Re: [jQuery] jqModal overlay problem in IE6, IE7
Moving all the jqModal windows to be direct children of body fixed the IE
problem. I couldn't do that directly with the HTML (long story..) so I just
used $('body').append($('.jqmWindow')) right before doing .jqm()
I'd like to know why having the jqmWindows inside other divs breaks it
though...maybe I'll look into it later
Thanks!
Laurent
On 3/20/07, Laurent Yaish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Brice and Benjamin,
Thanks for the replies. I looked at the z-index and it seemed to be fine.
I even manually set it in the css file for
.jqWindow to 3000, but it still didn't work.
The HTML for the windows is indeed nested several levels deep, so I will
try to make them direct children of body and
will let you know how that goes.
Thanks!
Laurent
On 3/20/07, Brice Burgess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Laurent Yaish wrote:
Hi,
I just started using jqModal and it works fine in Firefox but in IE (6
and 7) the window
appears under the overlay. I tried turning on and off modal mode but
it made no difference.
I wish I could post the code, but it's for an intranet...
I am using the CSS file from the jqModal site.
Any ideas where I should start looking?
Thanks,
Laurent
Laurent,
Try having the modal dialog outside of any containing elements (e.g. a
direct child of body) .. I have found that parent z-index overflow
settings interfere with/take precedence of the target element's
settings.
Hope this helps,
~ Brice
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] jqModal overlay problem in IE6, IE7
Hi Brice and Benjamin, Thanks for the replies. I looked at the z-index and it seemed to be fine. I even manually set it in the css file for .jqWindow to 3000, but it still didn't work. The HTML for the windows is indeed nested several levels deep, so I will try to make them direct children of body and will let you know how that goes. Thanks! Laurent On 3/20/07, Brice Burgess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Laurent Yaish wrote: Hi, I just started using jqModal and it works fine in Firefox but in IE (6 and 7) the window appears under the overlay. I tried turning on and off modal mode but it made no difference. I wish I could post the code, but it's for an intranet... I am using the CSS file from the jqModal site. Any ideas where I should start looking? Thanks, Laurent Laurent, Try having the modal dialog outside of any containing elements (e.g. a direct child of body) .. I have found that parent z-index overflow settings interfere with/take precedence of the target element's settings. Hope this helps, ~ Brice ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] jQuery 1.0.4 Documentation
That worked, thanks! Laurent On 1/16/07, Karl Swedberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Give this a try: http://www.visualjquery.com/1.0.4.html --Karl _ Karl Swedberg www.englishrules.com www.learningjquery.com On Jan 16, 2007, at 4:54 PM, Laurent Yaish wrote: Is the documentation for jQuery 1.0.4 still available somewhere? I plan on updating to 1.1 very soon, but in the meantime I still need to lookup the 1.0.4 API documentation Thanks, Laurent ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
[jQuery] jQuery and SourceForge.net
I just noticed while browsing sourceforge.net that they are using jQuery and Thickbox. Yet another big site using the greatest js library out there... Congrats on 1.1 and keep up the good work! Laurent ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] New Plugin: modalContent
Hi Gavin, Looks pretty neat and simple. I haven't really gone through the code but the one think I noticed is that you're using the $ alias. Plugins should be using jQuery not the alias. Laurent On 11/28/06, Gavin M. Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Putting my time where my mouth is in the Stop using thickbox! I've created a modalContent plugin. You can view it and a few examples at http://jquery.glyphix.com/ As this is an initial revision, I'm sure I've not thought of everything. This is meant to be a base modal content plugin that things like thickbox can be built upon. Please let me know your thoughts. Gavin ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] jQuery sites
probably to prevent the browser from using the same cached js file between sessionsOn 11/14/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Awesome looking sites! I have a Q about your use of jquery...script type=text/_javascript_src="">script language=_javascript_ type=text/_javascript_ src="">What is the purpose of having the sessionid like that in the src= "">--Jacob Some sites we just launched using jQuery: 1. http://www.payroll.com.Used jQuery for manipulating the icons on the local nav and creating some visual effects. 2. http://www.intuit.com. Currently running 3 tests.2 with tons of jQuery and 1 with minimal. (delete cookies and refresh to see) I used jQuery for a bunch of visual effects.Bottom right scrolling thingy (props to Karl Swedberg), tabs effect in the middle.I used it to create shadow effects on several labels.Some simple things like making the radio button labels clickable.Other various items. Also across the intuit family of websites, we updated the checkout and recover password functionality.All use jQuery extensively. Thanks to everyone.The interactivity has helped our customers and the company. Feedback welcome, by the way. :)I always want to improve. Glen ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/___jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.comhttp://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Text pointer to hand pointer on MouseOver...
try setting the CSS cursor propertyhttp://www.w3schools.com/css/pr_class_cursor.aspLaurentOn 11/13/06,
Rick Faircloth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How could I cause the mouse pointer to change from the
text select pointer to a hand when a user mouses over
text before clicking?
I'm working with this jQuery code
…
$(document).ready(function() {
$('#ann').find('dd').hide().end().find('dt').click(function() {
var answer = $(this).next();
if (answer.is(':visible')) {
answer.slideUp();
} else {
answer.slideDown();
}
});
});
Rick
___jQuery mailing listdiscuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] new jQuery API draft
Man you scared me... You meant new jQuery API DOCS, not new jQuery API right?LaurentOn 11/10/06, Gavin M. Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Very nice.Very, very nice.On Nov 10, 2006, at 1:20 PM, Jörn Zaefferer wrote: Hi jQueryians, I'd like to present you a first draft for a new stylesheet for the jQuery API: http://joern.jquery.com/api-draft/cat.xml There is still lot's of work to do, but the main concern, a new concept for the navigation, is already functional. Both Alphabetical and Category lists will be provided as exapandable trees. Please don't waste your time checking it with IE, the draft works so far only with Firefox. Please post your opinions and ideas, I'm sure there are many. Regards Jörn -- Jörn Zaefferer http://bassistance.de ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/___jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.comhttp://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
[jQuery] Element tagName
Hi All,I couldn't find a way using jQuery to get the tagName of an element.Let's say I have this:divspantest/span/div$('span').parent().tag() would return 'div'
is that currently possible?I found the is() function, maybe that could be changed to return the tagname if no argument is passedThanks!Laurent
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] Element tagName
so you guys don't think that this should be part of jQuery?what if the function is() with no argument returned the tag name?Laurent
On 11/10/06,
Michael Geary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Laurent Yaish
I couldn't find a way using jQuery to get the tagName of an element. Let's say I have this: divspantest/span/div
$('span').parent().tag() would return 'div' From: Brandon Aaron You could do two things ... write yourself a plugin that would look something like this: jQuery.fn.tag
= function() { return this[0] ? this[0].tagName : null; };That would certainly do the trick. I can't resist a little codeoptimization... :-)jQuery.fn.tag = function() { return this[0] this[0].tagName; };
or you could just do it like this: $('span').parent().get(0).tagNameOr:$('span').parent()[0].tagNameAlthough here I can see where one might prefer the .get(0) for clarity - not
sure which I like better.-Mike___jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] jQuery 1.0.3 compressed - file header missing
What's wrong with having the file header in the packed version???/** jQuery 1.0.3 - New Wave _javascript_** Copyright (c) 2006 John Resig (jquery.com)* Dual licensed under the MIT ( MIT-LICENSE.txt)* and GPL (GPL-LICENSE.txt) licenses.** $Date: 2006-10-27 11:15:44 -0400 (Fri, 27 Oct 2006) $* $Rev: 501 $*/I keep the packed version of jquery in my project svn repository so having the file header is a must since the whole file is on one lineand therefore it's impossible to figure out what has changed with svn diff.Plus I also don't mind having credits and license information available. Here's another reason for having it: developer X adds jQuery packed to a project,developer X quits 2 months later. New developer Y sees that developer X is using some file called jquery-latest.pack.js but developer Y has never heard of jQuery and has no idea what this file is! Now developer Y has a problem...Thanks,LaurentOn 11/3/06, Choan C. Gálvez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:On 11/3/06, Brent Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: $().jquery gives the version.That's right, but it used to return the revision number. While havingaccess to the version number is useful for everybody, I think having access to the revision number would be useful for some of us. Atleast, for me.So, could we have a `$.revision` (or maybe `$().revision`) property?--Choan http://choangalvez.nom.es/___jQuery mailing listdiscuss@jquery.comhttp://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
[jQuery] jQuery 1.0.3 compressed - file header missing
The packed version of jQuery 1.0.3 is missing the file header, 1.0.2 had it. I know it makes the file slightly smaller but then there is no way to know what version you're using.Thanks!Laurent ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] jQuery 1.0.2 RC2
IE 6.0.2900.2180 - All tests OK FF 1.5.0.7 - All tests OK Laurent On 10/8/06, Larry Garfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday 08 October 2006 13:44, Kent Fredric wrote: Firefox 2.0_rc1 Linux fails #55 as well. Konqueror version 3.5.4 does the same as Larry's, ( Just he didn't specify what version so I wasn't sure ) 3.5.4 as well, sorry. :-) -- Larry Garfield AIM: LOLG42 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 6817012 If nature has made any one thing less susceptible than all others of exclusive property, it is the action of the thinking power called an idea, which an individual may exclusively possess as long as he keeps it to himself; but the moment it is divulged, it forces itself into the possession of every one, and the receiver cannot dispossess himself of it. -- Thomas Jefferson ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/ ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
[jQuery] jQuery and Prototype
Hi Folks, First of all thank you John for writing jQuery. I've read the wiki page regarding using jQuery and prototype together and couldn't get it to work reliably. I did load prototype first but ended up going through the jQuery source code and renamed $() to JQ(). It would be kind of cool if the $ function could be renamed via a configuration setting Thanks, Laurent ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] jQuery and Prototype
The jQuery code itself uses $
toggle: function(){
$(this)[ $(this).is(:hidden) ? show :
hide ].apply( $(this),
arguments );
},
The $ is great for the end user, but it is a very generic alias. I
don't think it is a good idea for jQuery or plugins to use it
internally. But it might already be too late to change this...
Thanks
Laurent
On 10/6/06, Jörn Zaefferer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 08:12:51 -0700
Von: Laurent Yaish [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: discuss@jquery.com
Betreff: [jQuery] jQuery and Prototype
Hi Folks,
First of all thank you John for writing jQuery. I've read the wiki page
regarding using jQuery and prototype together and couldn't get it to work
reliably. I did load prototype first but ended up going through the
jQuery source code
and renamed $() to JQ().
It would be kind of cool if the $ function could be renamed via a
configuration setting
It should be enough to change this line: var $ = jQuery; to something else,
like var JQ = jQuery.
But this won't solve the problem that most plugins use the $ alias instead of
jQuery.
-- Jörn
PS: http://jquery.com/dev/bugs/bug/253/
--
GMX DSL-Flatrate 0,- Euro* - Überall, wo DSL verfügbar ist!
NEU: Jetzt bis zu 16.000 kBit/s! http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Re: [jQuery] jQuery and Prototype
Yes it is a simple search and replace, that's what I just did to get
prototype and jQuery to work together. Even for plugin authors this
should be a very simple change. When is the next release due?
On 10/6/06, Brandon Aaron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it would be worth it to change all internals of jQuery to not
use $. Essentially it is just a find and replace ... the issue is
getting plugins to do it. I think the next release should force the
issue.
--
Brandon Aaron
On 10/6/06, Laurent Yaish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The jQuery code itself uses $
toggle: function(){
$(this)[ $(this).is(:hidden) ? show :
hide ].apply( $(this),
arguments );
},
The $ is great for the end user, but it is a very generic alias. I
don't think it is a good idea for jQuery or plugins to use it
internally. But it might already be too late to change this...
Thanks
Laurent
On 10/6/06, Jörn Zaefferer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 08:12:51 -0700
Von: Laurent Yaish [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: discuss@jquery.com
Betreff: [jQuery] jQuery and Prototype
Hi Folks,
First of all thank you John for writing jQuery. I've read the wiki page
regarding using jQuery and prototype together and couldn't get it to
work
reliably. I did load prototype first but ended up going through the
jQuery source code
and renamed $() to JQ().
It would be kind of cool if the $ function could be renamed via a
configuration setting
It should be enough to change this line: var $ = jQuery; to something
else, like var JQ = jQuery.
But this won't solve the problem that most plugins use the $ alias
instead of jQuery.
-- Jörn
PS: http://jquery.com/dev/bugs/bug/253/
--
GMX DSL-Flatrate 0,- Euro* - Überall, wo DSL verfügbar ist!
NEU: Jetzt bis zu 16.000 kBit/s! http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
