Re: [digitalradio] possible purchase

2009-07-14 Thread Stelios Bounanos
 On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:57:54 +0200, Simon (HB9DRV) simon.br...@kns.ch 
 said:

 1Hz tuning,

Huh, so it is. I was looking at the specs as advertised on Universal
Radio.  I assume that 1 Hz tuning is available via CAT without having
to use front panel controls.

 IF DSP not desirable for digital modes,

IF DSP includes the tunable bandpass filters.  I like the idea of
rejecting QRM with an adjustable digital filter before it hits the audio
stage.  This is the only kind of DSP that I would find remotely useful
for digital modes.

For other modes I can do all kinds of audio processing with jack-rack or
gAlan and LADSPA effects plugins [1].  Something to keep that quad-core
processor warm.

[1] http://plugin.org.uk/

 Rock-solid stable,
 Remote-mount the radio head next to your monitor,
 Excellent value for money (especially the 100watt version) - it's a Kenwood!

No argument about it being excellent value.

 Simon Brown, HB9DRV
 www.ham-radio-deluxe.com

 - Original Message - 
 From: Stelios Bounanos digra...@enotty.net
 
 Errr, 10Hz tuning, no IF DSP, no external reference input. Perhaps the
 best for some unspecified definitions of market and digi use? :-)
 


-- 

73,
Stelios, M0GLD.


Re: [digitalradio] possible purchase

2009-07-14 Thread Simon (HB9DRV)
Hah,

Actually the 480 does have nice 500Hz filters so you can use this for 
getting rid of signals. The beauty of the TS-480SAT is that it's a pure 
analogue radio, the audio is good and pleasant to listen to.

Simon Brown, HB9DRV
www.ham-radio-deluxe.com

- Original Message - 
From: Stelios Bounanos digra...@enotty.net

 IF DSP includes the tunable bandpass filters.  I like the idea of
 rejecting QRM with an adjustable digital filter before it hits the audio
 stage.  This is the only kind of DSP that I would find remotely useful
 for digital modes.
 


Re: [digitalradio] possible purchase

2009-07-14 Thread Stelios Bounanos
 On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:59:55 +0200, Simon (HB9DRV) simon.br...@kns.ch 
 said:

 Hah,
 Actually the 480 does have nice 500Hz filters so you can use this for 
 getting rid of signals. The beauty of the TS-480SAT is that it's a pure 
 analogue radio, the audio is good and pleasant to listen to.

I do have a 500Hz mechanical IF filter in the FT-857 and use it for both
RX and TX.  It's a very big improvement over the 2.8 kHz filter but
still lets a lot of splatter through when the band is busy, and IF
shifting can only help so much.

I know this method works very well but I consider it legacy.

My definition of best rig for digital modes requires adjustable IF
filters that can be narrowed to 50 Hz or so via (documented!) CAT
control, so that the software can do this stuff automatically when the
user clicks on a signal on the waterfall.

 Simon Brown, HB9DRV
 www.ham-radio-deluxe.com

 - Original Message - 
 From: Stelios Bounanos digra...@enotty.net
 
 IF DSP includes the tunable bandpass filters.  I like the idea of
 rejecting QRM with an adjustable digital filter before it hits the audio
 stage.  This is the only kind of DSP that I would find remotely useful
 for digital modes.
 


-- 

73,
Stelios, M0GLD.


[digitalradio] possible purchase

2009-07-13 Thread John Bradley
I would go with the antenna, since your 480 does not need an interface, working 
well with a direct connect from your sound
card to the rig data port. Use menu item 60 to see a VOX signal at the port.

I have also not had many problems with sound cards as supplied with computers, 
especially if you take the time to calibrate them.

The 480 is perhaps the best rig on the market right now for digi use, in my 
not-so-humble opinion

cheers

John
VE5MU


Re: [digitalradio] possible purchase

2009-07-13 Thread Stelios Bounanos
 On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 08:20:21 -0500, John Bradley jbrad...@sasktel.net 
 said:

[...]

 The 480 is perhaps the best rig on the market right now for digi use,
 in my not-so-humble opinion

Errr, 10Hz tuning, no IF DSP, no external reference input. Perhaps the
best for some unspecified definitions of market and digi use? :-)

 cheers

 John
 VE5MU


-- 

73,
Stelios, M0GLD.


Re: [digitalradio] possible purchase

2009-07-13 Thread Simon (HB9DRV)
1Hz tuning,
IF DSP not desirable for digital modes,
Rock-solid stable,
Remote-mount the radio head next to your monitor,
Excellent value for money (especially the 100watt version) - it's a Kenwood!

Simon Brown, HB9DRV
www.ham-radio-deluxe.com

- Original Message - 
From: Stelios Bounanos digra...@enotty.net

 Errr, 10Hz tuning, no IF DSP, no external reference input. Perhaps the
 best for some unspecified definitions of market and digi use? :-)
 


[digitalradio] Possible Purchase

2009-07-12 Thread Gmail - Kevin, Natalia, Stacey Rochelle
Hi All,

I am in the proceeds of purchasing a new piece of radio equipment.
I am tossing up between buying a new radio, new screwdriver antenna or a new 
sound interface.
The first two are a lot more then the last.
But that depends on which one I decide to buy.
I had a look at the Rigblaster Pro, but at US$299 I felt this was a little high 
(I could be wrong here)
I also looked at the Tigertronic at around $100 (a bit better price)

My interest is in using it with my TS-480S/AT and any future rig I decide to 
buy.
I am using all the digital modes.

I would like it to be used on a couple of radios but that is not a high 
priority.

I know this is very limited but what else is there to the interface.
Some I have heard have better filtering and protection.

Any thoughts would be grateful, direct would be fine too, see my address in the 
header.

Regards

Kevin, ZL1KFM.


Re: [digitalradio] Possible Purchase

2009-07-12 Thread Simon (HB9DRV)
Look at the microHam USB Interface III - soundcard and CAT in one package, I 
have one and use it with my own TS-480SAT.

http://www.microham-usa.com/Products/USB3.html

Simon Brown, HB9DRV
www.ham-radio-deluxe.com
  - Original Message - 
  From: Gmail - Kevin, Natalia, Stacey  Rochelle 

  I had a look at the Rigblaster Pro, but at US$299 I felt this was a little 
high (I could be wrong here)

Re: [digitalradio] Possible Purchase

2009-07-12 Thread Gmail - Kevin, Natalia, Stacey Rochelle
Thanks Simon,

But the big issue is the price. This one you mention is also up in the US$200 
area, which is nearly NZ$400 for us, exchange rate.
Makes me think twice before I purchase.

I think I will get a sound interface it's just twisting my arm a little more to 
finally do the bank transfer.

Regards
Kevin., ZL1KFM

BTW, version 7 is working great for me. Had one issue with DM780 shutting down 
when going into TX mode. Might of been because the network link was not active 
between it and HRD.


  - Original Message - 
  From: Simon (HB9DRV) 
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2009 9:34 PM
  Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Possible Purchase






  Look at the microHam USB Interface III - soundcard and CAT in one package, I 
have one and use it with my own TS-480SAT.

  http://www.microham-usa.com/Products/USB3.html

  Simon Brown, HB9DRV
  www.ham-radio-deluxe.com
- Original Message - 
From: Gmail - Kevin, Natalia, Stacey  Rochelle 

I had a look at the Rigblaster Pro, but at US$299 I felt this was a little 
high (I could be wrong here)

  

Re: [digitalradio] Possible Purchase

2009-07-12 Thread Joe Veldhuis
I continue to be puzzled as to why anyone would spend more than $50 on a 
soundcard and/or CAT interface, when both can be built for about $10 in parts.

For the sound interface:
* two 8:500 audio transformers
* one 2n3904 transistor (for hard keying, if you don't want to just use the 
rig's VOX)
* one DB-9 female connector
* one 3.5mm audio patch cable (cut in half)
* one mic or DIN connector
* one altoids tin

For CAT:
* two 2n3904 transistors
* five resistors (3x10k, 4.3k, 11k)
* one DB-9 female connector
* one connector suitable for your rig
* one altoids tin

The soundcard interface is nothing but the audio in/out lines from the rig 
connected to the soundcard with standard audio connections, optionally using 
transformers, and a single NPN transistor configured thusly:

Collector: rig PTT pin
Base: computer serial port RTS pin (DB-9 pin 7)
Emitter: ground pins on rig and serial port

CAT/CI-V interface is just two NPN's and 5 resistors. Google for schematics. 
Since I've never seen a rig that uses RTS/CTS handshaking, you can combine 
keying and CAT into a single serial connection.

If you need USB audio and serial interfaces, they aren't too expensive. Don't 
know about sources in NZ, but they can be had in the US for as little as $5 
each.

-Joe, N8FQ

On Sun, 12 Jul 2009 21:48:54 +1200
Gmail - Kevin, Natalia, Stacey  Rochelle spar...@gmail.com wrote:

 I think I will get a sound interface it's just twisting my arm a little more 
 to finally do the bank transfer.
 
 Regards
 Kevin., ZL1KFM


Re: [digitalradio] Possible Purchase

2009-07-12 Thread Simon (HB9DRV)
- Original Message - 
From: Joe Veldhuis kd8...@gmail.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2009 12:34 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Possible Purchase


I continue to be puzzled as to why anyone would spend more than $50 on a 
soundcard and/or CAT interface, when both can be built for about $10 in 
parts.

Not everyone can see well enough to solder, not everyone has easy access to 
all the components.

When I was starting in Ham Radio I built everything, now the only reason I 
use the soldering iron is for assembling cables, sadly the eyes no longer 
have what's needed.

Simon Brown, HB9DRV
www.ham-radio-deluxe.com 



Re: [digitalradio] Possible Purchase

2009-07-12 Thread kh6ty
See page 30 of the June QST for an inexpensive interface design and 
circuit board. As of this date, 250 have been built and all worked 
without any problems as far as I have been told. No SMT parts are used, 
and soldering is easy, even for an old man like me. Cost of all parts is 
less than $20 and no USB or serial port is needed.


Joe Veldhuis wrote:


 I continue to be puzzled as to why anyone would spend more than $50 on 
 a soundcard and/or CAT interface, when both can be built for about $10 
 in parts.



  

73
-- 
*Skip KH6TY*
http://KH6TY.home.comcast.net


Re: [digitalradio] Possible Purchase

2009-07-12 Thread Rick W
As was mentioned, construction may be impractical for many hams. In my 
case, I have been soldering since around age 13 or so with my first 
crystal radio kit and later many kits and dozens of projects over the 
years, so it is not too difficult to make a simple interface.

Today, because of my age, it is increasingly difficult to do close work 
without special help. I normally wear trifocals and the close-in 
distance is for book reading at around a foot, but it is very much at 
the bottom of the glasses and difficult to use so I sometimes use 
magnifying googles.

Due to an error in having some bifocal computer glasses made, with 
computer on the main portion and the full lower portion for reading, it 
turned out that they cut the lower part so that the focus was more like 
8 inches. This actually slightly magnifies things but the downside is 
that I have to work extremely close to the work which also means that I 
need to be careful with any solder splashes, etc. Speaking from personal 
experience,  one should never solder without eye protection as I have 
had splatter several times, which would have been catastrophic without 
glasses or some shield. I might mention that for about 25 years I built 
and ran an electronic/AV/computer repair shop, so exposure was 
significant. The largest project I ever built was the Heath HERO robot, 
which was a very large undertaking for educational use through my employer.

Realistically, most new hams do not do construction of electronic 
projects and many no longer own soldering equipment, so it is actually 
quite rare to find those who are both interested in such things and also 
interested in the communication aspects (much less the digital 
communication aspects) of ham radio.

If you don't need full rig control, and can build the simplest possible 
kit, I recommend the Unified Microsystems SCI-6 Sound Card Interface at 
just over $30 delivered price here in the U.S. It would be difficult to 
build it from your own separately purchased parts at that price point. 
It includes both audio lines transformer isolated, which is not always 
true of other products, and it has a socketed optoisolator for PTT hard 
keying. It does require a COM or USB to COM port, however that may be 
preferable to VOX keying. The most difficult part is making up your own 
cables, and that may not be easy for some to do.

73,

Rick, KV9U




Re: [digitalradio] Possible Purchase

2009-07-12 Thread Tim N9PUZ
If you do not have to have an external sound card the various 
interfaces that use your computers internal sound card are much less 
expensive. With some, such as the Rascal GLX you switch cables to use 
them with different transceivers. There are many other choices, I just 
happen to be familiar with that one.

Tim, N9PUZ


Gmail - Kevin, Natalia, Stacey  Rochelle wrote:
 
 Thanks Simon,
  
 But the big issue is the price. This one you mention is also up in the 
 US$200 area, which is nearly NZ$400 for us, exchange rate.
 Makes me think twice before I purchase.
  
 I think I will get a sound interface it's just twisting my arm a little 
 more to finally do the bank transfer.
  
 Regards
 Kevin., ZL1KFM
  
 BTW, version 7 is working great for me. Had one issue with DM780 
 shutting down when going into TX mode. Might of been because the network 
 link was not active between it and HRD.
  
  
 
 - Original Message -
 *From:* Simon (HB9DRV) mailto:simon.br...@kns.ch
 *To:* digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
 mailto:digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
 *Sent:* Sunday, July 12, 2009 9:34 PM
 *Subject:* Re: [digitalradio] Possible Purchase
 
 Look at the microHam USB Interface III - soundcard and CAT in one
 package, I have one and use it with my own TS-480SAT.
  
 http://www.microham-usa.com/Products/USB3.html
 http://www.microham-usa.com/Products/USB3.html
  
 Simon Brown, HB9DRV
 www.ham-radio-deluxe.com http://www.ham-radio-deluxe.com
 
 - Original Message -
 *From:* Gmail - Kevin, Natalia, Stacey  Rochelle
 mailto:spar...@gmail.com
  
 I had a look at the Rigblaster Pro, but at US$299 I felt this
 was a little high (I could be wrong here)





Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Pages at
http://www.obriensweb.com/sked

Recommended digital mode software:  Winwarbler, FLDIGI, DM780, or Multipsk
Logging Software:  DXKeeper or Ham Radio Deluxe.



Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:digitalradio-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:digitalradio-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
digitalradio-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Re: [digitalradio] Possible Purchase

2009-07-12 Thread kh6ty
If you are not an ARRL member, a description of the interface described 
on page 30 of the June QST is here: 
http://home.comcast.net/~hteller/interface.htm

73

Skip KH6TY


Tim N9PUZ wrote:
 If you do not have to have an external sound card the various 
 interfaces that use your computers internal sound card are much less 
 expensive. With some, such as the Rascal GLX you switch cables to use 
 them with different transceivers. There are many other choices, I just 
 happen to be familiar with that one.

 Tim, N9PUZ


 Gmail - Kevin, Natalia, Stacey  Rochelle wrote:
   
 Thanks Simon,
  
 But the big issue is the price. This one you mention is also up in the 
 US$200 area, which is nearly NZ$400 for us, exchange rate.
 Makes me think twice before I purchase.
  
 I think I will get a sound interface it's just twisting my arm a little 
 more to finally do the bank transfer.
  
 Regards
 Kevin., ZL1KFM
  
 BTW, version 7 is working great for me. Had one issue with DM780 
 shutting down when going into TX mode. Might of been because the network 
 link was not active between it and HRD.
  
  

 - Original Message -
 *From:* Simon (HB9DRV) mailto:simon.br...@kns.ch
 *To:* digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
 mailto:digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
 *Sent:* Sunday, July 12, 2009 9:34 PM
 *Subject:* Re: [digitalradio] Possible Purchase

 Look at the microHam USB Interface III - soundcard and CAT in one
 package, I have one and use it with my own TS-480SAT.
  
 http://www.microham-usa.com/Products/USB3.html
 http://www.microham-usa.com/Products/USB3.html
  
 Simon Brown, HB9DRV
 www.ham-radio-deluxe.com http://www.ham-radio-deluxe.com

 - Original Message -
 *From:* Gmail - Kevin, Natalia, Stacey  Rochelle
 mailto:spar...@gmail.com
  
 I had a look at the Rigblaster Pro, but at US$299 I felt this
 was a little high (I could be wrong here)
 



 

 Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Pages at
 http://www.obriensweb.com/sked

 Recommended digital mode software:  Winwarbler, FLDIGI, DM780, or Multipsk
 Logging Software:  DXKeeper or Ham Radio Deluxe.



 Yahoo! Groups Links




   

-- 
*Skip KH6TY*
http://KH6TY.home.comcast.net




Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Pages at
http://www.obriensweb.com/sked

Recommended digital mode software:  Winwarbler, FLDIGI, DM780, or Multipsk
Logging Software:  DXKeeper or Ham Radio Deluxe.



Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:digitalradio-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:digitalradio-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
digitalradio-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Re: [digitalradio] Possible Purchase

2009-07-12 Thread Jose A. Amador

For many reasons I built my own and I feel it is foolish not to use an 
optocoupler when you already use two transformers.
I am not happy with less than that. I use soundcard input and output 
with stereo miniplugs and serial port keying with a DB9
female connector. I use another female DB9 for audio I/O, wired to the 
same standard as Kantronics TNC's, so my old
TNC cables are still useful. All using scrounged material, and does work 
acceptably well. I have included fixed attenuators
in the newer cables to suit the radio, so the interface is the simplest.

Of course, I understand all the explained reasons, but in my case, 
homebrewing is the easy way out.

73,

Jose, CO2JA.

Tim N9PUZ escribió:
 If you do not have to have an external sound card the various 
 interfaces that use your computers internal sound card are much less 
 expensive. With some, such as the Rascal GLX you switch cables to use 
 them with different transceivers. There are many other choices, I just 
 happen to be familiar with that one.

 Tim, N9PUZ
   





Participe en Universidad 2010, del 8 al 12 de febrero de 2010
La Habana, Cuba 
http://www.universidad2010.cu


-

SEGUNDO SEMINARIO INTERNACIONAL LEGADO Y DIVERSIDAD. ARQUITECTURA Y URBANISMO.

El rescate de los valores urbanos y arquitectónicos en tiempos de globalización

Colegio de San Gerónimo, La Habana Vieja, noviembre 24-27, 2009

-


Re: [digitalradio] Possible Purchase

2009-07-12 Thread Stelios Bounanos
 On Sun, 12 Jul 2009 09:25:10 -0500, Rick W mrf...@frontiernet.net said:

 As was mentioned, construction may be impractical for many hams. In my 
 case, I have been soldering since around age 13 or so with my first 
 crystal radio kit and later many kits and dozens of projects over the 
 years, so it is not too difficult to make a simple interface.

 Today, because of my age, it is increasingly difficult to do close work 
 without special help. I normally wear trifocals and the close-in 
 distance is for book reading at around a foot, but it is very much at 
 the bottom of the glasses and difficult to use so I sometimes use 
 magnifying googles.

There must be a lot of cheap second hand camcorders out there, many with
both analogue and digital video outputs and plenty of optical zoom.  I
imagine you could easily display a good 10-20x image of the work on your
monitor (perhaps with the aid of an external lens).

That's a lot of magnification and as a bonus you can sit straight and
not spend hours hunched over your desk looking at the work with
magnifying goggles on.  You also inhale less flux fumes and avoid
solder splashes.


-- 

73,
Stelios, M0GLD.