Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] FCC issues SDR/CDR rules in the Federal Register
I'm having a bit of trouble locating the passages of interest in the link below. Is it possible to be a bit more specific about where to look? Thanks. On 7/6/07, Robert McGwier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That means they are now U.S. law. http://dw.com.com/redir?destUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fenterprise.spawar.navy.mil%2Fbody.cfm%3Ftype%3Dc%26category%3D27%26subcat%3D60siteId=22oId=2100-3513-6195102ontId=3513lop=nl.ex Amateur radio is mentioned explicitly. Bob -- AMSAT Director and VP Engineering. Member: ARRL, AMSAT-DL, TAPR, Packrats, NJQRP, QRP ARCI, QCWA, FRC. ARRL SDR WG Chair If you're going to be crazy, you have to get paid for it or else you're going to be locked up. Hunter S. Thompson ___ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio -- Mark ___ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
[Discuss-gnuradio] gnuradio at Field Day
Just curious if anyone used their gnuradio/USRP platform this past Field Day? If yes, I'd like to hear in what capacity. For those of you who may not know what FD is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Field_Day -- Mark ___ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
[Discuss-gnuradio] GNU Radio overview podcast
Eric was kind enough to spend time with me to produce an overview podcast of GNU Radio, targetted at teh curious or newcomer.It's my first recorded podcast, so the audio quality is not what I would have hoped, but I believe it is usable. http://www.petrovic.org/blog/2006/10/18/gnu-radio-podcast/-- MarkAE6RT ___ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] USRP - hotplug / udev / auto-loading of firmware
I also added to the rules fileSYSFS{idVendor}==077d, SYSFS{idProduct}==0410, MODE=0666so I could access the Powermate without becoming root.
On 6/29/06, Lee Patton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 07:44 +0100, Kalen Watermeyer wrote: I ask because I run Ubuntu 6.06 (Dapper), which uses udev, and will need to edit my device manager's rules to identify my custom board, and am not sure if this
is necessary. Oh, and the OS detects my FX2 micro when I run lsusb (albeit unconfigured). Finally, if I do have to edit the rules (SYSFS, VendorId etc), what exactly will I need to let my
system know? (I have read udev docs briefly, but was a little confused)You don't necessarily have to do this, but it is useful to run as anon-root user.See the following link for specific details:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/discuss-gnuradio/2006-06/msg00213.html___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing listDiscuss-gnuradio@gnu.orghttp://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
-- MarkAE6RT
___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
[Discuss-gnuradio] Creating a CW receiver for 20m ham band
Good day.Does anyone have GNU Radio code I can inspect to learn how to decode and render to audio CW transmissions in, say, the US amateur bands?Thank you.-- Mark ___ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Which LinuxOS to use?--1.Unbuntu, Fedora, Mandrake, FreeBSD
I , too, am an Ubuntu 6.06 user. What were you attempting to fix by modifying gnuradio-core/aclocal.m4?MarkOn 6/26/06, Robert McGwier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Lamar:I installed Ubunto 5.X and GnuRadio just made and ran after I used apt (synaptic) to download any package GnuRadio could not find.With Ubunto6.0XI had to make a modification to aclocal.m4(and I am sure thereare other ways to fix it) in gnuradio-core but otherwise,it just compiled and ran.It is easy to install and maintain and with theopening up to universe, multiverse,nongpl code as opposed to Debian onwhich it is based,I find I am not building out of necessity.I haveCHOSEN (for example) to build swig.1.2.latest for various reasons but Idid not need to.BobLamar Owen wrote: On Monday 26 June 2006 11:42, Marcus Leech wrote: FC6 is just around the corner--the TEST1 release is already available. Sigh. Yeah, I had sworn I wasn't going to get back on the Fedora roller coaster; that's why I use CentOS of the servers.But the needs of the bleeding edge have conspired to cause me to go with FC5 the needs being driven by GNUradio in part, and Plone in part. But with YUM, it's relatively painless to keep up. Depending upon your bandwidth, at least. --AMSAT VP Engineering. Member: ARRL, AMSAT-DL, TAPR, Packrats,NJQRP/AMQRP, QRP ARCI, QCWA, FRC. ARRL SDR Wrk Grp ChairmanTime for a new motto, what should I choose?___ Discuss-gnuradio mailing listDiscuss-gnuradio@gnu.orghttp://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio -- MarkAE6RT ___ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
[Discuss-gnuradio] Boost: regarding not found shared_ptr.hpp
I installed boost in nonstandard location $HOME/gr, and thereby produced the same build failure as this gentleman http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/discuss-gnuradio/2005-06/msg00282.html In my Linux environment, I set CPPFLAGS=-I$HOME/gr/include/boost-1_33_1export CPPFLAGSand where $ ls $HOME/gr/include/boost-1_33_1boostThis constitutes a third fix for this failed build situation. The first two being 1) install boost in a standard location so the preprocessor can find stuff without being told, and 2) pass --with-boost-include-dir=$HOME/gr/include/boost-1_33_1 to configure hth somebody.-- Mark ___ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
