Re: QtD is resumed
Max Samukha Wrote: As there is interest in the project, we have decided to proceed. Stay tuned. Perhaps someone could update the website to mention that the project is still active? http://www.dsource.org/projects/qtd
Re: QtD is resumed
On 10/12/2010 09:49 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 10/12/10 13:20 CDT, Max Samukha wrote: As there is interest in the project, we have decided to proceed. Stay tuned. Awesome news! I think we need to take the hiccup as a warning to be more mindful of compilers and library bugs reported on behalf of QtD. Andrei Thanks! I find it reasonable to lower our expectations of the language/tools for a while. I've decided to go on without const and other goodies like the scarcely implemented alias this. For now, the most important for me are the issues with struct lifetime management. For example, destructors should be called on global struct instances. And this one is critical: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3516 It would be great if we soon had a complete and debugged implementation of the struct semantics described in TDPL.
Re: QtD is resumed
Max Samukha wrote: On 10/12/2010 09:49 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 10/12/10 13:20 CDT, Max Samukha wrote: As there is interest in the project, we have decided to proceed. Stay tuned. Awesome news! I think we need to take the hiccup as a warning to be more mindful of compilers and library bugs reported on behalf of QtD. Andrei Thanks! I find it reasonable to lower our expectations of the language/tools for a while. I've decided to go on without const and other goodies like the scarcely implemented alias this. For now, the most important for me are the issues with struct lifetime management. For example, destructors should be called on global struct instances. And this one is critical: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3516 Yes, I know it's an important one.
Re: QtD is resumed
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 19:39:26 -0400, Jesse Phillips jessekphillip...@gmail.com wrote: This is indeed good news. I don't do enough with GUIs, but having GUI library(s) will be a big requirement in D succeeding Good Luck. Qt ia not only GUI - it also have network, database and data structures classes. Which makes me wonder (@to the Qt guys): do you plan, once the data structures bindings are done, to add the ranges interfaces to them?
QtD is resumed
As there is interest in the project, we have decided to proceed. Stay tuned.
Re: QtD is resumed
On 10/12/10 13:20 CDT, Max Samukha wrote: As there is interest in the project, we have decided to proceed. Stay tuned. Awesome news! I think we need to take the hiccup as a warning to be more mindful of compilers and library bugs reported on behalf of QtD. Andrei
Re: QtD is resumed
Max Samukha wrote: As there is interest in the project, we have decided to proceed. Stay tuned. I'm drinking one on this, cheers!
Re: QtD is resumed
Max Samukha Wrote: As there is interest in the project, we have decided to proceed. Stay tuned. This is indeed good news. I don't do enough with GUIs, but having GUI library(s) will be a big requirement in D succeeding Good Luck. Is anyone using QtD also on the beta mailing list? Don has taking on a point that we should not have known regressions newer than something like dmd 2.37 (until all known regressions have been eliminated) And this will be good for all projects. And Gour, I suppose you get some thanks for giving QtD the pat on the back they missed. Good luck.
Re: QtD is resumed
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 21:20:47 +0300, Max Samukha spam...@d-coding.com wrote: As there is interest in the project, we have decided to proceed. Stay tuned. Thanks! I'm not using QtD in my current project but it is 100% sure that I'll want to use it in the future. I would love to help but I need a lot more practice with the language (and time).
Re: QtD is resumed
Max Samukha spam...@d-coding.com wrote: As there is interest in the project, we have decided to proceed. Stay tuned. Yay! Good luck, and hope Walter and co will give your bug reports some higher priority. I think that is the right thing to do now. -- Simen
