Re: [slim] Re: Transporter vs. SB3

[Marc Sherman]

Mark Lanctot wrote:


If we're going to list the things it doesn't have, it doesn't have
steel-belted radials either.


I'm pretty sure that it is also completely lacking in ponies.

- Marc
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss

Re: [slim] Re: Transporter vs. SB3

[ron thigpen]

JJZolx wrote:

What kind of audiophile buys a $2000 source component without hearing
it first?


It appears that the 30 day trial applies to this product as well.  And 
how better to try out a component but in your listening room, connected 
to your gear?

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss

Re: [slim] Re: Transporter vs. SB3

[kolepard002]

I'll run an SB3 through my Esoteric D-03 and let you know
> > how the Transporter stacks up.
> What kind of audiophile buys a $2000 source component without hearing
> it first?
> 
> You must have a lot of faith in the designer's ears.  Or his
> oscilloscope.  Or something.

No need to have faith.  There's a 30-day money-back guarantee.  How many places 
let you have 30 days to listen to your new audiophile equipment with the rest 
of your setup for an entire month before you're actually committed to the 
purchase?  (I'm not being sarcastic--I don't live in the audiophile world, but 
do most sellers let you take something home and use it a month?)

In any case, you don't have to have faith in anything.  You get to use your own 
ears in your own home.

Kevin
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss