Re: [freenet-dev] Thoughts on 1471 feature set?
On 12/10/15 00:33, Steve Dougherty wrote: > Florent expressed interest in getting the caching store tracker out, [0] > but we'd also planned for 1471 to transition to a new key as part of > 1472 requiring Java 7, and that's not implemented yet. Are people > interested in postponing the Java 7 transition again if it's necessary > to get 1471 out sooner? > > I plan to release 1471-pre2 the weekend of October 24th. > > - Steve > > [0] https://github.com/freenet/fred/pull/157 Does it try to update essential plugins? There was something about this in the changelog - needs to be handled with care? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
Re: [freenet-dev] Thoughts on 1471 feature set?
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015, 12:04 AM xor wrote: On Sunday, October 11, 2015 07:33:29 PM Steve Dougherty wrote: > Florent expressed interest in getting the caching store tracker out, [0] > but we'd also planned for 1471 to transition to a new key as part of > 1472 requiring Java 7, and that's not implemented yet. Are people > interested in postponing the Java 7 transition again if it's necessary > to get 1471 out sooner? > > I plan to release 1471-pre2 the weekend of October 24th. ... What I do care about: There currently are 2 WoT releases which have not been deployed yet, and the latest of those has been released for testing for almost a month. So I'd say it would be safe to get out WoT build0017 at least, if not build0018. The performance improvements they provide should be a lot for each of them, so it'd be really nice to get one out. I'd suggest you try to compile / unit test them soon enough: We've two times in a row had the case where you tried to compile them on fred release day, ran into problems, and couldn't wait for me to fix them because it was release day already. Sure - I'll include build 18 in 1471 pre1. From mobile ___ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
Re: [freenet-dev] Thoughts on 1471 feature set?
On Monday, October 12, 2015 06:03:59 AM xor wrote: > The performance improvements they provide should be a lot for each of them, > so it'd be really nice to get one out. Oh an: Getting the performance fixes out might also be enough of a reason to have a fred release soon. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
Re: [freenet-dev] Thoughts on 1471 feature set?
On Sunday, October 11, 2015 07:33:29 PM Steve Dougherty wrote: > Florent expressed interest in getting the caching store tracker out, [0] > but we'd also planned for 1471 to transition to a new key as part of > 1472 requiring Java 7, and that's not implemented yet. Are people > interested in postponing the Java 7 transition again if it's necessary > to get 1471 out sooner? > > I plan to release 1471-pre2 the weekend of October 24th. > I don't really need Java 7 yet for my purposes -> Don't care. What I do care about: There currently are 2 WoT releases which have not been deployed yet, and the latest of those has been released for testing for almost a month. So I'd say it would be safe to get out WoT build0017 at least, if not build0018. The performance improvements they provide should be a lot for each of them, so it'd be really nice to get one out. I'd suggest you try to compile / unit test them soon enough: We've two times in a row had the case where you tried to compile them on fred release day, ran into problems, and couldn't wait for me to fix them because it was release day already. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
