Re: [slim] Native AAC Support

2009-04-04 Thread jeremygray

Nonreality;410827 Wrote: 
 It's a nightmare for you to listen to but you still use AAC?
I think you might have misread me. I said that music training makes it
a nightmare to listen to off-key vocals, etc. I also said that I can
hear compression artifacts in any lossy encoding at any rate I've tried
(and even a few that are out-of-spec.) I didn't say that AAC is a
nightmare to listen to. :)

That aside for the moment, the only reason I even use AAC is because it
is the most sonically transparent of the lossy options available for a
reasonable number of portable players. Were iPods to have gigabytes
upon gigabytes of solid-state storage I'd be off of AAC and using only
lossless faster than you could say Go! :D


-- 
jeremygray

jeremygray's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=29143
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=19155

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Native AAC Support

2009-03-29 Thread Ron F.

Nonreality;410414 Wrote: 
 Of course, of course.  I'm sure no one here would think that you would
 use any of those other lowly formats. Just think of the humiliation if
 that wasn't so. :)

It would be awful! I can't bare to think about it.


-- 
Ron F.

*Squeezebox setup:* wireless SB3 - CI Audio VDA.2 DAC + VAC.1 PSU
*Main rig:* NAD 7600 + NAD 2600A - Phase Tech PC-6.5 speakers
*Headphone rig:* Headroom Max - Sennheiser 650s
*Music Server:* Nano-ITX computer running SlimCD + 750 GByte HDD -
Netgear wireless router
*Other stuff:* NAD C542 CDP, NAD 6300 Tape, Monster 5100 Power
conditioner, Outlaw Audio cables

Ron F.'s Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=5616
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=19155

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Native AAC Support

2009-03-29 Thread Ron F.

Nonreality;410415 Wrote: 
 From my experience and readings on hydrogenaudio.org what you are saying
 is true up to about 160kbs.  When you get into the higher bit rates you
 really can't tell any difference between mp3, ogg or aac.  There may be
 differences in size but it's really not much at all.  Try it and see.  A
 256 mp3 is going to sound every bit as good as a 256 aac or ogg.

Personally, I find 64K MP3 to be truly awful - I have to turn it off.
128K WMA or AAC to be listenable for an extended period of time, if not
equivalent to a quality FM broadcast. 192K - any format - to be hard to
distinguish from lossless. So, when making compressed files - I opt for
192K Vorbis.

-Ron


-- 
Ron F.

*Squeezebox setup:* wireless SB3 - CI Audio VDA.2 DAC + VAC.1 PSU
*Main rig:* NAD 7600 + NAD 2600A - Phase Tech PC-6.5 speakers
*Headphone rig:* Headroom Max - Sennheiser 650s
*Music Server:* Nano-ITX computer running SlimCD + 750 GByte HDD -
Netgear wireless router
*Other stuff:* NAD C542 CDP, NAD 6300 Tape, Monster 5100 Power
conditioner, Outlaw Audio cables

Ron F.'s Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=5616
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=19155

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Native AAC Support

2009-03-29 Thread MrSinatra

i do 256kbps mp3s, lame 3.96.1 and higher, at -q1

i don't believe i could reliably tell the difference between them, and
a CD, in a proper double blind test, and i'd be willing to bet most
people here couldn't either.

in fact, if the mp3s were just a wee bit louder than the cds, i bet
they'd pick the mp3s all day long...  (due to a psychoacoustic effect
where the ear prefers louder sound)

even if someone could tell the difference reliably, in order to do so,
you'd need the best equipment AND environment to do so, and the further
question would be HOW MUCH BETTER is the difference?  meaning, how would
you quantify/qualify it?

for most peoples purposes, that are less than ideal, i think a HQ mp3,
such as mine, more than suffice.  (i would agree however, that there
are other good reasons to use FLAC, or what have you...)


-- 
MrSinatra

www.lion-radio.org
using:
sb2 (my home) / sbr (parent's home) / sbc (my home) - w/sc 7.3.3b - win
xp pro sp3 ie8 - 3.2ghz / 2gig ram - 1tb wd usb2 raid - d-link dir-655

MrSinatra's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2336
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=19155

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Native AAC Support

2009-03-28 Thread jeremygray

probedb;410513 Wrote: 
 To you at least.
 
 Am currently at -V3 with LAME and can't tell the difference with the
 source for most tracks.

To you at least. :)

I can hear the compression artifacts in any MP3 or AAC bitrate (even
320). Too many years of music training, I suppose. Makes it a nightmare
to listen to off-key vocals (though tuned vocals drive me even crazier
:D), lazy drummers (OMG! These hi-hat 16ths are too fast! I'd best
slow down the entire band for this section of the song!), etc.

Suffice it to say that there really are only two safe recommendations
us users can make to one another: 1. keep a losslessly-compressed copy
of your sources somewhere so you can recompress at will. 2. Use
whatever lossy format/rate works for _your_ears_.

Back to AAC for a moment: Bring on the FF/RW! I've just started with
Squeezcenter recently and haven't yet done all my various transcoding
to work with it best. In the meantime, I'd love to be able to seek
within my AAC files.


-- 
jeremygray

jeremygray's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=29143
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=19155

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Native AAC Support

2009-03-28 Thread Nonreality

It's a nightmare for you to listen to but you still use AAC?


-- 
Nonreality

-IF THE RULE YOU FOLLOWED BROUGHT YOU TO THIS, OF WHAT USE IS THE RULE.-

HTTP://www.last.fm/user/nonreality

Nonreality's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15723
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=19155

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Native AAC Support

2009-03-27 Thread probedb

pfarrell;410419 Wrote: 
 Its the ten to one compression that sounds terrible.
 

To you at least.

Am currently at -V3 with LAME and can't tell the difference with the
source for most tracks.


-- 
probedb

Paul.

'last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/probedb)

probedb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7825
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=19155

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Native AAC Support

2009-03-26 Thread awy

ianr;410151 Wrote: 
 
 Now that AACPlus is the defacto for iTunes purchases, has there been
 any thought given to implementing either native support or at the very
 least FF/RW functionality for these files? 
 

SC 7.3.3 will come with AAC/AAC+ support out of the box, using
server-side transcoding using faad2. There will not be native codec
support in the players: there is no more space in the firmware.

Unfortunately, there will not be FF/RW support in this release. Note
that this issue is independent of native codec support as FF/RW
functionality is always implemented in SC, not the player.


-- 
awy

awy's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7480
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=19155

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Native AAC Support

2009-03-26 Thread gorman

I wonder what's the reasoning behind keeping Vorbis native and
transcoding AAC. While I don't use AAC at all and use Vorbis for
portable needs... I don't doubt that the market would far prefer the
opposite solution.


-- 
gorman

gorman's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=56
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=19155

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Native AAC Support

2009-03-26 Thread funkstar

gorman;410221 Wrote: 
 I wonder what's the reasoning behind keeping Vorbis native and
 transcoding AAC. While I don't use AAC at all and use Vorbis for
 portable needs... I don't doubt that the market would far prefer the
 opposite solution.
Some idle speculation:
#8226; Perhaps the AAC/AAC+ decoder would be far larger than the Ogg
decoder, so there still wouldn't be space.
#8226; Ogg has issues in the amount of memory it uses, especially with
lower than 64bit recordings. Perhaps this is the same with AAC/AAC+? and
if that's the case, broken native support is going to cause more
problems than no native support will.
#8226; Perhaps, even with a bug free codec in the firmware, there
isn't enough processing power in the SB3/Receiver/Boom to run
everything and decode AAC/AAC+
#8226; There is also the time/cost factor in implementing this codec
in the firmware. I think the Ogg codec was a fairly simple port as
various decoders are readily available as it is. AAC/AAC+ might need
extensive reworking from faad2 to make it compatible with the Ubicom
processor. I believe it doesn't have a floating point unit, so only
integer maths is available. This heavily restricts what a codec can
do.

So as you can see, there are plenty of possible reasons why AAC/AAC+
and ALAC aren't included in the current lineup of players. Perhaps
adding codecs to some future player will be trivial, and everything
will be supported natively, who knows!

:)


-- 
funkstar

funkstar's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2335
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=19155

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Native AAC Support

2009-03-26 Thread gorman

In fact, I was simply wondering. Never thought there were no reasons.
Also, it could well be that, back then, with the grand majority of AAC
music being DRMed, SD thought useless to implement it natively.
The market, in this regard, has changed significantly.


-- 
gorman

gorman's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=56
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=19155

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Native AAC Support

2009-03-26 Thread DoomWolf

I believe Spotify uses Ogg Vorbis for its streams, so there's a
potential larger use for Vorbis in the future.


-- 
DoomWolf

DoomWolf's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=8839
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=19155

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Native AAC Support

2009-03-26 Thread Nonreality

Ron F.;410166 Wrote: 
  My own library is in FLAC of course.

Of course, of course.  I'm sure no one here would think that you would
use any of those other lowly formats. Just think of the humiliation if
that wasn't so. :)


-- 
Nonreality

-IF THE RULE YOU FOLLOWED BROUGHT YOU TO THIS, OF WHAT USE IS THE RULE.-

HTTP://www.last.fm/user/nonreality

Nonreality's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15723
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=19155

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Native AAC Support

2009-03-26 Thread Nonreality

samlw;72226 Wrote: 
 I think high-bitrate MP3 is the way I will have to go. In my experience,
 AAC sounds better and compresses better than MP3 at a given bitrate. So
 I have a personal preference for AAC over MP3.
From my experience and readings on hydrogenaudio.org what you are
saying is true up to about 160kbs.  When you get into the higher bit
rates you really can't tell any difference between mp3, ogg or aac. 
There may be differences in size but it's really not much at all.  Try
it and see.  A 256 mp3 is going to sound every bit as good as a 256 aac
or ogg.


-- 
Nonreality

-IF THE RULE YOU FOLLOWED BROUGHT YOU TO THIS, OF WHAT USE IS THE RULE.-

HTTP://www.last.fm/user/nonreality

Nonreality's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15723
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=19155

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Native AAC Support

2009-03-26 Thread Pat Farrell
Nonreality wrote:
  A 256 mp3 is going to sound every bit as good as a 256 aac or ogg.

A flac file, lossless and all that, is only about 700kbs. So any 256kbs
is not all that compressed.

Its the ten to one compression that sounds terrible.

-- 
Pat Farrell
http://www.pfarrell.com/

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Native AAC Support

2009-03-25 Thread ianr

Hi,

Now that AACPlus is the defacto for iTunes purchases, has there been
any thought given to implementing either native support or at the very
least FF/RW functionality for these files? 
I really don't want to transcode the files to mp3 (quality loss) or
flac (takes up additional space and no SQ benefit). Like it or not,
iTMS is the largest online music source, so surely it makes sense to
extend the support, no?


-- 
ianr

ianr's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=13726
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=19155

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Native AAC Support

2009-03-25 Thread agillis

Support for various music encoding formats is one of SqueezeCenters
strengths. Because SC is extensible Plugins can make it support any
type of file. Unfortunately most NAS systems don't have the processing
power to handle plugins and transcoding. This is why I created
VortexBox to allow the playing of all types of files and the widest
support of plugins.

If you really want to use apple files I would recommend VortexBox. If
you have Apple file with DRM you will need to play them on an Apple
Device.


-- 
agillis

rip, tag, get cover artÂ… All you do is insert the CD!
http://vortexbox.org

agillis
Lead Developer VortexBox

agillis's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=21140
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=19155

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Native AAC Support

2009-03-25 Thread Ron F.

Where I use AAC and AAC+ is not in my own library, but streaming
internet radio stations to my SB3. My own library is in FLAC of course.


-- 
Ron F.

*Squeezebox setup:* wireless SB3 - CI Audio VDA.2 DAC + VAC.1 PSU
*Main rig:* NAD 7600 + NAD 2600A - Phase Tech PC-6.5 speakers
*Headphone rig:* Headroom Max - Sennheiser 650s
*Music Server:* Nano-ITX computer running SlimCD + 750 GByte HDD -
Netgear wireless router
*Other stuff:* NAD C542 CDP, NAD 6300 Tape, Monster 5100 Power
conditioner, Outlaw Audio cables

Ron F.'s Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=5616
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=19155

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Native AAC Support

2005-12-15 Thread Kevin O. Lepard
However, I want to store the music uncompressed... (And no, I don't 
want to install extra software modules like LAME to convert my 
uncompressed music to high quality MP3!)


Then you don't want AAC anyway.  And if you've encoded your music 
with AAC, then you've compressed it.  AAC is a compressed file, 
similar to MP3, merely a different codec.


If you want to use a lossless format supported by iTunes, you'll 
probably have to use Apple Lossless (is that what you meant?  Not 
AAC?), which I presume is supported by iTunes.  But if you're willing 
to accept compression with AAC, there isn't any reason to reject it 
with MP3.  Just find an encoding bit-rate that is acceptable to you. 
Installing the iTunes-LAME program in iTunes is trivial.



Why doesn't the Squeezebox simply support AAC in firmware?


Simply?  Implementing a codec in firmware is probably not a trivial 
task.  And since AAC is a lossy codec just as MP3 is, there isn't a 
lot of reason to do it, especially with MP3 being a more universally 
supported encoding method.


As for Apple Lossless, it is not widely used.  I'm a big Apple/Mac 
fan and user, but I use FLAC, not Apple Lossless.


Basically, I conclude that there isn't enough demand and other tasks 
are higher priority.


Kevin
--
Kevin O. Lepard

Happiness is being 100% Microsoft free.
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss