RE: [digitalradio] ros
And a bow, rope and stick to create fire ? HI HI 73 - Bill KA8VIT > > I got into RTTY in 1976. Still use a machine for RTTY. > _ Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection. http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469227/direct/01/
RE: [digitalradio] Remote CW over the internet
We use TeamSpeak for doing stuff like this. It has the lowest latency of any VoIP program we've tried! http://www.goteamspeak.com/ 73 - Bill KA8VIT > To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 23:22:14 + > Subject: [digitalradio] Remote CW over the internet > > > My setup is basically a PC with digital mode software, Interface and > Radio. > I am experimenting with Log-Me-In software to operate my base station > PC over the internet. At present I can operate the digital modes such > as PSK over the internet from the remote PC. In the case of CW, I am > looking for for a means of passing CW audio from the RX back to the > remote location. > 73 > Stan > > > > > Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at > http://www.obriensweb.com/sked > > Check our other Yahoo Groups > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dxlist/ > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/contesting > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > _ Time for vacation? WIN what you need- enter now! http://www.gowindowslive.com/summergiveaway/?ocid=tag_jlyhm
RE: [digitalradio] Shoutcast of PSK31 - 14.070
I use TeamSpeak to stream repeaters and HF to the internet. It allows me to monitor while at work. It had the lowest latency of all the programs I tired. Skype, Ventrilo, Window Media Encoder... etc. TeamSpeak was the only one that would allow me to use HRD to tune the radio while using TeamSpeak to stream the audio. With the others I could not tune in a CW signal because by the time I heard the audio I had actually already tuned past the signal I was trying to copy. 73 - Bill KA8VIT > To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 28 Mar > 2008 02:55:56 -0400> Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Shoutcast of PSK31 - 14.070> > > On Thursday 27 March 2008 05:15:16 pm Bill Vodall WA7NWP wrote:> > Has > anybody set up a Shoutcast or similar Internet radio feed of a psk> > radio > channel like 14.070?> >> > I wonder how the latency and jitter on an TCP/IP > audio feed would be> > tolerated.> > I just went through the process of > setting up an Icecast of a 2 meter repeater > here in town. While can't do > this to 14.070, I don't mind sharing the setups > that it took to get that > going on Linux with someone who is interested.> _ Windows Live Hotmail is giving away Zunes. http://www.windowslive-hotmail.com/ZuneADay/?locale=en-US&ocid=TXT_TAGLM_Mobile_Zune_V3
RE: [digitalradio] MARS WinLink in Tennessee Storms
YES ! 73 - Bill KA8VIT = Bill Chaikin, KA8VIT USS COD Amateur Radio Club W8COD WW2 Submarine USS COD SS-224 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ka8vit.com = To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 12:27:50 -0800 Subject: Re: [digitalradio] MARS WinLink in Tennessee Storms What I found even more interesting than the article on QRZ was the comments on it. To a "T" everyone commented that it was good that WINLINK2000 was now being used on MARS freqs instead of the amateur bands. Not having much experience with Pactor and WL2K, I wasn't aware that there were bandwidth issues associated with the WL2K system. Is this as big an issue as it appears to be? I'm personally more concerned with the expensive proprietary nature of the Pactor modes and the standardization on it by the WL2K proponents. Any comments?? Jeff Moore KE7ACY Deschutes County ARES Bend, Oregon - Original Message - From: Mark Thompson Subject: [digitalradio] MARS WinLink in Tennessee Storms N1IN MARS WinLink in Tennessee Storms Those tornados that swept across the Mid South Feb. 5 and 6 carried Army MARS into a new era of operations. For the first time as far back as we can remember, a state government called for MARS deployment in response to an actual emergency. The resulting teamwork gave the Tennessee Emergency Management Agency—TEMA—its only e-mail link during President Bush’s visit to the storm-stricken area. That link was the army MARS WinLink 2000 Radio e-mail system. Stuart S. Carter, the Army MARS Chief, gave a full account of the MARS tornado response on his biweekly broadcast to members Feb. 15. Compiled from several after-action reports, Carter’s account follows verbatim. On Tuesday, 5 Feb 08, Region 4 Director Jim Hamilton (AAA4RD) was watching the weather on TV and based on the developing storm, called Tennessee SD Chris Bindrim (AAA4TN), to place TN Army MARS on alert. A short time after calling Bindrim, Hamilton received an email from David Wolfe, AAR4CY, (Chief of Communication for the TN Emergency Management Agency (TEMA), State RACES Officer, and an Army MARS member) requesting TN Army MARS be placed on standby for possible support to TEMA. In addition to calling Bindrim, Hamilton also called Kentucky SD Barry Jackson (AAA4KY) who was already alerting Kentucky Army MARS members to stand-by for possible emergency support to officials in Kentucky. What I just told you Jim Moore, Great Falls, MT, AAM8AMT is that before the Tornados struck, the preparatory alerts were sent to Region 4 SDs and members to “Prepare and Stand by to assist.” This event illustrates the importance of detailed preparation and training which has taken place during realistic disaster response exercises over the past several years. In the case of TN, the story goes back a year and a half. Steve Waterman (AAA9AC) began working with TEMA’s David Wolfe, preparing for just such a deployment. At the time, Army MARS was just beginning to adopt the Winlink 2000 radio e-mail network system, and with the assistance of the then TN State Director, Paul Drothler, AAV4DJ, Army MARS had just signed a Memorandum of Understanding with TEMA. This MOU just served to strengthen an already strong relationship between TEMA and Army MARS. Next, Wolfe led TEMA staffers who were already hams to becoming MARS members and to become qualified MARS WinLink 2000 operators. The rest of Wolfe’s team soon obtained their amateur radio and Army MARS licenses. The next step was joint training for TEMA staff and TN Army MARS members. Some was classroom training followed up with extensive field training. The culmination of the field training was TNCAT07, a massive exercise, which included the Central United States Earthquake Consortium (CUSEC, an 8 state alert consortium along the New Madras fault line). This exercise also included the participation by ARRL Amateur Emergency Radio Service (ARES), CAP and other EMCOM services, which clearly demonstrated interoperability between TEMA, TN Army MARS, the amateur radio community, and other municipal communications services. You have just heard that Army MARS was integrating and training with virtually all of the EMCOM services in TN. That was what this CAM calls leaning forward and TCAMO. As the situation developed Tuesday, the dispersed pattern of the multiple twisters and their swift movem
RE: [digitalradio] Re: Trouble at mill RTTY contesters war with HFlink
Exactly... they *just* don't get it Bill KA8VIT > To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 08:22:37 -0500 > Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Trouble at mill RTTY contesters war with HFlink > > Look at it this way - NO transmissions without listening first, either ALE > soundings, beacons, or mailboxes of any kind, are permissible on the > *shared* HF amateur bands, except in designated beacon areas or the > automatic subbands ( where it is presumed by the FCC to occur, since > unattended stations do not, and cannot, listen first for any other activity > within range of the unattended station). > > It does not matter how short a time the unattended interference signal is on > either. If it disrupts a QSO, it is *too long*. > > Skip KH6TY > > > > > Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at > http://www.obriensweb.com/sked > > > DRCC contest info : http://www.obriensweb.com/drcc.htm > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > _ Make distant family not so distant with Windows Vista® + Windows Live™. http://www.microsoft.com/windows/digitallife/keepintouch.mspx?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_CPC_VideoChat_distantfamily_012008
RE: [digitalradio] Re: Will You Let FCC Kill Digital Radio Technology?
Well, the petition is out there now. Don't waste time making your arguments here... they mean nothing. Post your responses and feeling to the FCC's site. 73 - Bill KA8VIT > To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 04:04:08 -0500 > Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Will You Let FCC Kill Digital Radio > Technology? > > Written in great spin mister style. I disagree with the unsubstantiated > claims made in this and other posts by Bonnie. I participate in various > digital modes but I know that they will not be a major factor in a true > emergency. Anyone who uses that ruse is just playing politics. _ i’m is proud to present Cause Effect, a series about real people making a difference. http://im.live.com/Messenger/IM/MTV/?source=text_Cause_Effect
RE: [digitalradio] I Apologize
I have to agree with Garrett. While at one time contests may have help build operating skills... That is no longer true. Now, during a contest... all good operating practices go right out the window. No listening first... no nothing... just keep calling CQ TEST. Ask the guy 15 times for his exchange...and then tell him he's a 599 ! 73 - Bill KA8VIT > To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 17:31:19 -0600 > Subject: Re: [digitalradio] I Apologize > > Sorry you feel that way Garrett. > But it's been that way the 37 years that I have been a ham. > Since many do get on just to work the contest how about > putting those that are not contesting in that 100kc ? > > The needs of the many outweight the needs of the few ! > > > At 05:13 PM 11/20/2007, you wrote: > >Hi John: > >The problem is that during a contest ,, contesters have all the channels, > >and it doesn't matter if you do find a clear spot,, contestester will move > >in within in a kc and take out ANY other communications that are going on.. > >whether it be ssb qso, digital sstv, sstv.. If the idea is to weed out the > >week,, take and put all the contester in 100kc together and let the > >screaming begin,, but no lets spread them out over the entire band and > >make it miserable for everyone who isn't contesting.. > >( sorry about the high horse, but when contest are on,, it just ruins my > >days) > > > >Garrett / AA0OI > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at > http://www.obriensweb.com/drsked/drsked.php > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > _ Put your friends on the big screen with Windows Vista® + Windows Live™. http://www.microsoft.com/windows/shop/specialoffers.mspx?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_CPC_MediaCtr_bigscreen_102007
RE: [digitalradio] Busy Detectors
Exactly the reason the mode should be taken to some other band(s). 73 Bill KA8VIT > To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 00:52:07 + > Subject: [digitalradio] Busy Detectors > > There are down sides to busy-detection: > > 1. There is no way to know the relative interference temperature > threshold for distant co-channel users on HF. SNR at every station is > different. A signal that seems in the background at one location, for > one mode, may be interference to another mode working at a different > SNR or a different mode at another station. > > 2. What to detect? How sensitive? It is possible to engineer a > busy-detector that can be set for a very sensitive threshold, and > detect almost any mode or almost any level. That same detector will > also falsely show a busy channel most of the time on the HF ham bands. > That renders the busy-detector useless for the busy-detector user who > wants to have a QSO or send an important message. > > 3. When does the receiving station with busy-detection know whether > the content of such an incoming message is an emergency? A > too-sensitive busy detector might prevent such a message from being > run in the first place, and the result would not be good. Thus, > stations that are on the air specifically with a very likely possible > purpose of running emergency traffic should probably not use a > busy-detector. It is possible to envision a busy-detector that could > be programmed to remotely disengage upon reception of a specific > command... but such a system is not readily available at the present > time, and the use of it would certainly unnecessarily complicate the > sending of an emergency message at a critical time. > > 4. It may be counter-productive for networks or users to announce what > type of busy-detection they use or don't use, because this sort of > information can be used nefariously (has been and will be) by > individuals on purpose to maliciously interfere or thwart normal > operation. > > 5. We all know that there are many feuds and grudges out there on the > air. It seems that certain hams who are most prone to carrying on > feuds or grudge-matches may also be the same individuals who clamor > most loudly for busy-detectors to be put in place by their "enemy" :) > > > Bonnie KQ6XA > > > > > > > > > Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at > http://www.obriensweb.com/drsked/drsked.php > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > _ Gear up for Halo® 3 with free downloads and an exclusive offer. It’s our way of saying thanks for using Windows Live™. http://gethalo3gear.com?ocid=SeptemberWLHalo3_WLHMTxt_2
RE: [digitalradio] Re: 3580kHz-3600kHz Freq Coordination Info
What coordination...? the ARRL just stuck a flag into a frequency and called it theirs ! 73 Bill KA8VIT >From: "expeditionradio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >There is no grab happening. Everyone has to operate somewhere in this >small band. Since the sub-band changes are fairly new, the only >coordination entities listed so far have been well-organized ones like >ARRL NTS, Winlink2000, ARRL's W1AW station, and International ALE. > >73 Bonnie KQ6XA _ Play Flexicon: the crossword game that feeds your brain. PLAY now for FREE. http://zone.msn.com/en/flexicon/default.htm?icid=flexicon_hmtagline Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> Yahoo! Groups gets a make over. See the new email design. http://us.click.yahoo.com/hOt0.A/lOaOAA/yQLSAA/ELTolB/TM ~-> Announce your digital presence via our DX Cluster telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Our other groups: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dxlist/ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup http://groups.yahoo.com/group/contesting http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wnyar http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Omnibus97 Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
RE: [digitalradio] Why still the W1AW CW non-listening stuff on 3.580?
W1AW has stepped on me many times over the last 26 years. As bad as K1MAN sometimes. 73 Bill KA8VIT >From: "Bill McLaughlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com >To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com >Subject: [digitalradio] Why still the W1AW CW non-listening stuff on 3.580? >Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 03:16:04 - > >(Stepping lightly) Why, with the recent changes, does ARRL/W1AW still >transmit without listening on 3.580? We all know far too well how >compressed for bandwidth the digital modes are on 80 meters due to >recent FCC changes. Yet W1AW persists to take a slice of this >compressed band-space to transmit without listening. I received my >license partially due to listening to code practice via W1AW (and some >decent tapes), so this is not to diminish its supposed but now sorta >defunct purpose. And not to even broach the code versus non-code mess, >I wonder why the ARRL feels compelled to ignore its own "bandplan" and >also continue to transmit without even the illusion of listening? > >Re-reading this it seems like a slam but that is not my intent; I am >actually quite curious as to the mind-set behind this all > >73 > >Bill N9DSJ > _ The average US Credit Score is 675. The cost to see yours: $0 by Experian. http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=660600&bcd=EMAILFOOTERAVERAGE
RE: [digitalradio] An observation on Olivia
Propagation... Maybe the mountains in northern Georgia ? >From: "jhaynesatalumni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com >To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com >Subject: [digitalradio] An observation on Olivia >Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 03:22:58 - > >Right now I'm copying a QSO where the stations are using Olivia >16/500 on 80M. I'm in NW Arkansas, and the two stations in the QSO >are in Florida and Georgia. I'm getting solid copy on the Florida >station and extremely lousy copy on the Georgia station. >(Presumably they are getting good copy on each other) Wonder why >this is. > _ FREE online classifieds from Windows Live Expo buy and sell with people you know http://clk.atdmt.com/MSN/go/msnnkwex001001msn/direct/01/?href=http://expo.live.com?s_cid=Hotmail_tagline_12/06 Announce your digital presence via our DX Cluster telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Our other groups: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dxlist/ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup http://groups.yahoo.com/group/contesting http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wnyar http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Omnibus97 Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [digitalradio] Re: Dec 15?
Hi Danny, I was just being facetious to make my point. I too used to listen to W1AW. But in CW, RTTY, AMTOR, ASCII and VOICE ? 73 Bill KA8VIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ka8vit.com >From: "Danny Douglas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com >To: >Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Dec 15? >Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:03:09 -0500 > >I will not say that their broadcast is not needed. Indeed, when I was >overseas, I listened to it from time to time, to find out if their were >special events such as expeditions I didnt know about. Now- most all of us >have computers, but there are still places in the world that computer >connectivity is very expensive, or just plain non existant. Heck, here in >the states, millions still dont have any connectivity, except possibly >satellite (some in mountains cant even see that) or call up on telephone >lines, which is s l o w . I suspect the CW practice is still needed by a >few (a heck of a lot NEED it but wont bother), so I would not recommend its >demise. Just its proper use- which included CHECKING THE FREQ before use. > > >Danny Douglas N7DC >ex WN5QMX ET2US WA5UKR ET3USA >SV0WPP VS6DD N7DC/YV5 G5CTB all >DX 2-6 years each >. >QSL LOTW-buro- direct >As courtesty I upload to eQSL but if you > use that - also pls upload to LOTW > or hard card. > >moderator [EMAIL PROTECTED] >- Original Message - >From: "Box SisteenHundred" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: >Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 10:39 AM >Subject: RE: [digitalradio] Re: Dec 15? > > > > W1AW has come up on top of me a number of times > > while I was engaged in a QSO. > > > > No QRL... no nothing. > > > > Maybe I should just publicly post my operating schedule > > and just come up on top of whomever is there when the > > scheduled time arrives. > > > > Hey, I'll post my schedule a month in advance, so, you > > guys had better check so you'll know when to be off > > of my "scheduled" frequencies. > > > > That's exactly what W1AW does. > > > > I see no provisions in Part 97 that makes their transmissions > > special. > > > > There was a time when their transmissions were special. > > > > Now they just take up three hours of air/space repeating > > the same thing printed in QST and published on their web > > site. > > > > 73 > > > > Bill KA8VIT > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://ka8vit.com > > _ WIN up to $10,000 in cash or prizes enter the Microsoft Office Live Sweepstakes http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/aub0050001581mrt/direct/01/ Connect to telnet://cluster.dynalias.org a single node spotting/alert system dedicated to digital and CW QSOs. Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
RE: [digitalradio] Re: Dec 15?
W1AW has come up on top of me a number of times while I was engaged in a QSO. No QRL... no nothing. Maybe I should just publicly post my operating schedule and just come up on top of whomever is there when the scheduled time arrives. Hey, I'll post my schedule a month in advance, so, you guys had better check so you'll know when to be off of my "scheduled" frequencies. That's exactly what W1AW does. I see no provisions in Part 97 that makes their transmissions special. There was a time when their transmissions were special. Now they just take up three hours of air/space repeating the same thing printed in QST and published on their web site. 73 Bill KA8VIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ka8vit.com >From: "Andrew O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com >To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com >Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Dec 15? >Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 03:56:31 - >I was parked on 3581 USB tonight and heard W1AW start up with CW. Not >a "QRL?" to be heard. I saw someone post somwthing about it not being >reaslistic to expect W1AW to actually listen first, because >they "broadcast" on many frequencies at the same time. The point make >sense, but it still seems weird to me that an ARRL station just fires >up, and off you go. > > >Andy K3UK. _ View Athletes Collections with Live Search http://sportmaps.live.com/index.html?source=hmemailtaglinenov06&FORM=MGAC01 Connect to telnet://cluster.dynalias.org a single node spotting/alert system dedicated to digital and CW QSOs. Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Well said, Jim. 73 Bill KA8VIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ka8vit.com >From: "jgorman01" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com >To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com >Subject: [digitalradio] 3kHz or 500Hz Re: Updates on effect of FCC R&O >Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 13:29:05 - > >A couple of comments. The FCC must consider more than just how fast >data can be sent. It must also consider how to maximize the numbers >of users that can access a finite spectrum without waiting. > >Your point assumes there is queuing system of some sort for that 3 kHz >of spectrum and that people will stand in line to use the frequency. >In amateur radio there is no queuing system, you can only monitor a >frequency until the qso finishes. There is no "grab a number" system >to determine who uses it next. And, since qso's are generally random >length, you may have to wait one minute or 30 minutes. The >traditional way of bypassing this is to move to a clear frequency. > >It seems obvious to me that the FCC has decided that much more >bandwidth for phone users is needed versus bandwidth for CW/RTTY/data >(i.e., narrow bandwidth) users and that the narrow bandwidth segment >should be shrunk. In doing so, they needed to decide how to "best" >use the smaller spectrum, and that part of the determination was how >to minimize the wait time for spectrum for the most users. > >I'm old enough to remember 2, 4, and even 8 party telephone lines. Do >you know how much time was wasted in checking the line to see if it >was not being used? There were lots of times it was quicker to drive >to a neighbors or to town rather than wait for the line to clear. >Frustration to the max! Telephone companies have dealt with >maximizing the use on shared facilities for over a hundred years. >They have sophisticated analysis tools that into account all kinds of >variables. However, cusomter wait times is still the one variable >that drives everything else. > >I'll bet I'm not the only ham who would chose wait time for an open >frequency as being more important than length of qso. Perhaps the FCC >is "encouraging" hams to develop a method of queuing for frequencies >and qso times thereby maximizing spectrum use. I suspect a system >like this would go a long way to letting the FCC expand bandwidths. > >Jim >WA0LYK _ Try the next generation of search with Windows Live Search today! http://imagine-windowslive.com/minisites/searchlaunch/?locale=en-us&source=hmtagline Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [digitalradio] Little SDR (was Re: Best Mode for QRP?)
Here is a SoftRock I got two weeks ago. It is a version 6.0 http://ka8vit.com/sr40 73 Bill KA8VIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ka8vit.com >From: kd4e <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com >To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com >Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Little SDR (was Re: Best Mode for QRP?) >Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 11:18:17 +0800 > > > jhaynesatalumni wrote: > > I don't know offhand. I googled for "software defined radio" > > and kit and came up with, among 39,000 other things, the > > SoftRock-40 - but that looks a little different from what > > my friend has. But I think it came from one of the QRP > > equipment suppliers. His was on two little PC boards. > >It may be an older version than they currently show. > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> Check out the new improvements in Yahoo! Groups email. http://us.click.yahoo.com/7EuRwD/fOaOAA/yQLSAA/ELTolB/TM ~-> Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
RE: [digitalradio] Re: First HELL mode Net will be held on 2 April Sunday at 180
And this Pactor / Winlink crap will only get worse... So much for the "signal detection..." 73 Bill KA8VIT >From: "Craig - N7OR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com >To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com >Subject: [digitalradio] Re: First HELL mode Net will be held on 2 April >Sunday at 1800z >Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2006 19:24:22 - > >This net was going along ok. I was copying both US and European >stations quite well. Then, one of the automatic unmanned QRM machines >came on. In this case it was Pactor, but could of been anything >really. There must have been an urgent message to get through, and the >entire internet was down. Clowns. >73 - N7OR Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
RE: [digitalradio] MULTIPSK CW
That IS cw Paul. In reality, that's how your rig probably generates CW By injecting an audio tone into a SSB transmitter. When you say won't do "regular" cw... do you mean keying a circuit open and closed so you can connect it to the key jack of your rig? 73 Bill KA8VIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ka8vit.com >From: "Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com >To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com >Subject: [digitalradio] MULTIPSK CW >Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 18:56:36 - > > MULTI PSK ONLY XMTS CW ON USB OR LSB DOES NOT DO REGULAR CW,AT LEAST > I CANT GET IT TO WORK ?? BUT IS A EXCELLENT DIGITAL PROGRAM > K8PG-Paul Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
RE: [digitalradio] DominoEX
I'm looking to sked DominoEX this weekend. Email direct... [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks, Bill KA8VIT >From: "n0ziz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com >To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com >Subject: [digitalradio] DominoEX >Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 03:01:06 - > >What frequencies are good to look for DominoTX transmissions? > > > > > > > >Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to telnet://208.15.25.196/ > >Other areas of interest: >The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ > >Looking for digital mode software? Check the quick commerical free link >below >http://www.obriensweb.com/digimodes.html > >Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/ELTolB/TM ~-> Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to telnet://208.15.25.196/ Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ Looking for digital mode software? Check the quick commerical free link below http://www.obriensweb.com/digimodes.html Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
RE: [digitalradio] Log software for digitalmodes
I use XMLog at http://XMLog.com 73, Bill KA8VIT http://ka8vit.com >From: "holopainen_tommi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com >To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com >Subject: [digitalradio] Log software for digitalmodes >Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 16:05:14 - > >There seems many new digimodes and new ones comes almost every week. >What is good log program which knows new modes or modes can add >easily. QSL card/label printing also needed. Also adif import/export and >statistics. Is this right forum to ask this? > >Tommi oh7jjt > > > > > > > >Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to telnet://208.15.25.196/ > >Other areas of interest: >The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ > >Looking for digital mode software? Check the quick commerical free link >below >http://www.obriensweb.com/digimodes.html > >Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> AIDS in India: A "lurking bomb." Click and help stop AIDS now. http://us.click.yahoo.com/VpTY2A/lzNLAA/yQLSAA/ELTolB/TM ~-> Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to telnet://208.15.25.196/ Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ Looking for digital mode software? Check the quick commerical free link below http://www.obriensweb.com/digimodes.html Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [digitalradio] Calling all experimenters ( A Proposal)
If I recall... the phrase was originally THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG. The word was "JUMPS" 73, Bill KA8VIT http://ka8vit.com >From: "Danny Douglas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com >To: >Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Calling all experimenters ( A Proposal) >Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 10:48:20 -0500 > >RE: [digitalradio] Calling all experimenters ( A Proposal)THE QUICK BROWN >FOX JUMPED OVER THE LAZY DOGS BACK 1234567890 >RYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRY > >Adds the character S to the mix, and thus transmits every letter in the >English alphabet. The RY string was used because the two letters together >give a signal at each level of the 5 element baudot code and if any hits >occur, you can easily see >that there is not five by copy. If you ran a tape, and there was a >consistent problem with either the R or the Y, you knew immediately which >baudot level had the mistake. You would probably then replace the TEEDEE >(tansmit distributor) which read the holes in the tape. >Danny > - Original Message - > From: DuBose Walt Civ AETC CONS/LGCA > To: 'digitalradio@yahoogroups.com' > Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 9:38 AM > Subject: RE: [digitalradio] Calling all experimenters ( A Proposal) > > > This is what I used to copy and send... > > THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPED OVER THE LAZY DOG 1234567890 > > But I think a little longer text would be better...at least 65 >characters per line and two lines. > > Walt/K5YFW > > > > -Original Message- > From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Becker > Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 7:39 PM > To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Calling all experimenters ( A Proposal) > > > > The "fence", really ? > > > > > > At 07:12 PM 12/6/05, you wrote: > > > The quick brown fox jumps over the fence. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > > > > > > > Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to telnet://208.15.25.196/ > > Other areas of interest: > The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ > > Looking for digital mode software? Check the quick commerical free link >below > http://www.obriensweb.com/digimodes.html > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to telnet://208.15.25.196/ > > Other areas of interest: > The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ > > Looking for digital mode software? Check the quick commerical free link >below > http://www.obriensweb.com/digimodes.html > > > > > SPONSORED LINKS Craft hobby Hobby and craft supply Ham radio > > >-- > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS > > a.. Visit your group "digitalradio" on the web. > > b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of >Service. > > >-- > > > > >-- > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.13.12/193 - Release Date: >12/6/2005 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> 1.2 million kids a year are victims of human trafficking. Stop slavery. http://us.click.yahoo.com/WpTY2A/izNLAA/yQLSAA/ELTolB/TM ~-> Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to telnet://208.15.25.196/ Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ Looking for digital mode software? Check the quick commerical free link below http://www.obriensweb.com/digimodes.html Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
RE: [digitalradio] PAX mode?
I'm looking to sked on PAX and HELLschrieber. Tuesday night not good though... we have school conferences. Bill KA8VIT >From: "Andrew J. O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com >To: >Subject: [digitalradio] PAX mode? >Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 16:26:42 -0500 > > > >Anyone QRV on PAX yet? > >Andy K3UK Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> 1.2 million kids a year are victims of human trafficking. Stop slavery. http://us.click.yahoo.com/WpTY2A/izNLAA/yQLSAA/ELTolB/TM ~-> Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to telnet://208.15.25.196/ Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ Looking for digital mode software? This group suggests you try either : http://www.mixw.net MIWX (many modes) http://f6cte.free.fr MultiPSK (many modes) http://www.dxlab.com DXLAB (logging, PSK31/63 and more) http://www.qsl.net/hamscope Hamscope (many modes) http://http://xoomer.virgilio.it/aporcino/Chip64 Chip64 http://www.digipan.net/Digipan Digipan (PSK31 and PSK63 http://www.kc4elo.com/ Logger32 (logging, PSK31/63 and RTTY) Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
RE: [digitalradio] 10 meter mode
That's 30-meters... not 10-meters. And, its probably military traffic. 73, Bill KA8VIT >From: "jerloch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com >To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com >Subject: [digitalradio] 10 meter mode >Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 12:27:07 - > >Would someone please tell me what mode I am hearing on 10.130, it >sounds like a high speed cw but none of the programs I have tried will >decode it. I am fairly new to digital HF and can't figure out what it >is. > >Thanks to all > >Jerry >KT5TT > > > > > > >The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/ >More info at http:///www.obriensweb.com > >Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/ More info at http:///www.obriensweb.com Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
RE: [digitalradio] WWV Broadcast Format: Tones and Ticks
Vince, A simple google search... http://www.boulder.nist.gov/timefreq/stations/iform.html 73, Bill KA8VIT >From: Vince <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com >To: Digital Radio >Subject: [digitalradio] WWV Broadcast Format: Tones and Ticks >Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 17:13:22 -0500 > The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/ http://dxcluster.blogspot.com";>http://feeds.feedburner.com/DigitalSpotter.gif"; height="67" width="200" style="border:0" alt="Digital Spotter"/> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ --- Begin Message --- Hi Group: Can anybody lead me to where I may obtain information related to the various tones, ticks, etc., that are included in the WWV transmissions? IOW, at what audio frequencies, in what sequence/minute past the hour, are the various tones es ticks transmitted ? I want to zero beat and use the received signal as a benchmark for calibration of my transceiver's digital readout/master oscillator. Thanks. Regards, de ~ Vince ~ WA2RSX IOTA NA-026 The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/ http://dxcluster.blogspot.com">http://feeds.feedburner.com/DigitalSpotter.gif" height="67" width="200" style="border:0" alt="Digital Spotter"/> --- End Message ---
