RE: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX
Well using SeeFusion showed me that if I decrease thread volume I increased UP TIME! What was more important? 4 hours between 1-2 minute lock ups, or 2 hours between 40 minute lock ups? I think I did the only logical thing I could do considering my pathetic lack of knowledge. I am sure that one day I will comment to myself how IGNORANT I was at this time. Robert P. Reil Managing Director, Motorcyclecarbs.com, Inc. 4292 Country Garden Walk NW Kennesaw, Ga. 30152 Office 770-974-8851 Fax 770-974-8852 www.motorcyclecarbs.com From: Teddy Payne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 10:41 AM To: discussion@acfug.org Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX Umm, why would you reduce the thread count? Threads are like available channels that can execute code in tandom. You have a queue of requests and the threads are the ones that handle all of the requests. If you have 100 requests and 10 threads handle them, that is faster than 100 requests and 2 threads handling them. The only thing that has to observed is how much memory is best suited for the threads. Each threads takes up resources as individual and asynchronous processes. I typically increase my threads over time and watch the performance of a box. I try to keep the CPU to around 30% if possible. 60-70% works just fine if you have over 1000 queues per minute. Teddy - To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by FusionLink -
Re: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX
SeeFusion recommended reducing the thread count by 80%? That would choke most application servers I know.Teddy - To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by FusionLink -
RE: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX
More importantly, what pages does SeeFusion note as running during your "lockups"? If you terminate the execution of those threads (using SeeFusion), is the server able to handle requests normally? Can you provide a stack trace of the threads running at the time of lockup? Regards,Steve DruckerCEOFig Leaf Softwarehttp://www.figleaf.comhttp://training.figleaf.comAdobe / Macromedia / Google / Paperthin Premier Consulting and Training Partner From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert ReilSent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 11:00 AMTo: discussion@acfug.orgSubject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX Well using SeeFusion showed me that if I decrease thread volume I increased UP TIME! What was more important? 4 hours between 1-2 minute lock ups, or 2 hours between 40 minute lock ups? I think I did the only logical thing I could do considering my pathetic lack of knowledge. I am sure that one day I will comment to myself how IGNORANT I was at this time. Robert P. Reil Managing Director, Motorcyclecarbs.com, Inc. 4292 Country Garden Walk NW Kennesaw, Ga. 30152 Office 770-974-8851 Fax 770-974-8852 www.motorcyclecarbs.com From: Teddy Payne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 10:41 AMTo: discussion@acfug.orgSubject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX Umm, why would you reduce the thread count? Threads are like available channels that can execute code in tandom. You have a queue of requests and the threads are the ones that handle all of the requests. If you have 100 requests and 10 threads handle them, that is faster than 100 requests and 2 threads handling them. The only thing that has to observed is how much memory is best suited for the threads. Each threads takes up resources as individual and asynchronous processes. I typically increase my threads over time and watch the performance of a box. I try to keep the CPU to around 30% if possible. 60-70% works just fine if you have over 1000 queues per minute. Teddy- To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by FusionLink -
Re: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX
On 8/29/06, Robert Reil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well using SeeFusion showed me that if I decrease thread volume I increased UP TIME! What was more important? 4 hours between 1-2 minute lock ups, or 2 hours between 40 minute lock ups? I think I did the only logical thing I could do considering my pathetic lack of knowledge. I am sure that one day I will comment to myself how IGNORANT I was at this time.gee, I do this daily! Messing with thread count limits is a fairly advanced topic and from my experience can enlist the use of some voodoo magik. Lowering your thread count max basically says give more processing power to each thread, which can lead to these threads executing faster. But this sacrifices the ability to handle several requests at once. As others have said, its those cfm pages causing the bottleneck that need help. Lowering the thread count can act as a bandaid in these situations. 4 hours between 1-2 minute lock upsthis is not a 'up time' really. 'up time' would usually refer to CF running continuously. Some water in a fuel line would cause your motorcycle to stutter here in there, but not shut off completely, eh? To fix, need to take care of the water, not lower the amount of fuel flow. ...a stab at a analogy here, its been quite a few years since I messed around with me dirt bike! DK Robert P. Reil Managing Director, Motorcyclecarbs.com, Inc. 4292 Country Garden Walk NW Kennesaw , Ga. 30152 Office 770-974-8851 Fax 770-974-8852 www.motorcyclecarbs.com From: Teddy Payne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 10:41 AM To: discussion@acfug.org Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX Umm, why would you reduce the thread count? Threads are like available channels that can execute code in tandom. You have a queue of requests and the threads are the ones that handle all of the requests. If you have 100 requests and 10 threads handle them, that is faster than 100 requests and 2 threads handling them. The only thing that has to observed is how much memory is best suited for the threads. Each threads takes up resources as individual and asynchronous processes. I typically increase my threads over time and watch the performance of a box. I try to keep the CPU to around 30% if possible. 60-70% works just fine if you have over 1000 queues per minute. Teddy - To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by FusionLink - -- Douglas Knudsenhttp://www.cubicleman.comthis is my signature, like it? - To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by FusionLink -
Re: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX
It depends on the power of the box to handle the performance of each thread. If the requests are heavy every time, more power by reducing threads is indeed a band-aid. What Doug was alluding to was that the pages need to be fixed and not the thread count. Teddy - To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by FusionLink -
RE: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX
In the past thread termination (in SeeFusion) seems to take about 5 minutes to recover from. I guess I could do a stack trace if someone told me what and how to do it. Robert P. Reil Managing Director, Motorcyclecarbs.com, Inc. 4292 Country Garden Walk NW Kennesaw, Ga. 30152 Office 770-974-8851 Fax 770-974-8852 www.motorcyclecarbs.com From: Steve Drucker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 11:21 AM To: discussion@acfug.org Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX More importantly, what pages does SeeFusion note as running during your lockups? If you terminate the execution of those threads (using SeeFusion), is the server able to handle requests normally? Can you provide a stack trace of the threads running at the time of lockup? Regards, Steve Drucker CEO Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com Adobe / Macromedia / Google / Paperthin Premier Consulting and Training Partner From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Reil Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 11:00 AM To: discussion@acfug.org Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX Well using SeeFusion showed me that if I decrease thread volume I increased UP TIME! What was more important? 4 hours between 1-2 minute lock ups, or 2 hours between 40 minute lock ups? I think I did the only logical thing I could do considering my pathetic lack of knowledge. I am sure that one day I will comment to myself how IGNORANT I was at this time. Robert P. Reil Managing Director, Motorcyclecarbs.com, Inc. 4292 Country Garden Walk NW Kennesaw, Ga. 30152 Office 770-974-8851 Fax 770-974-8852 www.motorcyclecarbs.com From: Teddy Payne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 10:41 AM To: discussion@acfug.org Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX Umm, why would you reduce the thread count? Threads are like available channels that can execute code in tandom. You have a queue of requests and the threads are the ones that handle all of the requests. If you have 100 requests and 10 threads handle them, that is faster than 100 requests and 2 threads handling them. The only thing that has to observed is how much memory is best suited for the threads. Each threads takes up resources as individual and asynchronous processes. I typically increase my threads over time and watch the performance of a box. I try to keep the CPU to around 30% if possible. 60-70% works just fine if you have over 1000 queues per minute. Teddy - To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by FusionLink -
RE: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX
See fusion didnt recommend it. However... I had I think the default of 8, Then I went to 6, it ran better longer and recovered sooner Then I went to 4, Then 2. All I know is cause and effect. The behind the scences server performance issues at this time are still voodoo majik! Robert P. Reil Managing Director, Motorcyclecarbs.com, Inc. 4292 Country Garden Walk NW Kennesaw, Ga. 30152 Office 770-974-8851 Fax 770-974-8852 www.motorcyclecarbs.com From: Teddy Payne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 11:27 AM To: discussion@acfug.org Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX SeeFusion recommended reducing the thread count by 80%? That would choke most application servers I know. Teddy - To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by FusionLink -
RE: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX
Is it Robertday (er, Friday) already? ;-) - dhs On August 29, 2006, Robert Reil wrote: In the past thread termination (in SeeFusion) seems to take about 5 minutes to recover from. I guess I could do a stack trace if someone told me what and how to do it. Robert P. Reil Managing Director, Motorcyclecarbs.com, Inc. 4292 Country Garden Walk NW Kennesaw, Ga. 30152 Office 770-974-8851 Fax 770-974-8852 www.motorcyclecarbs.com http://www.motorcyclecarbs.com _ From: Steve Drucker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 11:21 AM To: discussion@acfug.org Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX More importantly, what pages does SeeFusion note as running during your lockups? If you terminate the execution of those threads (using SeeFusion), is the server able to handle requests normally? Can you provide a stack trace of the threads running at the time of lockup? Regards, Steve Drucker CEO Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com http://www.figleaf.com/ http://training.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com/ Adobe / Macromedia / Google / Paperthin Premier Consulting and Training Partner _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Reil Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 11:00 AM To: discussion@acfug.org Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX Well using SeeFusion showed me that if I decrease thread volume I increased UP TIME! What was more important? 4 hours between 1-2 minute lock ups, or 2 hours between 40 minute lock ups? I think I did the only logical thing I could do considering my pathetic lack of knowledge. I am sure that one day I will comment to myself how IGNORANT I was at this time. Robert P. Reil Managing Director, Motorcyclecarbs.com, Inc. 4292 Country Garden Walk NW Kennesaw, Ga. 30152 Office 770-974-8851 Fax 770-974-8852 www.motorcyclecarbs.com http://www.motorcyclecarbs.com _ From: Teddy Payne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 10:41 AM To: discussion@acfug.org Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX Umm, why would you reduce the thread count? Threads are like available channels that can execute code in tandom. You have a queue of requests and the threads are the ones that handle all of the requests. If you have 100 requests and 10 threads handle them, that is faster than 100 requests and 2 threads handling them. The only thing that has to observed is how much memory is best suited for the threads. Each threads takes up resources as individual and asynchronous processes. I typically increase my threads over time and watch the performance of a box. I try to keep the CPU to around 30% if possible. 60-70% works just fine if you have over 1000 queues per minute. Teddy - To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by FusionLink http://www.fusionlink.com - Dean H. Saxe [EMAIL PROTECTED] What difference does it make to the dead, the orphans, and the homeless, whether the mad destruction is wrought under the name of totalitarianism or the holy name of liberty and democracy? -Gandhi - To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com -
RE: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX
Nice analogy Doug: Unfortunately I had to pay $100 for the tool (seefusion) to realize there was a peel and stick bandaid to use. I didnt know how to play with all the bells and whistles under the hood and deep into the diagnostic equipment. I just seemed to see a knob on the dash that made a difference and figured it would limp along till I knew what I was doing... If that day ever gets here that is... lol... As to what pages are doing it? I think a few of them. But even if I find them I dont know how to read the code yet to be able to debug it. I have a feeling that the data is out of sync in the DB, but then how to sync it? Ah... I better just be happy with the bandaid for a while and learn, or I could win t the lottery (as if I played) and hire a guru for a week to fix it... (as if Id win)... Stumbling along... Robert P. Reil Managing Director, Motorcyclecarbs.com, Inc. 4292 Country Garden Walk NW Kennesaw, Ga. 30152 Office 770-974-8851 Fax 770-974-8852 www.motorcyclecarbs.com From: Douglas Knudsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 11:47 AM To: discussion@acfug.org Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX On 8/29/06, Robert Reil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well using SeeFusion showed me that if I decrease thread volume I increased UP TIME! What was more important? 4 hours between 1-2 minute lock ups, or 2 hours between 40 minute lock ups? I think I did the only logical thing I could do considering my pathetic lack of knowledge. I am sure that one day I will comment to myself how IGNORANT I was at this time. gee, I do this daily! Messing with thread count limits is a fairly advanced topic and from my experience can enlist the use of some voodoo magik. Lowering your thread count max basically says give more processing power to each thread, which can lead to these threads executing faster. But this sacrifices the ability to handle several requests at once. As others have said, its those cfm pages causing the bottleneck that need help. Lowering the thread count can act as a bandaid in these situations. 4 hours between 1-2 minute lock ups this is not a 'up time' really. 'up time' would usually refer to CF running continuously. Some water in a fuel line would cause your motorcycle to stutter here in there, but not shut off completely, eh? To fix, need to take care of the water, not lower the amount of fuel flow. ...a stab at a analogy here, its been quite a few years since I messed around with me dirt bike! DK Robert P. Reil Managing Director, Motorcyclecarbs.com, Inc. 4292 Country Garden Walk NW Kennesaw , Ga. 30152 Office 770-974-8851 Fax 770-974-8852 www.motorcyclecarbs.com From: Teddy Payne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 10:41 AM To: discussion@acfug.org Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX Umm, why would you reduce the thread count? Threads are like available channels that can execute code in tandom. You have a queue of requests and the threads are the ones that handle all of the requests. If you have 100 requests and 10 threads handle them, that is faster than 100 requests and 2 threads handling them. The only thing that has to observed is how much memory is best suited for the threads. Each threads takes up resources as individual and asynchronous processes. I typically increase my threads over time and watch the performance of a box. I try to keep the CPU to around 30% if possible. 60-70% works just fine if you have over 1000 queues per minute. Teddy - To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by FusionLink - -- Douglas Knudsen http://www.cubicleman.com this is my signature, like it? - To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by FusionLink -
RE: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX
Robert, Send the pages seefusion says are causing the problem. You sent them once before but I cannot find that message. I will take a look against my AC installation. Cody From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Reil Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 1:03 PM To: discussion@acfug.org Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX In the past thread termination (in SeeFusion) seems to take about 5 minutes to recover from. I guess I could do a stack trace if someone told me what and how to do it. Robert P. Reil Managing Director, Motorcyclecarbs.com, Inc. 4292 Country Garden Walk NW Kennesaw, Ga. 30152 Office 770-974-8851 Fax 770-974-8852 www.motorcyclecarbs.com From: Steve Drucker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 11:21 AM To: discussion@acfug.org Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX More importantly, what pages does SeeFusion note as running during your lockups? If you terminate the execution of those threads (using SeeFusion), is the server able to handle requests normally? Can you provide a stack trace of the threads running at the time of lockup? Regards, Steve Drucker CEO Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com Adobe / Macromedia / Google / Paperthin Premier Consulting and Training Partner From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Reil Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 11:00 AM To: discussion@acfug.org Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX Well using SeeFusion showed me that if I decrease thread volume I increased UP TIME! What was more important? 4 hours between 1-2 minute lock ups, or 2 hours between 40 minute lock ups? I think I did the only logical thing I could do considering my pathetic lack of knowledge. I am sure that one day I will comment to myself how IGNORANT I was at this time. Robert P. Reil Managing Director, Motorcyclecarbs.com, Inc. 4292 Country Garden Walk NW Kennesaw, Ga. 30152 Office 770-974-8851 Fax 770-974-8852 www.motorcyclecarbs.com From: Teddy Payne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 10:41 AM To: discussion@acfug.org Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX Umm, why would you reduce the thread count? Threads are like available channels that can execute code in tandom. You have a queue of requests and the threads are the ones that handle all of the requests. If you have 100 requests and 10 threads handle them, that is faster than 100 requests and 2 threads handling them. The only thing that has to observed is how much memory is best suited for the threads. Each threads takes up resources as individual and asynchronous processes. I typically increase my threads over time and watch the performance of a box. I try to keep the CPU to around 30% if possible. 60-70% works just fine if you have over 1000 queues per minute. Teddy - To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by FusionLink - - To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by FusionLink -
RE: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX
Iz waiting for that... :P Robert P. Reil Managing Director, Motorcyclecarbs.com, Inc. 4292 Country Garden Walk NW Kennesaw, Ga. 30152 Office 770-974-8851 Fax 770-974-8852 www.motorcyclecarbs.com -Original Message- From: Dean H. Saxe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 1:18 PM To: discussion@acfug.org Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX Is it Robertday (er, Friday) already? ;-) - dhs On August 29, 2006, Robert Reil wrote: In the past thread termination (in SeeFusion) seems to take about 5 minutes to recover from. I guess I could do a stack trace if someone told me what and how to do it. Robert P. Reil Managing Director, Motorcyclecarbs.com, Inc. 4292 Country Garden Walk NW Kennesaw, Ga. 30152 Office 770-974-8851 Fax 770-974-8852 www.motorcyclecarbs.com http://www.motorcyclecarbs.com _ From: Steve Drucker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 11:21 AM To: discussion@acfug.org Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX More importantly, what pages does SeeFusion note as running during your lockups? If you terminate the execution of those threads (using SeeFusion), is the server able to handle requests normally? Can you provide a stack trace of the threads running at the time of lockup? Regards, Steve Drucker CEO Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com http://www.figleaf.com/ http://training.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com/ Adobe / Macromedia / Google / Paperthin Premier Consulting and Training Partner _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Reil Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 11:00 AM To: discussion@acfug.org Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX Well using SeeFusion showed me that if I decrease thread volume I increased UP TIME! What was more important? 4 hours between 1-2 minute lock ups, or 2 hours between 40 minute lock ups? I think I did the only logical thing I could do considering my pathetic lack of knowledge. I am sure that one day I will comment to myself how IGNORANT I was at this time. Robert P. Reil Managing Director, Motorcyclecarbs.com, Inc. 4292 Country Garden Walk NW Kennesaw, Ga. 30152 Office 770-974-8851 Fax 770-974-8852 www.motorcyclecarbs.com http://www.motorcyclecarbs.com _ From: Teddy Payne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 10:41 AM To: discussion@acfug.org Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: JRUN Hangs REDEUX Umm, why would you reduce the thread count? Threads are like available channels that can execute code in tandom. You have a queue of requests and the threads are the ones that handle all of the requests. If you have 100 requests and 10 threads handle them, that is faster than 100 requests and 2 threads handling them. The only thing that has to observed is how much memory is best suited for the threads. Each threads takes up resources as individual and asynchronous processes. I typically increase my threads over time and watch the performance of a box. I try to keep the CPU to around 30% if possible. 60-70% works just fine if you have over 1000 queues per minute. Teddy - To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by FusionLink http://www.fusionlink.com - Dean H. Saxe [EMAIL PROTECTED] What difference does it make to the dead, the orphans, and the homeless, whether the mad destruction is wrought under the name of totalitarianism or the holy name of liberty and democracy? -Gandhi - To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com - - To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com -
