[Discuss-gnuradio] Swig Error
Hi, I am getting the following error while running a programme. Programme is fine. I have checked it on other PC. I think there is some thing wrong with the installation of SWIG or else. Traceback (most recent call last): File "./gsm_scan.py", line 21, in from gnuradio import usrp File "/usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gnuradio/usrp/__init__.py", line 25, in from usrp_swig import * File "/usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gnuradio/usrp/usrp_swig.py", line 6, in import _usrp_swig ImportError: /usr/local/lib/libgnuradio-usrp.so.0: undefined symbol: _ZN7db_base4dbidEv # Line 6 is: import _usrp_swig line 25 is: from usrp_swig import * I am on Ubuntu 8.10 GNU Radio 3.1.3 Best Regards, Gohar ___ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Error in compilation of runTransceiver.cpp in OpenBTS
Dear David ./bootstrap did not fail when i use it in top level directory. But the point is that all the process did not produce any binary/executable like runTransceiver,LoopbackTest and TRXSimulator ...etc I m interesting in these executables for testing purpose, as mentioned in openbts/tests/README.test. Regards, Gohar From: David Burgess To: gohar anwar Cc: Johnathan Corgan ; discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 9:25:10 PM Subject: Re: RE : [Discuss-gnuradio] Error in compilation of runTransceiver.cpp in OpenBTS Gohar - "bootstrap" is a system utility you should already have, not part of the OpenBTS distribution. When bootstrap failed with "No such file...", you should have stopped and figured this obvious mistake instead of doing something completely pointless with raw g++ and then posting it to the list. In the output below, everything past the failed bootstrap is useless and irrelevant. -- David On Mar 18, 2009, at 9:07 AM, gohar anwar wrote: Thanks for your reply. Actually i tried to build this using the ./bootstrap, ./configure and make commands. It did not work.That's why I adopted the other way. Following appears as i try to build it with standard commands. Do i have to make changes in the "makefile"? Or how should i build this? RESULTS OF STANDARD METHOD: go...@gohar:~/openbts/Transceiver$ ./bootstrap bash: ./bootstrap: No such file or directory go...@gohar:~/openbts/Transceiver$ ./configure bash: ./configure: No such file or directory go...@gohar:~/openbts/Transceiver$ make cd .. && make am--refresh make[1]: Entering directory `/home/gohar/openbts' /bin/bash ./config.status --recheck running CONFIG_SHELL=/bin/bash /bin/bash ./configure --no-create --no-recursion checking build system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu checking host system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu checking target system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c checking whether build environment is sane... yes checking for gawk... no checking for mawk... mawk checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes checking for style of include used by make... GNU checking for gcc... gcc checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out checking whether the C compiler works... yes checking whether we are cross compiling... no checking for suffix of executables... checking for suffix of object files... o checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes checking for gcc option to accept ISO C89... none needed checking dependency style of gcc... gcc3 checking for g++... g++ checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... yes checking whether g++ accepts -g... yes checking dependency style of g++... gcc3 checking whether ln -s works... yes checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... (cached) yes checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c checking for rm... /bin/rm checking for a sed that does not truncate output... /bin/sed checking for grep that handles long lines and -e... /bin/grep checking for egrep... /bin/grep -E checking for fgrep... /bin/grep -F checking for ld used by gcc... /usr/bin/ld checking if the linker (/usr/bin/ld) is GNU ld... yes checking for BSD- or MS-compatible name lister (nm)... /usr/bin/nm -B checking the name lister (/usr/bin/nm -B) interface... BSD nm checking the maximum length of command line arguments... 805306365 checking whether the shell understands some XSI constructs... yes checking whether the shell understands "+="... yes checking for /usr/bin/ld option to reload object files... -r checking how to recognize dependent libraries... pass_all checking for ar... ar checking for strip... strip checking for ranlib... ranlib checking command to parse /usr/bin/nm -B output from gcc object... ok checking how to run the C preprocessor... gcc -E checking for ANSI C header files... yes checking for sys/types.h... yes checking for sys/stat.h... yes checking for stdlib.h... yes checking for string.h... yes checking for memory.h... yes checking for strings.h... yes checking for inttypes.h... yes checking for stdint.h... yes checking for unistd.h... yes checking for dlfcn.h... yes checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... (cached) yes checking whether g++ accepts -g... (cached) yes checking dependency style of g++... (cached) gcc3 checking how to run the C++ preprocessor... g++ -E checking for objdir... .libs checking if gcc supports -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions... no checking for gcc option to produce PIC... -fPIC -DPIC checking if gcc PIC flag -fPIC -DPIC works... yes checking if gcc static flag -static works... yes checking if gcc supports -c -o file.o... yes checking if gcc supports -c -o file.o... (cached) yes checking whether the gcc linker (/usr/bin/ld) supports shared libraries... yes checking whether -lc should be explicitly linked in... no checking dynamic
RE : [Discuss-gnuradio] Error in compilation of runTransceiver.cpp in OpenBTS
r inline... inline checking for size_t... yes checking whether time.h and sys/time.h may both be included... yes checking whether byte ordering is bigendian... no checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config checking pkg-config is at least version 0.18... yes checking for USRP... yes checking for OSIP... yes checking for ORTP... yes configure: creating ./config.status /bin/bash ./config.status config.status: creating Makefile config.status: creating apps/Makefile config.status: creating config/Makefile config.status: creating doc/Makefile config.status: creating AsteriskConfig/Makefile config.status: creating CommonLibs/Makefile config.status: creating Control/Makefile config.status: creating GSM/Makefile config.status: creating RFHardware/Makefile config.status: creating SIP/Makefile config.status: creating SMS/Makefile config.status: creating Transceiver/Makefile config.status: creating TRXManager/Makefile config.status: creating config.h config.status: config.h is unchanged config.status: executing depfiles commands config.status: executing libtool commands make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/gohar/openbtscopy' make[1]: Entering directory `/home/gohar/openbtscopy' make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/gohar/openbtscopy' make[1]: Entering directory `/home/gohar/openbtscopy' make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/gohar/openbtscopy' make: Nothing to be done for `all'. go...@gohar:~/openbtscopy/Transceiver$ sudo make install [sudo] password for gohar: make[1]: Entering directory `/home/gohar/openbtscopy/Transceiver' make[1]: Nothing to be done for `install-exec-am'. test -z "/usr/local/share/usrp/rev2" || mkdir -p -- "/usr/local/share/usrp/rev2" /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 'std_inband.rbf' '/usr/local/share/usrp/rev2/std_inband.rbf' test -z "/usr/local/share/usrp/rev4" || mkdir -p -- "/usr/local/share/usrp/rev4" /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 'std_inband.rbf' '/usr/local/share/usrp/rev4/std_inband.rbf' make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/gohar/openbtscopy/Transceiver' go...@gohar:~/openbtscopy/Transceiver$ Gohar From: Johnathan Corgan To: gohar anwar Cc: discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 7:24:38 PM Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Error in compilation of runTransceiver.cpp in OpenBTS 2009/3/17 gohar anwar : > I am facing the following warnings and error when i compile > "runTransceiver.cpp". > go...@gohar:~/openbts/Transceiver$ g++ > '/home/gohar/openbts/Transceiver/runTransceiver.cpp' You should be using the standard ./bootstrap, ./configure, and make commands to build this, not trying to compile it directly as above. Johnathan ___ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
[Discuss-gnuradio] Error in compilation of runTransceiver.cpp in OpenBTS
Hi, I am facing the following warnings and error when i compile "runTransceiver.cpp". This seems to be a problem with the Functions using reference to device USRP. libusrp is already installed. What does this error indicates? How should i remove it? go...@gohar:~/openbts/Transceiver$ g++ '/home/gohar/openbts/Transceiver/runTransceiver.cpp' In file included from /home/gohar/openbts/Transceiver/USRPDevice.h:25, from /home/gohar/openbts/Transceiver/radioInterface.h:25, from /home/gohar/openbts/Transceiver/Transceiver.h:29, from /home/gohar/openbts/Transceiver/runTransceiver.cpp:24: /usr/local/include/usrp_bytesex.h:37:2: warning: #warning Using non-portable code (likely wrong other than ILP32). In file included from /home/gohar/openbts/Transceiver/radioInterface.h:24, from /home/gohar/openbts/Transceiver/Transceiver.h:29, from /home/gohar/openbts/Transceiver/runTransceiver.cpp:24: /home/gohar/openbts/Transceiver/sigProcLib.h:35: warning: ‘typedef’ was ignored in this declaration /home/gohar/openbts/Transceiver/sigProcLib.h:45: warning: ‘typedef’ was ignored in this declaration /tmp/cc1M0b51.o: In function `main': runTransceiver.cpp:(.text+0xa3): undefined reference to `USRPDevice::USRPDevice(double)' runTransceiver.cpp:(.text+0xc5): undefined reference to `USRPDevice::make(bool)' runTransceiver.cpp:(.text+0x131): undefined reference to `RadioInterface::RadioInterface(USRPDevice*, int, int, GSM::Time)' runTransceiver.cpp:(.text+0x1e1): undefined reference to `Transceiver::Transceiver(int, char const*, int, GSM::Time, RadioInterface*)' runTransceiver.cpp:(.text+0x22f): undefined reference to `Transceiver::start()' runTransceiver.cpp:(.text+0x2a5): undefined reference to `Transceiver::~Transceiver()' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status Regards Gohar ___ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] OpenBTS issue/help needed
Thanks for your reply Davek, In openbts/tests its written in README.test that "Tests that can be built and run. L1 Software Loopback (no USRP) This test exercises L1 components for bidirectional channels. It uses two executables: TRXManager/LoopbackTest and TRXManager/TRXSimulator. also Beacon test . This test uses the tests/BeaconTest and the Transceiver/runTransceiver binaries" There are only .cpp files with these names. How to build these binaries/executables? Make command does not perform this task. Thanks Gohar Anwar From: davek To: Gohar Cc: "discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org" Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 12:57:04 AM Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] OpenBTS issue/help needed the following excutables are in the openbts folder you svn'ed after you do a make. they are not copied to the dist with make install, not sure why, but they work... openbts/apps/OpenBTS800 openbts/apps/OpenBTS900 openbts/Transciever/transciever On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Gohar wrote: > > > Hi, > I have installed the OpenBTS by following the instructions on the page below: > > http://www.gnuradio.org/trac/wiki/OpenBTS/BuildingAndRunning > > Apparently there were no errors in all the process (ie: ./bootstrap, > ./configure, make, make install) > But i can only see Asterisk folder in /usr/local/share/OpenBTS. > I want to run the tests like "loopbackTest.cpp" and "BeaconTest.cpp" etc. > > How to compile and run these tests? Which commands should i execute in > terminal to run these .cpp files? > I am on Ubuntu 8.10 with the latest trunk of GnuRadio. > > > Best regards > Gohar Anwar > > > > > > > > ___ > Discuss-gnuradio mailing list > Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio > ___ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
[Discuss-gnuradio] Open BTS Installation and testing
Hi, I have successfully installed the OpenBTS by following the instructions on the page below: http://www.gnuradio.org/trac/wiki/OpenBTS/BuildingAndRunning Apparently there were no errors in all the process (ie: ./bootstrap, ./configure, make, make install) But i can only see Asterisk folder in /usr/local/share/OpenBTS. I want to run the tests like "loopbackTest.cpp" and "BeaconTest.cpp" etc. How to compile and run these tests? Which commands should i execute in terminal to run these .cpp files? I am on Ubuntu 8.10 with the latest trunk of GnuRadio. Gohar Anwar ___ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
[Discuss-gnuradio] Re: Using RFX900 with usrp rev 3 (2005)
well i have sorted out the issue. I was doing a mistake by putting 'cd' before the directory and then was trying to run the file after entering the directory (gnuradio/usrp/host/apps). I should have written the following in terminal instead: go...@ubuntu:~gnuradio/usrp/host/apps/burn-db-eeprom -t rfx900_mimo_a -f -A -B This works fine. Gohar gohar wrote: I did all the modifications on rfx900. when trying to burn eeprom i receive the following error. bash: burn-db-eeprom: command not found I am trying to run the command in the following manner (after mounting the rfx900 on side A of USRP rev 3): go...@ubuntu:~/gnuradio/usrp/host/apps$burn-db-eeprom -t rfx900_mimo_a -f -A -B What am i missing? Is there any problem with the permissions? If yes, then how to set permissions correctly? Gohar The newer way will have better phase noise. Matt Newell Jensen wrote: > When doing this modification, is there any performance differences > between using a setup with this modification versus a newer USRP1 that > doesn't need this modification? I think I had heard that the newer > USRP1 has better clock performance or something for the RFX900 boards > and didn't know how much a setup with this modification would perform > in comparison to a setup with a newer USRP1 (using the RFX900 boards). > > On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:23 PM, Matt Ettus > > wrote: > > Gohar wrote: > > Hi, > Is it possible to use rfx900 with usrp rev 3 hardware that was > released in 2005? If yes, what changigs should be made on > either board (usrp board or rfx900 board) ? > > > > > On the RFX board > Move R36 to R34 > Move R115 to R116 > > Put the rfx board on the USRP and run > > burn-db-eeprom -t rfx900_mimo_a -f -A -B > > Matt > ___ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
[Discuss-gnuradio] Re: Using RFX900 with usrp rev 3 (2005)
I did all the modifications on rfx900. when trying to burn eeprom i receive the following error. bash: burn-db-eeprom: command not found I am trying to run the command in the following manner (after mounting the rfx900 on side A of USRP rev 3): go...@ubuntu:~/gnuradio/usrp/host/apps$burn-db-eeprom -t rfx900_mimo_a -f -A -B What am i missing? Is there any problem with the permissions? If yes, then how to set permissions correctly? Gohar The newer way will have better phase noise. Matt Newell Jensen wrote: > When doing this modification, is there any performance differences > between using a setup with this modification versus a newer USRP1 that > doesn't need this modification? I think I had heard that the newer > USRP1 has better clock performance or something for the RFX900 boards > and didn't know how much a setup with this modification would perform > in comparison to a setup with a newer USRP1 (using the RFX900 boards). > > On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:23 PM, Matt Ettus > > wrote: > > Gohar wrote: > > Hi, > Is it possible to use rfx900 with usrp rev 3 hardware that was > released in 2005? If yes, what changigs should be made on > either board (usrp board or rfx900 board) ? > > > > > On the RFX board > Move R36 to R34 > Move R115 to R116 > > Put the rfx board on the USRP and run > > burn-db-eeprom -t rfx900_mimo_a -f -A -B > > Matt > ___ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
[Discuss-gnuradio] Problem with GNU radio installation in UBUNTU 8.10
Hi, I am trying to install GNU radio on Ubuntu 8.10. I followed the script method (apt-get) step by step as described in wiki. All the packages are completey installed without any error.(during installation). But still GNU radio cant access the USRP. I am using USRP1 with my sony vaio fw160j. Following error occured when i tried to run th example usrp_benchmark_usb.py [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ python '/usr/local/share/gnuradio/examples/usrp/usrp_benchmark_usb.py' Testing 2MB/sec... usrp_open_interface:usb_claim_interface: failed interface 0 could not claim interface 0: Operation not permitted open_nth_cmd_interface: open_cmd_interface failed usrp: failed to load firmware /usr/local/share/usrp/rev2/std.ihx. Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/share/gnuradio/examples/usrp/usrp_benchmark_usb.py", line 106, in main () File "/usr/local/share/gnuradio/examples/usrp/usrp_benchmark_usb.py", line 96, in main ok = run_test (rate, verbose) File "/usr/local/share/gnuradio/examples/usrp/usrp_benchmark_usb.py", line 63, in run_test usrp_tx = usrp.sink_s (0, tx_interp) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gnuradio/usrp.py", line 233, in __init__ fpga_filename, firmware_filename) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gnuradio/usrp1.py", line 946, in sink_s return _usrp1.sink_s(*args) RuntimeError: can't open usrp1 Can any body help me out. Further i have to test the files of GSM scanner project. Can i do so using the latest stable release of gnu radio or i have to use some previous releases? Any suggestion? Thanks ___ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
[Discuss-gnuradio] Implementation of a gsm BTS Using USRP
Hi, I wanna know whether it is possible to implement the GSM BTS on USRP. Supposing that i am an official of service providers (any cellular company) and have access to all the information of that particular Service provider. Can i implement the VIRTUAL BTS using USRP. If yes, then How? >From where should i start doing that? Thanks Gohar ___ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
[Discuss-gnuradio] Implement GSM transceiver using Nokia 3310
Hi, I am working in the project in which i want to implement the GSM receiver and transmitter. I want to take input for gnu radio from First IF stage(71Mhz) or 2nd IF stage (13 MHZ) of a mobile PCB. For this purpose i am using the PCB of Nokia 3310. Can u tell me that what exactly is the point on the PCB of nokia 3310 from where i should extract one of these frequencies? Is the encryption at this stage is the same as of the 900Mhz or 1800Mhz signal? ___ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
