Re: Some tickets that should perhaps get looked at before 1.1
1.1 is not 8 days away, the 1.1 major feature freeze, this means items that are new features on the 1.1 features list. 1.1 final doesn't ship until mid-March, which is quite a bit of time considering that starting on February 15th the only changes that will occur will be bug fixes. Alex On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 1:56 PM, mrtswrote: > > On Jan 7, 11:56 am, "Alex Gaynor" wrote: > > I'd like to remind everyone that the policy for bugs is to fix them, they > > don't all need to be listed, because the goal is to fix them all. > > Let me remind everybody that 1.1 is officially only 8 days away. The > goal is clearly not achievable in that time :), so a selection has to > be made. I'd say bringing up trivial, non-controversial, fully > documented and tested bugfixes like I and Tai Lee did, helps in that > selection and makes 1.1 a better release. The total ticket mass is > just unmanageable and picking ripe fruits for the devs to review and > commit should assist, not hinder in achieving that goal. > > --- > > Which brings me to a related matter: as there have been no news about > Honza and his progress on model validation, I'll semi-champion it (at > least until he pops up again OR a core dev steps up to take it upon > him/herself OR someone opposes this). I've created a fork of the > unofficial git mirror for that purpose at > http://github.com/mrts/django/tree/master > . Everybody is most welcome to contribute. > > By semi-champion I mean that I'll contribute as much as I can beside > daily job tasks by directly writing code, hanging in #django-dev to > discuss things with people interested in helping out and merging > other's patches and upstream changes ASAP. Unfortunately I can not > warrant that this will be completed it in the short time remaining. > Design decisions will eventually appear in the wiki: > http://wiki.github.com/mrts/django > > As of now, I've only merged the latest patch by Honza, so the branch > should be rather unusable (trunk has changed considerably in some > areas -- neither did the patch apply cleanly nor was it always > applicable where it did). > > > -- "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." --Voltaire "The people's good is the highest law."--Cicero --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Some tickets that should perhaps get looked at before 1.1
On Jan 7, 11:56 am, "Alex Gaynor"wrote: > I'd like to remind everyone that the policy for bugs is to fix them, they > don't all need to be listed, because the goal is to fix them all. Let me remind everybody that 1.1 is officially only 8 days away. The goal is clearly not achievable in that time :), so a selection has to be made. I'd say bringing up trivial, non-controversial, fully documented and tested bugfixes like I and Tai Lee did, helps in that selection and makes 1.1 a better release. The total ticket mass is just unmanageable and picking ripe fruits for the devs to review and commit should assist, not hinder in achieving that goal. --- Which brings me to a related matter: as there have been no news about Honza and his progress on model validation, I'll semi-champion it (at least until he pops up again OR a core dev steps up to take it upon him/herself OR someone opposes this). I've created a fork of the unofficial git mirror for that purpose at http://github.com/mrts/django/tree/master . Everybody is most welcome to contribute. By semi-champion I mean that I'll contribute as much as I can beside daily job tasks by directly writing code, hanging in #django-dev to discuss things with people interested in helping out and merging other's patches and upstream changes ASAP. Unfortunately I can not warrant that this will be completed it in the short time remaining. Design decisions will eventually appear in the wiki: http://wiki.github.com/mrts/django As of now, I've only merged the latest patch by Honza, so the branch should be rather unusable (trunk has changed considerably in some areas -- neither did the patch apply cleanly nor was it always applicable where it did). --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Some tickets that should perhaps get looked at before 1.1
I'd like to remind everyone that the policy for bugs is to fix them, they don't all need to be listed, because the goal is to fix them all. Alex On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 3:47 AM, Tai Leewrote: > > I'd also love to see 8898 committed. It looks to be a fairly straight- > forward bug fix, at least to me. > > http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/8898 > > Cheers. > Tai. > > > > -- "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." --Voltaire "The people's good is the highest law."--Cicero --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Some tickets that should perhaps get looked at before 1.1
I'd also love to see 8898 committed. It looks to be a fairly straight- forward bug fix, at least to me. http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/8898 Cheers. Tai. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Some tickets that should perhaps get looked at before 1.1
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 09:05 -0800, mrts wrote: > As the list seems to be resuming from holiday hibernation, I risk > causing another "don't you dare to push us" flame-bombing :) by > proposing that the following get looked at before 1.1: > > * `__import__(mod, {}, {}, [''])` causes double import of modules [1] It's already being looked at. It's assigned to me for that reason. As I mentioned in the last substantive comment on the ticket, solving it has revealed some other problems with imports that I'm slowly working through as time permits. Regards, Malcolm --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---