Re: BSP .inc files and .cfg files

2023-06-18 Thread Chris Johns 
On 17/6/2023 5:30 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 3:18 AM Philip Kirkpatrick
> mailto:p.kirkpatr...@reflexaerospace.com>>
> wrote:
> 
> For the RPU patch, I'll add removing this to my next pass at it.
> 
> If there is some transformation on the linked executable needed to download 
> it,
> I hope you document that entire process in the Users Guide. :)

I suspect there is a whole book on how that could be done.

On the Versal it may be as simple as an SMC call but I would need to check the
calls on the Versal [1]. I think it would take a binary image in DDR. I am not
sure what is needed on the ZymqMP?

Chris

[1] https://github.com/kiwichris/rtems-xilinx-xrt/tree/main/rtems
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: BSP .inc files and .cfg files

2023-06-16 Thread Joel Sherrill 
On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 3:18 AM Philip Kirkpatrick <
p.kirkpatr...@reflexaerospace.com> wrote:

> For the RPU patch, I'll add removing this to my next pass at it.
>

If there is some transformation on the linked executable needed to download
it,
I hope you document that entire process in the Users Guide. :)

--joel


>
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 6:37 AM Sebastian Huber <
> sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 16.06.23 06:35, Chris Johns wrote:
>> > On 16/6/2023 2:33 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>> >> On 16.06.23 03:46, Chris Johns wrote:
>> >>> On 16/6/2023 9:04 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>  On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 5:41 PM Chris Johns >  > wrote:
>> 
>>    Hi,
>> 
>>    Reviewing the RPU patch I noticed a .inc file being added and
>> I wondered
>>  why so
>>    I checked the sources and to my surprise found:
>> 
>>    rtems.git $ find bsps -name \*.inc
>>    bsps/v850/gdbv850sim/config/v850sim.inc
>>    bsps/m68k/genmcf548x/config/genmcf548x.inc
>>    bsps/m68k/gen68340/include/m68340.inc
>>    bsps/m68k/gen68340/include/m68349.inc
>>    bsps/arm/altera-cyclone-v/config/altcycv.inc
>>    bsps/arm/raspberrypi/config/raspberrypi.inc
>>    bsps/arm/lpc32xx/config/lpc32xx.inc
>>    bsps/arm/beagle/config/beagle.inc
>>    bsps/arm/tms570/config/tms570ls3137.inc
>>    bsps/arm/xilinx-zynqmp/config/xilinx_zynqmp.inc
>>    bsps/arm/xilinx-zynq/config/xilinx_zynq.inc
>>    bsps/arm/lpc24xx/config/lpc17xx.inc
>>    bsps/arm/lpc24xx/config/lpc40xx.inc
>>    bsps/arm/lpc24xx/config/lpc24xx.inc
>>    bsps/arm/lm3s69xx/config/lm3s69xx.inc
>>    bsps/powerpc/gen5200/config/gen5200.inc
>>    bsps/powerpc/tqm8xx/config/tqm8xx.inc
>>    bsps/powerpc/mpc55xxevb/config/mpc55xx.inc
>>    bsps/powerpc/qoriq/config/qoriq.inc
>>    bsps/powerpc/gen83xx/config/gen83xx.inc
>> 
>> 
>>  These likely can. Thinking back, we have cfg files for every BSP
>>  variant within a family. They often set a variable like CPU and
>> CPU_CFLAGS
>>  and included a shared .inc file. These all appear to be from BSPs
>> which
>>  had variants. I think they are remnants and missed when the .cfg
>> files
>>  were
>> 
>>  Would like someone to concur.
>> 
>> 
>>    And for .cfg there is:
>> 
>>    rtems.git $ find bsps -name \*.cfg | wc -l
>> 191
>> 
>> 
>>  Are these installed and used by the application Makefile system. If
>> so, no.
>> >>> I cannot see any references in spec but Sebastian is the best person
>> to answer
>> >>> this.
>> >> They are definitely not used or installed. I think we still have then
>> since they
>> >> document the post-link actions which are not yet supported by the new
>> build system.
>> > Ah yes, thanks. What if the files are collected and archived?
>>
>> I think we should just remove them. We can use the RTEMS 5 branch to
>> look up the post-link actions if needed.
>>
>> > The RPU BSP is adding a new one. Is this what we want to see happen?
>>
>> No, we don't want to see new ones.
>>
>> --
>> embedded brains GmbH
>> Herr Sebastian HUBER
>> Dornierstr. 4
>> 82178 Puchheim
>> Germany
>> email: sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
>> phone: +49-89-18 94 741 - 16
>> fax:   +49-89-18 94 741 - 08
>>
>> Registergericht: Amtsgericht München
>> Registernummer: HRB 157899
>> Vertretungsberechtigte Geschäftsführer: Peter Rasmussen, Thomas Dörfler
>> Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier:
>> https://embedded-brains.de/datenschutzerklaerung/
>> ___
>> devel mailing list
>> devel@rtems.org
>> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
>
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: BSP .inc files and .cfg files

2023-06-16 Thread Philip Kirkpatrick 
For the RPU patch, I'll add removing this to my next pass at it.

On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 6:37 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:

>
>
> On 16.06.23 06:35, Chris Johns wrote:
> > On 16/6/2023 2:33 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> >> On 16.06.23 03:46, Chris Johns wrote:
> >>> On 16/6/2023 9:04 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>  On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 5:41 PM Chris Johns   > wrote:
> 
>    Hi,
> 
>    Reviewing the RPU patch I noticed a .inc file being added and I
> wondered
>  why so
>    I checked the sources and to my surprise found:
> 
>    rtems.git $ find bsps -name \*.inc
>    bsps/v850/gdbv850sim/config/v850sim.inc
>    bsps/m68k/genmcf548x/config/genmcf548x.inc
>    bsps/m68k/gen68340/include/m68340.inc
>    bsps/m68k/gen68340/include/m68349.inc
>    bsps/arm/altera-cyclone-v/config/altcycv.inc
>    bsps/arm/raspberrypi/config/raspberrypi.inc
>    bsps/arm/lpc32xx/config/lpc32xx.inc
>    bsps/arm/beagle/config/beagle.inc
>    bsps/arm/tms570/config/tms570ls3137.inc
>    bsps/arm/xilinx-zynqmp/config/xilinx_zynqmp.inc
>    bsps/arm/xilinx-zynq/config/xilinx_zynq.inc
>    bsps/arm/lpc24xx/config/lpc17xx.inc
>    bsps/arm/lpc24xx/config/lpc40xx.inc
>    bsps/arm/lpc24xx/config/lpc24xx.inc
>    bsps/arm/lm3s69xx/config/lm3s69xx.inc
>    bsps/powerpc/gen5200/config/gen5200.inc
>    bsps/powerpc/tqm8xx/config/tqm8xx.inc
>    bsps/powerpc/mpc55xxevb/config/mpc55xx.inc
>    bsps/powerpc/qoriq/config/qoriq.inc
>    bsps/powerpc/gen83xx/config/gen83xx.inc
> 
> 
>  These likely can. Thinking back, we have cfg files for every BSP
>  variant within a family. They often set a variable like CPU and
> CPU_CFLAGS
>  and included a shared .inc file. These all appear to be from BSPs
> which
>  had variants. I think they are remnants and missed when the .cfg files
>  were
> 
>  Would like someone to concur.
> 
> 
>    And for .cfg there is:
> 
>    rtems.git $ find bsps -name \*.cfg | wc -l
> 191
> 
> 
>  Are these installed and used by the application Makefile system. If
> so, no.
> >>> I cannot see any references in spec but Sebastian is the best person
> to answer
> >>> this.
> >> They are definitely not used or installed. I think we still have then
> since they
> >> document the post-link actions which are not yet supported by the new
> build system.
> > Ah yes, thanks. What if the files are collected and archived?
>
> I think we should just remove them. We can use the RTEMS 5 branch to
> look up the post-link actions if needed.
>
> > The RPU BSP is adding a new one. Is this what we want to see happen?
>
> No, we don't want to see new ones.
>
> --
> embedded brains GmbH
> Herr Sebastian HUBER
> Dornierstr. 4
> 82178 Puchheim
> Germany
> email: sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
> phone: +49-89-18 94 741 - 16
> fax:   +49-89-18 94 741 - 08
>
> Registergericht: Amtsgericht München
> Registernummer: HRB 157899
> Vertretungsberechtigte Geschäftsführer: Peter Rasmussen, Thomas Dörfler
> Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier:
> https://embedded-brains.de/datenschutzerklaerung/
> ___
> devel mailing list
> devel@rtems.org
> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: BSP .inc files and .cfg files

2023-06-15 Thread Sebastian Huber 



On 16.06.23 06:35, Chris Johns wrote:

On 16/6/2023 2:33 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:

On 16.06.23 03:46, Chris Johns wrote:

On 16/6/2023 9:04 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:

On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 5:41 PM Chris Johns mailto:chr...@rtems.org>> wrote:

  Hi,

  Reviewing the RPU patch I noticed a .inc file being added and I wondered
why so
  I checked the sources and to my surprise found:

  rtems.git $ find bsps -name \*.inc
  bsps/v850/gdbv850sim/config/v850sim.inc
  bsps/m68k/genmcf548x/config/genmcf548x.inc
  bsps/m68k/gen68340/include/m68340.inc
  bsps/m68k/gen68340/include/m68349.inc
  bsps/arm/altera-cyclone-v/config/altcycv.inc
  bsps/arm/raspberrypi/config/raspberrypi.inc
  bsps/arm/lpc32xx/config/lpc32xx.inc
  bsps/arm/beagle/config/beagle.inc
  bsps/arm/tms570/config/tms570ls3137.inc
  bsps/arm/xilinx-zynqmp/config/xilinx_zynqmp.inc
  bsps/arm/xilinx-zynq/config/xilinx_zynq.inc
  bsps/arm/lpc24xx/config/lpc17xx.inc
  bsps/arm/lpc24xx/config/lpc40xx.inc
  bsps/arm/lpc24xx/config/lpc24xx.inc
  bsps/arm/lm3s69xx/config/lm3s69xx.inc
  bsps/powerpc/gen5200/config/gen5200.inc
  bsps/powerpc/tqm8xx/config/tqm8xx.inc
  bsps/powerpc/mpc55xxevb/config/mpc55xx.inc
  bsps/powerpc/qoriq/config/qoriq.inc
  bsps/powerpc/gen83xx/config/gen83xx.inc


These likely can. Thinking back, we have cfg files for every BSP
variant within a family. They often set a variable like CPU and CPU_CFLAGS
and included a shared .inc file. These all appear to be from BSPs which
had variants. I think they are remnants and missed when the .cfg files
were

Would like someone to concur.


  And for .cfg there is:

  rtems.git $ find bsps -name \*.cfg | wc -l
       191


Are these installed and used by the application Makefile system. If so, no.

I cannot see any references in spec but Sebastian is the best person to answer
this.

They are definitely not used or installed. I think we still have then since they
document the post-link actions which are not yet supported by the new build 
system.

Ah yes, thanks. What if the files are collected and archived?


I think we should just remove them. We can use the RTEMS 5 branch to 
look up the post-link actions if needed.



The RPU BSP is adding a new one. Is this what we want to see happen?


No, we don't want to see new ones.

--
embedded brains GmbH
Herr Sebastian HUBER
Dornierstr. 4
82178 Puchheim
Germany
email: sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
phone: +49-89-18 94 741 - 16
fax:   +49-89-18 94 741 - 08

Registergericht: Amtsgericht München
Registernummer: HRB 157899
Vertretungsberechtigte Geschäftsführer: Peter Rasmussen, Thomas Dörfler
Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier:
https://embedded-brains.de/datenschutzerklaerung/
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: BSP .inc files and .cfg files

2023-06-15 Thread Chris Johns 
On 16/6/2023 2:33 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 16.06.23 03:46, Chris Johns wrote:
>>
>> On 16/6/2023 9:04 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 5:41 PM Chris Johns >> > wrote:
>>>
>>>  Hi,
>>>
>>>  Reviewing the RPU patch I noticed a .inc file being added and I 
>>> wondered
>>> why so
>>>  I checked the sources and to my surprise found:
>>>
>>>  rtems.git $ find bsps -name \*.inc
>>>  bsps/v850/gdbv850sim/config/v850sim.inc
>>>  bsps/m68k/genmcf548x/config/genmcf548x.inc
>>>  bsps/m68k/gen68340/include/m68340.inc
>>>  bsps/m68k/gen68340/include/m68349.inc
>>>  bsps/arm/altera-cyclone-v/config/altcycv.inc
>>>  bsps/arm/raspberrypi/config/raspberrypi.inc
>>>  bsps/arm/lpc32xx/config/lpc32xx.inc
>>>  bsps/arm/beagle/config/beagle.inc
>>>  bsps/arm/tms570/config/tms570ls3137.inc
>>>  bsps/arm/xilinx-zynqmp/config/xilinx_zynqmp.inc
>>>  bsps/arm/xilinx-zynq/config/xilinx_zynq.inc
>>>  bsps/arm/lpc24xx/config/lpc17xx.inc
>>>  bsps/arm/lpc24xx/config/lpc40xx.inc
>>>  bsps/arm/lpc24xx/config/lpc24xx.inc
>>>  bsps/arm/lm3s69xx/config/lm3s69xx.inc
>>>  bsps/powerpc/gen5200/config/gen5200.inc
>>>  bsps/powerpc/tqm8xx/config/tqm8xx.inc
>>>  bsps/powerpc/mpc55xxevb/config/mpc55xx.inc
>>>  bsps/powerpc/qoriq/config/qoriq.inc
>>>  bsps/powerpc/gen83xx/config/gen83xx.inc
>>>
>>>
>>> These likely can. Thinking back, we have cfg files for every BSP
>>> variant within a family. They often set a variable like CPU and CPU_CFLAGS
>>> and included a shared .inc file. These all appear to be from BSPs which
>>> had variants. I think they are remnants and missed when the .cfg files
>>> were
>>>
>>> Would like someone to concur.
>>>
>>>
>>>  And for .cfg there is:
>>>
>>>  rtems.git $ find bsps -name \*.cfg | wc -l
>>>       191
>>>
>>>
>>> Are these installed and used by the application Makefile system. If so, no.
>> I cannot see any references in spec but Sebastian is the best person to 
>> answer
>> this.
> 
> They are definitely not used or installed. I think we still have then since 
> they
> document the post-link actions which are not yet supported by the new build 
> system.

Ah yes, thanks. What if the files are collected and archived?

The RPU BSP is adding a new one. Is this what we want to see happen?

Chris
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: BSP .inc files and .cfg files

2023-06-15 Thread Sebastian Huber 

On 16.06.23 03:46, Chris Johns wrote:


On 16/6/2023 9:04 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:


On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 5:41 PM Chris Johns mailto:chr...@rtems.org>> wrote:

 Hi,

 Reviewing the RPU patch I noticed a .inc file being added and I wondered 
why so
 I checked the sources and to my surprise found:

 rtems.git $ find bsps -name \*.inc
 bsps/v850/gdbv850sim/config/v850sim.inc
 bsps/m68k/genmcf548x/config/genmcf548x.inc
 bsps/m68k/gen68340/include/m68340.inc
 bsps/m68k/gen68340/include/m68349.inc
 bsps/arm/altera-cyclone-v/config/altcycv.inc
 bsps/arm/raspberrypi/config/raspberrypi.inc
 bsps/arm/lpc32xx/config/lpc32xx.inc
 bsps/arm/beagle/config/beagle.inc
 bsps/arm/tms570/config/tms570ls3137.inc
 bsps/arm/xilinx-zynqmp/config/xilinx_zynqmp.inc
 bsps/arm/xilinx-zynq/config/xilinx_zynq.inc
 bsps/arm/lpc24xx/config/lpc17xx.inc
 bsps/arm/lpc24xx/config/lpc40xx.inc
 bsps/arm/lpc24xx/config/lpc24xx.inc
 bsps/arm/lm3s69xx/config/lm3s69xx.inc
 bsps/powerpc/gen5200/config/gen5200.inc
 bsps/powerpc/tqm8xx/config/tqm8xx.inc
 bsps/powerpc/mpc55xxevb/config/mpc55xx.inc
 bsps/powerpc/qoriq/config/qoriq.inc
 bsps/powerpc/gen83xx/config/gen83xx.inc


These likely can. Thinking back, we have cfg files for every BSP
variant within a family. They often set a variable like CPU and CPU_CFLAGS
and included a shared .inc file. These all appear to be from BSPs which
had variants. I think they are remnants and missed when the .cfg files
were

Would like someone to concur.


 And for .cfg there is:

 rtems.git $ find bsps -name \*.cfg | wc -l
      191


Are these installed and used by the application Makefile system. If so, no.

I cannot see any references in spec but Sebastian is the best person to answer 
this.


They are definitely not used or installed. I think we still have then 
since they document the post-link actions which are not yet supported by 
the new build system.


--
embedded brains GmbH
Herr Sebastian HUBER
Dornierstr. 4
82178 Puchheim
Germany
email: sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
phone: +49-89-18 94 741 - 16
fax:   +49-89-18 94 741 - 08

Registergericht: Amtsgericht München
Registernummer: HRB 157899
Vertretungsberechtigte Geschäftsführer: Peter Rasmussen, Thomas Dörfler
Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier:
https://embedded-brains.de/datenschutzerklaerung/
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: BSP .inc files and .cfg files

2023-06-15 Thread Chris Johns 


On 16/6/2023 9:04 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 5:41 PM Chris Johns  > wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Reviewing the RPU patch I noticed a .inc file being added and I wondered 
> why so
> I checked the sources and to my surprise found:
> 
> rtems.git $ find bsps -name \*.inc
> bsps/v850/gdbv850sim/config/v850sim.inc
> bsps/m68k/genmcf548x/config/genmcf548x.inc
> bsps/m68k/gen68340/include/m68340.inc
> bsps/m68k/gen68340/include/m68349.inc
> bsps/arm/altera-cyclone-v/config/altcycv.inc
> bsps/arm/raspberrypi/config/raspberrypi.inc
> bsps/arm/lpc32xx/config/lpc32xx.inc
> bsps/arm/beagle/config/beagle.inc
> bsps/arm/tms570/config/tms570ls3137.inc
> bsps/arm/xilinx-zynqmp/config/xilinx_zynqmp.inc
> bsps/arm/xilinx-zynq/config/xilinx_zynq.inc
> bsps/arm/lpc24xx/config/lpc17xx.inc
> bsps/arm/lpc24xx/config/lpc40xx.inc
> bsps/arm/lpc24xx/config/lpc24xx.inc
> bsps/arm/lm3s69xx/config/lm3s69xx.inc
> bsps/powerpc/gen5200/config/gen5200.inc
> bsps/powerpc/tqm8xx/config/tqm8xx.inc
> bsps/powerpc/mpc55xxevb/config/mpc55xx.inc
> bsps/powerpc/qoriq/config/qoriq.inc
> bsps/powerpc/gen83xx/config/gen83xx.inc
> 
> 
> These likely can. Thinking back, we have cfg files for every BSP
> variant within a family. They often set a variable like CPU and CPU_CFLAGS
> and included a shared .inc file. These all appear to be from BSPs which
> had variants. I think they are remnants and missed when the .cfg files
> were 
> 
> Would like someone to concur. 
> 
> 
> And for .cfg there is:
> 
> rtems.git $ find bsps -name \*.cfg | wc -l
>      191
> 
> 
> Are these installed and used by the application Makefile system. If so, no. 

I cannot see any references in spec but Sebastian is the best person to answer 
this.

Chris

> But if these were just the ".cfg" files I mentioned above, then likely yes. We
> probably had 191 BSPs which we switched to waf.
> 
> 
> Can these files be removed?
> 
> Chris
> ___
> devel mailing list
> devel@rtems.org 
> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> 
> 
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: BSP .inc files and .cfg files

2023-06-15 Thread Joel Sherrill 
On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 5:41 PM Chris Johns  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Reviewing the RPU patch I noticed a .inc file being added and I wondered
> why so
> I checked the sources and to my surprise found:
>
> rtems.git $ find bsps -name \*.inc
> bsps/v850/gdbv850sim/config/v850sim.inc
> bsps/m68k/genmcf548x/config/genmcf548x.inc
> bsps/m68k/gen68340/include/m68340.inc
> bsps/m68k/gen68340/include/m68349.inc
> bsps/arm/altera-cyclone-v/config/altcycv.inc
> bsps/arm/raspberrypi/config/raspberrypi.inc
> bsps/arm/lpc32xx/config/lpc32xx.inc
> bsps/arm/beagle/config/beagle.inc
> bsps/arm/tms570/config/tms570ls3137.inc
> bsps/arm/xilinx-zynqmp/config/xilinx_zynqmp.inc
> bsps/arm/xilinx-zynq/config/xilinx_zynq.inc
> bsps/arm/lpc24xx/config/lpc17xx.inc
> bsps/arm/lpc24xx/config/lpc40xx.inc
> bsps/arm/lpc24xx/config/lpc24xx.inc
> bsps/arm/lm3s69xx/config/lm3s69xx.inc
> bsps/powerpc/gen5200/config/gen5200.inc
> bsps/powerpc/tqm8xx/config/tqm8xx.inc
> bsps/powerpc/mpc55xxevb/config/mpc55xx.inc
> bsps/powerpc/qoriq/config/qoriq.inc
> bsps/powerpc/gen83xx/config/gen83xx.inc
>

These likely can. Thinking back, we have cfg files for every BSP
variant within a family. They often set a variable like CPU and CPU_CFLAGS
and included a shared .inc file. These all appear to be from BSPs which
had variants. I think they are remnants and missed when the .cfg files
were

Would like someone to concur.

>
> And for .cfg there is:
>
> rtems.git $ find bsps -name \*.cfg | wc -l
>  191
>

Are these installed and used by the application Makefile system. If so, no.

But if these were just the ".cfg" files I mentioned above, then likely yes.
We
probably had 191 BSPs which we switched to waf.

>
> Can these files be removed?
>
> Chris
> ___
> devel mailing list
> devel@rtems.org
> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

BSP .inc files and .cfg files

2023-06-15 Thread Chris Johns 
Hi,

Reviewing the RPU patch I noticed a .inc file being added and I wondered why so
I checked the sources and to my surprise found:

rtems.git $ find bsps -name \*.inc
bsps/v850/gdbv850sim/config/v850sim.inc
bsps/m68k/genmcf548x/config/genmcf548x.inc
bsps/m68k/gen68340/include/m68340.inc
bsps/m68k/gen68340/include/m68349.inc
bsps/arm/altera-cyclone-v/config/altcycv.inc
bsps/arm/raspberrypi/config/raspberrypi.inc
bsps/arm/lpc32xx/config/lpc32xx.inc
bsps/arm/beagle/config/beagle.inc
bsps/arm/tms570/config/tms570ls3137.inc
bsps/arm/xilinx-zynqmp/config/xilinx_zynqmp.inc
bsps/arm/xilinx-zynq/config/xilinx_zynq.inc
bsps/arm/lpc24xx/config/lpc17xx.inc
bsps/arm/lpc24xx/config/lpc40xx.inc
bsps/arm/lpc24xx/config/lpc24xx.inc
bsps/arm/lm3s69xx/config/lm3s69xx.inc
bsps/powerpc/gen5200/config/gen5200.inc
bsps/powerpc/tqm8xx/config/tqm8xx.inc
bsps/powerpc/mpc55xxevb/config/mpc55xx.inc
bsps/powerpc/qoriq/config/qoriq.inc
bsps/powerpc/gen83xx/config/gen83xx.inc

And for .cfg there is:

rtems.git $ find bsps -name \*.cfg | wc -l
 191

Can these files be removed?

Chris
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel