Re: Instructions to build DMD from source don't work (anymore) here

2017-12-02 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-learn

On Thursday, 30 November 2017 at 08:38:15 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
Hi, I've recently switched from a linux distribution to another 
(F27). During the last 2 years i used a script to build DMD, 
unfortunately i forgot to include it in my backup. Initially i 
thought "No problem, there's the instructions in the wiki, it's 
more or less about calling make with a couple of option". In 
theory only...


make -fposix.mak gives me


[basile@pc1 dmd]$ make -f posix.mak
make -C src -f posix.mak
make[1] : on entre dans le répertoire 
« /home/basile/dev/repos/dlang/dmd/src »

no cpu specified, assuming X86
 (CC)  ROOT_OBJS  ddmd/root/newdelete.c
c++ -c -o../generated/linux/release/64/newdelete.o 
-Wno-deprecated -Wstrict-
aliasing -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -D__pascal= -DMARS=1 
-DTARGET_LINUX=1 -
DDM_TARGET_CPU_X86=1 -m64 -fPIC -std=gnu++98 -Iddmd/root -MMD 
-MF ../generated/linux/release/64/newdelete.deps 
ddmd/root/newdelete.c

cc1plus: désolé, pas implémenté: mode 64 bits pas compilé


According to Google Translate, this means your C++ compiler 
doesn't support 64-bit mode.  Not sure why, since the Makefile is 
only compiling in 64-bit after checking that's what your kernel 
is, with uname -m.


Re: Instructions to build DMD from source don't work (anymore) here

2017-11-30 Thread Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d-learn

On 2017-11-30 12:19, Basile B. wrote:

That's strange because as said i had g++ / c++ but DMD compiles only 
once gcc-c++ setup. Anyway, working now.


It should be possible to get which package the "g++" file belongs to [1].

[1] 
https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/4705/how-to-find-out-which-package-a-file-belongs-to


--
/Jacob Carlborg


Re: Instructions to build DMD from source don't work (anymore) here

2017-11-30 Thread Basile B. via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Thursday, 30 November 2017 at 10:47:57 UTC, Jacob Carlborg 
wrote:

On 2017-11-30 09:56, Basile B. wrote:

On Thursday, 30 November 2017 at 08:38:15 UTC, Basile B. wrote:

[...]
All required tools are setup. I do not set AUTOBOOTSTRAP=1 
since dmd 2.077 is setup.


I needed gcc-c++... I don't know why but since "which g++" 
gave a valid file name i thought it was enough.


What's the difference ?


I don't know how Fedora works but you need a C++ compiler [1]. 
It seems like "gcc-c++" is the name of the "g++" package in 
Fedora.


[1] 
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/12952913/how-do-i-install-g-for-fedora


That's strange because as said i had g++ / c++ but DMD compiles 
only once gcc-c++ setup. Anyway, working now.


Re: Instructions to build DMD from source don't work (anymore) here

2017-11-30 Thread Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d-learn

On 2017-11-30 09:56, Basile B. wrote:

On Thursday, 30 November 2017 at 08:38:15 UTC, Basile B. wrote:

[...]
All required tools are setup. I do not set AUTOBOOTSTRAP=1 since dmd 
2.077 is setup.


I needed gcc-c++... I don't know why but since "which g++" gave a valid 
file name i thought it was enough.


What's the difference ?


I don't know how Fedora works but you need a C++ compiler [1]. It seems 
like "gcc-c++" is the name of the "g++" package in Fedora.


[1] 
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/12952913/how-do-i-install-g-for-fedora


--
/Jacob Carlborg


Re: Instructions to build DMD from source don't work (anymore) here

2017-11-30 Thread Basile B. via Digitalmars-d-learn

On Thursday, 30 November 2017 at 08:38:15 UTC, Basile B. wrote:

[...]
All required tools are setup. I do not set AUTOBOOTSTRAP=1 
since dmd 2.077 is setup.


I needed gcc-c++... I don't know why but since "which g++" gave a 
valid file name i thought it was enough.


What's the difference ?




Instructions to build DMD from source don't work (anymore) here

2017-11-30 Thread Basile B. via Digitalmars-d-learn
Hi, I've recently switched from a linux distribution to another 
(F27). During the last 2 years i used a script to build DMD, 
unfortunately i forgot to include it in my backup. Initially i 
thought "No problem, there's the instructions in the wiki, it's 
more or less about calling make with a couple of option". In 
theory only...


make -fposix.mak gives me


[basile@pc1 dmd]$ make -f posix.mak
make -C src -f posix.mak
make[1] : on entre dans le répertoire 
« /home/basile/dev/repos/dlang/dmd/src »

no cpu specified, assuming X86
 (CC)  ROOT_OBJS  ddmd/root/newdelete.c
c++ -c -o../generated/linux/release/64/newdelete.o 
-Wno-deprecated -Wstrict-
aliasing -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -D__pascal= -DMARS=1 
-DTARGET_LINUX=1 -
DDM_TARGET_CPU_X86=1 -m64 -fPIC -std=gnu++98 -Iddmd/root -MMD 
-MF ../generated/linux/release/64/newdelete.deps 
ddmd/root/newdelete.c

cc1plus: désolé, pas implémenté: mode 64 bits pas compilé
make[1]: *** [posix.mak:568: 
../generated/linux/release/64/newdelete.o] Error 1
make[1] : on quitte le répertoire 
« /home/basile/dev/repos/dlang/dmd/src »

make: *** [posix.mak:8: all] Error 2


All required tools are setup. I do not set AUTOBOOTSTRAP=1 since 
dmd 2.077 is setup.