> > >it's nice to see how many respondents in this thread gave all sorts of > advise to Henrik how to deal with a problem, which basically cannot solved > by him because it is caused by some 3rd party (modifying the body of a mail > for adv. purposes). > > > >I interpreted Henrik's mail as a followup to the thread that John Kelly > started, titled 'Indirect mail flows'. In my view both John and Henrik > tried to make (a start of) an inventory of all sorts of real-life > situations that potentially can break DKIM signatures or more in general: > cause DMARC failures for legitimate mail flows where sending DMARC >policy > is p=reject. > > That's right, that was my original intention.
/Henrik
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
