Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] PSK Mod Block

2015-06-23 Thread Surya Agam
So,
"it appears that PSK Mod expects packed bytes" = from Packet Encoder direct
to PSK Mod
"the Demod block outputs a stream of bits with 1 meaningful bit in the LSB
position" = Repack Bits 1 to 8 (packet alignment = input)
the result, without delay the output is similar but not same. I don't know
if need a long delay (the input and output from attachment not from the
same packet) or I use a wrong Repack Bits block setting.

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:51 PM, Nowlan, Sean 
wrote:

>  Looking quickly at the documentation, for PSK Mod and Demod blocks, it
> appears that PSK Mod expects packed bytes (8 bits of meaningful data in
> each byte) and that the Demod block outputs a stream of bits with 1
> meaningful bit in the LSB position. Use a Repack Bits block. However, you
> may need to play with the delay (insert a Delay Block) to make sure that
> the Repack Bits block is aligning bits into bytes properly.
>
>
>
> Mod: “The input is a byte stream (unsigned char), treated as a series of
> packed symbols. Symbols are grouped from MSB to LSB.”
>
>
>
> Demod: “The output is a stream of bytes, each representing a recovered
> bit. The most significant bit is reported first.”
>
>
>
> *From:* discuss-gnuradio-bounces+sean.nowlan=gtri.gatech@gnu.org
> [mailto:discuss-gnuradio-bounces+sean.nowlan=gtri.gatech@gnu.org] *On
> Behalf Of *Marcus Müller
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 23, 2015 11:59 AM
> *To:* discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
>
> *Subject:* Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] PSK Mod Block
>
>
>
> Then you really want some pulse shaping filter, like the RRC that is used
> by default.
>
> On 06/23/2015 05:39 PM, Surya Agam wrote:
>
>  My target is using USRP, but still simulate using a noise channel. The
> output of PSK Demod is bit "0" a with some "1" and no input data in the
> output.
>
>
>
> I attach the input and the output screenshot.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 10:12 PM, Nowlan, Sean <
> sean.now...@gtri.gatech.edu> wrote:
>
>  This depends on your setup. If you’re just simulating with PSK Mod -->
> PSK Demod and then comparing the input with the output, then you may be
> seeing some initial output from the filters due to the convolution
> operations. Try searching through your output after some delay.
>
>
>
> If you disabled differential encoding, you may be seeing a bitstream that
> is not correct due to phase locking with a fixed phase offset at the
> receiver.
>
>
>
> If you’re going over hardware or through a noise channel, you might not
> have enough SNR to decode properly.
>
>
>
> If you’re using USRPs, have you experimented with the benchmark_tx/rx
> scripts? These implement various types of single carrier modulation,
> including many variants of PSK.
>
>
>
> Sean
>
>
>
> *From:* Surya Agam [mailto:surya11.01a...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 23, 2015 10:53 AM
> *To:* Nowlan, Sean
> *Cc:* GNURadio Discussion List
> *Subject:* Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] PSK Mod Block
>
>
>
> Thank you for the fast respond,
>
>
>
> But, when I use PSK Mod then PSK Demod the output different from the input
> so no output from the Packet Decoder. Any suggestion?
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 9:17 PM, Nowlan, Sean 
> wrote:
>
>  Introducing ISI to a PSK signal with a root-raised cosine (RRC) filter
> is a standard communications technique. At the receiver, use a matched RRC
> filter to eliminate the intentional ISI introduced at the transmitter. This
> works because the combined filter response of the two filters is a raised
> cosine pulse, which satisfies the Nyquist criterion for zero ISI.
>
>
>
> In the PSK Mod block, the filter construction is not exposed to the user
> except through the excess bandwidth or roll-off parameter. You could adjust
> that bandwidth factor to be close to zero, but this will create a very long
> filter. If you really want to do what you are saying, it would be worth
> looking at the source code for the PSK Mod block, and taking the filter
> out. However, it is likely that you don’t really want to do this.
>
>
>
> Sean
>
>
>
> *From:* discuss-gnuradio-bounces+sean.nowlan=gtri.gatech@gnu.org
> [mailto:discuss-gnuradio-bounces+sean.nowlan=gtri.gatech@gnu.org] *On
> Behalf Of *Surya Agam
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 23, 2015 9:47 AM
> *To:* GNURadio Discussion List
> *Subject:* [Discuss-gnuradio] PSK Mod Block
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I wanna use PSK Mod Block, but the ISI is annoying. Why PSK Mod Block have
> a it's own ISI?
>
> And also is there anyway to disable the ISI from the block?
>
>
>
> --
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
>
>

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] PSK Mod Block

2015-06-23 Thread Nowlan, Sean
Looking quickly at the documentation, for PSK Mod and Demod blocks, it appears 
that PSK Mod expects packed bytes (8 bits of meaningful data in each byte) and 
that the Demod block outputs a stream of bits with 1 meaningful bit in the LSB 
position. Use a Repack Bits block. However, you may need to play with the delay 
(insert a Delay Block) to make sure that the Repack Bits block is aligning bits 
into bytes properly.

Mod: "The input is a byte stream (unsigned char), treated as a series of packed 
symbols. Symbols are grouped from MSB to LSB."

Demod: "The output is a stream of bytes, each representing a recovered bit. The 
most significant bit is reported first."

From: discuss-gnuradio-bounces+sean.nowlan=gtri.gatech@gnu.org 
[mailto:discuss-gnuradio-bounces+sean.nowlan=gtri.gatech@gnu.org] On Behalf 
Of Marcus Müller
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 11:59 AM
To: discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] PSK Mod Block

Then you really want some pulse shaping filter, like the RRC that is used by 
default.
On 06/23/2015 05:39 PM, Surya Agam wrote:
My target is using USRP, but still simulate using a noise channel. The output 
of PSK Demod is bit "0" a with some "1" and no input data in the output.

I attach the input and the output screenshot.

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 10:12 PM, Nowlan, Sean 
mailto:sean.now...@gtri.gatech.edu>> wrote:
This depends on your setup. If you're just simulating with PSK Mod --> PSK 
Demod and then comparing the input with the output, then you may be seeing some 
initial output from the filters due to the convolution operations. Try 
searching through your output after some delay.

If you disabled differential encoding, you may be seeing a bitstream that is 
not correct due to phase locking with a fixed phase offset at the receiver.

If you're going over hardware or through a noise channel, you might not have 
enough SNR to decode properly.

If you're using USRPs, have you experimented with the benchmark_tx/rx scripts? 
These implement various types of single carrier modulation, including many 
variants of PSK.

Sean

From: Surya Agam 
[mailto:surya11.01a...@gmail.com<mailto:surya11.01a...@gmail.com>]
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 10:53 AM
To: Nowlan, Sean
Cc: GNURadio Discussion List
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] PSK Mod Block

Thank you for the fast respond,

But, when I use PSK Mod then PSK Demod the output different from the input so 
no output from the Packet Decoder. Any suggestion?

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 9:17 PM, Nowlan, Sean 
mailto:sean.now...@gtri.gatech.edu>> wrote:
Introducing ISI to a PSK signal with a root-raised cosine (RRC) filter is a 
standard communications technique. At the receiver, use a matched RRC filter to 
eliminate the intentional ISI introduced at the transmitter. This works because 
the combined filter response of the two filters is a raised cosine pulse, which 
satisfies the Nyquist criterion for zero ISI.

In the PSK Mod block, the filter construction is not exposed to the user except 
through the excess bandwidth or roll-off parameter. You could adjust that 
bandwidth factor to be close to zero, but this will create a very long filter. 
If you really want to do what you are saying, it would be worth looking at the 
source code for the PSK Mod block, and taking the filter out. However, it is 
likely that you don't really want to do this.

Sean

From: 
discuss-gnuradio-bounces+sean.nowlan=gtri.gatech@gnu.org<mailto:gtri.gatech@gnu.org>
 
[mailto:discuss-gnuradio-bounces+sean.nowlan<mailto:discuss-gnuradio-bounces%2Bsean.nowlan>=gtri.gatech@gnu.org<mailto:gtri.gatech@gnu.org>]
 On Behalf Of Surya Agam
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 9:47 AM
To: GNURadio Discussion List
Subject: [Discuss-gnuradio] PSK Mod Block

Hello,

I wanna use PSK Mod Block, but the ISI is annoying. Why PSK Mod Block have a 
it's own ISI?
And also is there anyway to disable the ISI from the block?

--
Sincerely,

Surya Agam
University Al Azhar of Indonesia, Jakarta



--
Sincerely,

Surya Agam
University Al Azhar of Indonesia, Jakarta



--
Sincerely,

Surya Agam
University Al Azhar of Indonesia, Jakarta




___

Discuss-gnuradio mailing list

Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org<mailto:Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org>

https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio


Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] PSK Mod Block

2015-06-23 Thread Marcus Müller
Then you really want some pulse shaping filter, like the RRC that is
used by default.

On 06/23/2015 05:39 PM, Surya Agam wrote:
> My target is using USRP, but still simulate using a noise channel. The
> output of PSK Demod is bit "0" a with some "1" and no input data in
> the output.
>
> I attach the input and the output screenshot.
>
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 10:12 PM, Nowlan, Sean
> mailto:sean.now...@gtri.gatech.edu>> wrote:
>
> This depends on your setup. If you’re just simulating with PSK Mod
> --> PSK Demod and then comparing the input with the output, then
> you may be seeing some initial output from the filters due to the
> convolution operations. Try searching through your output after
> some delay.
>
>  
>
> If you disabled differential encoding, you may be seeing a
> bitstream that is not correct due to phase locking with a fixed
> phase offset at the receiver.
>
>  
>
> If you’re going over hardware or through a noise channel, you
> might not have enough SNR to decode properly.
>
>  
>
> If you’re using USRPs, have you experimented with the
> benchmark_tx/rx scripts? These implement various types of single
> carrier modulation, including many variants of PSK.
>
>  
>
> Sean
>
>  
>
> *From:*Surya Agam [mailto:surya11.01a...@gmail.com
> <mailto:surya11.01a...@gmail.com>]
>     *Sent:* Tuesday, June 23, 2015 10:53 AM
> *To:* Nowlan, Sean
> *Cc:* GNURadio Discussion List
> *Subject:* Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] PSK Mod Block
>
>  
>
> Thank you for the fast respond,
>
>  
>
> But, when I use PSK Mod then PSK Demod the output different from
> the input so no output from the Packet Decoder. Any suggestion?
>
>  
>
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 9:17 PM, Nowlan, Sean
> mailto:sean.now...@gtri.gatech.edu>>
> wrote:
>
> Introducing ISI to a PSK signal with a root-raised cosine
> (RRC) filter is a standard communications technique. At the
> receiver, use a matched RRC filter to eliminate the
> intentional ISI introduced at the transmitter. This works
> because the combined filter response of the two filters is a
> raised cosine pulse, which satisfies the Nyquist criterion for
> zero ISI.
>
>  
>
> In the PSK Mod block, the filter construction is not exposed
> to the user except through the excess bandwidth or roll-off
> parameter. You could adjust that bandwidth factor to be close
> to zero, but this will create a very long filter. If you
> really want to do what you are saying, it would be worth
> looking at the source code for the PSK Mod block, and taking
> the filter out. However, it is likely that you don’t really
> want to do this.
>
>  
>
> Sean
>
>  
>
> *From:*discuss-gnuradio-bounces+sean.nowlan=gtri.gatech@gnu.org
> <mailto:gtri.gatech@gnu.org>
> [mailto:discuss-gnuradio-bounces+sean.nowlan
> 
> <mailto:discuss-gnuradio-bounces%2Bsean.nowlan>=gtri.gatech@gnu.org
> <mailto:gtri.gatech@gnu.org>] *On Behalf Of *Surya Agam
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 23, 2015 9:47 AM
> *To:* GNURadio Discussion List
> *Subject:* [Discuss-gnuradio] PSK Mod Block
>
>  
>
> Hello,
>
>  
>
> I wanna use PSK Mod Block, but the ISI is annoying. Why PSK
> Mod Block have a it's own ISI?
>
> And also is there anyway to disable the ISI from the block?
>
>  
>
> -- 
>
> Sincerely,
>
>  
>
> Surya Agam
>
> University Al Azhar of Indonesia, Jakarta
>
>
>
>  
>
> -- 
>
> Sincerely,
>
>  
>
> Surya Agam
>
> University Al Azhar of Indonesia, Jakarta
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Sincerely,
>
> Surya Agam
> University Al Azhar of Indonesia, Jakarta
>
>
> ___
> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio


Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] PSK Mod Block

2015-06-23 Thread Surya Agam
My target is using USRP, but still simulate using a noise channel. The
output of PSK Demod is bit "0" a with some "1" and no input data in the
output.

I attach the input and the output screenshot.

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 10:12 PM, Nowlan, Sean 
wrote:

>  This depends on your setup. If you’re just simulating with PSK Mod -->
> PSK Demod and then comparing the input with the output, then you may be
> seeing some initial output from the filters due to the convolution
> operations. Try searching through your output after some delay.
>
>
>
> If you disabled differential encoding, you may be seeing a bitstream that
> is not correct due to phase locking with a fixed phase offset at the
> receiver.
>
>
>
> If you’re going over hardware or through a noise channel, you might not
> have enough SNR to decode properly.
>
>
>
> If you’re using USRPs, have you experimented with the benchmark_tx/rx
> scripts? These implement various types of single carrier modulation,
> including many variants of PSK.
>
>
>
> Sean
>
>
>
> *From:* Surya Agam [mailto:surya11.01a...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 23, 2015 10:53 AM
> *To:* Nowlan, Sean
> *Cc:* GNURadio Discussion List
> *Subject:* Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] PSK Mod Block
>
>
>
> Thank you for the fast respond,
>
>
>
> But, when I use PSK Mod then PSK Demod the output different from the input
> so no output from the Packet Decoder. Any suggestion?
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 9:17 PM, Nowlan, Sean 
> wrote:
>
>  Introducing ISI to a PSK signal with a root-raised cosine (RRC) filter
> is a standard communications technique. At the receiver, use a matched RRC
> filter to eliminate the intentional ISI introduced at the transmitter. This
> works because the combined filter response of the two filters is a raised
> cosine pulse, which satisfies the Nyquist criterion for zero ISI.
>
>
>
> In the PSK Mod block, the filter construction is not exposed to the user
> except through the excess bandwidth or roll-off parameter. You could adjust
> that bandwidth factor to be close to zero, but this will create a very long
> filter. If you really want to do what you are saying, it would be worth
> looking at the source code for the PSK Mod block, and taking the filter
> out. However, it is likely that you don’t really want to do this.
>
>
>
> Sean
>
>
>
> *From:* discuss-gnuradio-bounces+sean.nowlan=gtri.gatech@gnu.org
> [mailto:discuss-gnuradio-bounces+sean.nowlan=gtri.gatech@gnu.org] *On
> Behalf Of *Surya Agam
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 23, 2015 9:47 AM
> *To:* GNURadio Discussion List
> *Subject:* [Discuss-gnuradio] PSK Mod Block
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I wanna use PSK Mod Block, but the ISI is annoying. Why PSK Mod Block have
> a it's own ISI?
>
> And also is there anyway to disable the ISI from the block?
>
>
>
> --
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
>
> Surya Agam
>
> University Al Azhar of Indonesia, Jakarta
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
>
> Surya Agam
>
> University Al Azhar of Indonesia, Jakarta
>



-- 
Sincerely,

Surya Agam
University Al Azhar of Indonesia, Jakarta
___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio


Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] PSK Mod Block

2015-06-23 Thread Nowlan, Sean
This depends on your setup. If you’re just simulating with PSK Mod --> PSK 
Demod and then comparing the input with the output, then you may be seeing some 
initial output from the filters due to the convolution operations. Try 
searching through your output after some delay.

If you disabled differential encoding, you may be seeing a bitstream that is 
not correct due to phase locking with a fixed phase offset at the receiver.

If you’re going over hardware or through a noise channel, you might not have 
enough SNR to decode properly.

If you’re using USRPs, have you experimented with the benchmark_tx/rx scripts? 
These implement various types of single carrier modulation, including many 
variants of PSK.

Sean

From: Surya Agam [mailto:surya11.01a...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 10:53 AM
To: Nowlan, Sean
Cc: GNURadio Discussion List
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] PSK Mod Block

Thank you for the fast respond,

But, when I use PSK Mod then PSK Demod the output different from the input so 
no output from the Packet Decoder. Any suggestion?

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 9:17 PM, Nowlan, Sean 
mailto:sean.now...@gtri.gatech.edu>> wrote:
Introducing ISI to a PSK signal with a root-raised cosine (RRC) filter is a 
standard communications technique. At the receiver, use a matched RRC filter to 
eliminate the intentional ISI introduced at the transmitter. This works because 
the combined filter response of the two filters is a raised cosine pulse, which 
satisfies the Nyquist criterion for zero ISI.

In the PSK Mod block, the filter construction is not exposed to the user except 
through the excess bandwidth or roll-off parameter. You could adjust that 
bandwidth factor to be close to zero, but this will create a very long filter. 
If you really want to do what you are saying, it would be worth looking at the 
source code for the PSK Mod block, and taking the filter out. However, it is 
likely that you don’t really want to do this.

Sean

From: 
discuss-gnuradio-bounces+sean.nowlan=gtri.gatech@gnu.org<mailto:gtri.gatech@gnu.org>
 
[mailto:discuss-gnuradio-bounces+sean.nowlan<mailto:discuss-gnuradio-bounces%2Bsean.nowlan>=gtri.gatech@gnu.org<mailto:gtri.gatech@gnu.org>]
 On Behalf Of Surya Agam
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 9:47 AM
To: GNURadio Discussion List
Subject: [Discuss-gnuradio] PSK Mod Block

Hello,

I wanna use PSK Mod Block, but the ISI is annoying. Why PSK Mod Block have a 
it's own ISI?
And also is there anyway to disable the ISI from the block?

--
Sincerely,

Surya Agam
University Al Azhar of Indonesia, Jakarta



--
Sincerely,

Surya Agam
University Al Azhar of Indonesia, Jakarta
___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio


Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] PSK Mod Block

2015-06-23 Thread Surya Agam
Thank you for the fast respond,

But, when I use PSK Mod then PSK Demod the output different from the input
so no output from the Packet Decoder. Any suggestion?

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 9:17 PM, Nowlan, Sean 
wrote:

>  Introducing ISI to a PSK signal with a root-raised cosine (RRC) filter
> is a standard communications technique. At the receiver, use a matched RRC
> filter to eliminate the intentional ISI introduced at the transmitter. This
> works because the combined filter response of the two filters is a raised
> cosine pulse, which satisfies the Nyquist criterion for zero ISI.
>
>
>
> In the PSK Mod block, the filter construction is not exposed to the user
> except through the excess bandwidth or roll-off parameter. You could adjust
> that bandwidth factor to be close to zero, but this will create a very long
> filter. If you really want to do what you are saying, it would be worth
> looking at the source code for the PSK Mod block, and taking the filter
> out. However, it is likely that you don’t really want to do this.
>
>
>
> Sean
>
>
>
> *From:* discuss-gnuradio-bounces+sean.nowlan=gtri.gatech@gnu.org
> [mailto:discuss-gnuradio-bounces+sean.nowlan=gtri.gatech@gnu.org] *On
> Behalf Of *Surya Agam
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 23, 2015 9:47 AM
> *To:* GNURadio Discussion List
> *Subject:* [Discuss-gnuradio] PSK Mod Block
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I wanna use PSK Mod Block, but the ISI is annoying. Why PSK Mod Block have
> a it's own ISI?
>
> And also is there anyway to disable the ISI from the block?
>
>
>
> --
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
>
> Surya Agam
>
> University Al Azhar of Indonesia, Jakarta
>



-- 
Sincerely,

Surya Agam
University Al Azhar of Indonesia, Jakarta
___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio


Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] PSK Mod Block

2015-06-23 Thread Nowlan, Sean
Introducing ISI to a PSK signal with a root-raised cosine (RRC) filter is a 
standard communications technique. At the receiver, use a matched RRC filter to 
eliminate the intentional ISI introduced at the transmitter. This works because 
the combined filter response of the two filters is a raised cosine pulse, which 
satisfies the Nyquist criterion for zero ISI.

In the PSK Mod block, the filter construction is not exposed to the user except 
through the excess bandwidth or roll-off parameter. You could adjust that 
bandwidth factor to be close to zero, but this will create a very long filter. 
If you really want to do what you are saying, it would be worth looking at the 
source code for the PSK Mod block, and taking the filter out. However, it is 
likely that you don’t really want to do this.

Sean

From: discuss-gnuradio-bounces+sean.nowlan=gtri.gatech@gnu.org 
[mailto:discuss-gnuradio-bounces+sean.nowlan=gtri.gatech@gnu.org] On Behalf 
Of Surya Agam
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 9:47 AM
To: GNURadio Discussion List
Subject: [Discuss-gnuradio] PSK Mod Block

Hello,

I wanna use PSK Mod Block, but the ISI is annoying. Why PSK Mod Block have a 
it's own ISI?
And also is there anyway to disable the ISI from the block?

--
Sincerely,

Surya Agam
University Al Azhar of Indonesia, Jakarta
___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio