[slim] Re: Which format puts heaviest demand on SB?

2006-02-06 Thread joek

Thanks for the replies and sorry for the confusion.

I am currently running two wireless SB3#8217;s playing MP3#8217;s
(VBR highest quality setting) and have not experienced any network
drops or skips in the audio. I feel confident my network, server and SB
can easily manage these MP3 streams. I just wanted to make sure my
environment (server, network, SB) as a whole can handle the most
extreme cases when streaming audio.

Based on Mark#8217;s reply, wav audio format is probably the most
demanding on the network (and possibly server), since it is streaming
at 1440 Kbps. Good starting point for me to run some wav streams
through my configuration.

What do you mean by stress?
stress - try: test the limits of


-- 
joek

joek's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3318
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=20825

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Re: Which format puts heaviest demand on SB?

2006-02-06 Thread funkstar

To place demand on the server you could set it up to transode from
something like OGG (takes slightly more CPU to decode than MP3) and
then send it out as MP3 with some insane quality presets. That should
stretch your server.

What is your server hardware?
Are you using all this wired or wire less?
How many SBs are we talking here?

a completely wired network with hardware less than three years old and
a single SB is going to cope with anything you can throw at it.
Increase the number of SBs significantly, use old hardware and switch
to wireless and you will very easily start to come across problems.
Some of with will be easy enough to get round, others not so (wireless
especially when you have a noisy signal area)


-- 
funkstar

funkstar's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2335
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=20825

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Re: Which format puts heaviest demand on SB?

2006-02-06 Thread Mark Lanctot
If you can play WAV without issues, you can 
definitely play FLAC.

WAV = 1440 kbps (off a CD), with overhead you'd 
need 2000 kbps of bandwidth at least.

FLAC = 1000 kbps, 1500 kbps of bandwidth will do.

There's no reason to stream WAV though.  You won't 
gain any quality, it doesn't support tags and it 
uses more hard drive space and bandwidth.

There's a good network test plugin here: 
http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=18149. 
  If you can manage 2000 kbps at 100%, you will 
have no problems with WAVs, but you'll only need 
1500 kbps for FLAC.

joek wrote:
 Thanks for the replies and sorry for the confusion.
 
 I am currently running two wireless SB3#8217;s
playing MP3#8217;s
 (VBR highest quality setting) and have not
experienced any network
 drops or skips in the audio. I feel confident my
network, server and SB
 can easily manage these MP3 streams. I just wanted
to make sure my
 environment (server, network, SB) as a whole can
handle the most
 extreme cases when streaming audio.
 
 Based on Mark#8217;s reply, wav audio format is
probably the most
 demanding on the network (and possibly server),
since it is streaming
 at 1440 Kbps. Good starting point for me to run some
wav streams
 through my configuration.
 
 What do you mean by stress?
 stress - try: test the limits of
 
 

-- 
___
 

  Mark Lanctot
___






__ 
Find your next car at http://autos.yahoo.ca
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss