[digitalradio] 7077 Slow Tones

2007-04-16 Thread Bill P.
Sorry, but I've looked around and cannot ID the mode I hear on 3577 and 
7076, very slow tones, about 1 second each?   Any help please ??

Bill k6acj psk31, mfsk, Olivia, etc





[digitalradio] Re: 7077 Slow Tones

2007-04-16 Thread Andrew O'Brien
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Bill P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Sorry, but I've looked around and cannot ID the mode I hear on 3577 and 
 7076, very slow tones, about 1 second each?   Any help please ??
 
 Bill k6acj psk31, mfsk, Olivia, etc



I'm not sure about 3577 but ob 7076 it is most likely JT65A.



[digitalradio] JT65A and ARRL Field Day

2007-04-16 Thread jdh23462
After reading though the Bozo guide and the JT65 protocol, I am
assuming that everyone is using WSJT as it would be set up for moon
bounce or meteor scatter.  Has anyone used it sending plain text?  

The reason I ask, I would like to use this as a demonstration mode for
field day and could I stray from the type 1 message and substitute
the grid square with the Field day exchange? (4AVA vice FN16?)  How
would this effect the decoding? 

Any assistance would be helpful.

Thanks and 73's,

Jeff, KA1DBE/4



[digitalradio] TAIWAN in JT65A mode @ 14.076

2007-04-16 Thread Steinar Aanesland
Hi

144600  2  -27  2.7  -22  4 *  CQ BX1AD PL04 1   0

73 de LA5VNA Steinar


[digitalradio] JT65A Slow decoding

2007-04-16 Thread g0azs_marc
Hello All

I'm just getting into decoding some JT65A on 14076 and I seem to have
a problem that's probably computer related... but I would appreciate
some advice.

My clock is sync'ed OK but at the end of a minute (and when I have
even seen strong traces) it is 25 seconds into the next minute before
decoding finishes. Is this normal?

It seems that this would make a QSO difficult...

Look foward to your comments.

73 Marc G0AZS

PS Computer is AMD 450 MHz 320MB RAM



Re: [digitalradio] JT65A Slow decoding

2007-04-16 Thread John Becker
The computer is very busy in this time frame. Creating a WAV 
file and other things. If your CPU is slow it will take a while.
My dell 500 mhz some times goes to 10 seconds after the
minute but never had it run that long.



At 04:36 PM 4/16/2007, you wrote:
Hello All

I'm just getting into decoding some JT65A on 14076 and I seem to have
a problem that's probably computer related... but I would appreciate
some advice.

My clock is sync'ed OK but at the end of a minute (and when I have
even seen strong traces) it is 25 seconds into the next minute before
decoding finishes. Is this normal?

It seems that this would make a QSO difficult...

Look foward to your comments.

73 Marc G0AZS

PS Computer is AMD 450 MHz 320MB RAM























[digitalradio] ATTN: ALL JT65 HF OPS

2007-04-16 Thread KT2Q
All: 

Please try to spread out when working JT65 on the HF bands. It is impossible to 
decode signals when they overlap. Remember that the transmit tones are fixed 
and will not change unless you change your dial frequency. 

Clicking on signals that are some X-hertz away from zero-beat in the SpecJT 
waterfall, or the red spike in the WSJT window, will not change your transmit 
frequency tones. It will only 'zero-in' on the incoming signal. The outgoing 
tones stay the same. 

Working JT65 stations this way, without zero-beating, is essentially the same 
as working split; it's a waste of spectrum and can interfere with other QSO's.  

One way around this is to use your VFO to dial-in the station you want to work. 
Pay attention to the DF after you decode the station by clicking the sync tone 
(red spike) in the main WSJT window. The DF will tell you how far to move your 
dial frequency to work that station. 

If your dial frequency reads 14076.0 and a station is decoded with a DF of 
+300hz, then move your dial frequency to 14076.3 to zero beat. This will put 
your TX tones near the calling station. 
It's a good idea to click the TOL to widen it a bit in case your slightly off 
frequency. 

Thanks, 

73, Tony - KT2Q



[digitalradio] Fwd: [tapr-announce] TAPR PSR Needs Articles for Dayton Hamvention Issue

2007-04-16 Thread Mark Thompson
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 5:48 PM
Subject: [tapr-announce] Write Now for PSR

I say again: The editorial staff of TAPR's quarterly newsletter Packet
Status Register (PSR) is busily preparing the next issue (the Dayton
Hamvention issue) and seeks any and all input in the way of articles, news,
comments, etc. related to the digital modus operandi of Amateur Radio. So,
if you have anything, e-mail it to the PSR editor and chief bottle washer as
soon as you can.

73,

Stan Horzepa, WA1LOU
PSR Ed/CBW  


___
tapr-announce mailing list

NOTE:  This list includes all addresses currently subscribed to any TAPR 
mailing 
list.  Please don't try to manually unsubscribe from this list; it won't work.  
If you unsubscribe from all other TAPR mailing lists, you will automatically be 
unsubscribed from this one.

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Re: [digitalradio] JT65A Slow decoding

2007-04-16 Thread Darrel Smith

Hi Marc

With my Compaq Deskpro 731Mhz usually decodes at 6 seconds after the  
minute with nothing else open.If I have other apps open it could be a  
long as 10-11 secs.
I just double click the callsign and hit auto very quickly and I  
still make the contacts.


Darrel



On 16-Apr-07, at 2:36 PM, g0azs_marc wrote:


Hello All

I'm just getting into decoding some JT65A on 14076 and I seem to have
a problem that's probably computer related... but I would appreciate
some advice.

My clock is sync'ed OK but at the end of a minute (and when I have
even seen strong traces) it is 25 seconds into the next minute before
decoding finishes. Is this normal?

It seems that this would make a QSO difficult...

Look foward to your comments.

73 Marc G0AZS

PS Computer is AMD 450 MHz 320MB RAM







[digitalradio] 10mw QSO JT65

2007-04-16 Thread KT2Q
All:

Managed to work Justin (N5BO) with 10mw on 20 
meters. Justin's report was -23db so it would seem 
there was some room to go even lower. There's no 
doubt that you could microwatt with this mode 
under ideal conditions -- amazing!

04/17 02:27 021900  2  -23  0.08  4 # 
N5BO KT2Q FN30  OOOTony KT2Q





[digitalradio] Re: JT65A Slow decoding

2007-04-16 Thread Bill McLaughlin
Hi,

Also go to the decode psuedo-button and disble deepsearch 
options...might miss a weak sign in the deepsearch file but will 
speed up the decodes...

73

Bill N9DSJ


--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Darrel Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi Marc
 
 With my Compaq Deskpro 731Mhz usually decodes at 6 seconds after 
the  
 minute with nothing else open.If I have other apps open it could be 
a  
 long as 10-11 secs.
 I just double click the callsign and hit auto very quickly and I  
 still make the contacts.
 
 Darrel
 
 
 
 On 16-Apr-07, at 2:36 PM, g0azs_marc wrote:
 
  Hello All
 
  I'm just getting into decoding some JT65A on 14076 and I seem to 
have
  a problem that's probably computer related... but I would 
appreciate
  some advice.
 
  My clock is sync'ed OK but at the end of a minute (and when I have
  even seen strong traces) it is 25 seconds into the next minute 
before
  decoding finishes. Is this normal?
 
  It seems that this would make a QSO difficult...
 
  Look foward to your comments.
 
  73 Marc G0AZS
 
  PS Computer is AMD 450 MHz 320MB RAM
 
 
 





[digitalradio] Re: 10mw QSO JT65

2007-04-16 Thread Bill McLaughlin
Saw that Tonyseems like 2.5 mw would work although with little 
margin!

73

Bill N9DSJ

--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, KT2Q [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 All:
 
 Managed to work Justin (N5BO) with 10mw on 20 
 meters. Justin's report was -23db so it would seem 
 there was some room to go even lower. There's no 
 doubt that you could microwatt with this mode 
 under ideal conditions -- amazing!
 
 04/17 02:27 021900  2  -23  0.08  4 # 
 N5BO KT2Q FN30  OOOTony KT2Q





Re: [digitalradio] Re: 10mw QSO JT65

2007-04-16 Thread KT2Q
 Saw that Tonyseems like 2.5 mw would work 
 although with little margin!
73 Bill N9DSJ

I think your right Bill. That would have weakend 
the signal another 6 db. I would guess JT65 could 
handle that if the band noise was low enough. Need 
to try that again.

Tony KT2Q





- Original Message - 
From: Bill McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 11:11 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: 10mw QSO JT65


 Saw that Tonyseems like 2.5 mw would work 
 although with little
 margin!

 73

 Bill N9DSJ

 --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, KT2Q 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 All:

 Managed to work Justin (N5BO) with 10mw on 20
 meters. Justin's report was -23db so it would 
 seem
 there was some room to go even lower. There's 
 no
 doubt that you could microwatt with this mode
 under ideal conditions -- amazing!

 04/17 02:27 021900  2  -23  0.08  4 #
 N5BO KT2Q FN30  OOOTony KT2Q