RE: Django_xmlrpc
Nevermind. I got it. I missed that _all_ requests should be forwarded to handle_xmlrpc. I was expecting the registered ones functions to behave "normally." Well it was actually your email that tipped me off, but let's chalk it up as an object lesson on reading code. (For anyone unfamiliar, the code states clearly that requests should go handle_xmlrpc. My bad.) I coulda solved it with a little more reading. And coffee. Thanks Graham. I look forward to using this xmlrpc interface since it hits the sweet spot for my present needs. Simpler than SOAP, less cutting edge than REST. J -Original Message- From: django-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Graham Binns Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 12:24 PM To: Django users Subject: Re: Django_xmlrpc Hi John, I have it up and running using the introspection-dev branch, but then I wrote it. Or adapted it. Or at least made it into a django app... Something like that anyway. Anyroadup I'm responsible for it, so if you've got a problem it's my job to help you solve it :) I'm sorry that you're having trouble and, for the sake of getting it said, the documentation that exists sucks and that which doesn't suck doesn't exist, something that I'm working to fix at present. Can you give me some more details about your setup? Ideally, I'd need to see the XMLRPC_METHODS section of settings.py and the entry in your urlconf (urls.py) that points to handle_xmlrpc. Cheers, Graham John Goodleaf wrote: > Does anyone have django_xmlrpc running successfully? I have been > trying to get the introspection-dev branch running but am running into > some problems. I feel sure it's my fault. I'm not sure how to wire up > django_xmlrpc with settings and urls.py. I can get the system to run > and, apparently, register a function, but I've been trying to rest it > with xmlrpclib and can't get a response that isn't either a 404 or 500. > Anyone have an example they can share, including the settings and urls? > Thanks, > J --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Django_xmlrpc
Does anyone have django_xmlrpc running successfully? I have been trying to get the introspection-dev branch running but am running into some problems. I feel sure it's my fault. I'm not sure how to wire up django_xmlrpc with settings and urls.py. I can get the system to run and, apparently, register a function, but I've been trying to rest it with xmlrpclib and can't get a response that isn't either a 404 or 500. Anyone have an example they can share, including the settings and urls? Thanks, J --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Get_FIELD_url issues
Awright. I just know I'm missing something stupid here.
I have a model for file attachments that are uploaded. In one of my
templates, I'd like to display a URL whence the attachment could be
recalled. So I've put in {{ a.get_bugfile_url }} in the template, but
the output HTML looks like Title. I can't retrieve the
URL. However, if I test this in the shell, calling a.get_bugfile_url(),
I get exactly the URL I'm expecting. Interestingly, get_bugfile_filename
also doesn't work in the template, but does in the shell.
Anyone tell me what stupid thing I'm missing? I'm using the most current
SVN version of django (trunk).
Thanks,
J
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
RE: Django IDE
Wing IDE. I'll second that recommendation. I have both Komodo 4 and Wing at work. I use Wing pretty much exclusively. From a purely aesthetic standpoint, Komodo 4 is somewhat "cleaner" looking, but otherwise I think Wing is stronger. In addition to mentioned debugger, Wing does a very nice job with autocompletion and project management. Good integration with SVN. Key bindings can be made to mimic Emacs (or vi or Visual Studio). Moreover, the support is excellent and the Wing developers are present and responsive on the company's mailing list. J (Not affiliated with WingWare!) -Original Message- From: django-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of BrandonC Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 8:43 AM To: Django users Subject: Re: Django IDE As a comparison I have to say that Wing IDE has a very nice Python debugger (fast and it works). I haven't used Komodo in a while but I remember my biggest issue with it was that its debugger stopped at exceptions that truely were handled, and that it was slow. For django I set my manage.py file as the main debug file, and then add --noreload --settings=devsettings (my settings for running a test server) in the debug run arguments and I can run the dev. server locally to debug. There may be better editors I don't know, but I find that I'm always comparing them to what I can do in Wing. Brandon --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
filter by related data
Title: Message Django newb. I haven't yet read everything (I admit it) but I'm hoping someone can help me out with a quick answer. Assuming the following model: class Patient(models.Model): study_id = models.CharField(maxlength=10) usubjid = models.CharField(maxlength=8, unique=True, primary_key=True, db_column='usubjid') sex = models.CharField(maxlength=1,blank=True,null=True) birth_date = models.DateField(null=True) screenfail = models.BooleanField(null=True) def __repr__(self): return "%s:%s" %(self.study_id, self.usubjid) class Comment(models.Model): usubjid = models.ForeignKey(Patient, db_column='usubjid') comment_seq = models.SmallIntegerField() form_number = models.SmallIntegerField(null=True) visit_id = models.SmallIntegerField(null=True) violation = models.BooleanField() text = models.TextField(null=True) review_status = models.SmallIntegerField(null=True) I'm looking for django/python syntax to retrieve all the comments that belong to a particular study_id (which is an attribute of Patient). In SQL, this'd be: SELECT FROM Patient JOIN Comment on Patient.usubjid = Comment.usubjid WHERE Patient.study_id = 'CP-AI-005' I'm just not sure what django call would yield that. I've tried a few variations on filter() but haven't hit the right solution and have failed, so far, to actually go and read the source code. (Like everyone else, I'm in a hurry.) Thanks for your time. J --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
RE: filter by related data
Thanks. I had just figured it out this very minute and was about to call a 'nevermind.' I had, I suppose out of habit, tried c=Comments.objects.filter(usubjid.study_id__exact='CP-AI-005') Missed the initial set of double underscores. D'oh. Thanks though. I appreciate your time. J -Original Message- From: django-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Shaffer Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 2:40 PM To: Django users Subject: Re: filter by related data comments = Comment.objects.filter(usubjid__study_id__exact='CP-AI-005') By using the usubjid__study_id syntax it lets django know that you want to filter by study_id field in the usubjid (Patient) model. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
