[Dhis2-users] GIS best practice choice of colours

2014-02-20 Thread Bob Jolliffe
Hi

I am no expert here, but I was talking last week with someone who had just
been on a GIS course.  She made the interesting observation that when you
are displaying numerical data as shaded regions on a map, you should not
mix primary colours in the same gradated scale because what you end up with
is sort of rubic cube kaleidoscope of colour rather than a clear gradation
of values.

If that is good advice then I think our demo site could be improved as
presently it seems like a good example of bad practice, where we have mixed
red, green and blue with joyful and cheerful abandon :-)

I had a go to change the Diarrhoea map on the dashboard at
http://apps.dhis2.org/dev/dhis-web-dashboard-integration/index.action and I
think it is true that it conveys the data better than the extreme
multi-coloured ones around it.  Even if the distribution of data between
bands is not so interesting.  Anyone agree or disagree? (the data will only
be there for a short while longer)

If there is a best practice to be had here regarding colour selection I
guess we should promote it, particularly with default offerings so that
people have to be quite deliberate in order to go astray.

Bob
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-users
Post to : dhis2-users@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-users
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Dhis2-users] GIS best practice choice of colours

2014-02-20 Thread Knut Staring
http://colorbrewer2.org/


On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Jan Henrik Øverland 
janhenrik.overl...@gmail.com wrote:

 Others will have to comment on this, but what we should do anyway is to
 add more colours to the palette to allow for a combination of the two -
 fixed class breaks (predefined legend set) and that nice colour/value
 gradation Bob mentioned.


 On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Bob Jolliffe bobjolli...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hi

 I am no expert here, but I was talking last week with someone who had
 just been on a GIS course.  She made the interesting observation that when
 you are displaying numerical data as shaded regions on a map, you should
 not mix primary colours in the same gradated scale because what you end up
 with is sort of rubic cube kaleidoscope of colour rather than a clear
 gradation of values.

 If that is good advice then I think our demo site could be improved as
 presently it seems like a good example of bad practice, where we have mixed
 red, green and blue with joyful and cheerful abandon :-)

 I had a go to change the Diarrhoea map on the dashboard at
 http://apps.dhis2.org/dev/dhis-web-dashboard-integration/index.action and
 I think it is true that it conveys the data better than the extreme
 multi-coloured ones around it.  Even if the distribution of data between
 bands is not so interesting.  Anyone agree or disagree? (the data will only
 be there for a short while longer)

 If there is a best practice to be had here regarding colour selection I
 guess we should promote it, particularly with default offerings so that
 people have to be quite deliberate in order to go astray.

 Bob

 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-users
 Post to : dhis2-users@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-users
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp



 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-users
 Post to : dhis2-users@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-users
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp




-- 
Knut Staring
Dept. of Informatics, University of Oslo
+4791880522
http://dhis2.org
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-users
Post to : dhis2-users@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-users
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Dhis2-users] GIS best practice choice of colours

2014-02-20 Thread Bram Piot
Hi Bob,

I don't think there's one single rule that will fit all when it comes to
choosing your symbols or colours for a thematic map depicting numeric
values. There's nothing wrong with say a red/yellow/green colour scheme if
you are showing for example reporting rates, where low (red) = bad and high
(green) = good. If I were to map out HIV prevalence, then I may go from
green (low values) to red (high prevalence). More neutral variables such
as population density are usually better off with a graduated scheme from
light to dark, e.g. pale to dark brown.

Maybe the only basic rules are that there should be some logic in the
choice of colour ramps, and to keep it simple (don't overload your map,
don't use 15 different classes each with a different colour when you only
have 20 districts!). I must agree that the current colour scheme for ANC1
and ANC2 coverage by chiefdom in the demo site can definitely be improved:
too many colours that are not in a logical order. Your diarrhea map looks
better, though it would be even better if you changed the classification
type to equal counts rather than equal intervals.

Agree with what has been requested recently by Knut: option to display
polygon data (e.g district) by symbol, not just colour, and include more
symbols because currently it's rather limited. Especially for categorical
values the legend behaviour could be greatly improved. Bar/Pie charts as
symbols on the map would be cool but not a priority as there are more
suitable tools for that.

bram


On 20 February 2014 17:27, Bob Jolliffe bobjolli...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi

 I am no expert here, but I was talking last week with someone who had just
 been on a GIS course.  She made the interesting observation that when you
 are displaying numerical data as shaded regions on a map, you should not
 mix primary colours in the same gradated scale because what you end up with
 is sort of rubic cube kaleidoscope of colour rather than a clear gradation
 of values.

 If that is good advice then I think our demo site could be improved as
 presently it seems like a good example of bad practice, where we have mixed
 red, green and blue with joyful and cheerful abandon :-)

 I had a go to change the Diarrhoea map on the dashboard at
 http://apps.dhis2.org/dev/dhis-web-dashboard-integration/index.action and
 I think it is true that it conveys the data better than the extreme
 multi-coloured ones around it.  Even if the distribution of data between
 bands is not so interesting.  Anyone agree or disagree? (the data will only
 be there for a short while longer)

 If there is a best practice to be had here regarding colour selection I
 guess we should promote it, particularly with default offerings so that
 people have to be quite deliberate in order to go astray.

 Bob

 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-users
 Post to : dhis2-users@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-users
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-users
Post to : dhis2-users@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-users
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Dhis2-users] GIS best practice choice of colours

2014-02-20 Thread Marta Vila
I agree with Bob and since the topic is on the table... I´ve been wondering
for a long time now...

Why the default legend is painting in green the high values and red the low
ones?
I believe that it may apply in some cases, but generally... it ends up in
showing areas high incidence of cases in green.. and low ones in red...
which is not very intuitive for me...

Although...it could be solved if we don´t mix primary colors any more


On 20 February 2014 16:54, Bram Piot bram.p...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi Bob,

 I don't think there's one single rule that will fit all when it comes to
 choosing your symbols or colours for a thematic map depicting numeric
 values. There's nothing wrong with say a red/yellow/green colour scheme if
 you are showing for example reporting rates, where low (red) = bad and high
 (green) = good. If I were to map out HIV prevalence, then I may go from
 green (low values) to red (high prevalence). More neutral variables such
 as population density are usually better off with a graduated scheme from
 light to dark, e.g. pale to dark brown.

 Maybe the only basic rules are that there should be some logic in the
 choice of colour ramps, and to keep it simple (don't overload your map,
 don't use 15 different classes each with a different colour when you only
 have 20 districts!). I must agree that the current colour scheme for ANC1
 and ANC2 coverage by chiefdom in the demo site can definitely be improved:
 too many colours that are not in a logical order. Your diarrhea map looks
 better, though it would be even better if you changed the classification
 type to equal counts rather than equal intervals.

 Agree with what has been requested recently by Knut: option to display
 polygon data (e.g district) by symbol, not just colour, and include more
 symbols because currently it's rather limited. Especially for categorical
 values the legend behaviour could be greatly improved. Bar/Pie charts as
 symbols on the map would be cool but not a priority as there are more
 suitable tools for that.

 bram


 On 20 February 2014 17:27, Bob Jolliffe bobjolli...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi

 I am no expert here, but I was talking last week with someone who had
 just been on a GIS course.  She made the interesting observation that when
 you are displaying numerical data as shaded regions on a map, you should
 not mix primary colours in the same gradated scale because what you end up
 with is sort of rubic cube kaleidoscope of colour rather than a clear
 gradation of values.

 If that is good advice then I think our demo site could be improved as
 presently it seems like a good example of bad practice, where we have mixed
 red, green and blue with joyful and cheerful abandon :-)

 I had a go to change the Diarrhoea map on the dashboard at
 http://apps.dhis2.org/dev/dhis-web-dashboard-integration/index.action and
 I think it is true that it conveys the data better than the extreme
 multi-coloured ones around it.  Even if the distribution of data between
 bands is not so interesting.  Anyone agree or disagree? (the data will only
 be there for a short while longer)

 If there is a best practice to be had here regarding colour selection I
 guess we should promote it, particularly with default offerings so that
 people have to be quite deliberate in order to go astray.

 Bob

 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-users
 Post to : dhis2-users@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-users
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp



 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-users
 Post to : dhis2-users@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-users
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-users
Post to : dhis2-users@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-users
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Dhis2-users] GIS best practice choice of colours

2014-02-20 Thread Nicola Hobby
Marta, my only thought is that in terms of performance indicators, higher
data points would indicate better performance, while lower points indicate
poor performance


On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Marta Vila martav...@gmail.com wrote:

 I agree with Bob and since the topic is on the table... I´ve been
 wondering for a long time now...

 Why the default legend is painting in green the high values and red the
 low ones?
 I believe that it may apply in some cases, but generally... it ends up in
 showing areas high incidence of cases in green.. and low ones in red...
 which is not very intuitive for me...

 Although...it could be solved if we don´t mix primary colors any more


 On 20 February 2014 16:54, Bram Piot bram.p...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi Bob,

 I don't think there's one single rule that will fit all when it comes to
 choosing your symbols or colours for a thematic map depicting numeric
 values. There's nothing wrong with say a red/yellow/green colour scheme if
 you are showing for example reporting rates, where low (red) = bad and high
 (green) = good. If I were to map out HIV prevalence, then I may go from
 green (low values) to red (high prevalence). More neutral variables such
 as population density are usually better off with a graduated scheme from
 light to dark, e.g. pale to dark brown.

 Maybe the only basic rules are that there should be some logic in the
 choice of colour ramps, and to keep it simple (don't overload your map,
 don't use 15 different classes each with a different colour when you only
 have 20 districts!). I must agree that the current colour scheme for ANC1
 and ANC2 coverage by chiefdom in the demo site can definitely be improved:
 too many colours that are not in a logical order. Your diarrhea map looks
 better, though it would be even better if you changed the classification
 type to equal counts rather than equal intervals.

 Agree with what has been requested recently by Knut: option to display
 polygon data (e.g district) by symbol, not just colour, and include more
 symbols because currently it's rather limited. Especially for categorical
 values the legend behaviour could be greatly improved. Bar/Pie charts as
 symbols on the map would be cool but not a priority as there are more
 suitable tools for that.

 bram


 On 20 February 2014 17:27, Bob Jolliffe bobjolli...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi

 I am no expert here, but I was talking last week with someone who had
 just been on a GIS course.  She made the interesting observation that when
 you are displaying numerical data as shaded regions on a map, you should
 not mix primary colours in the same gradated scale because what you end up
 with is sort of rubic cube kaleidoscope of colour rather than a clear
 gradation of values.

 If that is good advice then I think our demo site could be improved as
 presently it seems like a good example of bad practice, where we have mixed
 red, green and blue with joyful and cheerful abandon :-)

 I had a go to change the Diarrhoea map on the dashboard at
 http://apps.dhis2.org/dev/dhis-web-dashboard-integration/index.action and
 I think it is true that it conveys the data better than the extreme
 multi-coloured ones around it.  Even if the distribution of data between
 bands is not so interesting.  Anyone agree or disagree? (the data will only
 be there for a short while longer)

 If there is a best practice to be had here regarding colour selection I
 guess we should promote it, particularly with default offerings so that
 people have to be quite deliberate in order to go astray.

 Bob

 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-users
 Post to : dhis2-users@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-users
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp



 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-users
 Post to : dhis2-users@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-users
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp



 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-users
 Post to : dhis2-users@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-users
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp




-- 
Nicola Hobby
MIS Program Manager

Office: +1 (202) 469-6685
Skype: nicolahobby

*Connect with PSI*
Website http://www.psi.org/  |  Blog http://blog.psiimpact.com/  |
Twitter https://twitter.com/PSIimpact  |
Facebookhttps://www.facebook.com/PSIHealthyLives  |
 YouTube http://www.youtube.com/user/healthybehaviors

http://www.psi.org/http://blog.psiimpact.com/
https://twitter.com/PSIimpact
  https://www.facebook.com/PSIHealthyLives
http://www.youtube.com/user/healthybehaviors


Donate to PSI
www.psi.org. 94.5 cents of every dollar raised directly supports PSI
programs.
___
Mailing list: 

Re: [Dhis2-users] GIS best practice choice of colours

2014-02-20 Thread Knut Staring
Available as JSON:
http://colorbrewer2.org/export/colorbrewer.json


On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Knut Staring knu...@gmail.com wrote:

 http://colorbrewer2.org/


 On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Jan Henrik Øverland 
 janhenrik.overl...@gmail.com wrote:

 Others will have to comment on this, but what we should do anyway is to
 add more colours to the palette to allow for a combination of the two -
 fixed class breaks (predefined legend set) and that nice colour/value
 gradation Bob mentioned.


 On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Bob Jolliffe bobjolli...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hi

 I am no expert here, but I was talking last week with someone who had
 just been on a GIS course.  She made the interesting observation that when
 you are displaying numerical data as shaded regions on a map, you should
 not mix primary colours in the same gradated scale because what you end up
 with is sort of rubic cube kaleidoscope of colour rather than a clear
 gradation of values.

 If that is good advice then I think our demo site could be improved as
 presently it seems like a good example of bad practice, where we have mixed
 red, green and blue with joyful and cheerful abandon :-)

 I had a go to change the Diarrhoea map on the dashboard at
 http://apps.dhis2.org/dev/dhis-web-dashboard-integration/index.action and
 I think it is true that it conveys the data better than the extreme
 multi-coloured ones around it.  Even if the distribution of data between
 bands is not so interesting.  Anyone agree or disagree? (the data will only
 be there for a short while longer)

 If there is a best practice to be had here regarding colour selection I
 guess we should promote it, particularly with default offerings so that
 people have to be quite deliberate in order to go astray.

 Bob

 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-users
 Post to : dhis2-users@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-users
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp



 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-users
 Post to : dhis2-users@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-users
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp




 --
 Knut Staring
 Dept. of Informatics, University of Oslo
 +4791880522
 http://dhis2.org




-- 
Knut Staring
Dept. of Informatics, University of Oslo
+4791880522
http://dhis2.org
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-users
Post to : dhis2-users@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-users
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Dhis2-users] GIS best practice choice of colours

2014-02-20 Thread Knut Staring
Exactly: Many children sick = BAD, Many children vaccinated = GOOD


On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Marta Vila martav...@gmail.com wrote:

 Yes Nicola, you are right... it is a good combination for that case...
 also for high coverage of vaccination... for instance.

 I was thinking more in ... high number of cases of ..., high rate of
 incidence of..., that generally are not very positive






 On 20 February 2014 17:19, Nicola Hobby nho...@psi.org wrote:

 Marta, my only thought is that in terms of performance indicators, higher
 data points would indicate better performance, while lower points indicate
 poor performance


 On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Marta Vila martav...@gmail.com wrote:

 I agree with Bob and since the topic is on the table... I´ve been
 wondering for a long time now...

 Why the default legend is painting in green the high values and red the
 low ones?
 I believe that it may apply in some cases, but generally... it ends up
 in showing areas high incidence of cases in green.. and low ones in red...
 which is not very intuitive for me...

 Although...it could be solved if we don´t mix primary colors any more


 On 20 February 2014 16:54, Bram Piot bram.p...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi Bob,

 I don't think there's one single rule that will fit all when it comes
 to choosing your symbols or colours for a thematic map depicting numeric
 values. There's nothing wrong with say a red/yellow/green colour scheme if
 you are showing for example reporting rates, where low (red) = bad and high
 (green) = good. If I were to map out HIV prevalence, then I may go from
 green (low values) to red (high prevalence). More neutral variables such
 as population density are usually better off with a graduated scheme from
 light to dark, e.g. pale to dark brown.

 Maybe the only basic rules are that there should be some logic in the
 choice of colour ramps, and to keep it simple (don't overload your map,
 don't use 15 different classes each with a different colour when you only
 have 20 districts!). I must agree that the current colour scheme for ANC1
 and ANC2 coverage by chiefdom in the demo site can definitely be improved:
 too many colours that are not in a logical order. Your diarrhea map looks
 better, though it would be even better if you changed the classification
 type to equal counts rather than equal intervals.

 Agree with what has been requested recently by Knut: option to display
 polygon data (e.g district) by symbol, not just colour, and include more
 symbols because currently it's rather limited. Especially for categorical
 values the legend behaviour could be greatly improved. Bar/Pie charts as
 symbols on the map would be cool but not a priority as there are more
 suitable tools for that.

 bram


 On 20 February 2014 17:27, Bob Jolliffe bobjolli...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi

 I am no expert here, but I was talking last week with someone who had
 just been on a GIS course.  She made the interesting observation that when
 you are displaying numerical data as shaded regions on a map, you should
 not mix primary colours in the same gradated scale because what you end up
 with is sort of rubic cube kaleidoscope of colour rather than a clear
 gradation of values.

 If that is good advice then I think our demo site could be improved as
 presently it seems like a good example of bad practice, where we have 
 mixed
 red, green and blue with joyful and cheerful abandon :-)

 I had a go to change the Diarrhoea map on the dashboard at
 http://apps.dhis2.org/dev/dhis-web-dashboard-integration/index.action and
 I think it is true that it conveys the data better than the extreme
 multi-coloured ones around it.  Even if the distribution of data between
 bands is not so interesting.  Anyone agree or disagree? (the data will 
 only
 be there for a short while longer)

 If there is a best practice to be had here regarding colour selection
 I guess we should promote it, particularly with default offerings so that
 people have to be quite deliberate in order to go astray.

 Bob

 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-users
 Post to : dhis2-users@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-users
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp



 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-users
 Post to : dhis2-users@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-users
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp



 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-users
 Post to : dhis2-users@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-users
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp




 --
 Nicola Hobby
 MIS Program Manager

 Office: +1 (202) 469-6685
 Skype: nicolahobby

 *Connect with PSI*
 Website http://www.psi.org/  |  Blog http://blog.psiimpact.com/  |
 Twitter 

Re: [Dhis2-users] GIS best practice choice of colours

2014-02-20 Thread Bob Jolliffe
Hi Bram

Interesting point about the red-yellow-green combo.  These are the traffic
light colours which are apparently sufficiently ubiquitous that you can say
red=bad and green=good without even explaining further.  If snooker was as
well known as traffic lights we could do a whole range from red through to
pink :-)

But in general, using hues as per Knut's colour brewer link is going to be
the best bet for most cases of numeric data.  You can even print to black
and white printers and maintain the message.

Good point about equal counts.  I actually did do that but somehow it
rendered different on the dashboard.

Bob

On 20 February 2014 15:54, Bram Piot bram.p...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi Bob,

 I don't think there's one single rule that will fit all when it comes to
 choosing your symbols or colours for a thematic map depicting numeric
 values. There's nothing wrong with say a red/yellow/green colour scheme if
 you are showing for example reporting rates, where low (red) = bad and high
 (green) = good. If I were to map out HIV prevalence, then I may go from
 green (low values) to red (high prevalence). More neutral variables such
 as population density are usually better off with a graduated scheme from
 light to dark, e.g. pale to dark brown.

 Maybe the only basic rules are that there should be some logic in the
 choice of colour ramps, and to keep it simple (don't overload your map,
 don't use 15 different classes each with a different colour when you only
 have 20 districts!). I must agree that the current colour scheme for ANC1
 and ANC2 coverage by chiefdom in the demo site can definitely be improved:
 too many colours that are not in a logical order. Your diarrhea map looks
 better, though it would be even better if you changed the classification
 type to equal counts rather than equal intervals.

 Agree with what has been requested recently by Knut: option to display
 polygon data (e.g district) by symbol, not just colour, and include more
 symbols because currently it's rather limited. Especially for categorical
 values the legend behaviour could be greatly improved. Bar/Pie charts as
 symbols on the map would be cool but not a priority as there are more
 suitable tools for that.

 bram


 On 20 February 2014 17:27, Bob Jolliffe bobjolli...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi

 I am no expert here, but I was talking last week with someone who had
 just been on a GIS course.  She made the interesting observation that when
 you are displaying numerical data as shaded regions on a map, you should
 not mix primary colours in the same gradated scale because what you end up
 with is sort of rubic cube kaleidoscope of colour rather than a clear
 gradation of values.

 If that is good advice then I think our demo site could be improved as
 presently it seems like a good example of bad practice, where we have mixed
 red, green and blue with joyful and cheerful abandon :-)

 I had a go to change the Diarrhoea map on the dashboard at
 http://apps.dhis2.org/dev/dhis-web-dashboard-integration/index.action and
 I think it is true that it conveys the data better than the extreme
 multi-coloured ones around it.  Even if the distribution of data between
 bands is not so interesting.  Anyone agree or disagree? (the data will only
 be there for a short while longer)

 If there is a best practice to be had here regarding colour selection I
 guess we should promote it, particularly with default offerings so that
 people have to be quite deliberate in order to go astray.

 Bob

 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-users
 Post to : dhis2-users@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-users
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp



___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-users
Post to : dhis2-users@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-users
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Dhis2-users] GIS best practice choice of colours

2014-02-20 Thread Jan Henrik Øverland
I have extended the color palette. Should allow for a combination of
colour/value gradation and fixed classes.

[image: Inline image 1]

[image: Inline image 2]
inline: cp.pnginline: legend.png___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-users
Post to : dhis2-users@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dhis2-users
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp