Re: [digitalradio] Request for future development of ROS

2010-02-20 Thread Dave Ackrill
I've thought of another feature to add to the list.

A button that stops transmission during a transmission period.  The 
reason is I just came back to the PC and my 16 Baud 'CQ' call was loaded 
ready to go.  However, whilst I was away, someone must have transmitted 
in 1 baud mode and, because my system was in 'Auto' it had changed to 1 
baud.  I did not realise this until I hit the PTT button and wondered 
why it was taking so long the transmit!

Other than closing the program down and restarting it, I couldn't see a 
way to stop the transmission of a very long CQ string in 1 baud.

Dave (G0DJA)


Re: [digitalradio] Request for future development of ROS

2010-02-20 Thread Toby Burnett
Eaxctly the same thing happened to me yesterday David.  
I couldn't see a way other than closing the program.  
I'm sure Jose will update it soon.  

Toby.  
 
---Original Message---
 
From: Dave Ackrill
Date: 20/02/2010 15:24:48
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Request for future development of ROS
 
  
I've thought of another feature to add to the list.

A button that stops transmission during a transmission period. The 
reason is I just came back to the PC and my 16 Baud 'CQ' call was loaded 
ready to go. However, whilst I was away, someone must have transmitted 
in 1 baud mode and, because my system was in 'Auto' it had changed to 1 
baud. I did not realise this until I hit the PTT button and wondered 
why it was taking so long the transmit!

Other than closing the program down and restarting it, I couldn't see a 
way to stop the transmission of a very long CQ string in 1 baud.

Dave (G0DJA)


 

Re: [digitalradio] Request for future development of ROS

2010-02-20 Thread jose alberto nieto ros
Hi,

I know what is the the problem but i prefer it will be so.

I explain me:  If i put other button called STOP JUST NOW many impatient 
people at 1 baud could click to this button before the end completly the 
transmission, thinking the software has crashed or like similar, so the 
receiver could not decode all the message.

So i prefer if you click PTT button accidentally you reset the software or you 
reset the computer :-), but that's option at 1 baud could be dangerous for 
impatient people.




De: Toby Burnett ruff...@hebrides.net
Para: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Enviado: sáb,20 febrero, 2010 20:14
Asunto: Re: [digitalradio] Request for future development of ROS

  
Eaxctly the same thing happened to me yesterday David.  
I couldn't see a way other than closing the program.  
I'm sure Jose will update it soon.  

Toby.  

---Original Message- --

From: Dave Ackrill
Date: 20/02/2010 15:24:48
To: digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Request for future development of ROS
  
I've thought of another feature to add to the list.

A button that stops transmission during a transmission period. The 
reason is I just came back to the PC and my 16 Baud 'CQ' call was loaded 
ready to go. However, whilst I was away, someone must have transmitted 
in 1 baud mode and, because my system was in 'Auto' it had changed to 1 
baud. I did not realise this until I hit the PTT button and wondered 
why it was taking so long the transmit!

Other than closing the program down and restarting it, I couldn't see a 
way to stop the transmission of a very long CQ string in 1 baud.

Dave (G0DJA)





  

Re: [digitalradio] Request for future development of ROS

2010-02-20 Thread Dave Ackrill
Toby Burnett wrote:
 Eaxctly the same thing happened to me yesterday David.  
 
 I couldn't see a way other than closing the program.  
 
 I'm sure Jose will update it soon.  
 

I'm glad it wasn't just me Toby. :-)

I see ROS as a great opportunity to have an input to develop another 
great digital mode.

I had the great honour of being able to help in the development of 
UI-View a few years ago and, I hope, added to the project by trying it 
and reporting what did, and did not, work.

Unfortunately the developer of that program is no longer with us, but I 
think that ROS could be another very interesting development in digital 
communication.

Dave (G0DJA)