Re: [dmarc-ietf] Moving on to our next phase?

[Murray S. Kucherawy]

On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Kurt Andersen (b)  wrote:

> Thank you! I'll do my best to attend at least the APPSWG general session
> (remotely). If there are any others pertinent to this work, please let me
> know.
>

Please note that APPSAWG is in the process of folding into DISPATCH, so the
session you're looking for is the latter one.  APPSAWG will cease to exist
soon.

-MSK, co-chair of both of those
___
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Moving on to our next phase?

[Kurt Andersen (b)]

On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Ned Freed  wrote:

> > > On 1 Apr 2016, at 19:13, Kurt Andersen (b)  wrote:
> > >
> > > Since we've completed the task of identifying the interoperability
> problems with some mitigations (phase I), is it time for us to move on to
> our next activity phase?
> > >
> > > Also, is there some admin-magic that has to happen to move a document
> from "draft" to "hey! all done!" status? (
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability/)
>
> > One of the chairs should do shepherding write up and request publication
> > using datatracker. Or find another person who can serve as the document
> > shepherd.
>
> I'll take care of it.
>

Thank you! I'll do my best to attend at least the APPSWG general session
(remotely). If there are any others pertinent to this work, please let me
know.

--Kurt
___
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Moving on to our next phase?

[ned+dmarc]

> Hi Kurt,

> > On 1 Apr 2016, at 19:13, Kurt Andersen (b)  wrote:
> >
> > Since we've completed the task of identifying the interoperability problems 
> > with some mitigations (phase I), is it time for us to move on to our next 
> > activity phase?
> >
> > Also, is there some admin-magic that has to happen to move a document from 
> > "draft" to "hey! all done!" status? 
> > (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability/)

> One of the chairs should do shepherding write up and request publication
> using datatracker. Or find another person who can serve as the document
> shepherd.

I'll take care of it.

> >
> > From the group charter:
> >> Phase I:
> >>* Draft description of interoperability issues for indirect mail flows 
> >> and plausible methods for reducing them.
> >> Phase II:
> >>* Specification of DMARC improvements to support indirect mail flows
> >>* Draft Guide on DMARC Usage
> >> Phase III:
> >>* Review and refinement of the DMARC specification
> >>* Completion of Guide on DMARC Usage
> >

> > I think that we need to update our target milestones a bit since they still
> > call for everything to be completed by May 2015.

> That would be great!

> Alexey,
> Who would become the responsible AD for this group on Wednesday evening.

I won't be there but may be online.

Ned

___
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Moving on to our next phase?

[Alexey Melnikov]

Hi Kurt,

> On 1 Apr 2016, at 19:13, Kurt Andersen (b)  wrote:
> 
> Since we've completed the task of identifying the interoperability problems 
> with some mitigations (phase I), is it time for us to move on to our next 
> activity phase?
> 
> Also, is there some admin-magic that has to happen to move a document from 
> "draft" to "hey! all done!" status? 
> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability/)

One of the chairs should do shepherding write up and request publication using 
datatracker. Or find another person who can serve as the document shepherd.
> 
> From the group charter:
>> Phase I:
>>* Draft description of interoperability issues for indirect mail flows 
>> and plausible methods for reducing them.
>> Phase II:
>>* Specification of DMARC improvements to support indirect mail flows
>>* Draft Guide on DMARC Usage
>> Phase III:
>>* Review and refinement of the DMARC specification
>>* Completion of Guide on DMARC Usage
> 
> I think that we need to update our target milestones a bit since they still 
> call for everything to be completed by May 2015.

That would be great!

Alexey,
Who would become the responsible AD for this group on Wednesday evening.

___
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

[dmarc-ietf] Moving on to our next phase?

[Kurt Andersen (b)]

Since we've completed the task of identifying the interoperability problems
with some mitigations (phase I), is it time for us to move on to our next
activity phase?

Also, is there some admin-magic that has to happen to move a document from
"draft" to "hey! all done!" status? (
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability/)

>From the group charter:

> Phase I:
>* Draft description of interoperability issues for indirect mail flows
> and plausible methods for reducing them.
> Phase II:
>* Specification of DMARC improvements to support indirect mail flows
>* Draft Guide on DMARC Usage
> Phase III:
>* Review and refinement of the DMARC specification
>* Completion of Guide on DMARC Usage


I think that we need to update our target milestones a bit since they still
call for everything to be completed by May 2015.

--Kurt
___
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc