Re: [IxDA Discuss] Pragmatic language theory and usability theory... same same or what?

2009-08-11 Thread Soren Weimann
What's going on? I may be dumb, but the best usability test subjects
are. Is the interaction design of this forum an experiment? 
I posted a reply to William. It's gone. I received a reply in my
mail-box I cannot see in the thread???
Sorry, it just blows my mind to see something like that in a forum
like this!

As I hope you have already guessed, I'm trying to provoke a
reaction. 
No doubt that these two disciplines are each relevant in their own
right. But they have much more in common than usability people (I use
the term very broadly) tend to acknoledge. And the discipline of
usability being so young, it would bebenefit greatly by looking more
closely at some of the language/communication theory classics. No
reason to invent the wheel all over again. 

Paul, Just like usability (again very broadly defined) language
theory have been assisted and developed by all kinds of disciplines
dealing with the human being (mind and body). 

You will of course need to fit it to your branch of communication,
but I can recommend Grice's co-operative principle and four maxims
to introduce some very basic, but important understandings of
pragmatics, and Sperber and Wilson Relevance (the later got me an
A in the usability exam at Copenhagen IT University - my only
formal usability credentials).

- Grice, Paul H 1967: Logic and Conversation. i Cole  Morgan 1975
- Sperber, Dan  Wilson, Deidre 2. udgave 1995: Relevance -
Communication and Cognition. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford


. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Posted from the new ixda.org
http://www.ixda.org/discuss?post=44465



Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ... disc...@ixda.org
Unsubscribe  http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines  http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .. http://www.ixda.org/help


Re: [IxDA Discuss] Pragmatic language theory and usability theory...same same or what?

2009-08-10 Thread William Hudson
Soren -

It is a useful distinction - there is a lot more to usability and user
experience than just language. Also, those of us focussing on
user-centred design tend to be more concerned with what influences user
behaviour rather than theoretical semantics.

Regards,

William Hudson
Syntagm Ltd
Design for Usability
UK 01235-522859
World +44-1235-522859
US Toll Free 1-866-SYNTAGM
mailto:william.hud...@syntagm.co.uk
http://www.syntagm.co.uk
skype:williamhudsonskype 

Syntagm is a limited company registered in England and Wales (1985).
Registered number: 1895345. Registered office: 10 Oxford Road, Abingdon
OX14 2DS.

Confused about dates in interaction design? See our new study (free):
http://www.syntagm.co.uk/design/datesstudy.htm

12 UK mobile phone e-commerce sites compared! Buy the report:
http://www.syntagm.co.uk/design/uxbench.shtml

Courses in card sorting and Ajax interaction design. London, Las Vegas
and Berlin:
http://www.syntagm.co.uk/design/csadvances.shtml
http://www.syntagm.co.uk/design/ajaxdesign.shtml

 -Original Message-
 From: new-boun...@ixda.org [mailto:new-boun...@ixda.org] On Behalf Of
 Soren Weimann
 Sent: 10 August 2009 3:39 AM
 To: disc...@ixda.org
 Subject: [IxDA Discuss] Pragmatic language theory and usability
 theory...same same or what?
...

Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ... disc...@ixda.org
Unsubscribe  http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines  http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .. http://www.ixda.org/help


Re: [IxDA Discuss] Pragmatic language theory and usability theory... same same or what?

2009-08-10 Thread Paul Bryan
I agree with you about the importance of language in user experience
design. An understanding of semiotics and related aspects of
information theory support the creation of interactive access points
that most closely mirror the intentions of the largest or more most
valuable segments of users of a given web site. 

Some aspects of user experience design that are better supported by
sciences such as ethnography, market research, web analytics, etc.,
include such things as task modeling, competitive differentiation,
and perceived utility. If the words are optimal, but we have users
step through processes that don't mirror the mental image they have
of those processes, or are not intuitive in terms of a mental leap to
a new process, then in studies we've conducted they clearly get
confused and abandon the experience. 

Also, we can create a system with optimum words and images, but if
users don't perceive that they will benefit more from using this
system than other available options (like calling HR or stopping at
the mall after work), then they will not even start the experience. 

For this reason, user experience designers need to rely on many
branches of social science, including semiotics, to achieve optimal,
measurable results.

Paul Bryan
Principal Consultant, Usography Corporation




. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Posted from the new ixda.org
http://www.ixda.org/discuss?post=44465



Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ... disc...@ixda.org
Unsubscribe  http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines  http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .. http://www.ixda.org/help


Re: [IxDA Discuss] Pragmatic language theory and usability theory...same same or what?

2009-08-10 Thread Sullivan, Brian
Hi Soren --

I have an MA in English Literature.  I see a lot of parallels myself.
For example, the Communication Triangle described by Kinneavy in a
Theory of Discourse is concept that (to me) really applies to usability.


I really think the issue is that most usability folks are NOT really
tuned into the communications field.  And, I think an argument could be
made that the communications field has started to take some steps.  For
example, the Society for Technical Communication has a SIG on Usability.


I see a lot of parallels:

- Personas
- Storytelling
- Patterns
- Metaphors

Am I talking about thinking about communication theory, studying a
novel, working on a web design, or doing a usability project?  The
answer is, of course:

It depends. (This is really sayingCONTEXT).

For me, I have always thought it would be interesting to use some ways
to analyze a work of fiction, but apply it to the design and usability
field:

- Post-colonialism (think social media here)
- Bibliographic codes (building components over time--ex: shopping cart)
- Historical context (ex: social media, iPhone, Google)
- Post-modernism (ex: gaming theory, emotional design, making meaning)
- Themes and motifs (ex: design patterns)
- Freudian (ex: Gestalt principles, anyone)

I do think there are a lot of connections to be explored.  I do not
think people are making the connection because there are few people out
there with the background in both areas. 

Finally, I would also say that usability and web design can also be
considered part of the creative process.  Buffalo State University has a
wonderful program teaching Creative Problem Solving (CPS) method.  I see
a lot of parallels in the early design process with this method, too.  

Stake a claim.  Make a name for yourself.  Make that connection.

Thanks,
Brian



-Original Message-
From: new-boun...@ixda.org [mailto:new-boun...@ixda.org] On Behalf Of
Soren Weimann
Sent: Sunday, August 09, 2009 9:39 PM
To: disc...@ixda.org
Subject: [IxDA Discuss] Pragmatic language theory and usability
theory...same same or what?

Being a product of the school of pragmatic language theory it have
always puzzled me that (some) usability folk are very eager to
distinguish their field from language and semiotic theory.

Honstly I don't see a big difference. By removing themselves from
language theory, they are cuting themselves of from several hundreds
of years of research on which they could be building their branch of
communicative theory.

- it's all about communicating
- it's all about receivers
- it's all about context

What am I missing?



Reply to this thread at ixda.org
http://www.ixda.org/discuss?post=44465


Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ... disc...@ixda.org
Unsubscribe  http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines  http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .. http://www.ixda.org/help

Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ... disc...@ixda.org
Unsubscribe  http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines  http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .. http://www.ixda.org/help


Re: [IxDA Discuss] Pragmatic language theory and usability theory... same same or what?

2009-08-10 Thread Kopano Ramaphoi
Could anybody explain the relationship between Human Computer
Interaction and Interacton Design?



. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Posted from the new ixda.org
http://www.ixda.org/discuss?post=44465



Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ... disc...@ixda.org
Unsubscribe  http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines  http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .. http://www.ixda.org/help


Re: [IxDA Discuss] Pragmatic language theory and usability theory...same same or what?

2009-08-10 Thread Kopano Ramaphoi
Its a bet confussing bcoz the explanation seems to be more close to
the definition of Interaction Design, so how about you put it into
defferent percepctive?


. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Posted from the new ixda.org
http://www.ixda.org/discuss?post=44465



Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ... disc...@ixda.org
Unsubscribe  http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines  http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .. http://www.ixda.org/help