Re: [digitalradio] Re: Psk Mail Help someone!!

2009-04-04 Thread Per
I'm sure if they open source HRD then interest for it would pick up.

73 de Per, sm0rwo





From: Alan Wilson ke4...@gmail.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, April 4, 2009 4:05:50 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Psk Mail Help someone!!


Thanks for the help...maybe we can get some hams here in the US interested. Not 
much here now. If it could be added to HRD I'm sure interest would pick up. 73, 
Alan 

 
 
 
 
  _ _ __



   


  

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Psk Mail Help someone!!

2009-04-04 Thread Phil Barnett
Simon (HB9DRV) wrote:
 I doubt it *very* much!
Interest would pick up. That's pretty funny.


[digitalradio] Re: 30M

2009-04-04 Thread Simon Brown
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andrew O'Brien andrewob...@... wrote:

 Just a reminder to keep 30Ms in mind for digital modes
 

Well you really got something going - over the last 24 hours I've seen six 
continents, 43 countries and 194 stations.

Today being Saturday I expect to see a lot more.

30m is now humming with activity, and thankfully no contests!

Simon HB9DRV



Re: [digitalradio] Re: Psk Mail Help someone!!

2009-04-04 Thread Simon (HB9DRV)
I mean open-sourcing the code! It's a massive project which uses commercial 
UI libraries from www.codejock.com and InstallShield for making kits, before 
you can even compile you'll have to spend at least $3k on software licences 
alone.

My plans for Q3/Q4 are a SDR console, this may be a better interface for 
mode like PSK Mail.

Simon Brown, HB9DRV
www.ham-radio-deluxe.com

- Original Message - 
From: Phil Barnett ph...@philb.us

 Interest would pick up. That's pretty funny.



Re: [digitalradio] Re: Psk Mail Help someone!!

2009-04-04 Thread Simon (HB9DRV)
I doubt it *very* much!

Simon Brown, HB9DRV
www.ham-radio-deluxe.com
  - Original Message - 
  From: Per 


  I'm sure if they open source HRD then interest for it would pick up.

[digitalradio] Digital SSTV sites DRM

2009-04-04 Thread Paul Young
Hi all,

Hi All

I have been updating my pages displaying world digital sites.

Europe: 
http://www.g0hwc.com/digital_sstv_europe.html

USA, Canada and Carabean:
http://www.g0hwc.com/digital_sstv_usa_can.html

Australasia:
http://www.g0hwc.com/digital_sstv_australasia.html

one page for all:
http://www.g0hwc.com/digital_sstv_world.html

Some new sites added and others updated.
If your site is missing or has any errors please let me know.

Paul G0HWC
http://www.g0hwc.com





[digitalradio] OFDM master thesis .Need help

2009-04-04 Thread Andrew O'Brien
hi I am a student of system engineering and I'm searching for a topic in MIMO 
or OFDM for my master thesis. I need some help. thank you.  

Welcome to the group, hopefully some people will be able to help you, what help 
do you need?

Andy K3UK



[digitalradio] New test version of Multipsk: BPSK1200 Packet (for satellite) + CW Keyer + removal of limitation on ALE/ALE scanning

2009-04-04 Thread Patrick Lindecker
Hello to all testers,

I have issued a new test version of Multipsk.

It contains the Multipsk test version, help files and a CW interface diagram: 
http://f6cte.free.fr/MULTIPSK_TEST_04_04_2009.ZIP

Paste this adress in your Internet Explorer or equivalent. Download the file.
Create a tempory folder (C:\TEST, for example), unzip the file in it and start 
C:\TEST\Multipsk.exe (the auxiliary files will be created automatically). 

After the first comments, I have modified the switch between FSK and PSK Packet 
and I have removed the limitation on ALE/ALE400 scanning (useful for the ALE400 
tests in progress).

Attention,  it is advised against the clicks of the transceiver relays. 
Normally the transceiver must scan without any clicks of the relays. If they 
click, try to work in Split mode (Options window). If they keep on 
clicking, it is advised not to scan.
Note: Multipsk scan through Commander (DXLab) or HRD.

73
Patrick


- Original Message - 
From: Patrick Lindecker 
To: multi...@yahoogroups.com ; multipsk_t...@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Saturday, April 04, 2009 1:24 AM
Subject: [multipsk] New test version of Multipsk: BPSK1200 Packet (for 
satellite) + CW Keyer


Hello all testers,

I have issued a new test version of Multipsk.

It contains the Multipsk test version, help files and a CW interface diagram: 
http://f6cte.free.fr/MULTIPSK_TEST_03_04_2009.ZIP

Paste this adress in your Internet Explorer or equivalent. Download the file.
Create a tempory folder (C:\TEST, for example), unzip the file in it and start 
C:\TEST\Multipsk.exe (the auxiliary files will be created automatically). 


New functions to test (in complement to the Andy's ones on ALE400...)

1) Coding/Decoding of Packet BPSK1200
This mode is used for satellite (as LUSAT LO-19 for example) transmissions in 
UHF (USB). But it could also be used in VHF (FM ) with a better performance 
than Packet FSK, in Unproto (APRS) or in connected mode.

See specifications further on.

It would be interesting for Hams or SWL having the adequate UHF satellite 
hardware to try to follow satellite BPSK1200 Packet transmissions. In interface 
with Commander (or HRD), the program can follow (according to my limited tests) 
a drift of 40 Hz/s, which is normally sufficient for this type of application.

Note: it would be also interesting to know if Packet PSK 1200 bauds is really 
better than Packet FSK 1200 bauds in standard connected mode or APRS (VHF FM).

Extract from the help

The operator can choose only Packet 1200 bauds for UHF satellite transmissions 
(JAS-2 FO-29, LUSAT LO-19, UO 14, PACSAT AO-16) in UHF (USB) or classical 
transmissions in VHF (FM). 

Available BPSK Packet options

These two options are available by clicking on the Options button which opens 
the window Packet parameters. In the sub-window BPSK Packet options, it is 
proposed:

By default , in FM (normal way to listen BPSK1200), there is no need of any 
AFC (Automatic Frequency Control), but it is required in USB.

  a.. option AFC on AF: by default, this option is unnotched.  The automatic 
frequency control is required in USB (if it is used to get a better signal to 
noise ratio).  In that case, aCe mode est utilisé pour les transmissions Ce 
mode est utilisé pour les transmissions Ce mode est utilisé pour les 
transmissions  50 HZ shift of the 1200 Hz AF carrier can be made up, but not 
beyond, the carrier frequency at 1200 Hz being supposed fixed.

  b.. option AFC on HF (satellite): by default, this option is unnotched.  To 
listen satellite BPSK1200, USB is the normal way to listen. It is proposed an 
AFC applied to the transceiver HF, through the CAT system, to keep the downlink 
receiver properly tuned to the BPSK transmission, during a satellite pass 
2) Possibility to automatically display the received Locators on Googleearth 
maps
This applies to the standard decoding and to all panoramics (PSK/CW/RTTY). In 
this case, all Locators received on a 3 KHz bandwidth will be displayed on 
GoogleEarth. This option is available on the controls part of the world map 
(button World).

3) CW: working in QSK and CW keyer
The QSK button permits to work in QSK (reception between transmitted Morse 
signs), by leaving the decoding on duty during CW transmission. 

The Keyer button permits to transform Multipsk in a CW generator (automatic 
dots and dashes), up to 30 wpm. The double-lever Morse key must be connected to 
the PC through the same serial port as the one selected to switch the 
transceiver.

This works only if the Yes without sound, for big PC (by timer) option is 
selected in the MODE window (click on the red button labeled MODE).

See the CW (RX/TX) interface diagram in the test package and the help about CW.

Description of the PSK Packet

The PSK Packet at 1200 bauds shares the same characteristics as the FSK Packet 
at 1200 bauds, except some ones:

* the modulation is a DBPSK one (differential binary phase shift keying), as, 
for example, in PSK31. DBPSK is 

[digitalradio] ALE141 v ALE 400 scan detect outcomes

2009-04-04 Thread Andrew O'Brien
My initial tests seem to show that weak signals in ALE141 via PC-ALE do better 
(decode) than ALE400 weak signals in Multipsk.  It is not a scientific 
comparison but just an observation, not a lot of ALE 400 soundings to get a 
better comparison .

If I remember correctly, last year there reports that ALE141 decoded easier via 
Multipsk than via PC-ALE .  I may do some comparisons today.

Andy K3UK



Re: [digitalradio] ALE141 v ALE 400 scan detect outcomes

2009-04-04 Thread Patrick Lindecker
Andy,

Normally there is a gain of 5 dB on minimum S/N between one mode and another 
(gain of 5 dB, simply due to a lower speed).
Have you checked your sound card calibration?

73
Patrick


- Original Message - 
From: Andrew O'Brien k3uka...@gmail.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, April 04, 2009 6:40 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] ALE141 v ALE 400 scan detect outcomes


 My initial tests seem to show that weak signals in ALE141 via PC-ALE do 
 better (decode) than ALE400 weak signals in Multipsk.  It is not a 
 scientific comparison but just an observation, not a lot of ALE 400 
 soundings to get a better comparison .

 If I remember correctly, last year there reports that ALE141 decoded 
 easier via Multipsk than via PC-ALE .  I may do some comparisons today.

 Andy K3UK



 

 Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at
 http://www.obriensweb.com/sked


 Recommended software:  Winwarbler, FLDIGI, DM780, or Multipsk



 Yahoo! Groups Links




 



[digitalradio] Re: 30M

2009-04-04 Thread dl8le
And if there wouldn't be mainly PSK and some RTTY but also Olivia activity or 
other digital modes then it would be even more fun ...

73

Juergen, DL8LE

--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Simon Brown simon.br...@... wrote:

 --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andrew O'Brien andrewobrie@ wrote:
 
  Just a reminder to keep 30Ms in mind for digital modes
  
 
 Well you really got something going - over the last 24 hours I've seen six 
 continents, 43 countries and 194 stations.
 
 Today being Saturday I expect to see a lot more.
 
 30m is now humming with activity, and thankfully no contests!
 
 Simon HB9DRV





Re: [digitalradio] Re: 30M

2009-04-04 Thread Simon (HB9DRV)
I'm seeing Olivia and MFSK-16

Simon Brown, HB9DRV
www.ham-radio-deluxe.com

- Original Message - 
From: dl8le dl...@darc.de


 And if there wouldn't be mainly PSK and some RTTY but also Olivia activity 
 or other digital modes then it would be even more fun ...



Re: [digitalradio] Re: 30M

2009-04-04 Thread Andy obrien
and I just easily worked CarlaBruniLand on 30M JT65A, great band.

Andy K3UK

On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Simon (HB9DRV) simon.br...@kns.ch wrote:
 I'm seeing Olivia and MFSK-16


[digitalradio] Re: 30M

2009-04-04 Thread Andrew O'Brien
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andy obrien k3uka...@... wrote:

 and I just easily worked CarlaBruniLand on 30M JT65A, great band.
 
 Andy K3UK
 
 On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Simon (HB9DRV) simon.br...@... wrote:
  I'm seeing Olivia and MFSK-16



30M open to Australia from my QTH as of 2050 UTC

JA2ACI VK4BLK R-13




[digitalradio] Re: Newb digital mode guy with Newb questions

2009-04-04 Thread doug_helbling
Thanks again, folks, for the Newb replies last month.

I've been busy dealing with some family health issues since then, but finally 
got back to my Great Digital Communications Exploration this week.  Today I 
landed my first QSO!  Got a 599 from Mexico right off the bat on my first 
attempt.  Followed up with another from OK
 (from here at my QTH in northwest Oregon).

Lessons learned and changes made:

1 - BAD built-in sound card (or driver) in the laptop.  My little Lenovo's 
built in sound card was not sampling at a high enough rate to get decent copy, 
even from pre-recorded signals.  I updated the drivers with the latest from the 
mgfer's website, but no improvements.  Solution: replace nearly new laptop 
(dual 1.6 GHz CPU) with old P3 900 MHz box sitting under the dust in the corner 
of the shop.  Boom!  It works!  (total setup time from power up to operational 
HRD/DM780: 20 minutues)  For future field day type stuff, I may add a PCMCIA 
sound card to the lappie and give it a chance to redeem itself.

2 - Hoist up that Dipole - I combined my two back porch 10M and 20M dipoles 
into a single 5 band (20/17/15/12/10) home-made dipole in the attic: still 
operating in stealth mode, but about 5' higher off the ground and away from the 
gutter flashing.  And now I have 3 more bands to play with.

3 - Old cables need love, too!  When I put my modest station together, it got a 
new IC-718, but everything else was scrounged, including a little Dentron 
tuner I landed off of ebay for $15.  I used an old stretch of RG8 from my CB 
radio days (circa 1975) to connect the tuner to the antenna.  The SWR was just 
not looking right, so I took everything apart and found the ground connection 
on one side of my cable was decidedly bad.  Resoldered the connector and SWR 
came right down (to managable  2 levels).  

4 - Shrink up that ground path.  I moved my shack into the corner of the 
garage and shrank the ground cable from 25' to 6'.  Noise level is down and 
there's no discernible RFI on my home media center anymore.

I look forward to a rash of new QSO's in my future ... I am seeing 20M calls in 
from Serbia, European Russia, Costa Rica, and other points all around the US 1K 
miles away and more.  Cheers and thanks again for the advice.  

- Doug / KE7SEI

PS - Still trying out all of the various Windoze PSKware, including those 
suggested here, but HRD/DM780 is still my new best friend.  Thank you, Simon!

--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, doug_helbling doug_helbl...@... wrote:

 Thanks for the welcome and the great advice and counsel, 
 Patrick/Andrew/Christian/Marc/Simon/Siegfried et al.
 
 I did some more poking around on my rig, and found that my audio input to the 
 PC was indeed the Mic input, not Line In, as suggested more than once.  
 Unfortunately, on this PC (a laptop), there is no Line In, only Mike In ... 
 but I think I found a different driver for the on-board audio that will allow 
 me to reconfigure the jack.  I will definitely give that a try.  If it fails, 
 I have an older / slower desktop machine and a drawer full of decent 
 Soundblaster PCI cards I can try instead.  It's a 1GHz P3, but it should 
 probably be strong enough for this.  If that fails, I've got a dual CPU 2GHz 
 P4 gathering dust in the corner that's just waiting for a purpose.  ;-)
 
 I'll also follow up on your other great suggestions, including pointers to 
 other tools/modes and to specific bands/freqs.  
 
 Cheers and thanks again.
 
 - Doug / KE7SEI