Re: [digitalradio]my last word(To the Moderators)
To the Moderators, This is my opinion and mine alone. I think that this thread has outlived it usefulness. You have one saying put your money where your mouth is and contester need to have busy dect. Then what is good winlids or packeters. I myself have heard it all before and it hasn't changed. My opinion on certain modes and operations will be noted to the FCC when and if they decide to get involved. I feel that those that want to continue this take it off the group. Again just my opinion as things are starting to get personnel. Kurt --- On Wed, 11/25/09, John Becker, WØJAB w0...@big-river.net wrote: From: John Becker, WØJAB w0...@big-river.net Subject: Re: [digitalradio]my last word To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Date: Wednesday, November 25, 2009, 12:50 PM Makes a lot of sense Let me try it this way - if I'm operating with my mark tone on a freq between your mark and space you never bother my QSO. Why is that the every time you hear a tone close to your operating freq it's QRM. It seems to a lot that you just like to complain. At 11:23 AM 11/25/2009, you wrote: Not making a lot of sense there, John. 73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
Re: [digitalradio] Disinformation about ALE by N5PVL Re: Getting serious about ALE / LID factor
Wow another rant. I don't care for contesting, but they are not the only QRM on the band. ALE can be, Winlids for sure but wait lets bring up cw and ssb, and of course AM, this is even during a contest. QRM is a way of life, get over it. KT --- On Mon, 11/23/09, expeditionradio expeditionra...@yahoo.com wrote: From: expeditionradio expeditionra...@yahoo.com Subject: [digitalradio] Disinformation about ALE by N5PVL Re: Getting serious about ALE / LID factor To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Date: Monday, November 23, 2009, 10:23 AM Charles, Your constant efforts to spread disinformation about ALE use in ham radio shows how little you know about how hams are using ALE. If you are really concerned about lids on HF, start with the #1 primary source of QRM: contesters. Bonnie VR2/KQ6XA --- In digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com, Charles Brabham n5...@... wrote: The system was not designed for use on amateur radio's shared spectrum, and that is why it's use is not appropriate there.
Re: [digitalradio] Linux Here I come!
I have to agree with using Ubuntu, and 9.10 is out. I upgraded from 9.04 and had no problem. You can also copy it to a disk and run it off that to make sure you like it before you do a hard install. I do wish HRD was available for Linux and I would dump windoze completely. 73 Kurt --- On Sat, 10/31/09, Per n59...@yahoo.com wrote: From: Per n59...@yahoo.com Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Linux Here I come! To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Date: Saturday, October 31, 2009, 2:59 PM I'm using ubuntu 9.10 here now and its great. You can install fldigi through synaptic, fldigi 3.11.4 is on the mirrors. I recommend that you learn about mirrors and synaptic, on ubuntu. The ham radio section is packed. 73 de Per, sm0rwo From: Tim N9PUZ tim.n9...@gmail. com To: digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com Sent: Sat, October 31, 2009 7:50:44 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Linux Here I come! James French wrote: I would recommend Ubuntu 9.04 to start with. I have not downloaded it yet but I believe Ubuntu 9.10 was released this past week. Tim, N9PUZ
Re: [digitalradio] New to digital modes? Try this weekend's challenge
I would recommend FeldHell also. KT K8YZK --- On Thu, 10/29/09, Phil Williams ka1...@gmail.com wrote: From: Phil Williams ka1...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [digitalradio] New to digital modes? Try this weekend's challenge To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Date: Thursday, October 29, 2009, 7:13 PM What? No THOR?! ;-) philw de ka1gmn On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 9:31 AM, obrienaj k3uka...@gmail. com wrote: We have had few new people join this group after the QST article on RS ID. Since many of them are NEW to digital modes other than RTTY or PSK31... I thought I would challenge the people who have not ventured away from PSK31 or RTTY to try a task this weekend. Three QSOs in three different modes. To keep is focused, I suggest you choose from these 5 modes Olivia Feld Hell Domninoex MFSK16 MT63 If you have NO clue about these modes, great... just ask and we will get you started. Choose Multipsk, Fldigi, or DM780 as your software and we can help set up.
Re: [digitalradio] Inexpensive digital mode interfaces with LINUX ?
Hi Andy, I have the donner rig and digital interface for my IC-738 but I use XP because my main program is HRD (This is my 6th one). Send Whitey or Carol a message and ask them, I am sure they give you a quick answer. They have great service after the sale, and they are true plug-n-play. 73 Kurt K8YZK --- On Thu, 10/15/09, Andrew O'Brien aobri...@stny.rr.com wrote: From: Andrew O'Brien aobri...@stny.rr.com Subject: [digitalradio] Inexpensive digital mode interfaces with LINUX ? To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Date: Thursday, October 15, 2009, 7:51 PM Does anyone know if there are inexpensive digital mdoe interfaces that work under Linux, have a usb conenctor, and provide CAT rig control ? I have a good inertface but it supports Windows only. For some upcoming projects I would like to have one that works under Linux. I was looking at the Donner digital interfaces but it is not clear if they require software that works with Windows or they are multi-platform Andy K3UK
