[steering-discuss] Wednesday's call

2011-10-03 Thread Florian Effenberger

Hello,

I might not be able to join Wednesday's call until the end - I have a 
meeting at 1700 UTC, and the call starts at 1600 UTC.


In case we have the need for a quorum, I'd like to ask my deputy 
Christoph Noack to jump in if possible.


Florian

--
Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org
Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation
Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108
Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[steering-discuss] BoD Election Candidates

2011-10-03 Thread Simon Phipps
I believe the list of valid candidates for the Document Foundation Board of 
Directors elections is as follows (in alphabetical order by surname):

Thorsten Behrens
Jesús Corrius
Florian Effenberger
Olivier Hallot
Kálmán Kéménczy
Andreas Mantke
Caolán McNamara
Michael Meeks
Bjoern Michaelsen
Charles-H Schulz
Andras Timar
Italo Vignoli
Alexander Werner

If you believe there is an error in this list, please contact me immediately. 
The Candidate List will become final at midnight UTC.
--
Simon Phipps
Election Officer, TDF 2011 Elections


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [steering-discuss] Wednesday's call

2011-10-03 Thread Christoph Noack
Hi Florian,

thanks for the ping ... I'll have to check my schedule at work; if I
remember correctly, I do have another call to the US at the same time.

At the moment, there is only the donation button for nonprofits that
might need a quorum. Is that right - or is this just a discussion?

Cheers,
Christoph

Am Montag, den 03.10.2011, 09:02 +0200 schrieb Florian Effenberger:
 Hello,
 
 I might not be able to join Wednesday's call until the end - I have a 
 meeting at 1700 UTC, and the call starts at 1600 UTC.
 
 In case we have the need for a quorum, I'd like to ask my deputy 
 Christoph Noack to jump in if possible.
 
 Florian
 
 -- 
 Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org
 Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation
 Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108
 Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff
 



-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [steering-discuss] Wednesday's call

2011-10-03 Thread Florian Effenberger

Hi,

Christoph Noack wrote on 2011-10-03 20:50:

At the moment, there is only the donation button for nonprofits that
might need a quorum. Is that right - or is this just a discussion?


this a leftover from the previous calls, needs no quorum anymore, and if 
so, we'll vote on the lists ;)


Florian

--
Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org
Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation
Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108
Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [tdf-discuss] OASIS Standard ODF 1.2 Approved

2011-10-03 Thread Ian Lynch
On 2 October 2011 23:41, Jaime R. Garza gar...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hello All,

 Why isn't ODF added as an extension of HTML5?

That is a very good idea.

 This would define ODF as the defacto Web Standard for Files!

 An ideas who could try to pursue such an agreement?

Presumably get OASIS, TDF and AOO representatives to talk to W3C. Get
a strategy agreed with say Mozilla and Google for good browser support
for rendering and editing ODF documents. (assuming MS will not play
ball but you never know). Editing could be a subset to start with eg
limited to editing text.

 Cheers!

 Jaime


 On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 03:17, Dennis E. Hamilton 
 dennis.hamil...@acm.orgwrote:

 The OASIS ODF 1.2 Committee Specification 01 has been successfully advanced
 to an OASIS Standard, 
 http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/tc-announce/201109/msg00010.html.

 The final ballot results for approval of OASIS Standard ODF 1.2 is at 
 http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ballot.php?id=2115.

 Rob Weir has a nice summary on his blog, 
 http://www.robweir.com/blog/2011/09/odf12-approved.html.  He lists the
 names of the contributors of 1.2 from the specification.  Some of those
 names will be familiar here.

  - Dennis


 --
 Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
 Problems?
 http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
 Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
 List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
 All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
 deleted


 --
 Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
 Problems? 
 http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
 Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
 List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
 All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted





-- 
Ian

Ofqual Accredited IT Qualifications (The Schools ITQ)

www.theINGOTs.org +44 (0)1827 305940

The Learning Machine Limited, Reg Office, 36 Ashby Road, Tamworth,
Staffordshire, B79 8AQ. Reg No: 05560797, Registered in England and
Wales.

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



RE: [tdf-discuss] Re: Top Posting... Can we have an LO Mailing List Guidelines Page?

2011-10-03 Thread Mark Wielaard
Dear Dennis,

On Sun, October 2, 2011 22:00, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
 Mark, I think my question was concrete and very clear:
   How about you just read the goddamn RFC's for email protocol and stop
   whining about it?
  Which RFC's are you talking about?  Numbers please.

 I don't see how RFC 1885 can be meant.

RFC 1885 is one of the inspirations for the document foundation
netiquette page: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette

These guidelines have been inspired by Mozilla Posting Guidelines,
with important additions from
http://linux.sgms-centre.com/misc/netiquette.php and
http://www.woodgate.org/FAQs/netiquette.html.

Original Netiquette guidelines: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1855.
Netiquette on Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netiquette.
Other useful information about the Netiquette:
http://www.livinginternet.com/i/ia_nq.htm.;

They are just guidelines, but ones which are generally considered good
practice on mailing lists. Please read them and try to follow them as
much as possible to keep discussions as pleasant and productive.

With respect to your question on top-vs-bottom-posting, the netiquette
gives a guideline, it is best to just follow that and use some tools
that facilitate the bottom-post/interspersed-style. And please refer to
the section on Let Sleeping Dogs Lie. We all have out pet-peeves that
we would like to discuss and rehash indefinitely. Please resist the urge.

Thanks,

Mark


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[tdf-discuss] ODF and HTML 5

2011-10-03 Thread Ian Lynch
There has been a proposal to try and get ODF recognised as an official
extension of HTML5. On the face of it it sounds a good idea but I
don't know enough about the details or whether this is already in
progress. I guess it would require discussion with W3C, OASIS, and
probably TDF and ASF as a minimum. A logical technical need could be
to develop ODF rendering and editing in web browsers. To start with
this might simply be a limited subset of what can be achieved in
OO/LibO.
-- 
Ian

Ofqual Accredited IT Qualifications (The Schools ITQ)

www.theINGOTs.org +44 (0)1827 305940

The Learning Machine Limited, Reg Office, 36 Ashby Road, Tamworth,
Staffordshire, B79 8AQ. Reg No: 05560797, Registered in England and
Wales.

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



RE: [tdf-discuss] ODF and HTML 5

2011-10-03 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
I was hasty.  The 2003 bug report is about a browser plug-in for 
OpenOffice.org, not ODF, and not anything like ODF embedded in an HTML5 
document or whatever else the current idea turns into.

The comment stream is amusing, however disappointingly predictable.

 - Dennis E. Hamilton
   tools for document interoperability,  http://nfoWorks.org/
   dennis.hamil...@acm.org  gsm: +1-206-779-9430  @orcmid

-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org] 
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2011 10:46
To: 'discuss@documentfoundation.org'
Subject: RE: [tdf-discuss] ODF and HTML 5

The active version of the bug report on having a browser plug-in 
for ODF mentioned below is now at
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=22406.

I'm not certain that the current discussion is the same issue, though.


-Original Message-
From: Olivier Hallot [mailto:olivier.hallot@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Olivier 
Hallot
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2011 02:57
To: discuss@documentfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [tdf-discuss] ODF and HTML 5



Em 03-10-2011 06:07, Ian Lynch escreveu:
 There has been a proposal to try and get ODF recognised as an official
 extension of HTML5. On the face of it it sounds a good idea but I
 don't know enough about the details or whether this is already in
 progress. I guess it would require discussion with W3C, OASIS, and
 probably TDF and ASF as a minimum. A logical technical need could be
 to develop ODF rendering and editing in web browsers. To start with
 this might simply be a limited subset of what can be achieved in
 OO/LibO.

Just for the summary of the issue, this has already been discussed long 
time ago...

http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22406

But of course, there was no HTML5 at that time...

Regards

-- 
Olivier Hallot
Founder, Steering Commitee Member - The Document Foundation
Voicing the enterprise needs
LibreOffice translation leader for Brazilian Portuguese
+55-21-8822-8812


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


[tdf-discuss] Unsupported Components (@Karl Morten Ramberg k...@ofs.no)

2011-10-03 Thread Harold Fuchs
On 3 October, in a different thread (ODF and HTML 5) Karl Morten Ramberg 
k...@ofs.no said:


== begin quote ===
We have started such a development and we also have some basic
functionality in place and we would be happy to release the code. There
are also some real time collaboration features implemented. So far it is
writer and calc we have been working on. Impress, draw and base is as of
now totally unsopported
=== end quote ===

It's the last sentence Impress, draw and base is as of now totally 
unsopported that I'm concerned about. Does this sentence mean that LO is 
not currently doing *anything* to support/enhance these components or *only* 
that there is no work being done on them in relation to HTML5?


Harold Fuchs
London, England



--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [tdf-discuss] Unsupported Components (@Karl Morten Ramberg k...@ofs.no)

2011-10-03 Thread Italo Vignoli

On 10/03/2011 06:20 PM, Harold Fuchs wrote:


It's the last sentence Impress, draw and base is as of now totally
unsopported that I'm concerned about. Does this sentence mean that LO
is not currently doing *anything* to support/enhance these components or
*only* that there is no work being done on them in relation to HTML5?


The sentence refers to a plugin supposed to read ODF documents inside a 
browser, which - so far - is reading only Writer and Calc files. It is 
not developed by TDF, so the sentence is not referring to LibreOffice 
development.


--
Italo Vignoli
italo.vign...@gmail.com
mobile +39.348.5653829
VoIP +39.02.320621813
skype italovignoli

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Top Posting...

2011-10-03 Thread Cor Nouws

Italo Vignoli wrote (02-10-11 22:20)

On 10/02/2011 08:38 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:



2. I have an offer. What formatting by senders will most powerfully
serve those on [libreoffice-accessibility]? What do those with access
limitations confirm to be the best that works for all of them?
Whatever *that* is, I will do everything in my power to honor.


I am not an expert about accessibility, but I recall that this is one of
the cases where top posting is the best choice. I suggest to have a
double check, though, as I am not competent in this domain.


I just checked with Peter op 't Hof, Dutch accessibility expert.
He says there is no accessibility problem with mail handling. Most 
important is that it's ascii.
(I did not ask if the people that rely on special handling for 
accessibility, have to do some extra tolling or settings. But I imagine 
the people are informed well enough themselves.)


So accessibility can't be considered as a reason for different mail 
handling.


HTH

--
 - Cor
 - http://nl.libreoffice.org


--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [tdf-discuss] OASIS Standard ODF 1.2 Approved

2011-10-03 Thread Mark Preston
Well, I worked with the W3C on doing the initial work on RDF but not
done anything for a while. If I can remember the login details I can
try to mention it.

On 03/10/2011 09:45, Jaime R. Garza wrote:
 It would be great if connected people could help to introduce this idea. I
 hope it doesn't stay just as an idea! I'll be willing to help in the
 discussions and organization, but I don't have the contacts. Anyone with
 contacts willing to help?
 
 
 On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 09:44, Ian Lynch ianrly...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 On 2 October 2011 23:41, Jaime R. Garza gar...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hello All,

 Why isn't ODF added as an extension of HTML5?

 That is a very good idea.

 This would define ODF as the defacto Web Standard for Files!

 An ideas who could try to pursue such an agreement?

 Presumably get OASIS, TDF and AOO representatives to talk to W3C. Get
 a strategy agreed with say Mozilla and Google for good browser support
 for rendering and editing ODF documents. (assuming MS will not play
 ball but you never know). Editing could be a subset to start with eg
 limited to editing text.

 Cheers!

 Jaime


 On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 03:17, Dennis E. Hamilton 
 dennis.hamil...@acm.orgwrote:

 The OASIS ODF 1.2 Committee Specification 01 has been successfully
 advanced
 to an OASIS Standard, 
 http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/tc-announce/201109/msg00010.html.

 The final ballot results for approval of OASIS Standard ODF 1.2 is at 
 http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ballot.php?id=2115.

 Rob Weir has a nice summary on his blog, 
 http://www.robweir.com/blog/2011/09/odf12-approved.html.  He lists the
 names of the contributors of 1.2 from the specification.  Some of those
 names will be familiar here.

  - Dennis


 --
 Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
 Problems?
 http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
 Posting guidelines + more:
 http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
 List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
 All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
 deleted


 --
 Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
 Problems?
 http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
 Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
 List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
 All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
 deleted





 --
 Ian

 Ofqual Accredited IT Qualifications (The Schools ITQ)

 www.theINGOTs.org +44 (0)1827 305940

 The Learning Machine Limited, Reg Office, 36 Ashby Road, Tamworth,
 Staffordshire, B79 8AQ. Reg No: 05560797, Registered in England and
 Wales.

 --
 Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
 Problems?
 http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
 Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
 List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
 All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
 deleted


 

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



RE: [tdf-discuss] Re: Top Posting...

2011-10-03 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
Concerning any accessibility issues around e-mail conversations, 
Cor reports that an accessibility expert says the main requirement 
is that the text be in ASCII.

Cor, does that mean Unicode (i.e., UTF-8) is undesirable?  Or was 
the response not that technical?

 - Dennis E. Hamilton
   tools for document interoperability,  http://nfoWorks.org/
   dennis.hamil...@acm.org  gsm: +1-206-779-9430  @orcmid


-Original Message-
From: Cor Nouws [mailto:oo...@nouenoff.nl] 
http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/msg07718.html
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2011 13:15
To: discuss@documentfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Top Posting...

[ ... ]

I just checked with Peter op 't Hof, Dutch accessibility expert.
He says there is no accessibility problem with mail handling. Most 
important is that it's ascii.
(I did not ask if the people that rely on special handling for 
accessibility, have to do some extra tolling or settings. But I imagine 
the people are informed well enough themselves.)

So accessibility can't be considered as a reason for different mail 
handling.
[ ... ]


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [tdf-discuss] ODF and HTML 5

2011-10-03 Thread Ian Lynch
On 3 October 2011 18:02, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
 My apologies for the heavy-duty cross-posting.  It might be good to pick a 
 single public list and a subject header and converge there.

 Q: WHERE IS THE PROPOSAL?

 This started as a simple e-mail list question by Jaime R. Garza on the 
 [tdf-discuss] list:
 http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/msg07698.html.

 There is no proposal in the sense of some technical submission to adapt ODF 
 for this purpose.  You are pretty  much seeing the extent of the discussion 
 so far.  The proposal is a paragraph and concept being echoed
 around these lists now.

Sorry, when I said proposal I meant it in a simple idea for discussion
sense rather than a formal proposal as in a project proposal requiring
lazy consensus or a vote. At this stage more a is this worth
discussing? (So that it might get refined to a specific proposal of
the type that gets voted on). Sorry for the confusion.
-- 
Ian

Ofqual Accredited IT Qualifications (The Schools ITQ)

www.theINGOTs.org +44 (0)1827 305940

The Learning Machine Limited, Reg Office, 36 Ashby Road, Tamworth,
Staffordshire, B79 8AQ. Reg No: 05560797, Registered in England and
Wales.

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted