[digitalradio] Re: RTTY Standard

2008-02-12 Thread Brad
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Robert Chudek - K0RC [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 For amateur radio stations, 45.45 bauds and 170 Hz shift.
 


Don't be surprised to find some 200Hz shift there too. Kantronics or
someone used it as their standard, but generally, 170Hz machines had
no problem decoding it.

Brad VK2QQ



Re: [digitalradio] An experiment: APRS on Yahoo maps

2008-02-12 Thread Darrel Smith

Hi Joe,

It works well but I think the satellite pictures are from the stone  
age, at least around here.


Darrel, VE7CUS

On 12-Feb-08, at 11:08 AM, Joe Veldhuis wrote:


http://www.electroblog.com/radio/yahooaprs/index.php

Something I've been working on on-and-off for awhile. There are at  
least a dozen web apps out there that plot APRS data on Google maps,  
but in many areas (including all of Ottawa and Allegan counties in  
Michigan) there is no high-resolution aerial imagery. Yahoo's maps  
have medium to high-res imagery almost everywhere, but I haven't  
been able to find any APRS plotters using them. On the request of a  
local ham, a few months ago I threw together something that would  
get the location of a given APRS station, then redirect to a Yahoo  
map centered there.


I left it like that until today, when I decided to start working on  
it again. Now, rather than simply redirecting to Yahoo's site, it  
actually embeds a map on my own page. I haven't yet implemented the  
APRS icon set, but that will soon be done. Using Yahoo's AJAX API it  
is possible to put markers on the map using any specified image, so  
it's just a matter of taking the icon code for the station and  
selecting the appropriate image.


The goal is to provide as much information as possible about a  
single, explicitly queried station. Eventually I'll have status and  
comment text, as well as any weather data, displayed along with the  
position. It's not possible to make something like aprs.he.fi since  
that would require me to constantly monitor the APRS-IS feed, which  
would require a daemon process, which my host doesn't allow. I  
suppose I could do it on my home computer if there were demand for  
such a thing...


Comments?

-Joe, N8FQ






[digitalradio] SOFTWARE HELP NEEDED ?

2008-02-12 Thread Michael Mihailovic
Hi all i need some information where do i find software that will run 
my rtty/amtor terminal unit.
I have both mfj and kantronics utu units early types can someone 
recomend software and where to look fer it.
Any help is greatly appreciated i used to run a program called mbator
but it's lost now been of the air fer 20 yrs want to get my station 
running agn.
Thanks Regards
Mike
VK2OZ.




[digitalradio] An experiment: APRS on Yahoo maps

2008-02-12 Thread Joe Veldhuis
http://www.electroblog.com/radio/yahooaprs/index.php

Something I've been working on on-and-off for awhile. There are at least a 
dozen web apps out there that plot APRS data on Google maps, but in many areas 
(including all of Ottawa and Allegan counties in Michigan) there is no 
high-resolution aerial imagery. Yahoo's maps have medium to high-res imagery 
almost everywhere, but I haven't been able to find any APRS plotters using 
them. On the request of a local ham, a few months ago I threw together 
something that would get the location of a given APRS station, then redirect to 
a Yahoo map centered there.

I left it like that until today, when I decided to start working on it again. 
Now, rather than simply redirecting to Yahoo's site, it actually embeds a map 
on my own page. I haven't yet implemented the APRS icon set, but that will soon 
be done. Using Yahoo's AJAX API it is possible to put markers on the map using 
any specified image, so it's just a matter of taking the icon code for the 
station and selecting the appropriate image.

The goal is to provide as much information as possible about a single, 
explicitly queried station. Eventually I'll have status and comment text, as 
well as any weather data, displayed along with the position. It's not possible 
to make something like aprs.he.fi since that would require me to constantly 
monitor the APRS-IS feed, which would require a daemon process, which my host 
doesn't allow. I suppose I could do it on my home computer if there were demand 
for such a thing...

Comments?

-Joe, N8FQ


Re: [digitalradio] Re: RTTY Standard

2008-02-12 Thread Jose A. Amador
Robert Chudek - K0RC wrote:
 I know the AEA PK-232 used 200 Hz, as well as the Heathkit HK-232, but 
 the Kantronics _KAM_ series all used 170 Hz shift. That was the reason I 
 switched from the AEA to the KAM products.
  
 What Kantronics models used 200 Hz shift?
  
 73 de Bob - KØRC in MN

Precisely, the KPC-2 used as dumb modem with an RTTY or pactor terminal.
I made it run with Terman93. Sometimes it did well, sometimes, not so 
well...I added a tuning aid with two LEDs.

Actually, the KPC-2 was intended only for packet...

73,

Jose, CO2JA



__

Participe en Universidad 2008.
11 al 15 de febrero del 2008.
Palacio de las Convenciones, Ciudad de la Habana, Cuba
http://www.universidad2008.cu


Re: [digitalradio] Re: Operating FSK RTTY in a contest ?

2008-02-12 Thread Sholto Fisher
MultiPSK can do 850Hz shift RTTY and add a CR at 72 chars if anyone 
feels like recreating the old days! maybe there's someone still with a 
mechanical RTTY machine who will let some of us younger guys experience 
a QSO...

I'm up for it but it would have to be 30m (only decent antenna I got 
right now)

73, Sholto  KE7HPV.




Les Warriner wrote:
 That smell and those sounds will never be forgotten.  Too bad the brats 
 have no chance to experience them, 15, 19, etcLoops - reminiscing
 
 73  Les
 
 
 At 07:30 AM 2/12/2008, you wrote:
 
 --- In 
 mailto:digitalradio%40yahoogroups.comdigitalradio@yahoogroups.com, 
 Robert Chudek - K0RC [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 
  I started my RTTY career using 2125 and 2975 tones...

 Same here, and with a pre-WW-II Super Pro receiver that would have
 drifted right out the window if it had not been screwed down. And
 a transmitter of the same vintage with a VFO down in the broadcast
 band and multiplying all the way up. Operation on 20M was
 practically unthinkable, even if we had not been in an extreme
 fringe area for TV and even if the transmitter had not had about
 18 of excess lead length in the PA tank circuit.

 until those young brats started pushing the envelope (or should I say,
 squeezing the envelope) with those 170 Hz tones... things were much
 simpler in those good ole days... your betcha... the smell of a well
 oiled machine, a whiff of ozone from the commutator, polar relays!
 (hey remember them?), and the quiet roar of all that machinery
 pounding out your CQ's... It was great... well, except for two
 things... having your platen pounded to death at the right margin, and
 coming home to find a half roll of paper behind the machine because
 some smart-a** thought it was cute to auto start your machine and feed
 it 15 minutes of line feeds. Yep, the good ole days... ! ! !

 Seems like the late Irv Hoff was especially plagued with that
 problem, as he had a large fan club and a small but vocal
 anti-fan club. He worked out a scheme for the Model 28 stunt
 box - I have one of the machines fitted out that way, but I
 no longer remember exactly what it all was. It involved putting
 in the automatic carriage return and line feed kit, to take care
 of the occasional missing carriage return. Then it was something
 like having the carriage return character also do the line feed,
 and suppressing line feeds on repeated carriage returns.

 Jim W6JVE


 Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
 Checked by AVG Free Edition.
 Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.14/1247 - Release Date: 
 1/28/2008 10:59 AM
 


[digitalradio] Re: Operating FSK RTTY in a contest ?

2008-02-12 Thread jhaynesatalumni
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Robert Chudek - K0RC [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 I started my RTTY career using 2125 and 2975 tones...
 
Same here, and with a pre-WW-II Super Pro receiver that would have
drifted right out the window if it had not been screwed down.  And
a transmitter of the same vintage with a VFO down in the broadcast
band and multiplying all the way up.  Operation on 20M was
practically unthinkable, even if we had not been in an extreme
fringe area for TV and even if the transmitter had not had about
18 of excess lead length in the PA tank circuit.

until those young brats started pushing the envelope (or should I say,
squeezing the envelope) with those 170 Hz tones... things were much
simpler in those good ole days... your betcha... the smell of a well
oiled machine, a whiff of ozone from the commutator, polar relays!
(hey remember them?), and the quiet roar of all that machinery
pounding out your CQ's... It was great... well, except for two
things... having your platen pounded to death at the right margin, and
coming home to find a half roll of paper behind the machine because
some smart-a** thought it was cute to auto start your machine and feed
it 15 minutes of line feeds. Yep, the good ole days...  ! ! ! 

Seems like the late Irv Hoff was especially plagued with that
problem, as he had a large fan club and a small but vocal
anti-fan club.  He worked out a scheme for the Model 28 stunt
box - I have one of the machines fitted out that way, but I
no longer remember exactly what it all was.  It involved putting
in the automatic carriage return and line feed kit, to take care
of the occasional missing carriage return.  Then it was something
like having the carriage return character also do the line feed,
and suppressing line feeds on repeated carriage returns.

Jim W6JVE



Re: [digitalradio] Re: RTTY Standard

2008-02-12 Thread Jose A. Amador
Jose A. Amador wrote:
 Kantronics and AEA too.
 
 I have a Communications Quarterly issue from the mid 90's somewhere here 
 in which the author modifies 

A PK-232...forgot to include that

 its filters for 170 Hz and describes a 
 great improvement for AMTOR...but also becomes almost useless for 300 
 baud packet.

Jose, CO2JA

__

Participe en Universidad 2008.
11 al 15 de febrero del 2008.
Palacio de las Convenciones, Ciudad de la Habana, Cuba
http://www.universidad2008.cu


Re: [digitalradio] Re: RTTY Standard

2008-02-12 Thread Jose A. Amador

Kantronics and AEA too.

I have a Communications Quarterly issue from the mid 90's somewhere here 
in which the author modifies its filters for 170 Hz and describes a 
great improvement for AMTOR...but also becomes almost useless for 300 
baud packet.

AM7910 modems have 200 Hz shift.

Jose, CO2JA

---

Brad wrote:
 --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Robert Chudek - K0RC [EMAIL 
 PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 For amateur radio stations, 45.45 bauds and 170 Hz shift.

 
 
 Don't be surprised to find some 200Hz shift there too. Kantronics or
 someone used it as their standard, but generally, 170Hz machines had
 no problem decoding it.
 
 Brad VK2QQ


__

Participe en Universidad 2008.
11 al 15 de febrero del 2008.
Palacio de las Convenciones, Ciudad de la Habana, Cuba
http://www.universidad2008.cu


Re: [digitalradio] Re: Operating FSK RTTY in a contest ?

2008-02-12 Thread Les Warriner
That smell and those sounds will never be forgotten.  Too bad the 
brats have no chance to experience them, 15, 19, etcLoops - reminiscing


73  Les


At 07:30 AM 2/12/2008, you wrote:

--- In 
mailto:digitalradio%40yahoogroups.comdigitalradio@yahoogroups.com, 
Robert Chudek - K0RC [EMAIL PROTECTED]

wrote:

 I started my RTTY career using 2125 and 2975 tones...

Same here, and with a pre-WW-II Super Pro receiver that would have
drifted right out the window if it had not been screwed down. And
a transmitter of the same vintage with a VFO down in the broadcast
band and multiplying all the way up. Operation on 20M was
practically unthinkable, even if we had not been in an extreme
fringe area for TV and even if the transmitter had not had about
18 of excess lead length in the PA tank circuit.

until those young brats started pushing the envelope (or should I say,
squeezing the envelope) with those 170 Hz tones... things were much
simpler in those good ole days... your betcha... the smell of a well
oiled machine, a whiff of ozone from the commutator, polar relays!
(hey remember them?), and the quiet roar of all that machinery
pounding out your CQ's... It was great... well, except for two
things... having your platen pounded to death at the right margin, and
coming home to find a half roll of paper behind the machine because
some smart-a** thought it was cute to auto start your machine and feed
it 15 minutes of line feeds. Yep, the good ole days... ! ! !

Seems like the late Irv Hoff was especially plagued with that
problem, as he had a large fan club and a small but vocal
anti-fan club. He worked out a scheme for the Model 28 stunt
box - I have one of the machines fitted out that way, but I
no longer remember exactly what it all was. It involved putting
in the automatic carriage return and line feed kit, to take care
of the occasional missing carriage return. Then it was something
like having the carriage return character also do the line feed,
and suppressing line feeds on repeated carriage returns.

Jim W6JVE


Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.14/1247 - Release Date: 
1/28/2008 10:59 AM


[digitalradio] Re: PD Modes

2008-02-12 Thread Roland M. Zurmely
PD Modes
The PD modes were developed jointly by Don Rotier and Paul Turner. 
Although
they're a little complicated, they represent a fair trade-off between 
color accuracy
and transmission time.
VIS CODES
PD50 93d (decimal)
PD90 99d
PD120 95d
PD160 98d
PD180 96d
PD240 97d
PD290 94d
COLOR MODE Y, R-Y, B-Y (See Appendix B)
SCAN SEQUENCE Y, R-Y, B-Y
NORMAL DISPLAY RESOLUTION
PD50 320x256 (all include 16-line header)
PD90 320x256
PD120 640x496
PD160 512x400
PD180 640x496
PD240 640x496
PD290 800x616
TRANSMISSION TIMES
PD50 49.7 seconds
PD90 90.0 seconds
PD120 126.1 seconds
PD160 160.9 seconds
PD180 187.1 seconds
PD240 248.0 seconds
PD290 288.7 seconds
COLOR SCAN TIMES (Y, R-Y, B-Y)
PD50 91.520ms
PD90 170.240ms
PD120 121.600ms
PD160 195.584ms
PD180 183.040ms
PD240 244.480ms
PD290 228.800ms
TIMING SEQUENCE
Note: two complete lines are shown.
(1) Sync pulse 20.000 1200hz
(2) Porch 2.080ms 1500hz
(3) Y scan (from odd line)
(4) R-Y scan averaged for two lines
(5) B-Y averaged for two lines
(6) Y scan (from even line)
Repeat until correct number of lines are transmitted for sub-mode

Appendix B Y, R-Y, B-Y Color Encoding
(Y, R-Y, B-Y) encoding is used in Robot and PD modes, as well as the 
seldomused
Wrasse SC2-120 mode. This method of encoding is also referred to as
(Y/C), (Y'U'V'), (Y'CBCR), and other names. Although all these refer 
to the same
overall method of encoding, the exact scalings used vary somewhat by
implementation and developer.
The encoding used in ChromaPIX and W95SSTV is compliant with
ITU BT. Rec. 601. (the 1953 NTSC standard) Because there has been no
clearly-defined standard, the scalings described below may vary 
slightly from
those used by other developers.
To convert non-linear RGB to [Y, R-Y, B-Y] (scaled 0-255) :
Y = 16.0 + (.003906 * ((65.738 * R) + (129.057 * G) + (25.064 * B)))
RY = 128.0 + (.003906 * ((112.439 * R) + (-94.154 * G) + (-18.285 * 
B)))
BY = 128.0 + (.003906 * ((-37.945 * R) + (-74.494 * G) + (112.439 * 
B)))
Again, as with RGB encoding, these values can be converted to 
frequency, for
SSTV transmission :
Frequency = 1500 + (v * 3.1372549)
(where `v' is the Y, R-Y, or B-Y value)
Conversely, Y, R-Y, B-Y values scaled 0-255 may be converted back to 
nonlinear
RGB:
R = 0.003906 * ((298.082 * (Y – 16.0)) + (408.583 * (RY – 128.0)))
G = 0.003906 * ((298.082 * (Y – 16.0)) + (-100.291 * (BY – 128.0)) + 
(-208.12 * (RY – 128.0)))
B = 0.003906 * ((298.082 * (Y – 16.0)) + (516.411 * (BY – 128.0)))

From:
http://www.barberdsp.com/files/Dayton%20Paper.pdf


73 de Roland PY4ZBZ


--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Simon Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 Does anyone have a full description of the SSTV PD modes developed 
by Don Rotier (SK I belive) and Paul Turner?
 
 Simon Brown, HB9DRV





Re: [digitalradio] Re: RTTY Standard

2008-02-12 Thread Robert Chudek - K0RC
I know the AEA PK-232 used 200 Hz, as well as the Heathkit HK-232, but the 
Kantronics KAM series all used 170 Hz shift. That was the reason I switched 
from the AEA to the KAM products.

What Kantronics models used 200 Hz shift?

73 de Bob - KØRC in MN


  - Original Message - 
  From: Jose A. Amador 
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 8:35 AM
  Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: RTTY Standard



  Kantronics and AEA too.

  I have a Communications Quarterly issue from the mid 90's somewhere here 
  in which the author modifies its filters for 170 Hz and describes a 
  great improvement for AMTOR...but also becomes almost useless for 300 
  baud packet.

  AM7910 modems have 200 Hz shift.

  Jose, CO2JA

  ---

  Brad wrote:
   --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Robert Chudek - K0RC [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
   wrote:
   For amateur radio stations, 45.45 bauds and 170 Hz shift.
  
   
   
   Don't be surprised to find some 200Hz shift there too. Kantronics or
   someone used it as their standard, but generally, 170Hz machines had
   no problem decoding it.
   
   Brad VK2QQ

  __

  Participe en Universidad 2008.
  11 al 15 de febrero del 2008.
  Palacio de las Convenciones, Ciudad de la Habana, Cuba
  http://www.universidad2008.cu