RE: [slim] Slim server, Safari 2.0 and Tiger.

2005-05-12 Thread Craig, James (IT)
Hmm thought so. 
I believe that playlists are not yet stored in the database and I am
hoping when they are this will no longer happen...
http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1459

James 

 
NOTICE: If received in error, please destroy and notify sender.  Sender does 
not waive confidentiality or privilege, and use is prohibited. 
 
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Slim server, Safari 2.0 and Tiger.

2005-05-12 Thread Steven Moore
Yes there normally is a populated playlist, usually around 10-30 tracks
Steven Moore
On May 12, 2005, at 8:20 PM, Craig, James (IT) wrote:
Steven,
Do you have a populated client playlist displayed when you open the
interface?
My experience (Windows/Firefox) is that this is validated against the
database before display.
Subsequent re-opening of the interface or the initial one with an  
empty
playlist are much faster

James
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven  
Moore
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 3:16 PM
To: Slim Devices Discussion
Subject: Re: [slim] Slim server, Safari 2.0 and Tiger.

Hi,
I did a bit of experimenting.
It seems that it only takes this long to open the web interface the
first time you use it since starting up the machine and since I may  
not
go to the web interface first thing it will be later on in the day.
I'll try and use the Web interface tomorrow first thing and see if  
it is
different.
At any time after that even after clearing the cache the web interface
comes up within seconds.

Could the sever be getting paged out or something?
As I say it's no problem I was just wondering if anyone else had  
noticed
this.

Steven Moore
O

NOTICE: If received in error, please destroy and notify sender.   
Sender does not waive confidentiality or privilege, and use is  
prohibited.

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


RE: [slim] Slim server, Safari 2.0 and Tiger.

2005-05-12 Thread Craig, James (IT)
Steven,
Do you have a populated client playlist displayed when you open the
interface?

My experience (Windows/Firefox) is that this is validated against the
database before display.
Subsequent re-opening of the interface or the initial one with an empty
playlist are much faster

James 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven Moore
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 3:16 PM
To: Slim Devices Discussion
Subject: Re: [slim] Slim server, Safari 2.0 and Tiger.

Hi,
I did a bit of experimenting.
It seems that it only takes this long to open the web interface the
first time you use it since starting up the machine and since I may not
go to the web interface first thing it will be later on in the day.
I'll try and use the Web interface tomorrow first thing and see if it is
different.
At any time after that even after clearing the cache the web interface
comes up within seconds.

Could the sever be getting paged out or something?
As I say it's no problem I was just wondering if anyone else had noticed
this.

Steven Moore
O 

 
NOTICE: If received in error, please destroy and notify sender.  Sender does 
not waive confidentiality or privilege, and use is prohibited. 
 
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Slim server, Safari 2.0 and Tiger.

2005-05-12 Thread Steven Moore
Hi,
I did a bit of experimenting.
It seems that it only takes this long to open the web interface the  
first time you use it since starting up the machine and since I may  
not go to the web interface first thing it will be later on in the day.
I'll try and use the Web interface tomorrow first thing and see if it  
is different.
At any time after that even after clearing the cache the web  
interface comes up within seconds.

Could the sever be getting paged out or something?
As I say it's no problem I was just wondering if anyone else had  
noticed this.

Steven Moore
On May 12, 2005, at 6:25 PM, dean blackketter wrote:
I'm running that here and haven't noticed it.
Can you describe the exact sequence of events (i.e. when you start  
counting and when you stop and what you do before and during that  
time)?

On May 12, 2005, at 10:16 AM, Steven Moore wrote:

Has anyone else using the above combination noticed that the  
server page takes a lot longer to appear (26 seconds) than when  
using 10.3.8 and the previous version of Safari? It didn't seem to  
take as long before.
After it appears everything is okay.

Slim 6.0.2 - 3085, Mac os 10.4, safari 2.0
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Slim server, Safari 2.0 and Tiger.

2005-05-12 Thread dean blackketter
I'm running that here and haven't noticed it.
Can you describe the exact sequence of events (i.e. when you start  
counting and when you stop and what you do before and during that time)?

On May 12, 2005, at 10:16 AM, Steven Moore wrote:
Has anyone else using the above combination noticed that the server  
page takes a lot longer to appear (26 seconds) than when using  
10.3.8 and the previous version of Safari? It didn't seem to take  
as long before.
After it appears everything is okay.

Slim 6.0.2 - 3085, Mac os 10.4, safari 2.0
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Slim server, Safari 2.0 and Tiger.

2005-05-12 Thread Steven Moore
Has anyone else using the above combination noticed that the server  
page takes a lot longer to appear (26 seconds) than when using 10.3.8  
and the previous version of Safari? It didn't seem to take as long  
before.
After it appears everything is okay.

Slim 6.0.2 - 3085, Mac os 10.4, safari 2.0
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss