Re: Five Projects Selected for SAOC 2019
On 2019-08-26 05:55, Andrej Mitrovic wrote: I'm guessing this means we might even be able to use multiple versions of Phobos one day. However before we do that, we will really need to fix the use of globals in Phobos. I don't think that's necessary. All symbols will have the version be part of the mangled name. -- /Jacob Carlborg
Re: Five Projects Selected for SAOC 2019
On Monday, 26 August 2019 at 11:03:51 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote: On 2019-08-26 05:55, Andrej Mitrovic wrote: I'm guessing this means we might even be able to use multiple versions of Phobos one day. However before we do that, we will really need to fix the use of globals in Phobos. I don't think that's necessary. All symbols will have the version be part of the mangled name. so, the target of project is to make mangled name for using by app 2+ version of one lib/module? cuz in that case u cannot fix situation when libV1.obj will land to libV2 somehow (through globals, AA.. ) and binary implementation is different. probably will be panic, data loss and other bad things.
Re: Five Projects Selected for SAOC 2019
On Sunday, 25 August 2019 at 13:38:24 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: The Symmetry Autumn of Code 2019 application selection process has come to an end. This year, we've got five projects instead of three. Congratulations to everyone who was selected! You can read about them and their projects over at the D Blog: https://dlang.org/blog/2019/08/25/saoc-2019-projects-and-participants/ Sorry, I haven't been following. Don't we already have an implementation of the "Create a CI or other infrastructure for measuring D’s progress and performance" project? I just haven't been maintaining it because there hasn't been a lot of interest in it while it was being maintained. Here's the original blog post: https://blog.thecybershadow.net/2015/05/05/is-d-slim-yet/ I'll give it a kick and get it back online if there is interest. Seems wasteful to reimplement it from scratch, though.
