Re: bootDoc - advanced DDoc framework using Twitter's Bootstrap

2012-05-08 Thread Jonas Drewsen
I guess most devs have a pretty wide screen. How about letting 
the overview of the current selected module be located to the 
right of the modules listing when there is enough horizontal 
space. Something like:


http://dl.dropbox.com/u/188292/flow.png

I guess that it could be accomplished by using left floats and 
min-widths in order not to break it for people with smaller 
screens.


/Jonas



Re: Introducing vibe.d!

2012-05-08 Thread James Miller

On Monday, 7 May 2012 at 18:51:26 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
I think one of us (Jan) has something for better form handling 
locally, not yet committed, and I would count that as something 
that would still fit well into the core package. But in 
general, I think the number of features should not grow too 
much anymore - the core should contain all that is necessary 
for _most_ applications and that with an interface that is as 
comfortable as possible.


The main scope of modules, I would say, are higher level 
features, features that are not as widely used or those which 
provide alternatives to the functions in the core library. 
Basic, common functionality, however, is always a candidate for 
the core (OAuth(2) is on the way for example).


Another - quite banal - criterion could be if we would actually 
use a feature ourselves, at least a bit; simply because if we 
don't use it, we cannot test it without further time 
investments and it could be unclear (to us) how well such a 
component actually works (e.g. wrt. stable releases). Also, the 
implementation/API style of a feature should match the rest of 
the core library. The MySQL driver would be an example that 
currently fails both criterions and thus is a module.


Maybe it would also be good to establish a defined procedure 
such as: New features are implemented as modules first and 
after a review it's decided if they should go in for the next 
release. I don't have a real opinion on this yet and I'm 
basically completely open for suggestions.


Sound good, now I'm just hoping that porting my forms stuff to 
the core forms isn't going to be too hard :D.


Otherwise it seems you have a rough idea of what constitutes a 
module and what is a feature, and that is a good start. I think 
an informal review process for module - feature promotion would 
be good, since then the code can be available for use earlier. 
Also, there is something to be said for making official vibe 
modules, ones maintained, or at least, approved by the vibe team 
and given slightly more prominence. This can keep the core system 
small, but still allow the vibe team to provide more 
functionality, especially if it is common functionality.


--
James Miller


D on AOJ

2012-05-08 Thread Masahiro Nakagawa
AOJ, Aizu Online Judge, also supports D programming language with 
dmd 2.059 :)


http://judge.u-aizu.ac.jp/onlinejudge/system_info.jsp

See Judge Server #3 (2012-).


On Saturday, 14 April 2012 at 10:22:18 UTC, Masahiro Nakagawa 
wrote:

This announcement is mainly for Japanese programmers.

AtCoder is a new programming contest site in Japan.

I and other D programmers begged AtCoder team to support D.
In the result, AtCoder supports D (dmd 2.058) officially.
Thanks to AtCoder team!

Today, 1st contest will be held.

http://arc001.contest.atcoder.jp/
Available languages are on the foot of a page.


D community in Japan is spreading year by year :)