Re: Awesomium D wrappers/bindings
Am 02.01.2013 08:48, schrieb evilrat:
arrays initialized with nulls right? anyway just setting only first
symbol in text field(it's wchar[4]) is enough.
Not wchar arrays:
import std.stdio;
void main() {
writefln(0x%x, wchar.init);
}
this prints: 0x
Re: Awesomium D wrappers/bindings
i'm figured out why awesomium doesn't load on osx, they have wrong instruction on their wiki. i'll try to do D app project for xcode later. i wish there be already existing template for this :( On Sunday, 30 December 2012 at 10:41:22 UTC, David wrote: And don't forget to set the wchar16 array to cast(wchar)0 otherwise it will display garbage (it needs a terminator) arrays initialized with nulls right? anyway just setting only first symbol in text field(it's wchar[4]) is enough.
Re: Awesomium D wrappers/bindings
Am 30.12.2012 07:14, schrieb evilrat: i hate myself sometimes. figured out what the stuck is wrong. it was my raw input problems. so awesomium just need key down without text, and for text input one would need just set type and text fields. And don't forget to set the wchar16 array to cast(wchar)0 otherwise it will display garbage (it needs a terminator)
Re: Awesomium D wrappers/bindings
Am 29.12.2012 08:20, schrieb evilrat: i can't make that damn raw input spit out unicode chars, and by some reason awesomium internal func don't eat key codes too(well it eat, but no chars in input), this is the only problem left before wrapper become somehow useful... Now that you say it, in my demo that also doesn't work, probably because of my ugly int - dchar - wchar casts
Re: Awesomium D wrappers/bindings
doh.. now it inputs 2 char in a row, this is really stupid because i'm not sending anything but single char event
Re: Awesomium D wrappers/bindings
i hate myself sometimes. figured out what the stuck is wrong. it was my raw input problems. so awesomium just need key down without text, and for text input one would need just set type and text fields.
Re: Awesomium D wrappers/bindings
i can't make that damn raw input spit out unicode chars, and by some reason awesomium internal func don't eat key codes too(well it eat, but no chars in input), this is the only problem left before wrapper become somehow useful...
Re: Awesomium D wrappers/bindings
Am 27.12.2012 05:30, schrieb evilrat: On Wednesday, 26 December 2012 at 16:14:11 UTC, David wrote: but i agree, glfw and sdl sucks, No, only SDL sucks also glfw has redundant call(glclearcolor) each frame :) That is not redundant, it's not the job of GLFW to do OpenGL stuff you're supposed to do this is OT, but ... glfw does context creation, manages window and so on, it does same job as old glut does, but in drawing func callback it call glclearcolor each frame!(setting color to clear viewport), may be it is a bug or typo, but it is really bad - opengl is a state machine and constant switching one of the states(which also already has same value, unless user want to manually set this which is even more strange to call it) is bad for performance, anyway glfw is good for small samples and demos. There is no drawing func callback, we are probably speaking of two different glfw version (even though I don't know of such a callback even in glfw 2.7) and thanks for info about old c api.
Re: Awesomium D wrappers/bindings
On Thursday, 27 December 2012 at 10:35:20 UTC, David wrote: There is no drawing func callback, we are probably speaking of two different glfw version (even though I don't know of such a callback even in glfw 2.7) well ok i must be forgot something, but i clearly remember that bug(or 'feature'?)
Re: Awesomium D wrappers/bindings
Am 26.12.2012 02:27, schrieb evilrat: On Tuesday, 25 December 2012 at 15:35:02 UTC, David wrote: Oh wow it works! ─[dav1d@ArchBox][~/workspaces/d/awesomium_test]╼ dmd -I../awesomium -L-L. -L-lawesomium-1.6.5 short.d ─[dav1d@ArchBox][~/workspaces/d/awesomium_test]╼ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=. ./short https://gist.github.com/4373754 that is amzing! yeah cool, but we need a OOP wrapper too that mimics C++ API, thats what i'm going to do ;) I started with an abstraction: https://github.com/Dav1dde/wonne Currently I've done only strings, I think I can add the rest today
Re: Awesomium D wrappers/bindings
On Thursday, 27 December 2012 at 13:16:33 UTC, David wrote: I started with an abstraction: https://github.com/Dav1dde/wonne Currently I've done only strings, I think I can add the rest today just to mention, last time i tried D wchar with awesomium wchar it was pure fail, but may be i've just a bit messed up somewhere
Re: Awesomium D wrappers/bindings
Am 27.12.2012 15:30, schrieb evilrat: On Thursday, 27 December 2012 at 13:16:33 UTC, David wrote: I started with an abstraction: https://github.com/Dav1dde/wonne Currently I've done only strings, I think I can add the rest today just to mention, last time i tried D wchar with awesomium wchar it was pure fail, but may be i've just a bit messed up somewhere It works fine (at least injecting char events as wchar), probably you mixed up wchar_t and wchar16
Re: Awesomium D wrappers/bindings
Webcore, done Webview, done (except the callbacks) Renderbuffer, done And bindings are waiting to get into deimos: https://github.com/D-Programming-Deimos/awesomium/pull/1
Re: Awesomium D wrappers/bindings
On Thursday, 27 December 2012 at 17:31:58 UTC, David wrote: Webcore, done Webview, done (except the callbacks) Renderbuffer, done And bindings are waiting to get into deimos: https://github.com/D-Programming-Deimos/awesomium/pull/1 will there be OOP wrapper in deimos? or deimos is purely for C header translation?
Re: Awesomium D wrappers/bindings
On Thursday, 27 December 2012 at 17:31:58 UTC, David wrote: Webcore, done Webview, done (except the callbacks) Renderbuffer, done And bindings are waiting to get into deimos: https://github.com/D-Programming-Deimos/awesomium/pull/1 will there be OOP wrapper? or deimos is purely for C headers translation?
Re: Awesomium D wrappers/bindings
On 12/27/2012 6:17 PM, evilrat wrote: will there be OOP wrapper? or deimos is purely for C headers translation? Deimos is purely for C header translation.
Re: Awesomium D wrappers/bindings
On Thursday, 27 December 2012 at 17:31:58 UTC, David wrote: Webcore, done Webview, done (except the callbacks) Renderbuffer, done And bindings are waiting to get into deimos: https://github.com/D-Programming-Deimos/awesomium/pull/1 will there be OOP wrapper? or deimos is purely for C header translation?
Re: Awesomium D wrappers/bindings
oh god. it was lagging this morning, sry for flood
Re: Awesomium D wrappers/bindings
On Wednesday, 26 December 2012 at 05:21:03 UTC, evilrat wrote: On Wednesday, 26 December 2012 at 05:08:47 UTC, evilrat wrote: On Tuesday, 25 December 2012 at 15:35:02 UTC, David wrote: Oh wow it works! by the way, how do u launch this on linux(my system is ubuntu 12.10 x86)? i take my mom netbook and it doesn't work, almost same crap as on osx, missing shared libs, though it in the same folder. i don't build my own stuff or samples, just trying to get webflow demo working oops. sorry i'm just copy that awesomium conf and add local path to shared lib. it also by some reason requires libXss(screensaver X11 lib) but it works now. it's really fast, webflow forks cool even on old crappy atom 1.8ghz with 1gb ram \0/ You need libjpg6 It is fast for you? I think I am doing something wrong, rendering a testpage (walterbright.com) takes quite a while, building an opengl demo now. Btw. OOP wrapper is planed if I get it working
Re: Awesomium D wrappers/bindings
On Wednesday, 26 December 2012 at 11:39:22 UTC, dav1d wrote: You need libjpg6 It is fast for you? I think I am doing something wrong, rendering a testpage (walterbright.com) takes quite a while, building an opengl demo now. Btw. OOP wrapper is planed if I get it working i think this libs shipped with system... webflow demo uses sdl(and so it's opengl). it works really fast, smooth scrolling and navigation, pages loads very fast, renderer draws about 40-60 fps i guess. just to mention, i have quite rare netbook with radeon hd3450, so perhaps this speed is reached with the help of the gpu. and, concerning bindings, do you want make it as your own project, or perhaps you may send me the patches so i'll add you to contributors list? of course everything should be MIT licensed so it will be usable to everyone, including commerce purposes where gpl is no go(if someone buys awesomium license and want use D as main language muahahah).
Re: Awesomium D wrappers/bindings
Am 26.12.2012 13:01, schrieb evilrat: On Wednesday, 26 December 2012 at 11:39:22 UTC, dav1d wrote: You need libjpg6 It is fast for you? I think I am doing something wrong, rendering a testpage (walterbright.com) takes quite a while, building an opengl demo now. Btw. OOP wrapper is planed if I get it working i think this libs shipped with system... Not e.g. with archlinux which has libjpeg7 webflow demo uses sdl(and so it's opengl). it works really fast, smooth scrolling and navigation, pages loads very fast, renderer draws about 40-60 fps i guess. just to mention, i have quite rare netbook with radeon hd3450, so perhaps this speed is reached with the help of the gpu. Ah I meant loading a website initially, the webflow demo simply reuses the buffer. and, concerning bindings, do you want make it as your own project, or perhaps you may send me the patches so i'll add you to contributors list? of course everything should be MIT licensed so it will be usable to everyone, including commerce purposes where gpl is no go(if someone buys awesomium license and want use D as main language muahahah). I want to send an inclusion request to deimos, if I find Walters e-mail
Re: Awesomium D wrappers/bindings
On Wednesday, 26 December 2012 at 13:39:20 UTC, David wrote: I want to send an inclusion request to deimos, if I find Walters e-mail his mail is something like walter at digitalmars dt com, maybe u may find it on forums. but i doubt it will be useful as a just C header translation
Re: Awesomium D wrappers/bindings
Am 26.12.2012 16:03, schrieb evilrat: On Wednesday, 26 December 2012 at 13:39:20 UTC, David wrote: I want to send an inclusion request to deimos, if I find Walters e-mail his mail is something like walter at digitalmars dt com, maybe u may find it on forums. but i doubt it will be useful as a just C header translation I found it nospam1 walter it is, that's what deimos is for, C - D translations
Re: Awesomium D wrappers/bindings
On Wednesday, 26 December 2012 at 15:06:32 UTC, David wrote: I found it nospam1 walter it is, that's what deimos is for, C - D translations okay :( i was thinking it's for cool wrappers including OOP and not only. now i remember why i've done my own glext and gl translations after using deimos ...
Re: Awesomium D wrappers/bindings
Am 26.12.2012 16:18, schrieb evilrat: On Wednesday, 26 December 2012 at 15:06:32 UTC, David wrote: I found it nospam1 walter it is, that's what deimos is for, C - D translations okay :( i was thinking it's for cool wrappers including OOP and not only. now i remember why i've done my own glext and gl translations after using deimos ... I just found out that keyinput making useable for awesomium is a pain, you know a trick?
Re: Awesomium D wrappers/bindings
On Wednesday, 26 December 2012 at 15:21:08 UTC, David wrote: I just found out that keyinput making useable for awesomium is a pain, you know a trick? no. a most simple way is to do ctfe function or mixin or template to convert chars to awesomium key codes, but i think it may be not portable and would require own version for each platform, though i may be wrong. also awesomium 1.7 c++ api has function to do this GetKeyIdentifierFromVirtualKeyCode, doesn't look to deep in 1.6 may be there is something similar
Re: Awesomium D wrappers/bindings
Am 26.12.2012 16:31, schrieb evilrat: On Wednesday, 26 December 2012 at 15:21:08 UTC, David wrote: I just found out that keyinput making useable for awesomium is a pain, you know a trick? no. a most simple way is to do ctfe function or mixin or template to convert chars to awesomium key codes, but i think it may be not portable and would require own version for each platform, though i may be wrong. also awesomium 1.7 c++ api has function to do this GetKeyIdentifierFromVirtualKeyCode, doesn't look to deep in 1.6 may be there is something similar There is the same but, there is no C counterpart and it does something different.
Re: Awesomium D wrappers/bindings
On Wednesday, 26 December 2012 at 15:35:56 UTC, David wrote: There is the same but, there is no C counterpart and it does something different. look at awesomiumgl demo, there is some example on using it. also it may worth looking at sdl(webflow) example, in webflow there is just simple mapping for this job but sdl provides crossplatform key codes unlike native system codes. and at last for C bindings it is possible to manually load one 1 c++ function.
Re: Awesomium D wrappers/bindings
Am 26.12.2012 16:44, schrieb evilrat: On Wednesday, 26 December 2012 at 15:35:56 UTC, David wrote: There is the same but, there is no C counterpart and it does something different. look at awesomiumgl demo, there is some example on using it. also it may worth looking at sdl(webflow) example, in webflow there is just simple mapping for this job but sdl provides crossplatform key codes unlike native system codes. and at last for C bindings it is possible to manually load one 1 c++ function. The c++ function isn't even needed. And meh SDL, using GLFW, I know that I have to map the keys, I simply thought you maybe already did it or knew a trick.
Re: Awesomium D wrappers/bindings
On Wednesday, 26 December 2012 at 15:46:12 UTC, David wrote: The c++ function isn't even needed. And meh SDL, using GLFW, I know that I have to map the keys, I simply thought you maybe already did it or knew a trick. not yet :( i've not finished callbacks stuff, then i would see if can find something. but i agree, glfw and sdl sucks, also glfw has redundant call(glclearcolor) each frame :) btw, may be u can try load that func for testing? should be not that hard, only finding mangled name is a bit problematic, but it's simple like this nm awesomium.so | grep part_of_funcname
Re: Awesomium D wrappers/bindings
but i agree, glfw and sdl sucks, No, only SDL sucks also glfw has redundant call(glclearcolor) each frame :) That is not redundant, it's not the job of GLFW to do OpenGL stuff you're supposed to do btw, may be u can try load that func for testing? should be not that hard, only finding mangled name is a bit problematic, but it's simple like this nm awesomium.so | grep part_of_funcname Got it working! (textinput and arrowkeys, didn't translate the others) http://imgur.com/a4d6f You don't need that func for the c-api (as it seems)
Re: Awesomium D wrappers/bindings
On Wednesday, 26 December 2012 at 16:14:11 UTC, David wrote: but i agree, glfw and sdl sucks, No, only SDL sucks also glfw has redundant call(glclearcolor) each frame :) That is not redundant, it's not the job of GLFW to do OpenGL stuff you're supposed to do this is OT, but ... glfw does context creation, manages window and so on, it does same job as old glut does, but in drawing func callback it call glclearcolor each frame!(setting color to clear viewport), may be it is a bug or typo, but it is really bad - opengl is a state machine and constant switching one of the states(which also already has same value, unless user want to manually set this which is even more strange to call it) is bad for performance, anyway glfw is good for small samples and demos. and thanks for info about old c api.
Re: Awesomium D wrappers/bindings
trying to get xcode project, all fine but i just can't do that damn dylib to work with awesomium.framework within another bundle. either is i am stupid or xcode is really pita to work with. just losing time...
Re: Awesomium D wrappers/bindings
Am 25.12.2012 13:43, schrieb evilrat: trying to get xcode project, all fine but i just can't do that damn dylib to work with awesomium.framework within another bundle. either is i am stupid or xcode is really pita to work with. just losing time... I just compiled a awesomium 1.6.5 test app successfully, so let's get to D bindings!
Re: Awesomium D wrappers/bindings
Am 25.12.2012 13:46, schrieb David: Am 25.12.2012 13:43, schrieb evilrat: trying to get xcode project, all fine but i just can't do that damn dylib to work with awesomium.framework within another bundle. either is i am stupid or xcode is really pita to work with. just losing time... I just compiled a awesomium 1.6.5 test app successfully, so let's get to D bindings! Here are the bindings: 0% tested https://github.com/Dav1dde/awesomium
Re: Awesomium D wrappers/bindings
On Tuesday, 25 December 2012 at 13:57:28 UTC, David wrote: Am 25.12.2012 13:46, schrieb David: Am 25.12.2012 13:43, schrieb evilrat: trying to get xcode project, all fine but i just can't do that damn dylib to work with awesomium.framework within another bundle. either is i am stupid or xcode is really pita to work with. just losing time... I just compiled a awesomium 1.6.5 test app successfully, so let's get to D bindings! Here are the bindings: 0% tested https://github.com/Dav1dde/awesomium i've just created empty 1.6 branch, i'll join later this week.
Re: Awesomium D wrappers/bindings
Am 25.12.2012 15:04, schrieb evilrat: On Tuesday, 25 December 2012 at 13:57:28 UTC, David wrote: Am 25.12.2012 13:46, schrieb David: Am 25.12.2012 13:43, schrieb evilrat: trying to get xcode project, all fine but i just can't do that damn dylib to work with awesomium.framework within another bundle. either is i am stupid or xcode is really pita to work with. just losing time... I just compiled a awesomium 1.6.5 test app successfully, so let's get to D bindings! Here are the bindings: 0% tested https://github.com/Dav1dde/awesomium i've just created empty 1.6 branch, i'll join later this week. Oh wow it works! ─[dav1d@ArchBox][~/workspaces/d/awesomium_test]╼ dmd -I../awesomium -L-L. -L-lawesomium-1.6.5 short.d ─[dav1d@ArchBox][~/workspaces/d/awesomium_test]╼ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=. ./short https://gist.github.com/4373754 that is amzing!
Re: Awesomium D wrappers/bindings
On Tuesday, 25 December 2012 at 15:35:02 UTC, David wrote: Oh wow it works! ─[dav1d@ArchBox][~/workspaces/d/awesomium_test]╼ dmd -I../awesomium -L-L. -L-lawesomium-1.6.5 short.d ─[dav1d@ArchBox][~/workspaces/d/awesomium_test]╼ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=. ./short https://gist.github.com/4373754 that is amzing! yeah cool, but we need a OOP wrapper too that mimics C++ API, thats what i'm going to do ;)
Re: Awesomium D wrappers/bindings
On Tuesday, 25 December 2012 at 15:35:02 UTC, David wrote: Oh wow it works! by the way, how do u launch this on linux(my system is ubuntu 12.10 x86)? i take my mom netbook and it doesn't work, almost same crap as on osx, missing shared libs, though it in the same folder. i don't build my own stuff or samples, just trying to get webflow demo working
Re: Awesomium D wrappers/bindings
On Wednesday, 26 December 2012 at 05:08:47 UTC, evilrat wrote: On Tuesday, 25 December 2012 at 15:35:02 UTC, David wrote: Oh wow it works! by the way, how do u launch this on linux(my system is ubuntu 12.10 x86)? i take my mom netbook and it doesn't work, almost same crap as on osx, missing shared libs, though it in the same folder. i don't build my own stuff or samples, just trying to get webflow demo working oops. sorry i'm just copy that awesomium conf and add local path to shared lib. it also by some reason requires libXss(screensaver X11 lib) but it works now. it's really fast, webflow forks cool even on old crappy atom 1.8ghz with 1gb ram \0/
Re: Awesomium D wrappers/bindings
Are you working on a stable port (1.6) by any chances?
Re: Awesomium D wrappers/bindings
Am 25.12.2012 00:08, schrieb David: Are you working on a stable port (1.6) by any chances? Oh wow, I just found out there is an capi, impressive. I never tried it because I thought there was no C-Api... Still any plans of making D bindings, otherwise I might do it.
Re: Awesomium D wrappers/bindings
On Monday, 24 December 2012 at 23:17:08 UTC, David wrote: Am 25.12.2012 00:08, schrieb David: Are you working on a stable port (1.6) by any chances? Oh wow, I just found out there is an capi, impressive. I never tried it because I thought there was no C-Api... Still any plans of making D bindings, otherwise I might do it. 1.6 planned go in parallel with 1.7 when all(well, most) of it's(1.7) features would receive their first implementation. i'm already done with most of the webview callbacks stuff(though i don't tested it much), so the rest is the input passing and some support class interfaces, then i would have to do testing and documentation. so i'm think i start 1.6 branch this weekend. it also must be much simpler to do, because it has less features, and it has own C API, but it was designed to use for C++ compiler interop. i need take a look at 1.6 again, can't remember what it has and what's not, and what remains the same in 1.7
Re: Awesomium D wrappers/bindings
Am 14.12.2012 06:15, schrieb evilrat: i wonder why no one interested in project? maybe thats just because awesomium is um... half dead(can't pick correct word)? Because not a lot of people need this. I also wouldn't need it but I *want* it. Another reason is probably that a lot of the D users use Linux, which isn't supported by awesomium. Furthermore awesomium isn't Opensource, if I had the choice between a working awesomium and a working berkelium, I would choose latter, even if it's a bigger pain to use.
Re: Awesomium D wrappers/bindings
On Friday, 14 December 2012 at 10:42:25 UTC, David wrote: Am 14.12.2012 06:15, schrieb evilrat: i wonder why no one interested in project? maybe thats just because awesomium is um... half dead(can't pick correct word)? Because not a lot of people need this. I also wouldn't need it but I *want* it. Another reason is probably that a lot of the D users use Linux, which isn't supported by awesomium. Furthermore awesomium isn't Opensource, if I had the choice between a working awesomium and a working berkelium, I would choose latter, even if it's a bigger pain to use. berkellium is at chrome version 8(11 on windows), current chrome version is 25, i've tried to just build up on version 23 but there is s much differences so i don't know where to start fixing stuff and where to find updated parts. unfortunately there is no offscreen renderer on linux currently, perphaps this is due to chrome itself(?). anyway, i'm too interested in truly free crossplatform offscreen browser renderer, perhaps i would (or at least try) to upgrade berkellium up to the latest chromium. well, my point is that even with all features D has that would help with UI programming, HTML+JS is both cheap(most?) and simple way to do modern UI, especially if target language don't have decent UI frameworks(no offense to gtkd, dwt and others, but they all mostly just a D wrapper rather than truly D ui), but thats just my opinion =3 and concerning open source vs closed source, i would prefer second if it allow free use when the first is GPL licensed. i hate viral licenses, hate hate hate... (well for the stuff like OS kernel it's fine, but for stuff such a simple small libraries thats a bad idea)
Re: Awesomium D wrappers/bindings
Am 14.12.2012 13:15, schrieb evilrat: On Friday, 14 December 2012 at 10:42:25 UTC, David wrote: Am 14.12.2012 06:15, schrieb evilrat: i wonder why no one interested in project? maybe thats just because awesomium is um... half dead(can't pick correct word)? Because not a lot of people need this. I also wouldn't need it but I *want* it. Another reason is probably that a lot of the D users use Linux, which isn't supported by awesomium. Furthermore awesomium isn't Opensource, if I had the choice between a working awesomium and a working berkelium, I would choose latter, even if it's a bigger pain to use. berkellium is at chrome version 8(11 on windows), current chrome version is 25, i've tried to just build up on version 23 but there is s much differences so i don't know where to start fixing stuff and where to find updated parts. Chrome 23 is completly different to chrome 8, so it's basically impossible. unfortunately there is no offscreen renderer on linux currently, perphaps this is due to chrome itself(?). Should work (according to chromium ppl) anyway, i'm too interested in truly free crossplatform offscreen browser renderer, perhaps i would (or at least try) to upgrade berkellium up to the latest chromium. That needs a rewrite of berkelium well, my point is that even with all features D has that would help with UI programming, HTML+JS is both cheap(most?) and simple way to do modern UI, especially if target language don't have decent UI frameworks(no offense to gtkd, dwt and others, but they all mostly just a D wrapper rather than truly D ui), but thats just my opinion =3 A lot of D users use Linux, which isn't supported by awesomium and concerning open source vs closed source, i would prefer second if it allow free use when the first is GPL licensed. i hate viral licenses, hate hate hate... (well for the stuff like OS kernel it's fine, but for stuff such a simple small libraries thats a bad idea) Depends, if you have also a GPL project ...
Re: Awesomium D wrappers/bindings
On Friday, 14 December 2012 at 14:24:01 UTC, David wrote: I use gdb all the time! Just compile with -g and -gc. And iirc gdb supports D when compiled with gdc. okay, thanks. i'll check gdc then. with all negative to OS X this is a one of the major OS, and D should be available everywhere \O/
Re: Awesomium D wrappers/bindings
On 2012-12-14 13:52, evilrat wrote: just because when i tried debug simple program in xcode it was really pain and suffering, the whole OS X for D coding is painful :( GDB shipped with Xcode is way to old, IIRC. -- /Jacob Carlborg
Re: Awesomium D wrappers/bindings
On Friday, 14 December 2012 at 14:39:55 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote: GDB shipped with Xcode is way to old, IIRC. yes i know, but latest versions use lldb, though i don't used it with D yet.
Re: Awesomium D wrappers/bindings
On 14 December 2012 14:24, David d...@dav1d.de wrote: Am 14.12.2012 13:52, schrieb evilrat: On Friday, 14 December 2012 at 12:24:06 UTC, David wrote: A lot of D users use Linux, which isn't supported by awesomium which debugger Linux users use? does gdb support D at least like visual studio(visual d)/mago? o_O I use gdb all the time! Just compile with -g and -gc. And iirc gdb supports D when compiled with gdc. Aye, GDC is supported by the GNU debugger. D arrays and classes have special handling within the gdb code, along with all the pretty names (ubyte, ushort, uint, ulong). The rest of the debugging information exported is pretty much shown identical as you would see it if it were gcc/g++ had compiled it. Regards, -- Iain Buclaw *(p e ? p++ : p) = (c 0x0f) + '0';
Re: Awesomium D wrappers/bindings
On Fri, 14 Dec 2012 13:22:28 +0100 Sönke Ludwig slud...@outerproduct.org wrote: It also doesn't seem to be ported to the mobile platforms, which makes it an uncertain development target. Don't the mobile platforms provide web-view components anyway? Or does all the sandboxing on them prevent loading one up with a file:/// url?
Re: Awesomium D wrappers/bindings
i've just updated source repo, some minor changes, first code released. still no xcode projects though, still have some mess in project and no docs. but as soon as i have time i will clean this up, also i think to add some opengl(and maybe awesomium sdl demo port) examples in next commit to draw some attention. i wonder why no one interested in project? maybe thats just because awesomium is um... half dead(can't pick correct word)?
Re: Awesomium D wrappers/bindings
I did it again, pressed answer instead of answer to Newsgroup... От: David Отправлено: 11 декабря 2012 г. 18:43 Кому: evilrat Тема: Re: Awesomium D wrappers/bindings Wow! I was thinking of doing that. I made CEF instead... https://github.com/Dav1dde/cef So Awesomium supports Linux? I thought it only supports Windows and Mac (that's the reason I switched to CEF (which unfortunatly doesn't support off-screen rendering on Linux, but not because the developers want money...))? hi. unfortunately at this moment Awesomium doesn’t have Linux build, but I hope it would when they push final release(it’s still release candidate). and concerning CEF, from what I know it doesn’t have offscreen rendering(except CEF1 on Windows) due to fact that devs still can’t find way to get offscreen renderering with acceptable speed without relying on platform specific and/or vendor specific stuff. p.s. thanks for the link, I though no one has made CEF bindings, would check it later. -- Afaik CEF supports off-screen rendering on Mac and Windows (CEF1) and on Windows (WIP) CEF3.
