  = >SPI,
.miso_pin = ARDUINO_PIN_12,
.mosi_pin = ARDUINO_PIN_11,
.clk_pin  = ARDUINO_PIN_13,
.miso_mux = GPIO_MUX_D,
.mosi_mux = GPIO_MUX_D,
.clk_mux  = GPIO_MUX_D,
.miso_pad = SPI_PAD_MISO_3,
.mosi_pad = SPI_PAD_MOSI_0_SCK_1
}
};

 

at86rf2xx_params.h:

 

#ifndef AT86RF2XX_PARAM_SPI
#define AT86RF2XX_PARAM_SPI (SPI_DEV(1))
#endif
#ifndef AT86RF2XX_PARAM_SPI_CLK
#define AT86RF2XX_PARAM_SPI_CLK (SPI_CLK_5MHZ)
#endif
#ifndef AT86RF2XX_PARAM_CS
#define AT86RF2XX_PARAM_CS  ARDUINO_PIN_10
#endif
#ifndef AT86RF2XX_PARAM_INT
#define AT86RF2XX_PARAM_INT ARDUINO_PIN_7
#endif
#ifndef AT86RF2XX_PARAM_SLEEP
#define AT86RF2XX_PARAM_SLEEP   ARDUINO_PIN_8
#endif
#ifndef AT86RF2XX_PARAM_RESET
#define AT86RF2XX_PARAM_RESET   ARDUINO_PIN_9
#endif

 

#define AT86RF2XX_PARAMS_BOARD{.spi = AT86RF2XX_PARAM_SPI, \
 .spi_clk = AT86RF2XX_PARAM_SPI_CLK, \
 .cs_pin = AT86RF2XX_PARAM_CS, \
 .int_pin = AT86RF2XX_PARAM_INT, \
 .sleep_pin = AT86RF2XX_PARAM_SLEEP, \
 .reset_pin = AT86RF2XX_PARAM_RESET}

 

Thanks 

Tobias

 

-- 

Tobias Guggemos, M.Sc

 

Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU)

Institue of Computer Science

Oettingenstr. 67, Room E003

D-80538 München, Germany

 

Munich Network Management Team (MNM) 

Tel: +49 89 2180-9209

 <http://www.mnm-team.org/~guggemos> http://www.mnm-team.org/~guggemos 

 


___
devel mailing list
 <mailto:devel@riot-os.org> devel@riot-os.org
 <https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel> 
https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

 

___
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[riot-devel] SPI on Arduino Zero for AT86RF233

2018-03-05 Thread Tobias Guggemos

Hey,

Im trying to use the AT86RF233 with the Arduino M0 Pro (using the Arduino
Zero configuration).

Using the default SPI configuration (and pins) didnt work, why I tried to
change the SPI to the Arduino_Pins 11,12,13 in order to have CS (PIN 10)
using the same SERCOM as the other SPI pins.

However, I didnt get it to work and it seems that using SPI with SERCOM1
does not initialize.

Is there anything I did completely wrong or is it just a stupid idea to
connect the AT86RF233 with an Arduino M0?

 

SPI Config in arduino/periph_conf.h:

static const spi_conf_t spi_config[] = {
   {
.dev  = >SPI,
.miso_pin = ARDUINO_PIN_ICSP_MISO,
.mosi_pin = ARUDINO_PIN_ICSP_MOSI,
.clk_pin  = ARUDINO_PIN_ICSP_CLK,
.miso_mux = GPIO_MUX_D,
.mosi_mux = GPIO_MUX_D,
.clk_mux  = GPIO_MUX_D,
.miso_pad = SPI_PAD_MISO_0,
.mosi_pad = SPI_PAD_MOSI_2_SCK_3
}
   ,
{
.dev  = >SPI,
.miso_pin = ARDUINO_PIN_12,
.mosi_pin = ARDUINO_PIN_11,
.clk_pin  = ARDUINO_PIN_13,
.miso_mux = GPIO_MUX_D,
.mosi_mux = GPIO_MUX_D,
.clk_mux  = GPIO_MUX_D,
.miso_pad = SPI_PAD_MISO_3,
.mosi_pad = SPI_PAD_MOSI_0_SCK_1
}
};

 

at86rf2xx_params.h:

 

#ifndef AT86RF2XX_PARAM_SPI
#define AT86RF2XX_PARAM_SPI (SPI_DEV(1))
#endif
#ifndef AT86RF2XX_PARAM_SPI_CLK
#define AT86RF2XX_PARAM_SPI_CLK (SPI_CLK_5MHZ)
#endif
#ifndef AT86RF2XX_PARAM_CS
#define AT86RF2XX_PARAM_CS  ARDUINO_PIN_10
#endif
#ifndef AT86RF2XX_PARAM_INT
#define AT86RF2XX_PARAM_INT ARDUINO_PIN_7
#endif
#ifndef AT86RF2XX_PARAM_SLEEP
#define AT86RF2XX_PARAM_SLEEP   ARDUINO_PIN_8
#endif
#ifndef AT86RF2XX_PARAM_RESET
#define AT86RF2XX_PARAM_RESET   ARDUINO_PIN_9
#endif

#define AT86RF2XX_PARAMS_BOARD{.spi = AT86RF2XX_PARAM_SPI, \
 .spi_clk = AT86RF2XX_PARAM_SPI_CLK, \
 .cs_pin = AT86RF2XX_PARAM_CS, \
 .int_pin = AT86RF2XX_PARAM_INT, \
 .sleep_pin = AT86RF2XX_PARAM_SLEEP, \
 .reset_pin = AT86RF2XX_PARAM_RESET}

 

Thanks 

Tobias

 

-- 

Tobias Guggemos, M.Sc

 

Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU)

Institue of Computer Science

Oettingenstr. 67, Room E003

D-80538 München, Germany

 

Munich Network Management Team (MNM) 

Tel: +49 89 2180-9209

 <http://www.mnm-team.org/~guggemos> http://www.mnm-team.org/~guggemos 

 

___
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [riot-devel] RIOT on the Arduino M0 Pro

2017-01-26 Thread Tobias Guggemos

In case anyone else has this issue:
It was basically what Antonio said, the USER_WORD_0 was set wrong by Arduino. 
The factory setting is 0xD8E0C7F9, but it needs to be set to  0xD8E0C7FF.
In Atmel Studio one can do that by changing the fuse-setting 
USER_WORD_0.NVMCTRL_BOOTPROT from 0x01 to 0x07.

If we find a way to do that automatically with openocd we'll post it.

Tobias

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: devel [mailto:devel-boun...@riot-os.org] Im Auftrag von Antonio Galea
Gesendet: Freitag, 23. Dezember 2016 08:01
An: RIOT OS kernel developers 
Betreff: Re: [riot-devel] RIOT on the Arduino M0 Pro

On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 5:47 PM, Florian Eich  wrote:
>
> Verification...
> at address 0x0 expected 0x00, read 0xff
> Error: verification failed

Mh, then my best bet is that your CPU has the fises bits set to protect the 
first pages - see for instance:

   http://www.avrfreaks.net/forum/fuses-samd21-xplained

If you have a copy of Atmel Studio, you can change the fuses in a snap. It 
might be possibile to do that with OpenOCD, but frankly I don't know how.

Antonio
___
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

___
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [riot-devel] IPSEC/IKEv2

Re: [riot-devel] SPI on Arduino Zero for AT86RF233

[riot-devel] SPI on Arduino Zero for AT86RF233

Re: [riot-devel] RIOT on the Arduino M0 Pro

4 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information