Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Bug in iso comp file? [was Re: [e-smith-devinfo] man pages gone under SME 5.0]
On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 04:18:54AM -, Darrell May [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] In fact on my fresh install I do not have any packages from the ExtrasForDevel group. So how did you get man installed? Do you have the others installed as well? Are you using the public .iso or do you have a different copy? The manpages were intentionally not installed, as with all of the ExtrasForDevel group. They are on the CD if developers want to install them manually. The entries in this group are useful for developers, but not for the average deployed system. There are a few reasons: - We don't expect people to log into deployed systems (man, slocate) - slocate generates a lot of daily disk activity - man/tmpwatch have gone through various stages of brokenness, generating cron errors I think Mitel has an error in the /e-smith/base/comp file which should read: [...] No, it was intentional. Thanks, Gordon -- Gordon Rowell[EMAIL PROTECTED] VP Engineering Network Server Solutions Group http://www.e-smith.com Mitel Networks Corporation http://www.mitel.com -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
Re: [e-smith-devinfo] man pages gone under SME 5.0
On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 02:36:25PM -0700, Greg Zartman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It appears that Mitel has removed the man pages from SME5.0. Is anyone else finding this to be true? Yes. They are on the CD if you want to install them manually. See my response to Darrell for why we removed them. If so, I'd say that creating a RPM or Blade upgrade to replace them would be a worth while effort. We think a developers blade is a great idea, and are looking for some free tuits. Hopefully we'll have some more now that SME Server V5 is out. Thanks, Gordon -- Gordon Rowell[EMAIL PROTECTED] VP Engineering Network Server Solutions Group http://www.e-smith.com Mitel Networks Corporation http://www.mitel.com -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
[e-smith-devinfo] Andrew Tridgell on oplocks (was Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: Samba and opportunistic file locking?)
- Forwarded message from Andrew Tridgell [EMAIL PROTECTED] - From: Andrew Tridgell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: Samba and opportunistic file locking? Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 15:15:33 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gordon, It's a bit hard to follow all the quoting in this email, so maybe I should just restate a few facts. 1) turning oplocks off in Samba will NOT cause file corruption. With oplocks off the clients will use synchronous IO operations. 2) oplocks have nothing to do with share modes (aka deny modes) or byte range locking. The primary mechanism in Windows for preventing corruption on simulantaneous usage is share modes. The secondary mechanism is byte range locks. 3) enabling oplocks does not play a role in preventing corruption, but if you enable them and you have simultaneous access to files by oplock aware apps and non-oplock aware apps then you can get corruption because the non-oplock aware apps won't see the cached data. That is why I recommended disabling oplocks in your config - I believe you were experiencing file corruption on a 2.2 kernel with Samba when files were being shared between windows clients and non-windows apps. 4) With the 2.4 kernel Samba is told by the kernel when a non-oplock aware app tries to access the file. The access is blocked until Samba is able to dispense with the oplock. In summary it is always safe to disable oplocks, but there is a performance hit that is sometimes quite large. With the 2.4 kernel you can safely enable oplocks which gains you performance without any risk. Cheers, Tridge - End forwarded message - Gordon Rowell[EMAIL PROTECTED] VP Engineering Network Server Solutions Group http://www.e-smith.com Mitel Networks Corporation http://www.mitel.com -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
[e-smith-devinfo] Re: Bug in iso comp file? [was Re: [e-smith-devinfo] man pages gone under SME 5.0]
Darrell May wrote:
Dan that is curious. If you look closer you will see on the CD in
/e-smith/base/comp that man only gets installed under this category:
1 ExtrasForDevel {
man
rcs
slocate
strace
}
Well, slocate is installed, but rcs and strace aren't. I'm using the
public .iso, and I upgraded a 4.1.2 installation. Don't know what's
going on, really, but there it is.
--
Dan Brown, KE6MKS, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Meddle not in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy
and taste good with ketchup.
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
[e-smith-devinfo] ????????????????????3????
Title: ÎÞ±êÌâÎĵµ ¹ú¼Ê³¤»°ËæÉíͨ"KOMODO ´ÙÏú»î¶¯¼Û1258Ôª. ´úÀí¼ÛÃæÒé ÏêϸÇë·ÃÎÊÎÒÃǵÄÍøÕ¾ http://www.kk98.com KOMODO¼ò½é KomodoÊÇÒ»¸öСÇɵÄÅä¼þ£¬ÓÃÀ´×ª»»Ò»°ãÆÕͨµÄµç»°³ÉΪÍøÂçµç»°¡£ÀûÓÃÃâ·ÑµÄÍøÂç×ÊÔ´£¬Ìṩ¸ßÆ·ÖÊ¡¢ÇåÎú¡¢×ÔÈ»µÄÒôÖÊ¡£ÎÒÃÇÓëÊÀ½çÉÏ×î´óµÄÍøÂç·þÎñ¹©Ó¦ÉÌNet2PhoneºÏ×÷£¬×÷Ó÷ÑÂÊÔ¶µÍÓÚÊÀ½çÉÏÆäËüµÄµçÐÅ·þÎñ¹©Ó¦ÉÌ£¬ÉõÖÁÔÚË«»úģʽÏ£¬ÄܽÚÊ¡½«½ü99.6%µÄͨ»°·Ñ¡£ http://www.kk98.com KomodoÖ®²úÆ·¸½¼þ Komodoһ̨ ÖÐÎÄʹÓÃÊÖ²á µç»°ÏßÒ»Ìõ 12·üÌؽ»Á÷µçԴת»»Æ÷ ÂòKomodoת»»Æ÷´ò¹ú¼Ê³¤Í¾Ö»ÐèÊл°·ÑÄ㻹ÓÌÔ¥Â𣿠ÉϺ£ÊÐÇøÃâ·ÑËÍ»õ°²×°¼°Î¬»¤ ͬʱ½ÓÊÜÍâµØ¶©¹º [EMAIL PROTECTED] ³Ï Õ÷ ´ú Àí ¶¨»õµç»° £º13041655679 021-54800674 021-64809047 Áª ϵ ÈË £ºÖì ÏÈ Éú ÉϺ£ÎÄÃÀÉÌÎñÐÅÏ¢·þÎñÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾ ÍâµØ¿ÉÒÔÓʹº£ºÉϺ£ÊÐä·1508Ū91ºÅ501 Óʱࣺ201101 ¹ú¼Ê³¤»°ËæÉíͨ"KOMODOÌصã 1¡¢µ¥¼ü¼òÒײÙ×÷£º Ö»ÐèÒ»¸ö°´Å¤Äú±ã¿ÉÒÔ°ÑÒ»°ãµç»°Á¬ÉÏÍø¼ÊÍø·£¬´òÍø¼ÊÍøÂçµç»°£¬ÍêÈ«²»ÓõçÄÔ£¬ÒÔ³¬µÍ·ÑÂʲ¦´òÊÀ½ç320¸öÒÔÉϵØÇø 2¡¢Ò»¿¨¶àÄÜ£¬°²È«¿É¿¿£º ËæÉíͨ²ÉÓõÄÊǹú¼ÊÉÏÖªÃû¶È×î¸ß£¬Õ¼ÓÐÂÊ×î´óµÄÃÀ¹únet2phone¹«Ë¾µÄÍøÂçµç»°Õʺš£ÀûÓÃKOMODO½Óµ½µç»°»úÉϼ´¿ÉÖ±½Ó²¦´òÊÀ½çÉÏÈκÎһ̨µç»°£¬¶ø·ÑÓÃÊÇ´«Í³·½Ê½µÄÊ®·ÖÖ®Ò»£¡ÁíÍâKOMODOÕʺŻ¹ÓÐÒÔÏÂ×÷Ó㺣¨1£©Ö§³ÖÔÚµçÄÔÉÏʹÓã¬ÊµÏÖµçÄÔµ½µç»°µÄ¹ú¼Ê³¤Í¾¹¦ÄÜ£¬·ÑÂÊͬÔÚËæÉíͨÉÏʹÓÃÒ»Ö¡££¨2£©Í¬Ê±Ö§³ÖµçÄÔµ½´«ÕæµÄ¹ú¼Ê´«ÕæÒµÎñ¡£ 3¡¢ÒôÖÊÇåÎú£º ƾ½è5Ïî¹ú¼Ê¶¥¼â¼¼Êõ£¨½ü¶Ë»ØÉùÄâÖƼ¼ÊõNEAR END EC£¬IP¸ßËÙ´ò°ü¼¼Êõ£¬DSP¼¼ÊõµÈ£©ÆäÒôÖÊ¿É´ïµ½ÁªÍ¨£¬¼ªÍ¨µÈIPµç»°µÄͨ»°Ð§¹û£¬²¢Ô¶Ô¶ºÃÓÚͬÀà²úÆ·£¬ÈçInfotalk¡¢Ipstar µÈ¡£ÎÒÃÇÈȳϵػ¶ÓÄúµ½ÎÒ¹«Ë¾Ç×Éí¸ÐÊÜÒ»ÏÂͨ»°ÖÊÁ¿¡£ 4¡¢ÉèÖüòµ¥£º ÖÐÎÄÓïÒôÌáʾ£¬ÇáËÉÍê³ÉISPÉÏÍøÕʺš¢NET2PHONEÍøÂçµç»°ÕʺŵÄÉèÖá£ËæÂôËæͨ¡£ 5¡¢ÖÇ»ÛÐÍÓïÒôϵͳ£º Ìṩ¶à¹úÓïÑÔÓïÒôĿ¼£¬Äú¿ÉÒÔÇáËɵذ´ÕÕÓïÒôָʾ£¬Ò»²½Ò»²½µÄʹÓÃKomodo£¬ ÍêȫûÓÐÓïÑÔÕÏ°¡£ £¨Í¬Ê±ÌṩӢÎÄ¡¢º«ÎÄ¡¢µÂÎÄ¡¢Î÷°àÑÀÎÄÌáʾ£© 6¡¢²Ù×÷¼ò±ã£º Ö±½Ó²¦´ò¹ú¼ÊÍøÂ糤»°¡£Ö»Ðè°´Ò»¸öK¼ü£¬¼´¿É½«ÄúµÄÆÕͨ»°»úÁ¬ÉÏÍøÂç¡£ 7¡¢½ÓͨÂʸߣº ÃÀ¹únet2phone¹«Ë¾ÌṩÍøÂçÔËÐÐϵͳ£¬20Ãë×óÓÒ½Óͨ×îÖյ绰£¬½ÓͨÂÊ¿É´ïµ½100%¡£ 8¡¢¹©»°»°·ÑÇåµ¥£º ÎÒÃÇ¿É°´ÄúµÄÒªÇó£¬ËæʱΪÄúÌṩÏêϸ£¬Ã÷È·µÄͨ»°Çåµ¥¡£È·±£ÄúµÄȨÒæ 9¡¢Ãâ·Ñ¹¦ÄÜÉý¼¶£º ϵͳÈí¼þԤװÔڿɱà³ÌоƬÖУ¬Í¨¹ýÉÏÍø£¬°´¼¸¸ö¼ü±ã¿ÉÍê³ÉÉý¼¶¹¤×÷¡£Í¬Ê±ÎÒÃÇÌṩΪÆÚÒ»ÄêµÄÃâ·Ñ±£ÐÞ·þÎñ¡£ 10¡¢»°·ÑµÍÁ®£º ÊÇ"¹ú¼Ê³¤»°ÍøÂçͨ"×îÍ»³öÌص㣬ԶµÍÓÚIPµç»°4.8ÔªÈËÃñ±Ò/·ÖÖÓ.ͬʱ±ÈÆäËûͬÀà²úÆ·ÈçIPST*£¬INFOTAL*£¬Ò×*µÈµÄ·ÑÂʵͺܶࡣÈçµ¥»úʹÓã¬ÐèÒªÖ§¸¶µÄ½öΪͨ»°·ÑºÍÉÏÍø·Ñ¡£Èç¹ûË«»ú¶Ô´ò£¬Ôò²»¼Æ³¤»°·Ñ£¬½öÐèÖ§¸¶ÉÏÍø·Ñ£¨0.09ÔªÈËÃñ±Ò/·ÖÖÓ£©¼´¿É¡£ http://www.kk98.com <[EMAIL PROTECTED]%>
RE: [e-smith-devinfo] Re: Bug in iso comp file? [was Re: [e-smith-devinfo] man pages gone under SME 5.0]
slocate isn't installed on a clean SME 5.00
and neither is man, strace, rcs for that matter.
Regards,
Craig Foster
-Original Message-
From: Dan Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, 23 September 2001 7:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [e-smith-devinfo] Re: Bug in iso comp file? [was Re:
[e-smith-devinfo] man pages gone under SME 5.0]
Darrell May wrote:
Dan that is curious. If you look closer you will see on the CD in
/e-smith/base/comp that man only gets installed under this category:
1 ExtrasForDevel {
man
rcs
slocate
strace
}
Well, slocate is installed, but rcs and strace aren't. I'm using the
public .iso, and I upgraded a 4.1.2 installation. Don't know what's
going on, really, but there it is.
--
Dan Brown, KE6MKS, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Meddle not in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy
and taste good with ketchup.
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives by mail and
http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
smime.p7s
[e-smith-devinfo] Virus in RE: [e-smith-devinfo] ????????????????????3????
For those without virus scanners, that was the HappyTime Virus. Regards, Craig Foster -Original Message- From: 3 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 23 January 2001 9:11 AM To: 3 Subject: [e-smith-devinfo] 3 Importance: High File: ATT00082.dat smime.p7s
[e-smith-devinfo] My Samba howtos
As you know, I have two versions of my Samba upgrade howto online. There are two primary differences between them. First, one uses the RPM from samba.org while the other uses RPMs from RedHat rawhide. Second, the add user script on the first completely bypasses the normal e-smith mechanisms and works for some users, while the add user script from the second one tries to use the e-smith way and doesn't seem to work for anybody. The first add user script is: add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -d /dev/null -g 100 -s /bin/false -M %u The second is: add user script = /etc/e-smith/events/actions/machine-account-create create- machine-account %u (all on one line). Well, the second one gives problems. If you run it from the command prompt, you get Use of uninitialized value in string eq at ./machine-account-create line 47. Account [whatever] is not a machine account; create account failed. ...which sounds like you need to run /sbin/e-smith/db accounts set [whatever] machine first. Unfortunately, I can't feed samba both commands at once. Do I just need to write a custom script that calls both of these, or is there some other way around this? -- Dan Brown, KE6MKS, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Since all the world is but a story, it were well for thee to buy the more enduring story rather than the story that is less enduring. --The Judgment of St. Collum Cille -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
[e-smith-devinfo] !Virus Alert! [was [e-smith-devinfo]????????????????????3????)]
It appears that the devinfo mailing list may have allowed an attachment, and one infected with a virus, to be forwarded to list members. As this virus is potentially destructive, I suggest all devinfo members review the details below, scan their computers for viruses and take appropriate actions. Regards -- Darrell May DMC NETSOURCED.COM http://netsourced.com http://myEZserver.com START RAV AntiVirus for Linux i686 (snapshot-20010621) The file (SCRIPT1) attached to mail (with subject: [e-smith-devinfo] 3) sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED], is infected with virus: [EMAIL PROTECTED]*. VIRUS DESCRIPTION Virus name: VBS/Haptime.A@mm Virus type: I_Worm Aliases: VBS/Happytime Infected objects: SYSTEM Like Hood: Common Detection added: 2001-05-29 Disinfection added: 2001-05-29 Description: This is internet worm that uses the same Outlook Express vulnerability that is used by the well-known JS/Kak worm. On unpatched versions on Outlook Express, the worm is able to replicate itself without opening infected messages. It comes into a system as an e-mail attachment called untitled.htm. The message subject is Help and the message body is empty. When an infected message is previewed or opened, it will drop a copy of itself with one of the following names: Help.htm, Help.vbs or Help.hta. Next, it looks for html, vbs, htm and asp files. When such files are found, the worm will attempt to find e-mail addresses embedded in these files. If it finds a valid e-mail address, it will mail itself to that address and infect the found files. On the 366-th infected file, Haptime will either send itself as e-mails to all the senders of the messages stored in Inbox, with the subject `Fw: old_message_subject`, and empty message body and the attachment untitled.htm or it will mass- mail itself to all addresses found in the Contacts folder. If the current day is 13, it will also try do delete .exe and .dll files. The wallpaper is also set to the dropped html files, so the worm code is executed when the system boots. Also, .htt files are infected - so opening folders like webpages will also result in worm's execution. Using Outlook Express Stationery feature, Haptime sets the default message format to the untitled.htm file that it drops. This way, each new mail that will be sent by the infected computer will also carry the worm code. Evilness: Potentially destructive (corrupts data while replicating) Analyst: Adrian Marinescu END -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Bug in iso comp file? [was Re: [e-smith-devinfo] man pages gone under SME 5.0]
Gordon Rowell [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: No, it was intentional. Thanks for confirming Gordon. IMHO I do not think this was a good choice. I feel man and slocate are valuable tools every admin should have at their disposal. I guess if they became a developer blade for easy install that will suffice. In addition a documented note simply saying 'these are on the CD but not installed by default' might be an idea for the FAQ. Regards, -- Darrell May DMC NETSOURCED.COM http://netsourced.com http://myEZserver.com -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Bug in iso comp file? [was Re: [e-smith-devinfo] man pages gone under SME 5.0]
I 100% agree with Darrell's points on this! Those are 2 critical components to have handy, perhaps the 2 things I use the most at the shell level. Are there other shell type tools/apps that got dropped (Pine/Pico, vi, etc.). I have not loaded up SME5 yet (I am on the road), wondering what other surprises are there. I guess this is probably a stupid question, but are the man pages themselves not installed, or is it just the man app? On a sematics point, the blade should probably be called the Sysadmin Blade or Shell Tools Blade, as Developer Blade seems to suggest things like compilers, make, etc. (which would be another fine blade to have handy, though I thoroughly agree that these should not installed by default). I know this is not a democracy, but my vote would say leave those in there by default. Still love the product, just registering an opinion. Regards, JP - Original Message - From: Darrell May [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Gordon Rowell [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Darrell May [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Dan Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Greg Zartman [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2001 9:23 AM Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Bug in iso comp file? [was Re: [e-smith-devinfo] man pages gone under SME 5.0] Gordon Rowell [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: No, it was intentional. Thanks for confirming Gordon. IMHO I do not think this was a good choice. I feel man and slocate are valuable tools every admin should have at their disposal. I guess if they became a developer blade for easy install that will suffice. In addition a documented note simply saying 'these are on the CD but not installed by default' might be an idea for the FAQ. -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Samba issues on e-smith
Citing Michael Doerner [EMAIL PROTECTED]: The remaining problems are the user profiles for Win9x machines which will reside in the user's home directory with the above settings. I can't get them onto the 'profiles' share. From what I read in the Samba documentation, it is not possible to store the user profiles for Win9x machines outside the user's home directory. See http://samba.org/samba/docs/Samba-HOWTO-Collection.html#AEN1512 Regards Stephan Burmeister -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
Re: [e-smith-devinfo] AntiNimda contrib RPMS.
On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 12:12:06AM +0200, Yann wrote:
This also blocks outbound proxy traffic. :)
And what about inbound http traffic ?
{
$OUT .= 'HERE';
# Deny any requests for web traffic
/sbin/ipchains --append input -p tcp -d 0/0 80 -j REJECT
HERE
}
There are two new versions that should appear on ftp.e-smith.com within
an hour, that address the above problem.
They do so by binding the above rule to the internal interface only, (so
that inbound web traffic is not affected from the outside world), and
also ACCEPT'ing any TCP port 80 traffic for the server's Local IP via
the internal interface as well.
The new versions are:
e-smith-proxy-4.2.0-09antinimda.noarch.rpm
Mitel-ProxyDenyReadmeEML-1.1.0-07.noarch.rpm
Downloads available from:
ftp://ftp.e-smith.com/pub/e-smith/contrib/AdrianChung/RPMS/noarch/
--
Adrian Chung [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Software Developer +1.613.368.4379
Network Server Solutions Group Mitel Networks Corporation
http://www.e-smith.com http://www.mitel.com
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Bug in iso comp file? [was Re: [e-smith-devinfo] man pages gone under SME 5.0]
On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 11:22:58AM -0500, John Powell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I 100% agree with Darrell's points on this! Those are 2 critical components
to have handy, perhaps the 2 things I use the most at the shell level.
With my developer hat on, I agree.
With my deployment hat on, I disagree. slocate, in particular, causes
(seemingly) random major disk activitity, which concerns customers (a lot).
I believe we took the correct approach - don't install them by default,
but place then on the CD for you to install if you wish, and make a Blade
out of them as soon as possible.
Are there other shell type tools/apps that got dropped (Pine/Pico, vi, etc.).
No.
I have not loaded up SME5 yet (I am on the road), wondering what other
surprises are there.
There should be none. The only tools not installed by default are in
this group:
1 ExtrasForDevel {
man
rcs
slocate
strace
}
I guess this is probably a stupid question, but are the man pages themselves
not installed, or is it just the man app?
Neither are installed by default. The installer will upgrade existing
versions.
On a sematics point, the blade should probably be called the Sysadmin
Blade or Shell Tools Blade, as Developer Blade seems to suggest things
like compilers, make, etc. (which would be another fine blade to have handy,
though I thoroughly agree that these should not installed by default).
Yep. I'd prefer to see small blades - Manual pages (which would include
man and manpages), Sysadmin (which would include slocate, ...), etc.
I know this is not a democracy, but my vote would say leave those in there
by default. Still love the product, just registering an opinion.
Which we value, but we all need to remember the focus on this list is
development. Developers want/need manpages, slocate, etc.
Thanks,
Gordon
--
Gordon Rowell[EMAIL PROTECTED]
VP Engineering
Network Server Solutions Group http://www.e-smith.com
Mitel Networks Corporation http://www.mitel.com
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
[e-smith-devinfo] Devinfo posts now subscribers only (was Re: [e-smith-devinfo] !Virus Alert! [was [e-smith-devinfo]????????????????????3????)])
On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 02:01:14PM -, Darrell May [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It appears that the devinfo mailing list may have allowed an attachment, [...] Thanks Darrell. Due to this and other spam on the list, the devinfo list has now been changed to allow postings from subscribers only. If you need to post from another address, please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am tracking down how any attachment made it to the list - it is configured to strip all attachments and reject mail containing just an attachment (e.g. HTML mail). Thanks, Gordon -- Gordon Rowell[EMAIL PROTECTED] VP Engineering Network Server Solutions Group http://www.e-smith.com Mitel Networks Corporation http://www.mitel.com -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
