Re: What's the proper way to add a local file dependence to dub?
On Monday, 12 March 2018 at 10:20:20 UTC, Seb wrote: On Sunday, 4 March 2018 at 16:46:56 UTC, Marc wrote: then copy it to sources folder? let's say I have a small library folder at C:\mylibrary\D where I want to use dir.d from it. How do I add that file dependence to dub? But I do not want to that file be passed directly to dmd, I want to that file be copied to application's source folder (so it's easy to distribuite, with the dependences together as possible) then compiled. So, what I want to some extension is dub work with loca files. Is this possible to do solely with dub? I know I can easily write a script to run before dub which copies the dependence files from C:\mylibrary to application's source but I'm looking for a more elegant approach as possible; I'm afraid of rewriting a makefile-like soon (I find cmake/make/makefiles just ugly). You can also add a simple dub.sdl to your local files and then use `dub add-local` to add the package to your dub environment. Dub will only rebuild the dependency on your local files if they changed (or you use a different compiler / build settings). Why is there no documentation for this? The dub documentation should have a filesystem layout page, with examples of how to structure local libraries, how to register them, how to add them to projects. AFAICT no such documentation exists. I've tried to follow the structure of libraries I've loaded into dub's packages directory, but it seems to treat local packages differently. And dub add-package is useless ... for one thing, it *overwrites* local-packages.json rather than adding to it.
Re: What's the proper way to add a local file dependence to dub?
On Sunday, 4 March 2018 at 16:46:56 UTC, Marc wrote: then copy it to sources folder? let's say I have a small library folder at C:\mylibrary\D where I want to use dir.d from it. How do I add that file dependence to dub? But I do not want to that file be passed directly to dmd, I want to that file be copied to application's source folder (so it's easy to distribuite, with the dependences together as possible) then compiled. So, what I want to some extension is dub work with loca files. Is this possible to do solely with dub? I know I can easily write a script to run before dub which copies the dependence files from C:\mylibrary to application's source but I'm looking for a more elegant approach as possible; I'm afraid of rewriting a makefile-like soon (I find cmake/make/makefiles just ugly). You can also add a simple dub.sdl to your local files and then use `dub add-local` to add the package to your dub environment. Dub will only rebuild the dependency on your local files if they changed (or you use a different compiler / build settings).
Re: What's the proper way to add a local file dependence to dub?
On Monday, 12 March 2018 at 09:38:41 UTC, Martin Tschierschke
wrote:
On Sunday, 4 March 2018 at 16:46:56 UTC, Marc wrote:
[...]
I did it this sway:
the part of dub.json:
"dependencies": {
[...]
"mylib":{
"versions": "~master",
"path": "/home/mt/d/mylib"
}
},
In spite of using a version directly after the used lib,
you give two parameters
"versions" : "~master"
and
"path": "/path_to_your_lib/"
Works well.
And in ...mylib/dub.json
you just add:
"targetType": "library",
on the top-level, and place your dir.d in ...mylib/source/
Re: What's the proper way to add a local file dependence to dub?
On Sunday, 4 March 2018 at 16:46:56 UTC, Marc wrote:
then copy it to sources folder?
let's say I have a small library folder at C:\mylibrary\D where
I want to use dir.d from it. How do I add that file dependence
to dub? But I do not want to that file be passed directly to
dmd, I want to that file be copied to application's source
folder (so it's easy to distribuite, with the dependences
together as possible) then compiled. So, what I want to some
extension is dub work with loca files.
Is this possible to do solely with dub? I know I can easily
write a script to run before dub which copies the dependence
files from C:\mylibrary to application's source but I'm looking
for a more elegant
approach as possible; I'm afraid of rewriting a makefile-like
soon (I find cmake/make/makefiles just ugly).
I did it this sway:
the part of dub.json:
"dependencies": {
"diet-ng": "~>1.4",
"vibe-d:tls": "~>0.8.0",
"vibe-d:http": "~>0.8",
"mysql-d": "~>0.3",
"mylib":{
"versions": "~master",
"path": "/home/mt/d/mylib"
}
},
In spite of using a version directly after the used lib,
you give two parameters
"versions" : "~master"
and
"path": "/path_to_your_lib/"
Works well.
Re: What's the proper way to add a local file dependence to dub?
On Sunday, 4 March 2018 at 16:46:56 UTC, Marc wrote: then copy it to sources folder? ... Also, symlinks are power tool for organizing your files without copying.
Re: What's the proper way to add a local file dependence to dub?
On 2018-03-04 17:46, Marc wrote: then copy it to sources folder? let's say I have a small library folder at C:\mylibrary\D where I want to use dir.d from it. How do I add that file dependence to dub? But I do not want to that file be passed directly to dmd, I want to that file be copied to application's source folder (so it's easy to distribuite, with the dependences together as possible) then compiled. So, what I want to some extension is dub work with loca files. Is this possible to do solely with dub? I know I can easily write a script to run before dub which copies the dependence files from C:\mylibrary to application's source but I'm looking for a more elegant approach as possible; I'm afraid of rewriting a makefile-like soon (I find cmake/make/makefiles just ugly). You can use "preGenerateCommands" or "preBuildCommands" to run arbitrary commands before Dub builds the project [1]. Alternativly you can use the "import" expression [2], together with the "stringImportPaths" Dub build setting. The "import" expression will embed the file into the executable as a string literal. [1] https://code.dlang.org/package-format?lang=sdl#build-settings [2] https://dlang.org/spec/expression.html#import_expressions -- /Jacob Carlborg
Re: What's the proper way to add a local file dependence to dub?
On Sunday, 4 March 2018 at 16:46:56 UTC, Marc wrote: then copy it to sources folder? let's say I have a small library folder at C:\mylibrary\D where I want to use dir.d from it. How do I add that file dependence to dub? But I do not want to that file be passed directly to dmd, I want to that file be copied to application's source folder (so it's easy to distribuite, with the dependences together as possible) then compiled. So, what I want to some extension is dub work with loca files. Is this possible to do solely with dub? I know I can easily write a script to run before dub which copies the dependence files from C:\mylibrary to application's source but I'm looking for a more elegant approach as possible; I'm afraid of rewriting a makefile-like soon (I find cmake/make/makefiles just ugly). Make it a sub package.
What's the proper way to add a local file dependence to dub?
then copy it to sources folder? let's say I have a small library folder at C:\mylibrary\D where I want to use dir.d from it. How do I add that file dependence to dub? But I do not want to that file be passed directly to dmd, I want to that file be copied to application's source folder (so it's easy to distribuite, with the dependences together as possible) then compiled. So, what I want to some extension is dub work with loca files. Is this possible to do solely with dub? I know I can easily write a script to run before dub which copies the dependence files from C:\mylibrary to application's source but I'm looking for a more elegant approach as possible; I'm afraid of rewriting a makefile-like soon (I find cmake/make/makefiles just ugly).
