[digitalradio] FDMDV on 14.236

2007-12-08 Thread Steinar Aanesland
Hi,

Anyone for digital voice qso 14.236?

FDMDV Download:
http://n1su.com/fdmdv/download.html

melp_1400.dll Download::
http://www.ku7pdx.com/files/melp_dll.zip

73 de LA5VNA Steinar




Re: [digitalradio] Re: FDMDV on 14.236

2007-12-08 Thread Steinar Aanesland
With my excellent Norwegian-English ? hihi :)

73 de LA5VNA


cesco12342000 skrev:

 Hi Steinar,

  Anyone for digital voice qso 14.236?

 I have uploaded a recording of your CQ call audio in the files-
 digitalvoice section.

  




Re: [digitalradio] FDMDV on 14.236

2007-12-08 Thread Patrick Lindecker
Hello Steinar,

I have two sound cards here, the first controlled in RX and the second 
controlled in TX.

At the moment I'm hearing to a transmission, but how to tune it . Is it 
automatic?

I'm QRV for a test. Tell me the time.

73
Patrick



  - Original Message - 
  From: Steinar Aanesland 
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2007 11:20 AM
  Subject: [digitalradio] FDMDV on 14.236


  Hi,

  Anyone for digital voice qso 14.236?

  FDMDV Download:
  http://n1su.com/fdmdv/download.html

  melp_1400.dll Download::
  http://www.ku7pdx.com/files/melp_dll.zip

  73 de LA5VNA Steinar



   

[digitalradio] Re: FDMDV on 14.236

2007-12-08 Thread cesco12342000
Hi Steinar,

 Anyone for digital voice qso 14.236?

I have uploaded a recording of your CQ call audio in the files-
digitalvoice section.





Re: [digitalradio] FDMDV on 14.236

2007-12-08 Thread Steinar Aanesland
Hi Patrick

Take a look at this pdf file. It describe the procedure in a 
straightforward way :)

http://n1su.com/fdmdv/FDMDV_Docs_Rel_1.0_revised.pdf

LA5VNA Steinar



Patrick Lindecker skrev:

 Hello Steinar,
  
 I have two sound cards here, the first controlled in RX and the second 
 controlled in TX.
  
 At the moment I'm hearing to a transmission, but how to tune it . Is 
 it automatic?
  
 I'm QRV for a test. Tell me the time.
  
 73
 Patrick
  
  
  

 - Original Message -
 *From:* Steinar Aanesland mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 *To:* digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
 mailto:digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
 *Sent:* Saturday, December 08, 2007 11:20 AM
 *Subject:* [digitalradio] FDMDV on 14.236

 Hi,

 Anyone for digital voice qso 14.236?

 FDMDV Download:
 http://n1su.com/fdmdv/download.html
 http://n1su.com/fdmdv/download.html

 melp_1400.dll Download::
 http://www.ku7pdx.com/files/melp_dll.zip
 http://www.ku7pdx.com/files/melp_dll.zip

 73 de LA5VNA Steinar

  




[digitalradio] EPC-CRO (Croatian PSK Award Series)

2007-12-08 Thread Andrew O'Brien
-- Forwarded message --
From: MM0DFV [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Dec 8, 2007 9:18 AM
Subject: EPC-CRO (Croatian PSK Award Series)
To: EPC [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Hi Guys,

Please have a look at our new award programme EPC-CRO (Croatian PSK
Award Series) at
http://eu.srars.org/index.php?option=com_contenttask=viewid=95Itemid=136

Design and idea by Zoran 9A3ACZ, award manager is Zdravko 9A6ZT.

Enjoy it!

73 de MM0DFV
Jurij


[digitalradio] FDMDV confusion

2007-12-08 Thread Dave
I must be missing something here. Decoding several stations right now
(1715Z)very well on 14.236 but see absolutely no signal on any of the
display types I choose. Hear the decoded voice perfectly, but the
display doesn't show any input.

Tnx es 73
Dave KB3MOW




Re: [digitalradio] FDMDV on 7.178

2007-12-08 Thread Steinar Aanesland
Hi Patrick,

Are you ready for a test this evening  ? I am QRV on 40m . 7.178 seems 
to be a quiet
spot.

-Bay the way, I am qrv on echolink node 3492 , a 70cm repeater in my 
neighbourhood

73 de LA5VNA Steinar


 



Patrick Lindecker skrev:

 Hello Steinar,
  
 I have two sound cards here, the first controlled in RX and the second 
 controlled in TX.
  
 At the moment I'm hearing to a transmission, but how to tune it . Is 
 it automatic?
  
 I'm QRV for a test. Tell me the time.
  
 73
 Patrick
  
  
  

 - Original Message -
 *From:* Steinar Aanesland mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 *To:* digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
 mailto:digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
 *Sent:* Saturday, December 08, 2007 11:20 AM
 *Subject:* [digitalradio] FDMDV on 14.236

 Hi,

 Anyone for digital voice qso 14.236?

 FDMDV Download:
 http://n1su.com/fdmdv/download.html
 http://n1su.com/fdmdv/download.html

 melp_1400.dll Download::
 http://www.ku7pdx.com/files/melp_dll.zip
 http://www.ku7pdx.com/files/melp_dll.zip

 73 de LA5VNA Steinar

  




Re: [digitalradio] FDMDV confusion

2007-12-08 Thread Steinar Aanesland
Hi Dave,

Do you see the signature in the text field ?

LA5VNA Steinar

 

Dave skrev:

 I must be missing something here. Decoding several stations right now
 (1715Z)very well on 14.236 but see absolutely no signal on any of the
 display types I choose. Hear the decoded voice perfectly, but the
 display doesn't show any input.

 Tnx es 73
 Dave KB3MOW

  




Re: [digitalradio] FDMDV confusion

2007-12-08 Thread Dave 'Doc' Corio
Sure do! And excellent decode right now on N0GR in Iowa. Just hard 
to tune without a visual on the signal.

73
dave


Steinar Aanesland wrote:

 Hi Dave,

 Do you see the signature in the text field ?

 LA5VNA Steinar

 Dave skrev:
 
  I must be missing something here. Decoding several stations right now
  (1715Z)very well on 14.236 but see absolutely no signal on any of the
  display types I choose. Hear the decoded voice perfectly, but the
  display doesn't show any input.
 
  Tnx es 73
  Dave KB3MOW
 
 

 
 

 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
 Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.17/1178 - Release Date: 12/8/2007 
 11:59 AM
   


Re: [digitalradio] FDMDV on 7.178

2007-12-08 Thread Steinar Aanesland

Hi all,

I am QSYing to 7.095 and calling

73 de LA5VNA Steinar


Steinar Aanesland skrev:

 Hi Patrick,

 Are you ready for a test this evening ? I am QRV on 40m . 7.178 seems
 to be a quiet
 spot.

 -Bay the way, I am qrv on echolink node 3492 , a 70cm repeater in my
 neighbourhood

 73 de LA5VNA Steinar

 Patrick Lindecker skrev:
 
  Hello Steinar,
 
  I have two sound cards here, the first controlled in RX and the second
  controlled in TX.
 
  At the moment I'm hearing to a transmission, but how to tune it . Is
  it automatic?
 
  I'm QRV for a test. Tell me the time.
 
  73
  Patrick
 
 
 
 
  - Original Message -
  *From:* Steinar Aanesland mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 mailto:saanes%40broadpark.no
  *To:* digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
 mailto:digitalradio%40yahoogroups.com
  mailto:digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
 mailto:digitalradio%40yahoogroups.com
  *Sent:* Saturday, December 08, 2007 11:20 AM
  *Subject:* [digitalradio] FDMDV on 14.236
 
  Hi,
 
  Anyone for digital voice qso 14.236?
 
  FDMDV Download:
  http://n1su.com/fdmdv/download.html 
 http://n1su.com/fdmdv/download.html
  http://n1su.com/fdmdv/download.html 
 http://n1su.com/fdmdv/download.html
 
  melp_1400.dll Download::
  http://www.ku7pdx.com/files/melp_dll.zip 
 http://www.ku7pdx.com/files/melp_dll.zip
  http://www.ku7pdx.com/files/melp_dll.zip 
 http://www.ku7pdx.com/files/melp_dll.zip
 
  73 de LA5VNA Steinar
 
 

  




[digitalradio] Re: Remote Access Desktop, and remote digital operation

2007-12-08 Thread zl1boe2002
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Dave AA6YQ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I have in the past used LogMeIn and Skype to remotely control my home
 station while running RTTY, PSK, and CW.
...snip...

I have also had some success with the Logmein/Skype approach using MixW.

Now LogMein are advertising a new PRO version with integrated sound 
(not free though) Has any tried this?

73, Chris ZL1BOE 



Re: [digitalradio] FDMDV confusion

2007-12-08 Thread Paul L Schmidt, K9PS
Is your audio level high enough going into the sound card,
or possibly the gain on the mic or aux input needs bumped
up a bit?  I was playing around a bit earlier watching some
signals, and if I got the audio level too low, the displays
didn't show anything but I was still decoding.

73
Paul / K9PS / Bloomfield, IN EM69na

Dave 'Doc' Corio wrote:
 Sure do! And excellent decode right now on N0GR in Iowa. Just hard 
 to tune without a visual on the signal.
 
 73
 dave
 
 
 Steinar Aanesland wrote:
 Hi Dave,

 Do you see the signature in the text field ?

 LA5VNA Steinar

 Dave skrev:
 I must be missing something here. Decoding several stations right now
 (1715Z)very well on 14.236 but see absolutely no signal on any of the
 display types I choose. Hear the decoded voice perfectly, but the
 display doesn't show any input.

 Tnx es 73
 Dave KB3MOW



 

 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
 Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.17/1178 - Release Date: 12/8/2007 
 11:59 AM
   
 
 
 Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at
 http://www.obriensweb.com/drsked/drsked.php
 
 
 View the DRCC numbers database at 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/database
  
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 



Re: [digitalradio] FDMDV confusion

2007-12-08 Thread Dave 'Doc' Corio
Cranked the input up, and had a great QSO with N0GR. Almost 100% 
copy with just a bit of drop-out caused by QSB. Still almost nothing 
showing on the display, but enough that I could see the peak I needed to 
tune to. Maybe I was just expecting a waterfall-type display similar to DRM.

Have to say I am truly impressed! The voice quality was better than 
I had expected for the bandwidth being used. Somewhat robotic-sounding, 
but still perfectly able to understand inflection and pitch. I almost 
expected it to sound like 'Robby the Robot'! This seems like quite an 
accomplishment!

73
Dave
KB3MOW


Paul L Schmidt, K9PS wrote:

 Is your audio level high enough going into the sound card,
 or possibly the gain on the mic or aux input needs bumped
 up a bit? I was playing around a bit earlier watching some
 signals, and if I got the audio level too low, the displays
 didn't show anything but I was still decoding.

 73
 Paul / K9PS / Bloomfield, IN EM69na

 Dave 'Doc' Corio wrote:
  Sure do! And excellent decode right now on N0GR in Iowa. Just hard
  to tune without a visual on the signal.
 
  73
  dave
 
 
  Steinar Aanesland wrote:
  Hi Dave,
 
  Do you see the signature in the text field ?
 
  LA5VNA Steinar
 
  Dave skrev:
  I must be missing something here. Decoding several stations right now
  (1715Z)very well on 14.236 but see absolutely no signal on any of the
  display types I choose. Hear the decoded voice perfectly, but the
  display doesn't show any input.
 
  Tnx es 73
  Dave KB3MOW
 
 
 
  --
 
  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition.
  Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.17/1178 - Release Date: 
 12/8/2007 11:59 AM
 
 
 
  Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at
  http://www.obriensweb.com/drsked/drsked.php 
 http://www.obriensweb.com/drsked/drsked.php
 
 
  View the DRCC numbers database at 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/database 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/database
 
  Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 

 
 

 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
 Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.17/1178 - Release Date: 12/8/2007 
 11:59 AM
   


Re: [digitalradio] FDMDV confusion

2007-12-08 Thread John Becker, WØJAB
At 11:50 AM 12/8/2007, you wrote:
Sure do! And excellent decode right now on N0GR in Iowa. Just hard 
to tune without a visual on the signal.

Why was it hard to tune ?
And why would there do a need for anything visual?
If your rig in on 14,236 it should work just fine.
I have never had a problem. Even while mobile.

John, W0JAB 



[digitalradio] Re: Remote Access Desktop, and remote digital operation

2007-12-08 Thread zl1boe2002
Hi Patrick,

It is interesting that no completely integrated HF rig remote cntrol 
solution seems to exist as yet. Maybe the just-announceed LogMein Pro 
remote PC control software (with intergated audio) is one possibility.

If one thinks about remote control from another point of view the 
only connections between the Ham PC and the radio is two-way audio 
(half duplex) and the serial path for CAT/CIV. The latter can be as 
slow  as 1200 bp/s if need be. If these two could be multiplexed 
together then the path from PC to remote radio is one serial stream - 
potentially well under 9600 bp/s. And the link and could be as simple 
as dial-up modems, packet or via IP with something like the Lantronix 
XPORT - an Ethernet-serial converter so small it is built into an 
RJ45 socket. The Xport component can even provide simple web server 
access (skilled programmer needed)!

A solution of this kind requires no PC at all at the radio end. And 
although we might laugh today at the idea of dial-up modems it 
provides zero latency and excellent security (probably the hackers 
today are too young to know or care about dial-up). Of course with 
modems we would not want to try and remote control from France to 
Canada but the typical application is from city apartment to a nearby 
rural radio site - every hams dream I think.

It is said that soon every household gadget will have built in 
network access so why not the next generation of ham rigs?

73, Chris ZL1BOE

--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Lindecker [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 Hello John,
 
 The remote control through TCP/IP exists in Multipsk. I and Cesco 
(HB9TLK) have permitted to control a remote transceiver thanks to a 
TCP/IP link through which it is transported the sound (as Skipe) and 
the commands (RX/TX).
 For this, click on the button Mdem. Click on Help (RX/TX 
operations through signals exchanged with a TCP/IP server) for more 
details.
 You must start, on the remote transceiver side, either 
Gui_serv_Multipsk (HB9TLK) or Multidem (F6CTE).
 
 It is not as complete as what is presented by K7AGE (because it is 
limited to digital modes and you can't change the XCVR frequency), 
but it permits at least to make digital QSOs through the remote 
transceiver. 
 For example it might be possible to send CQ DE F6CTE/VE5MU 
F6CTE/VE5MU +K if F6CTE controls  the transceiver of VE5MU (in fact 
it is theoritical as it is strictly forbidden in France). Afterwards, 
F6CTE will be able to QSO with another Ham. However there is a random 
latency time (up to several seconds) due to Internet which remind you 
that you are not in direct...
 
 73
 Patrick
 
 
   - Original Message - 
   From: John Bradley 
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
   Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 6:21 PM
   Subject: [multipsk] Remote Access Desktop, and remote digital 
operation
 
 
 
I have been fooling around with Windows XP remote access 
desktop, and found that I can readily access a desktop on any 
computer , wired or wireless, connected to my router.
 
 
 
   Further, I found that if  I was signed in on the ham computer , 
and MultiPSK or MixW was running already, I could change modes etc 
and actually do a digital QSO from a remote computer. I also had the 
Kenwood rig control software running, so could change frequencies, 
power, etc etc .
 
 
 
   Since Digital doesn't need any audio feed to the remote, or 
microphone feed, it really lends itself to remote operations.
 
 
 
   Trying this from the internet though did not permit accessing  
the computer.. according to XP documentation it's possible but didn't 
work for me. It looks like we need a Virtual Private Network (VPN) to 
do this?
 
 
 
   Possible  applications include remote control of a Station 
located in an EOC, and enabling folks like Patrick
 
   To access a station in North America to try the software 
personally. I'm not sure of the US laws, but know that
 
   Patrick could run a station here remotely, signing himself 
F6CTE/VE5 , since there is a reciprocal agreement between Canada and 
France
 
 
 
   Any bright ideas on how we can do this ?
 
 
 
   John
 
   VE5MU





[digitalradio] Re: FDMDV confusion

2007-12-08 Thread Dave
If that is the case, why is the ability to fine-tune included in
FDMDV? I find that many times a ham is a bit high or low in frequency
on digital voice, and it becomes necessary to tune them in. Not
every radio is perfectly aligned. It also appears that tuning in FDMDV
is more critical than other modes, as a change of just a few hertz can
make the difference between decoding and not decoding.

Dave


--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Becker, WØJAB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 At 11:50 AM 12/8/2007, you wrote:
 Sure do! And excellent decode right now on N0GR in Iowa. Just hard 
 to tune without a visual on the signal.
 
 Why was it hard to tune ?
 And why would there do a need for anything visual?
 If your rig in on 14,236 it should work just fine.
 I have never had a problem. Even while mobile.
 
 John, W0JAB





Re: [digitalradio] Re: FDMDV confusion

2007-12-08 Thread John Becker, WØJAB
Don't know Dave. Really can't say why.
Don't use software as I have had a AOR ARD9800 modem
in use for the last 5 years now.


At 02:14 PM 12/8/2007, you wrote:
If that is the case, why is the ability to fine-tune included in
FDMDV? I find that many times a ham is a bit high or low in frequency
on digital voice, and it becomes necessary to tune them in. Not
every radio is perfectly aligned. It also appears that tuning in FDMDV
is more critical than other modes, as a change of just a few hertz can
make the difference between decoding and not decoding.

Dave



Re: [digitalradio] Re: FDMDV confusion

2007-12-08 Thread Steinar Aanesland
Hi Dave,

A quote for this document 
http://n1su.com/fdmdv/FDMDV_Docs_Rel_1.0_revised.pdf

Tuning: Two methods of tuning are available, Manual Tune and Auto Tune.
Both use the mouse pointer that changes to a “+” when moved within the 
display
area. For Auto Tune, just left click anywhere within the display to sync 
your
receive frequency to the TX signal. For Manual Tune, move the mouse 
pointer to
the exact center of the BPSK carriers in the middle of the signal, then 
right click.

I hope this is a help.

73 de LA5VNA Steinar






John Becker, WØJAB skrev:

 Don't know Dave. Really can't say why.
 Don't use software as I have had a AOR ARD9800 modem
 in use for the last 5 years now.

 At 02:14 PM 12/8/2007, you wrote:
 If that is the case, why is the ability to fine-tune included in
 FDMDV? I find that many times a ham is a bit high or low in frequency
 on digital voice, and it becomes necessary to tune them in. Not
 every radio is perfectly aligned. It also appears that tuning in FDMDV
 is more critical than other modes, as a change of just a few hertz can
 make the difference between decoding and not decoding.
 
 Dave

  




Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at
http://www.obriensweb.com/drsked/drsked.php


View the DRCC numbers database at 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/database
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Re: [digitalradio] Re: FDMDV confusion

2007-12-08 Thread Dave 'Doc' Corio
Thanks, Steinar. That was actually the easy part! Getting enough 
audio to the software was the big problem. I'm using a Creative Labs 
Audigy sound card, and it automatically decides if it is mic or line 
input. I suspect it selected line input, and it just needed to be 
brought up to a higher level. Got it working perfectly and had a good 
QSO with it!

73
dave
KB3MOW


Steinar Aanesland wrote:
 Hi Dave,

 A quote for this document 
 http://n1su.com/fdmdv/FDMDV_Docs_Rel_1.0_revised.pdf

 Tuning: Two methods of tuning are available, Manual Tune and Auto Tune.
 Both use the mouse pointer that changes to a “+” when moved within the 
 display
 area. For Auto Tune, just left click anywhere within the display to sync 
 your
 receive frequency to the TX signal. For Manual Tune, move the mouse 
 pointer to
 the exact center of the BPSK carriers in the middle of the signal, then 
 right click.

 I hope this is a help.

 73 de LA5VNA Steinar






 John Becker, WØJAB skrev:
   
 Don't know Dave. Really can't say why.
 Don't use software as I have had a AOR ARD9800 modem
 in use for the last 5 years now.

 At 02:14 PM 12/8/2007, you wrote:
 
 If that is the case, why is the ability to fine-tune included in
 FDMDV? I find that many times a ham is a bit high or low in frequency
 on digital voice, and it becomes necessary to tune them in. Not
 every radio is perfectly aligned. It also appears that tuning in FDMDV
 is more critical than other modes, as a change of just a few hertz can
 make the difference between decoding and not decoding.

 Dave
   
  
 




 Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at
 http://www.obriensweb.com/drsked/drsked.php


 View the DRCC numbers database at 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/database
  
 Yahoo! Groups Links





   


Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at
http://www.obriensweb.com/drsked/drsked.php


View the DRCC numbers database at 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/database
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Re: [digitalradio] Re: FDMDV confusion

2007-12-08 Thread Steinar Aanesland

OK , Dave

It is to bad that I am not able to copy you on 20m , but the band is 
closed in my
part of the world right now ;)

73 de LA5VNA Steinar



Dave 'Doc' Corio skrev:
 Thanks, Steinar. That was actually the easy part! Getting enough 
 audio to the software was the big problem. I'm using a Creative Labs 
 Audigy sound card, and it automatically decides if it is mic or line 
 input. I suspect it selected line input, and it just needed to be 
 brought up to a higher level. Got it working perfectly and had a good 
 QSO with it!

 73
 dave
 KB3MOW


 Steinar Aanesland wrote:
   
 Hi Dave,

 A quote for this document 
 http://n1su.com/fdmdv/FDMDV_Docs_Rel_1.0_revised.pdf

 Tuning: Two methods of tuning are available, Manual Tune and Auto Tune.
 Both use the mouse pointer that changes to a “+” when moved within the 
 display
 area. For Auto Tune, just left click anywhere within the display to sync 
 your
 receive frequency to the TX signal. For Manual Tune, move the mouse 
 pointer to
 the exact center of the BPSK carriers in the middle of the signal, then 
 right click.

 I hope this is a help.

 73 de LA5VNA Steinar






 John Becker, WØJAB skrev:
   
 
 Don't know Dave. Really can't say why.
 Don't use software as I have had a AOR ARD9800 modem
 in use for the last 5 years now.

 At 02:14 PM 12/8/2007, you wrote:
 
   
 If that is the case, why is the ability to fine-tune included in
 FDMDV? I find that many times a ham is a bit high or low in frequency
 on digital voice, and it becomes necessary to tune them in. Not
 every radio is perfectly aligned. It also appears that tuning in FDMDV
 is more critical than other modes, as a change of just a few hertz can
 make the difference between decoding and not decoding.

 Dave
   
 
  
 
   


 Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at
 http://www.obriensweb.com/drsked/drsked.php


 View the DRCC numbers database at 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/database
  
 Yahoo! Groups Links





   
 


 Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at
 http://www.obriensweb.com/drsked/drsked.php


 View the DRCC numbers database at 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/database
  
 Yahoo! Groups Links





   




Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at
http://www.obriensweb.com/drsked/drsked.php


View the DRCC numbers database at 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/database
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Re: [digitalradio] Re: Remote Access Desktop, and remote digital operation

2007-12-08 Thread Patrick Lindecker
Hello Chris,

RR for all.

from city apartment to a nearby rural radio site - every hams dream I think
zero latency 
Yes it would be nice. But for this, you would need a TCP/IP (or AX25) 
transmission through air,  with a VHF or UHF link to control your HF rig. All 
with radio, the ideal...

For information,  the protocol followed for the TCP/IP control is in my WEB 
site (http://f6cte.free.fr) under Specifications -  
Multidem_TCP_IP_Version_1.doc.

73
Patrick


  - Original Message - 
  From: zl1boe2002 
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2007 8:16 PM
  Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Remote Access Desktop, and remote digital 
operation


  Hi Patrick,

  It is interesting that no completely integrated HF rig remote cntrol 
  solution seems to exist as yet. Maybe the just-announceed LogMein Pro 
  remote PC control software (with intergated audio) is one possibility.

  If one thinks about remote control from another point of view the 
  only connections between the Ham PC and the radio is two-way audio 
  (half duplex) and the serial path for CAT/CIV. The latter can be as 
  slow as 1200 bp/s if need be. If these two could be multiplexed 
  together then the path from PC to remote radio is one serial stream - 
  potentially well under 9600 bp/s. And the link and could be as simple 
  as dial-up modems, packet or via IP with something like the Lantronix 
  XPORT - an Ethernet-serial converter so small it is built into an 
  RJ45 socket. The Xport component can even provide simple web server 
  access (skilled programmer needed)!

  A solution of this kind requires no PC at all at the radio end. And 
  although we might laugh today at the idea of dial-up modems it 
  provides zero latency and excellent security (probably the hackers 
  today are too young to know or care about dial-up). Of course with 
  modems we would not want to try and remote control from France to 
  Canada but the typical application is from city apartment to a nearby 
  rural radio site - every hams dream I think.

  It is said that soon every household gadget will have built in 
  network access so why not the next generation of ham rigs?

  73, Chris ZL1BOE

  --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Lindecker [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  wrote:
  
   Hello John,
   
   The remote control through TCP/IP exists in Multipsk. I and Cesco 
  (HB9TLK) have permitted to control a remote transceiver thanks to a 
  TCP/IP link through which it is transported the sound (as Skipe) and 
  the commands (RX/TX).
   For this, click on the button Mdem. Click on Help (RX/TX 
  operations through signals exchanged with a TCP/IP server) for more 
  details.
   You must start, on the remote transceiver side, either 
  Gui_serv_Multipsk (HB9TLK) or Multidem (F6CTE).
   
   It is not as complete as what is presented by K7AGE (because it is 
  limited to digital modes and you can't change the XCVR frequency), 
  but it permits at least to make digital QSOs through the remote 
  transceiver. 
   For example it might be possible to send CQ DE F6CTE/VE5MU 
  F6CTE/VE5MU +K if F6CTE controls the transceiver of VE5MU (in fact 
  it is theoritical as it is strictly forbidden in France). Afterwards, 
  F6CTE will be able to QSO with another Ham. However there is a random 
  latency time (up to several seconds) due to Internet which remind you 
  that you are not in direct...
   
   73
   Patrick
   
   
   - Original Message - 
   From: John Bradley 
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
   Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 6:21 PM
   Subject: [multipsk] Remote Access Desktop, and remote digital 
  operation
   
   
   
   I have been fooling around with Windows XP remote access 
  desktop, and found that I can readily access a desktop on any 
  computer , wired or wireless, connected to my router.
   
   
   
   Further, I found that if I was signed in on the ham computer , 
  and MultiPSK or MixW was running already, I could change modes etc 
  and actually do a digital QSO from a remote computer. I also had the 
  Kenwood rig control software running, so could change frequencies, 
  power, etc etc .
   
   
   
   Since Digital doesn't need any audio feed to the remote, or 
  microphone feed, it really lends itself to remote operations.
   
   
   
   Trying this from the internet though did not permit accessing 
  the computer.. according to XP documentation it's possible but didn't 
  work for me. It looks like we need a Virtual Private Network (VPN) to 
  do this?
   
   
   
   Possible applications include remote control of a Station 
  located in an EOC, and enabling folks like Patrick
   
   To access a station in North America to try the software 
  personally. I'm not sure of the US laws, but know that
   
   Patrick could run a station here remotely, signing himself 
  F6CTE/VE5 , since there is a reciprocal agreement between Canada and 
  France
   
   
   
   Any bright ideas on how 

[digitalradio] PSK31 Operating Video

2007-12-08 Thread Mark Thompson
PSK31 Operating Video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZaAXMzGIUGA


  

Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ 


[digitalradio] PSK31 Transmitter Level Adjustment Video

2007-12-08 Thread Mark Thompson
PSK31 Transmitter Level Adjustment Video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I3CwHaX7t5M


  

Looking for last minute shopping deals?  
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.  
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping

Re: [digitalradio] Re: FDMDV confusion

2007-12-08 Thread Andrew O'Brien
Dave,

I need to learn from you now that I have an Audigy card that I
installed last week.  I use the on-board soundcard for receiving and
transmitting the tones but use the Audigy for the PC speakers .  Last
week, while testing with Cesco,  I decoded two QSOs while just parked
on 14236... BUT I could see nothing on the waterfall.  This week,
around 2.45PM local time I heard several loud digital signals on 14236
but none were visible in the waterfall, no were decoded.

Andy K3UK.


On Dec 8, 2007 3:37 PM, Dave 'Doc' Corio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Thanks, Steinar. That was actually the easy part! Getting enough
 audio to the software was the big problem. I'm using a Creative Labs
 Audigy sound card, and it automatically decides if it is mic or line
 input. I suspect it selected line input, and it just needed to be
 brought up to a higher level. Got it working perfectly and had a good
 QSO with it!

 73
 dave
 KB3MOW


[digitalradio] Hellschreiber Demonstration Video

2007-12-08 Thread Mark Thompson
Hellschreiber Demonstration Video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yR-EmyEBVqA


  

Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

[digitalradio] QRV 40M FDMDV 00:10z

2007-12-08 Thread Tony
Greetings all...

I'm QRV 7153.0 USB FDMDV -- 00:10Z December 9th... 

Tony - K2MO

 


Re: [digitalradio] FDMDV on 14.236

2007-12-08 Thread Patrick Lindecker
Steinar,

RR: left click on the waterfall  for autotuning and rightclick on the waterfall 
on the center of the transmission in manual.

So let's go for the test.

Cesco: the Steinar voice sound is very good and the Steinar's English accent is 
excellent (compared to mine).

73
Patrick



  - Original Message - 
  From: Steinar Aanesland 
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2007 12:25 PM
  Subject: Re: [digitalradio] FDMDV on 14.236


  Hi Patrick

  Take a look at this pdf file. It describe the procedure in a 
  straightforward way :)

  http://n1su.com/fdmdv/FDMDV_Docs_Rel_1.0_revised.pdf

  LA5VNA Steinar

  Patrick Lindecker skrev:
  
   Hello Steinar,
   
   I have two sound cards here, the first controlled in RX and the second 
   controlled in TX.
   
   At the moment I'm hearing to a transmission, but how to tune it . Is 
   it automatic?
   
   I'm QRV for a test. Tell me the time.
   
   73
   Patrick
   
   
   
  
   - Original Message -
   *From:* Steinar Aanesland mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   *To:* digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
   mailto:digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
   *Sent:* Saturday, December 08, 2007 11:20 AM
   *Subject:* [digitalradio] FDMDV on 14.236
  
   Hi,
  
   Anyone for digital voice qso 14.236?
  
   FDMDV Download:
   http://n1su.com/fdmdv/download.html
   http://n1su.com/fdmdv/download.html
  
   melp_1400.dll Download::
   http://www.ku7pdx.com/files/melp_dll.zip
   http://www.ku7pdx.com/files/melp_dll.zip
  
   73 de LA5VNA Steinar
  
   



   

[digitalradio] New digital links and DRCC web page

2007-12-08 Thread Andrew O'Brien
With the advent of the Digital Radio Century Club New Year contests, I
had a few requests to put all the email announcements for Jan 1, 2008
DRCC events  on a web page in HTML format.  I have just completed that
task and, while at it,  I added a few basic links to the primary
digital mode points of interest.

It has been a while since I did away with the old web pages,  and my
HTML ability is very rusty.  I use a wide screen 22 inch monitor in
high resolution, hopefully my attempts to scale for 800 X 600 are OK
and that you can squeeze the info in to smaller monitors.

It is still a work in progress, got to get some more consistent style
sheets, and link colours.  Anyway, you can check it out at

http://www.obriensweb.com/drcc.htm

Follow the links for DRCC contest  info.   More will be added as I get time.

-- 
Andy K3UK
www.obriensweb.com
(QSL via N2RJ)


[digitalradio] Major revisions to the Jan 1 2008 JT65 CRAWL

2007-12-08 Thread Andrew O'Brien
Thanks to input from Hisa 7L4IOU and Barry VE3CDX, I have made some
major changes to the 1/1/08  JT65A New Years Crawl,

Please check the contest link at http://www.obriensweb.com/drcc.htm
-- 
Andy K3UK
www.obriensweb.com
(QSL via N2RJ)


Re: [digitalradio] Re: FDMDV confusion

2007-12-08 Thread Dave 'Doc' Corio
Andy, I have just the opposite setup, but see the same results. I 
use Audigy for all the digital stuff, and the on-board SigmaTel for the 
Windoze sounds. From what I've seen, FDMDV requires a lot more audio 
level than any other digital mode I've used. That's not a condemnation 
of the mode, just an observation. You may have to crank it up as I did 
to be able to see the peaks to tune on in FDMDV. I think I had the 
display set on 'Spectrum', and it displayed a green line at the bottom 
of the display. When the other station transmitted, I right-clicked on 
the left-most peak on that line, and got good decode, but it did take a 
bit of experimentation to find the 'Sweet Spot'. It also took a lot 
higher audio level than required for MultiPSK or WinWarbler. to be able 
to see that peak.

Since I got the Audigy card specifically for digital modes, I 
haven't been that impressed with it. There is only one input, and it is 
'automagically' switched between line in and mic in, making it a real 
chore to set up a new mode! However, it seems to be as stable and useful 
as the on-board sound card, so it's at least usable.

I was hearing high-quality voice decoding from FDMDV today without 
seeing a thing on the display, so if you just crank up the input, it 
should give you a visual as to where to tune. It does seem a bit 
critical to get the tuning 'right on'. Maybe hook up later on 80 or 40 
if you like?

73
Dave KB3MOW


Andrew O'Brien wrote:

 Dave,

 I need to learn from you now that I have an Audigy card that I
 installed last week. I use the on-board soundcard for receiving and
 transmitting the tones but use the Audigy for the PC speakers . Last
 week, while testing with Cesco, I decoded two QSOs while just parked
 on 14236... BUT I could see nothing on the waterfall. This week,
 around 2.45PM local time I heard several loud digital signals on 14236
 but none were visible in the waterfall, no were decoded.

 Andy K3UK.

 On Dec 8, 2007 3:37 PM, Dave 'Doc' Corio [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 mailto:dcorio%40zitomedia.net wrote:
  Thanks, Steinar. That was actually the easy part! Getting enough
  audio to the software was the big problem. I'm using a Creative Labs
  Audigy sound card, and it automatically decides if it is mic or line
  input. I suspect it selected line input, and it just needed to be
  brought up to a higher level. Got it working perfectly and had a good
  QSO with it!
 
  73
  dave
  KB3MOW

 
 

 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
 Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.17/1178 - Release Date: 12/8/2007 
 11:59 AM