Re: [dmarc-ietf] Binding Operational Directive 18-01 require agencies to implement STARTTLS, SPF and DMARC

2017-10-20 Thread Henrik Schack
I've notified GlobalCyberAlliance, they have contacts at DHS

/Henrik Schack

On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 12:19 AM, Rolf E. Sonneveld <
r.e.sonnev...@sonnection.nl> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> See https://cyber.dhs.gov/
>
> DKIM is mentioned but not required, nor any negative side effects that the
> use of DMARC can have. Has anyone from the IETF been consulted for this
> directive?
>
> /rolf
>
> ___
> dmarc mailing list
> dmarc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>



-- 
Mvh/Best regards
Henrik Schack
ICQ: 889295
http://henrik.schack.dk/
http://links.schack.dk/
___
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc


Re: [dmarc-ietf] Indirect mail flows: DKIM signature breakage by cloud anti-virus/spam provider

2014-09-17 Thread Henrik Schack

 it's nice to see how many respondents in this thread gave all sorts of
 advise to Henrik how to deal with a problem, which basically cannot solved
 by him because it is caused by some 3rd party (modifying the body of a mail
 for adv. purposes).
 
 I interpreted Henrik's mail as a followup to the thread that John Kelly
 started, titled 'Indirect mail flows'. In my view both John and Henrik
 tried to make (a start of) an inventory of all sorts of real-life
 situations that potentially can break DKIM signatures or more in general:
 cause DMARC failures for legitimate mail flows where sending DMARC policy
 is p=reject.

 That's right, that was my original intention.

/Henrik
___
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc


Re: [dmarc-ietf] Indirect mail flows: DKIM signature breakage by cloud anti-virus/spam provider

2014-09-17 Thread Henrik Schack


 IMO, the place to record the inventory is the wiki.  Mailing lists are
 not a good place to keep such records.
 I would love to add it to the Wiki, unfortunately the Wiki signup features
 seems to be broken, wont accept any of my email addresses.

And the person responsible does not respond when asking for help.

/Henrik
___
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc


[dmarc-ietf] Indirect mail flows: DKIM signature breakage by cloud anti-virus/spam provider

2014-09-15 Thread Henrik Schack
In Denmark we have a somewhat large (10K+ domains) anti-virus/spam provider
breaking DKIM signatures.
They break DKIM signatures on incoming email by adding a Virus scanned by
 line to the body of the email.

Not sure how to fix this, but perhaps some day they'll get tired of my
bi-monthly calls and emails complaining about how they do things.


-- 
Mvh/Best regards
Henrik Schack
http://henrik.schack.dk/
___
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc


Re: [dmarc-ietf] Indirect mail flows: DKIM signature breakage by cloud anti-virus/spam provider

2014-09-15 Thread Henrik Schack
In this case it's not a header, but a line added to the body of the email
Br Henrik Schack
On Sep 15, 2014 8:51 PM, Tomki dmarci...@tomki.com wrote:

  Henrik,
 I think that the fact of virus scanning is more commonly just another
 header in the message, which would not break a properly created
 DKIM-Signature.
 For example your message (via the list) got to me with extra headers such
 as: X-IronPort-AV, X-IronPort-AS

 Perhaps that example from another major scanning system would help.

 --Tomki



 On 9/15/14 10:39, Henrik Schack wrote:

 In Denmark we have a somewhat large (10K+ domains) anti-virus/spam
 provider breaking DKIM signatures.
 They break DKIM signatures on incoming email by adding a Virus scanned by
  line to the body of the email.

  Not sure how to fix this, but perhaps some day they'll get tired of my
 bi-monthly calls and emails complaining about how they do things.


  --
 Mvh/Best regards
 Henrik Schack
 http://henrik.schack.dk/



 ___
 dmarc mailing listdmarc@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc



 ___
 dmarc mailing list
 dmarc@ietf.org
 https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc


___
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc


Re: [dmarc-ietf] Indirect mail flows: DKIM signature breakage by cloud anti-virus/spam provider

2014-09-15 Thread Henrik Schack
No it's not at all a free service. But they advertise anyway :-(
Br
Henrik

On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Franck Martin fmar...@linkedin.com wrote:


 On Sep 15, 2014, at 7:39 PM, Henrik Schack henrik.sch...@gmail.com
 wrote:

  In Denmark we have a somewhat large (10K+ domains) anti-virus/spam
 provider breaking DKIM signatures.
  They break DKIM signatures on incoming email by adding a Virus scanned
 by  line to the body of the email.
 
  Not sure how to fix this, but perhaps some day they'll get tired of my
 bi-monthly calls and emails complaining about how they do things.
 


 Is this a free service that they have to advertise themselves in the body
 of the email? If you pay for the service, may be you don’t want to get any
 advertisement?

 ___
 dmarc mailing list
 dmarc@ietf.org
 https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc




-- 
Mvh/Best regards
Henrik Schack
ICQ: 889295
http://henrik.schack.dk/
http://links.schack.dk/
___
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc