[Development] Qt 5.2 Testing
Hello, I used the snapshot from yesterday and today, and had problems with both. I have a Segmentation fault in all QML applications. My Env is Windows 8.1 , GCC 4.8.1, mingw-w64 r6302 The related bug is here, but I'm posting in the list because look like a very major bug. https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-34130 []'s Bruno ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Qt 5.2 Testing
Hi Bruno, Can you try with current qtdeclarative? The code the crash happened in was removed today, so I wonder what a current back trace looks like. Thanks, Simon Fra: Bruno Cabral Sendt: 19:13 onsdag 16. oktober 2013 Til: development@qt-project.org Emne: [Development] Qt 5.2 Testing Hello, I used the snapshot from yesterday and today, and had problems with both. I have a Segmentation fault in all QML applications. My Env is “Windows 8.1 , GCC 4.8.1, mingw-w64 r6302” The related bug is here, but I’m posting in the list because look like a very major bug. https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-34130 []’s Bruno ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Qt 5.2 Testing
Simon, With the latest git it is working. Thanks, Bruno From: Hausmann Simon [mailto:simon.hausm...@digia.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 2:22 PM To: Bruno Cabral; development@qt-project.org Subject: SV: [Development] Qt 5.2 Testing Hi Bruno, Can you try with current qtdeclarative? The code the crash happened in was removed today, so I wonder what a current back trace looks like. Thanks, Simon Fra: Bruno Cabral Sendt: 19:13 onsdag 16. oktober 2013 Til: development@qt-project.org mailto:development@qt-project.org Emne: [Development] Qt 5.2 Testing Hello, I used the snapshot from yesterday and today, and had problems with both. I have a Segmentation fault in all QML applications. My Env is Windows 8.1 , GCC 4.8.1, mingw-w64 r6302 The related bug is here, but I'm posting in the list because look like a very major bug. https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-34130 []'s Bruno ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Qt 5.2 Testing
On Monday, October 14, 2013 15:59:31 Raul Metsma wrote:
On Oct 14, 2013, at 3:04 PM, Raul Metsma r...@innovaatik.ee wrote:
On Oct 14, 2013, at 2:58 PM, Stephen Kelly stephen.ke...@kdab.com wrote:
On Thursday, October 10, 2013 15:10:17 Raul Metsma wrote:
On windows cmake cannot find dll-s again
Had to change QtCoreConfig.cmake and other modules line 31
set(imported_location
${_qt5Core_install_prefix}/lib/${LIB_LOCATION})
to
set(imported_location
${_qt5Core_install_prefix}/bin/${LIB_LOCATION})
Hi,
Which package do you get this with? A source package? A binary from
http://download.qt-project.org/snapshots/qt/5.2/5.2.0-beta1/2013-10-14_01
-57-18-92/
?
It was binary, I can test the later snapshot
qt-windows-opensource-5.2.0-beta1-msvc2012-x64-offline_2013-10-14_01-57-18-9
2.exe
CMake Error at
C:/Qt/Qt5.2.0/5.2.0-beta1/msvc2012_64/lib/cmake/Qt5Core/Qt5CoreConfig.cmake
:15 (message): The imported target Qt5::Core references the file
C:/Qt/Qt5.2.0/5.2.0-beta1/msvc2012_64/lib/Qt5Core.dll
but this file does not exist. Possible reasons include:
* The file was deleted, renamed, or moved to another location.
* An install or uninstall procedure did not complete successfully.
* The installation package was faulty and contained
C:/Qt/Qt5.2.0/5.2.0-beta1/msvc2012_64/lib/cmake/Qt5Core/Qt5CoreConfig.cmak
e
This should be fixed by
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,68262
Thanks,
--
Join us in October at Qt Developer Days 2013 - https://devdays.kdab.com
Stephen Kelly stephen.ke...@kdab.com | Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company
www.kdab.com || Germany +49-30-521325470 || Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090
KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-Independent Software Solutions
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Qt 5.2 Testing
On Thursday, October 10, 2013 15:10:17 Raul Metsma wrote:
On windows cmake cannot find dll-s again
Had to change QtCoreConfig.cmake and other modules line 31
set(imported_location ${_qt5Core_install_prefix}/lib/${LIB_LOCATION})
to
set(imported_location ${_qt5Core_install_prefix}/bin/${LIB_LOCATION})
Hi,
Which package do you get this with? A source package? A binary from
http://download.qt-project.org/snapshots/qt/5.2/5.2.0-beta1/2013-10-14_01-57-18-92/
?
and on mac cmake complains missing GL framewroks
workaround added ${CMAKE_OSX_SYSROOT}/ to path
Qt5GuiConfigExtras.cmake line 64
_qt5gui_find_extra_libs(OPENGL OpenGL;AGL
/System/Library/Frameworks/OpenGL.framework/Headers;/System/Li..
_qt5gui_find_extra_libs(OPENGL OpenGL;AGL
/${CMAKE_OSX_SYSROOT}/System/Library/Frameworks/OpenGL.framework/Headers;/
${CMAKE_OSX_SYSROOT}/System/Li..
This is interesting. Is this the problem reported in
https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-32308
?
Thanks,
--
Join us in October at Qt Developer Days 2013 - https://devdays.kdab.com
Stephen Kelly stephen.ke...@kdab.com | Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company
www.kdab.com || Germany +49-30-521325470 || Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090
KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-Independent Software Solutions
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
[Development] Qt 5.2 Testing
Hi,
Is system tray supposed to work under Ubuntu Unity? cause it's been broken
ever since Qt 5.0 I guesss, including the recent Qt 5.2 beta release, the
problem is: the tray icon doesn't show up - but it does show up (i.e.
works) in Kubuntu (same computer, logging out of Unity, logging in into
kubuntu-desktop).
For the record - the system tray in kde4/qt4 works ok under Ubuntu/Unity.
Testing on amd64 Ubuntu 13.10 with all daily updates installed.
I only found this bug reported though I'm not sure it addresses this
problem:
https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-30079
To be more specific this code works in Kubuntu but doesn't in Ubuntu/Unity
(amd64 13.10 daily):
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
QApplication app(argc, argv);
gst_init(NULL, NULL);
quap::ui::Win win;
QIcon icon(/home/fox/icon.png);
QSystemTrayIcon tray_icon(icon, win);
tray_icon.setVisible(true); // WON'T SHOW UP under Ubuntu/unity
win.show();
return app.exec();
}
Kind Regards
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Qt 5.2 Testing
That's a bug in the design of Unity. See
http://www.howtogeek.com/68119/how-to-bring-app-icons-back-into-unitys-system-tray/
Regards
Rich.
On 14 October 2013 13:34, Jiergir Ogoerg f35f22...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Is system tray supposed to work under Ubuntu Unity? cause it's been broken
ever since Qt 5.0 I guesss, including the recent Qt 5.2 beta release, the
problem is: the tray icon doesn't show up - but it does show up (i.e. works)
in Kubuntu (same computer, logging out of Unity, logging in into
kubuntu-desktop).
For the record - the system tray in kde4/qt4 works ok under Ubuntu/Unity.
Testing on amd64 Ubuntu 13.10 with all daily updates installed.
I only found this bug reported though I'm not sure it addresses this
problem:
https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-30079
To be more specific this code works in Kubuntu but doesn't in Ubuntu/Unity
(amd64 13.10 daily):
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
QApplication app(argc, argv);
gst_init(NULL, NULL);
quap::ui::Win win;
QIcon icon(/home/fox/icon.png);
QSystemTrayIcon tray_icon(icon, win);
tray_icon.setVisible(true); // WON'T SHOW UP under Ubuntu/unity
win.show();
return app.exec();
}
Kind Regards
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
[Development] Qt 5.2 Testing (System tray)
But the Qt4's systray works properly in this same version of Unity (I just tested myself). The issue you linked to is a different one, and the post is old and doesn't work - you can't white-list anything any longer in Unity (desktop unity panel doesn't exist in dconf), so it's certainly a Qt5+ issue. So the question stays, is it a policy for Qt4 to work with the Unity sys tray and Qt5 to not work? from Richard Moore r...@kde.org That's a bug in the design of Unity. See http://www.howtogeek.com/68119/how-to-bring-app-icons-back-into-unitys-system-tray/ ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Qt 5.2 Testing (System tray)
On segunda-feira, 14 de outubro de 2013 18:10:34, Jiergir Ogoerg wrote: But the Qt4's systray works properly in this same version of Unity (I just tested myself). The issue you linked to is a different one, and the post is old and doesn't work - you can't white-list anything any longer in Unity (desktop unity panel doesn't exist in dconf), so it's certainly a Qt5+ issue. So the question stays, is it a policy for Qt4 to work with the Unity sys tray and Qt5 to not work? Does Qt 4 get patches from Ubuntu to work with the new systray protocol? Or does the Unity host accept the old XEmbed systray protocol? -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Qt 5.2 Testing (System tray)
To test qt4 I did sudo apt-get install libqt4-dev, that is, the libs that come with Ubuntu. I'm not a Qt developer so I hope you guys figure out why (Ubuntu's) Qt4 works and (the offline version of) Qt5.2 beta doesn't. Since Ubuntu is the most popular distro I would guess it's worth spending some time investigating this issue, I'm just a Qt user so I don't know how Qt works underneath. On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.comwrote: On segunda-feira, 14 de outubro de 2013 18:10:34, Jiergir Ogoerg wrote: But the Qt4's systray works properly in this same version of Unity (I just tested myself). The issue you linked to is a different one, and the post is old and doesn't work - you can't white-list anything any longer in Unity (desktop unity panel doesn't exist in dconf), so it's certainly a Qt5+ issue. So the question stays, is it a policy for Qt4 to work with the Unity sys tray and Qt5 to not work? Does Qt 4 get patches from Ubuntu to work with the new systray protocol? Or does the Unity host accept the old XEmbed systray protocol? -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Qt 5.2 Testing (System tray)
I see, you guys don't have time (motivation or whatever) to look closer into this issue. At least I tried. As to Ubuntu's popularity - I don't like Canonical nor Ubuntu - but I have to use it cause it sucks less than other distros I tried out and regardless of the platitudes about popularity we can get into - it's clear that Ubuntu is so popular that Qt's devs shouldn't leave this issue uninvestigated, since the source code for Ubuntu's Qt4 version is open source and available you guys could check if you wanted. On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.comwrote: On segunda-feira, 14 de outubro de 2013 18:55:56, Jiergir Ogoerg wrote: To test qt4 I did sudo apt-get install libqt4-dev, that is, the libs that come with Ubuntu. I'm not a Qt developer so I hope you guys figure out why (Ubuntu's) Qt4 works and (the offline version of) Qt5.2 beta doesn't. Since Ubuntu is the most popular distro I would guess it's worth spending some time investigating this issue, I'm just a Qt user so I don't know how Qt works underneath. If they patch Qt, we can't do much. I hope their packagers are around the mailing list to answer. PS: Ubuntu being the most popular depends on your criteria for defining what popular means. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Qt 5.2 Testing (System tray)
It looks like they are trying to create their own QPA plugin for Qt5. For the appmenu changes, they reference the changes they made to the Qt4 source code and are porting to a Qt5 QPA plugin. I would assume that changes for the system tray icon would also be included in the plugin. https://bugs.launchpad.net/appmenu-qt/+bug/1157213 On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Jiergir Ogoerg f35f22...@gmail.comwrote: I see, you guys don't have time (motivation or whatever) to look closer into this issue. At least I tried. As to Ubuntu's popularity - I don't like Canonical nor Ubuntu - but I have to use it cause it sucks less than other distros I tried out and regardless of the platitudes about popularity we can get into - it's clear that Ubuntu is so popular that Qt's devs shouldn't leave this issue uninvestigated, since the source code for Ubuntu's Qt4 version is open source and available you guys could check if you wanted. On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote: On segunda-feira, 14 de outubro de 2013 18:55:56, Jiergir Ogoerg wrote: To test qt4 I did sudo apt-get install libqt4-dev, that is, the libs that come with Ubuntu. I'm not a Qt developer so I hope you guys figure out why (Ubuntu's) Qt4 works and (the offline version of) Qt5.2 beta doesn't. Since Ubuntu is the most popular distro I would guess it's worth spending some time investigating this issue, I'm just a Qt user so I don't know how Qt works underneath. If they patch Qt, we can't do much. I hope their packagers are around the mailing list to answer. PS: Ubuntu being the most popular depends on your criteria for defining what popular means. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Qt 5.2 Testing (System tray)
Thanks, if so, case closed, the Ubuntu users will have to wait for Canonical's patches and the users testing the versions of Qt from Qt's website are likely to file false bugs in the future, so I'd vouch for including Canonical's patches into upstream Qt to avoid this issue and possible future false bug reports. But since Canonical is taking a certain stance on certain issues (including Mir) I understand why Canonical's patches might not be welcome upstream. On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 7:29 PM, Keith Gardner kreios4...@gmail.com wrote: It looks like they are trying to create their own QPA plugin for Qt5. For the appmenu changes, they reference the changes they made to the Qt4 source code and are porting to a Qt5 QPA plugin. I would assume that changes for the system tray icon would also be included in the plugin. https://bugs.launchpad.net/appmenu-qt/+bug/1157213 On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Jiergir Ogoerg f35f22...@gmail.comwrote: I see, you guys don't have time (motivation or whatever) to look closer into this issue. At least I tried. As to Ubuntu's popularity - I don't like Canonical nor Ubuntu - but I have to use it cause it sucks less than other distros I tried out and regardless of the platitudes about popularity we can get into - it's clear that Ubuntu is so popular that Qt's devs shouldn't leave this issue uninvestigated, since the source code for Ubuntu's Qt4 version is open source and available you guys could check if you wanted. On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote: On segunda-feira, 14 de outubro de 2013 18:55:56, Jiergir Ogoerg wrote: To test qt4 I did sudo apt-get install libqt4-dev, that is, the libs that come with Ubuntu. I'm not a Qt developer so I hope you guys figure out why (Ubuntu's) Qt4 works and (the offline version of) Qt5.2 beta doesn't. Since Ubuntu is the most popular distro I would guess it's worth spending some time investigating this issue, I'm just a Qt user so I don't know how Qt works underneath. If they patch Qt, we can't do much. I hope their packagers are around the mailing list to answer. PS: Ubuntu being the most popular depends on your criteria for defining what popular means. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Qt 5.2 Testing (System tray)
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote: On segunda-feira, 14 de outubro de 2013 18:55:56, Jiergir Ogoerg wrote: To test qt4 I did sudo apt-get install libqt4-dev, that is, the libs that come with Ubuntu. I'm not a Qt developer so I hope you guys figure out why (Ubuntu's) Qt4 works and (the offline version of) Qt5.2 beta doesn't. Since Ubuntu is the most popular distro I would guess it's worth spending some time investigating this issue, I'm just a Qt user so I don't know how Qt works underneath. If they patch Qt, we can't do much. Disclaimer: I'm not ubuntu packager. For their patch, can be obtained from here, http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/q/qt4-x11/qt4-x11_4.8.4+dfsg-0ubuntu9.debian.tar.gz and related one is kubuntu_14_systemtrayicon.diff Which they introduce a new plugin type for tray, and used by this package: http://packages.ubuntu.com/raring/sni-qt Looks like this hasn't ported yet to Qt5. (Qt5 has such qpa plugin for systray so I guess patch on qt is not required anymore, but needs some one to implement that). ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Qt 5.2 Testing (System tray)
Qt4 systray works in Gnome shell and KDE, Qt5 systray doesn't work in Gnome shell and KDE. About 1 month ago I tested Qt5 systray (from dev branch) and it didn't work. Maybe it is general problem of Qt5 systray implementation? 14.10.2013 19:10, Jiergir Ogoerg ?: But the Qt4's systray works properly in this same version of Unity (I just tested myself). The issue you linked to is a different one, and the post is old and doesn't work - you can't white-list anything any longer in Unity (desktop unity panel doesn't exist in dconf), so it's certainly a Qt5+ issue. So the question stays, is it a policy for Qt4 to work with the Unity sys tray and Qt5 to not work? from Richard Moore r...@kde.org mailto:r...@kde.org That's a bug in the design of Unity. See http://www.howtogeek.com/68119/how-to-bring-app-icons-back-into-unitys-system-tray/ ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Qt 5.2 Testing (System tray)
On segunda-feira, 14 de outubro de 2013 19:40:15, Jiergir Ogoerg wrote: Thanks, if so, case closed, the Ubuntu users will have to wait for Canonical's patches and the users testing the versions of Qt from Qt's website are likely to file false bugs in the future, so I'd vouch for including Canonical's patches into upstream Qt to avoid this issue and possible future false bug reports. But since Canonical is taking a certain stance on certain issues (including Mir) I understand why Canonical's patches might not be welcome upstream. If the patches are technically correct and don't break the rest of the platforms, I don't see why we shouldn't accept them upstream. If the patch is large, then the patch must come with a promise of maintenance as well. We would require the same of any other port or large modification. In fact, we do require that of our QNX/BB10 friends and it's being required of the Android and iOS ports too. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Qt 5.2 Testing (System tray)
I agree very much with what Thiago said. Also note that the project can't _take_ patches, the legal framework requires the author to contribute them explicitly (and accepting the cla on the way). Thankfully there are canonical folks around in the Qt project submitting good stuff in other places. Simon Fra: Thiago Macieira Sendt: 21:30 mandag 14. oktober 2013 Til: development@qt-project.org Emne: Re: [Development] Qt 5.2 Testing (System tray) On segunda-feira, 14 de outubro de 2013 19:40:15, Jiergir Ogoerg wrote: Thanks, if so, case closed, the Ubuntu users will have to wait for Canonical's patches and the users testing the versions of Qt from Qt's website are likely to file false bugs in the future, so I'd vouch for including Canonical's patches into upstream Qt to avoid this issue and possible future false bug reports. But since Canonical is taking a certain stance on certain issues (including Mir) I understand why Canonical's patches might not be welcome upstream. If the patches are technically correct and don't break the rest of the platforms, I don't see why we shouldn't accept them upstream. If the patch is large, then the patch must come with a promise of maintenance as well. We would require the same of any other port or large modification. In fact, we do require that of our QNX/BB10 friends and it's being required of the Android and iOS ports too. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Qt 5.2 Testing (System tray)
That's basically how it looks. I'm happy to accept all patches that are required upstream (after review of course), but the authors (ie. Canonical) will have to submit them here. Cheers, Lars On 10/14/13 9:44 PM, Hausmann Simon simon.hausm...@digia.com wrote: I agree very much with what Thiago said. Also note that the project can't _take_ patches, the legal framework requires the author to contribute them explicitly (and accepting the cla on the way). Thankfully there are canonical folks around in the Qt project submitting good stuff in other places. Simon Fra: Thiago Macieira Sendt: 21:30 mandag 14. oktober 2013 Til: development@qt-project.org Emne: Re: [Development] Qt 5.2 Testing (System tray) On segunda-feira, 14 de outubro de 2013 19:40:15, Jiergir Ogoerg wrote: Thanks, if so, case closed, the Ubuntu users will have to wait for Canonical's patches and the users testing the versions of Qt from Qt's website are likely to file false bugs in the future, so I'd vouch for including Canonical's patches into upstream Qt to avoid this issue and possible future false bug reports. But since Canonical is taking a certain stance on certain issues (including Mir) I understand why Canonical's patches might not be welcome upstream. If the patches are technically correct and don't break the rest of the platforms, I don't see why we shouldn't accept them upstream. If the patch is large, then the patch must come with a promise of maintenance as well. We would require the same of any other port or large modification. In fact, we do require that of our QNX/BB10 friends and it's being required of the Android and iOS ports too. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
[Development] Qt 5.2 Testing
Hello, It's time to test Beta 1 candidate packages to make sure that they are as good as possible. Could you help by testing them? 1. Beta 1 packages are available here (please take the latest ones; Linux and Mac available): http://download.qt-project.org/snapshots/qt/5.2/5.2.0-beta1/http://download.qt-project.org/development_releases/qt/5.2/5.2.0-alpha/ 2. Qt bug reports should be reported in JIRA: https://bugreports.qt-project.org/ 3. The Sanity Test Guidelines can be used during testing: http://qt-project.org/wiki/Sanity-Test-Guidelines 4. Feel free to report your testing effort via: http://testresults.qt-project.org/forms/release-testing/ Thanks, /Rafal Rafal Motyka Quality Assurance Digia, Qt Email: rafal.mot...@digia.commailto:forename.surn...@digia.com Mobile: +47 95005389 http://qt.digia.com Qt Blog: http://blog.qt.digia.com/ Qt Facebook: www.facebook.com/qt Qt Twitter: www.twitter.com/qtcommercial -- PRIVACY AND CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message and any attachments are intended only for use by the named addressee and may contain privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, copy or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete the message and any attachments accompanying it. Digia Plc does not accept liability for any corruption, interception, amendment, tampering or viruses occurring to this message. - ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Qt 5.2 Testing
On Thu, 2013-10-10 at 10:11 +, Motyka Rafal wrote: Hello, It's time to test Beta 1 candidate packages to make sure that they are as good as possible. Could you help by testing them? 1. Beta 1 packages are available here (please take the latest ones; Linux and Mac available): http://download.qt-project.org/snapshots/qt/5.2/5.2.0-beta1/ 2. Qt bug reports should be reported in JIRA: https://bugreports.qt-project.org/ 3. The Sanity Test Guidelines can be used during testing: http://qt-project.org/wiki/Sanity-Test-Guidelines 4. Feel free to report your testing effort via: http://testresults.qt-project.org/forms/release-testing/ Thanks, /Rafal I have to mention that your link http://download.qt-project.org/snapshots/qt/5.2/5.2.0-beta1/ actually points to http://download.qt-project.org/development_releases/qt/5.2/5.2.0-alpha/ don't know how that happened. Petko ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Qt 5.2 Testing
First thing to mention - I could not deselect QtCreator (or Tools ) from the installation (Manjaro/GNOME environment , I don't know if that matters) . Secondly : Could not load the following plugins : Help Details: /home/p10/Qt5.2.0/Tools/QtCreator/lib/qtcreator/plugins/QtProject/libHelp.so: Cannot load library /home/p10/Qt5.2.0/Tools/QtCreator/lib/qtcreator/plugins/QtProject/libHelp.so: (libudev.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory) 3.There are no examples present , and Creator crashes when I search for examples but , that's probably because of the lack of Help plugin. 4.This bug (I just filed it,though it's been around for some time now) : https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-34005 . That's pretty much it for now. Petko On Thu, 2013-10-10 at 10:11 +, Motyka Rafal wrote: Hello, It's time to test Beta 1 candidate packages to make sure that they are as good as possible. Could you help by testing them? 1. Beta 1 packages are available here (please take the latest ones; Linux and Mac available): http://download.qt-project.org/snapshots/qt/5.2/5.2.0-beta1/ 2. Qt bug reports should be reported in JIRA: https://bugreports.qt-project.org/ 3. The Sanity Test Guidelines can be used during testing: http://qt-project.org/wiki/Sanity-Test-Guidelines 4. Feel free to report your testing effort via: http://testresults.qt-project.org/forms/release-testing/ Thanks, /Rafal ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Qt 5.2 Testing
Oh , sorry ,I'll use the form for reporting, I didn't see it on first glimpse. On Thu, 2013-10-10 at 10:11 +, Motyka Rafal wrote: Hello, It's time to test Beta 1 candidate packages to make sure that they are as good as possible. Could you help by testing them? 1. Beta 1 packages are available here (please take the latest ones; Linux and Mac available): http://download.qt-project.org/snapshots/qt/5.2/5.2.0-beta1/ 2. Qt bug reports should be reported in JIRA: https://bugreports.qt-project.org/ 3. The Sanity Test Guidelines can be used during testing: http://qt-project.org/wiki/Sanity-Test-Guidelines 4. Feel free to report your testing effort via: http://testresults.qt-project.org/forms/release-testing/ Thanks, /Rafal ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Qt 5.2 Testing
-Original Message- From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org [mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of p10 Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 1:18 PM Cc: development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] Qt 5.2 Testing First thing to mention - I could not deselect QtCreator (or Tools ) from the installation (Manjaro/GNOME environment , I don't know if that matters) . That's by design. The Qt versions need to register themselves with Qt Creator, and therefore require it. The alternative would be to accept that if you say install Qt first, and then later on Qt Creator, there's no automatically configured Kit for this version in Qt Creator. Or we invent some more complicated mechanism , like a central registry ... Secondly : Could not load the following plugins : Help Details: /home/p10/Qt5.2.0/Tools/QtCreator/lib/qtcreator/plugins/QtProject/libHelp .so: Cannot load library /home/p10/Qt5.2.0/Tools/QtCreator/lib/qtcreator/plugins/QtProject/libHelp .so: (libudev.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory) That's probably a webkit dependency ... did we require libudev in previous installers? Regards Kai ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Qt 5.2 Testing
On windows cmake cannot find dll-s again
Had to change QtCoreConfig.cmake and other modules line 31
set(imported_location ${_qt5Core_install_prefix}/lib/${LIB_LOCATION})
to
set(imported_location ${_qt5Core_install_prefix}/bin/${LIB_LOCATION})
and on mac cmake complains missing GL framewroks
workaround added ${CMAKE_OSX_SYSROOT}/ to path
Qt5GuiConfigExtras.cmake line 64
_qt5gui_find_extra_libs(OPENGL OpenGL;AGL
/System/Library/Frameworks/OpenGL.framework/Headers;/System/Li..
_qt5gui_find_extra_libs(OPENGL OpenGL;AGL
/${CMAKE_OSX_SYSROOT}/System/Library/Frameworks/OpenGL.framework/Headers;/${CMAKE_OSX_SYSROOT}/System/Li..
Raul
On Oct 10, 2013, at 3:03 PM, Koehne Kai kai.koe...@digia.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org
[mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org] On
Behalf Of p10
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 1:18 PM
Cc: development@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] Qt 5.2 Testing
First thing to mention - I could not deselect QtCreator (or Tools ) from the
installation (Manjaro/GNOME environment , I don't know if that
matters) .
That's by design. The Qt versions need to register themselves with Qt
Creator, and therefore require it.
The alternative would be to accept that if you say install Qt first, and then
later on Qt Creator, there's no automatically configured Kit for this version
in Qt Creator. Or we invent some more complicated mechanism , like a central
registry ...
Secondly : Could not load the following plugins : Help
Details:
/home/p10/Qt5.2.0/Tools/QtCreator/lib/qtcreator/plugins/QtProject/libHelp
.so: Cannot load library
/home/p10/Qt5.2.0/Tools/QtCreator/lib/qtcreator/plugins/QtProject/libHelp
.so: (libudev.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or
directory)
That's probably a webkit dependency ... did we require libudev in previous
installers?
Regards
Kai
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
