[digitalradio] Need a PDF manual (or any format) for the MFJ 1278 Data Controller

2007-02-13 Thread kc7fys
Howdy folks, 
I need this manual if you have it on PDF. No longer on their site.
Thanks, 
Jonathan KC7FYS



Re: [digitalradio] Need a PDF manual (or any format) for the MFJ 1278 Data Controller

2007-02-13 Thread Steve Hajducek

Hi Jonathan,

Can you accept a 26MB email?

/s/ Steve, N2CKH


At 12:56 AM 2/13/2007, you wrote:
Howdy folks,
I need this manual if you have it on PDF. No longer on their site.
Thanks,
Jonathan KC7FYS



[digitalradio] Domnio, PAX etc

2007-02-13 Thread John Bradley

at 1800Z 20 seems to be open into the mid west, eastcoast and westcoast.

Anyone up for playing with DominoEX? I'm on 14072.5 listening while doing some 
other work

John
VE5MU


Re: [digitalradio] Domnio, PAX etc

2007-02-13 Thread KV9U
W1OER was on 14.073 just now so worked him and chatted a bit. He was 
calling in DEX11/FEC and I was set up for DEX11 w/o FEC. And then 
realized that I was actually on FEC because I had the RS ID Detect 
turned on.

73,

Rick, KV9U


John Bradley wrote:

at 1800Z 20 seems to be open into the mid west, eastcoast and westcoast.

Anyone up for playing with DominoEX? I'm on 14072.5 listening while doing some 
other work

John
VE5MU

  



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.17.37/682 - Release Date: 2/12/2007 
1:23 PM
  




[digitalradio] Digital Voice Skeds

2007-02-13 Thread Tony
All:

Will be QRV WinDRM tonight (Tuesday) around 7:00 
est (00:00z). Skeds welcome..

Tony KT2Q





[digitalradio] [Fwd: [tapr-announce] HPSDR Janus and Ozy Board Production Announcement]

2007-02-13 Thread Robert McGwier

-- 
AMSAT Director and VP Engineering. Member: ARRL, AMSAT-DL,
TAPR, Packrats, NJQRP, QRP ARCI, QCWA, FRC. ARRL SDR WG Chair
Taking fun as simply fun and earnestness in earnest shows
how thoroughly thou none of the two discernest. - Piet Hine

---BeginMessage---


*** TAPR ANNOUNCES PRODUCTION OF HPSDR JANUS OZY BOARDS ***
High Performance Software Defined Radio Project (HPSDR)

*IMPORTANT*

TAPR and HPSDR need your input!

Please help us by visiting Dale's (WA8SRA) HAMSDR website (see below) and 
let us know if you are interested in purchasing Janus and/or Ozy bare or 
assembled boards for delivery by May.


THIS IS NOT PLACING AN ORDER; IT IS AN EXPRESSION OF INTEREST SO THAT WE 
CAN MORE ACCURATELY DETERMINE HOW MANY BOARDS TO ORDER AND ASSEMBLIES TO MAKE!


This opportunity will end on Tuesday, February 20th at 0200 UTC.

To register your interest you need to go to the Dale's (WA8SRA) HAMSDR 
website, in the projects section.


If you are a member and have previously expressed interest in these 
projects, log in and re-enter your quantities of each board.


NOTE: Previous quantities have been reset to zero so you WILL HAVE TO 
RE-ENTER QUANTITIES.


If you are new to HPSDR and Dale's Website, please join for instant access 
by providing the information requested.


Go to: http://www.hamsdr.com/HTTP://www.hamsdr.com

Login and go to Projects  TAPR-HPSDR and click on Indicate Your Interest 
button to create a new record for entering your quantities.


What is HPSDR? http://hpsdr.org/http://hpsdr.org
What is an Ozy?   http://hpsdr.org/ozy.htmlhttp://hpsdr.org/ozy.html
What is a 
Janus?   http://hpsdr.org/janus.htmlhttp://hpsdr.org/janus.html


There are many other HPSDR projects in design and testing; most will 
require the Janus and Ozy boards.







___
tapr-announce mailing list

NOTE:  This list includes all addresses currently subscribed to any TAPR 
mailing list.  Please don't try to manually unsubscribe from this list; it 
won't work.  If you unsubscribe from all other TAPR mailing lists, you will 
automatically be unsubscribed from this one.

---End Message---


Re: [digitalradio] New Rig!

2007-02-13 Thread Larry Cobb
Welcome to the TS2K Experience, Andy!

You'll enjoy this rig as you begin to understand it's many features.  
It's a great digi rig :-)  .  As another email noted, take a look at 
using the packet filters (menu 50A).  I think you use HRD and you can 
do macros in that app similar to MixW2 to enable and switch the 
filters.  I use that almost exclusively (instead of the Lo- and Hi-cut 
filters).  The best is to experiment with it and see which works best 
for you.

73,
Larry (NK2X)


[digitalradio] Re: Domnio, PAX etc

2007-02-13 Thread Bill McLaughlin
Hi Rick,

Just FYI; you and Dave (K3GAU) were solid copy on DoiminoEX on 160 
tonight despite me using my 80 meter antenna. Actually seemed best 
using 22 baud with FEC...one or two static crash hits, but overall 
impressive considering my antenna limitations on 160 meters.

73

Bill N9DSJ


--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, KV9U [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 W1OER was on 14.073 just now so worked him and chatted a bit. He 
was 
 calling in DEX11/FEC and I was set up for DEX11 w/o FEC. And then 
 realized that I was actually on FEC because I had the RS ID Detect 
 turned on.
 
 73,
 
 Rick, KV9U




RE: [digitalradio] [Fwd: [tapr-announce] HPSDR Janus and Ozy Board Production An

2007-02-13 Thread John Champa
Bob,

I re-posted this on the HSMM list too ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).

Thanks and good luck!
John - K8OCL




[digitalradio] Re: Domnio, PAX etc

2007-02-13 Thread Bill McLaughlin
Well can only relate my impressions; hope others chime in

I think even though DominoEX halves the speed when FEC in engaged, it 
is well worth the speed trade-off. 160/80 seems to vary night to 
night in this regard; probably due to qrn and multipath. It also 
depends on one's ability/willingness to read between the lines as 
there are a few hits at the higher speeds and one needs to brain-
error correct as there is no ARQ. 
As for Throb; I find it very sensitive, but at times it does not seem 
to decode signals that are audiblenever figured out why.
As for MFSK modes, yes they are very frequency sensitive although I 
have had little trouble tuning most, aside from a few that took a 
long time to sync. Multipsk's AFC seems to lock quite well on MFSK 
signals, not sure how other software doescertainly DominoEX is 
superior in that sense.
I have not worked enought MT63 to comment. I have had better luck 
with CHIP64 although both seem to not be qrp modes and require a high 
signal to noise ratio...
It is odd (but probably not so if studied correctly), on some nights 
(condx) certain modes just seem to work better under various 
conditionsat times I am amazed that Olivia can decode signals in 
the mudother times I swear at it...one night on a VHF path only 
PSKAM10 or JT65B would get through; guess that what makes it all fun.


73 

Bill N9DSJ





--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, KV9U [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi Bill,
 
 Yes, busy night tonight on 160:)
 
 The question I wanted to ask the group was whether they have found 
on 
 the lower bands (especially 80 and 160) that DominoEX (DEX) is 
better 
 when operating at a given speed such as DEX11/without FEC or is it 
 better at twice the speed, but with FEC, e.g., DEX 22 with FEC?
 
 Tentatively, I almost want to say that it may be better at the 
higher 
 speed with FEC. If true, and I am not sure it is, it could be 
because 
 the higher speed still has a fairly low baud rate, even for some 
serious 
 multipath on the lower bands. The 77 wpm speed with DEX22/FEC is 
faster 
 than is comfortable for keyboarding so a slower speed is not bad. 
The 
 DEX11/FEC does seem quite robust, even with static crashes and who 
knows 
 how much multipath. Of course you can never get 100% copy under 
certain 
 conditions when too much of the data is damaged and the Viterbi 
decoder 
 can not reconstruct the character. Then an ARQ mode would be needed.
 
 I wonder how well this type of mode would work with a PSKmail type 
of 
 program? I know that I had a very difficult time reading a PSK31 
signal 
 that was up the band from me. The earlier station that I was 
talking 
 with for our weekly sked for experimenting with these modes at 
a short 
 distance of about 35 miles or so indicated that he had good luck 
with 
 MT-63 in the past but the faster (wider) mode seemed to work better 
due 
 to having the data spread out so far. Has anyone else found this on 
the 
 lower bands with MT-63?
 
 The ability to only approximately tune in DEX signals is extremely 
 helpful for me as I find that I have a difficult time locking in on 
 MFSK16. Earlier tonight WA9HCZ and I started our experiments with 
ThrobX 
 and although he could copy me solid, I could never decode his 
signal. So 
 I must have been doing something wrong. Ideally, these modes that 
need 
 extremely accurate tuning, should have some kind of display to help 
you 
 determine if you are far from locking in to the signal or not. 
Something 
 like we had with the early PSK programs.
 
 73,
 
 Rick, KV9U




Re: [digitalradio] Re: Domnio, PAX etc

2007-02-13 Thread John Bradley
With respect to MT63 , I have used it extensively in the past and found it 
wanting, especially trying to tune a weak signal under less than
optimum conditions, as the noise covered the audio up.  Under side by side 
tests it did not copy as well as Olivia (1000/32) . probably half as well 
on the day tested between 2 stations 1500 miles apart on 20M . that day 
likely a 2 hop.


  MFSK is fussy to tune, and with some folks using older rigs, is subject to 
drift during a long TX at power. Does get through, however, as well as
  OLIVIA 500/16 , and much better than PSK31, again trying multiple modes 
between distant stations.

  DEX? I always seem to be in the wrong place at the wrong time, so have only 
used DEX locally. Look forward to playing with DEX  over a distance
  Will sit on 14073 center freq in the AM and please let me know if you are 
playing on 80 or 160 .

  Monday night had some good luck with OLIVIA 500/16 over a considerable 
distance on 160m

  tnx

  John
  VE5MU
   
   


[digitalradio] Re: Domnio, PAX etc

2007-02-13 Thread ozhan onder
Hello John,
What is DEX John?,a new digi mode to play with?..Tell us a little 
bit..
vy tnx.
73's de Özhan TA3BQ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Bradley [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 With respect to MT63 , I have used it extensively in the past and 
found it wanting, especially trying to tune a weak signal under less 
than
 optimum conditions, as the noise covered the audio up.  Under side 
by side tests it did not copy as well as Olivia (1000/32) . 
probably half as well on the day tested between 2 stations 1500 
miles apart on 20M . that day likely a 2 hop.
 
 
   MFSK is fussy to tune, and with some folks using older rigs, is 
subject to drift during a long TX at power. Does get through, 
however, as well as
   OLIVIA 500/16 , and much better than PSK31, again trying 
multiple modes between distant stations.
 
   DEX? I always seem to be in the wrong place at the wrong time, 
so have only used DEX locally. Look forward to playing with DEX  
over a distance
   Will sit on 14073 center freq in the AM and please let me know 
if you are playing on 80 or 160 .
 
   Monday night had some good luck with OLIVIA 500/16 over a 
considerable distance on 160m
 
   tnx
 
   John
   VE5MU





Re: [digitalradio] Domnio, PAX etc

2007-02-13 Thread Özhan Önder
Dr John,
I am sorry, it is the Domino Ex..Ok.tnx.Hope to meet you on DEX then..
Selam from Izmir
73's de Özhan TA3BQ

  - Original Message - 
  From: John Bradley 
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 8:22 PM
  Subject: [digitalradio] Domnio, PAX etc




  at 1800Z 20 seems to be open into the mid west, eastcoast and westcoast.

  Anyone up for playing with DominoEX? I'm on 14072.5 listening while doing 
some other work

  John
  VE5MU