[dmarc-ietf] Multiple SPF in a single auth_results

2020-12-14 Thread Brotman, Alex
I'm seeing a report where the XML contains two SPF records within a single 
auth_results entity.  This doesn't seem correct.  I found this thread: 
http://lists.dmarc.org/pipermail/dmarc-discuss/2016-April/003474.html and it 
says it's a bug, though, I'm a bit surprised (guess I probably shouldn't be) 
that this is still happening.  Is there some part of the RFC that makes this 
appear like it's a legitimate report that could be misconstrued?  Is this 
something that should perhaps be clarified?

  
 
email.peacocktv.com
pass
 
 
bounce.email.peacocktv.com
pass
 
 
mta-218-134.sparkpostmail.com.
none
 
  

Thanks

--
Alex Brotman
Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse & Messaging Policy
Comcast

___
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc


Re: [dmarc-ietf] Multiple SPF in a single auth_results

2020-12-14 Thread Henning Krause
Perhaps the first one is for the mail-from-domain and  the other is for the 
EHLO host?

Kind regards,
Henning

> -Original Message-
> From: dmarc [mailto:dmarc-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brotman, Alex
> Sent: Montag, 14. Dezember 2020 16:35
> To: dmarc@ietf.org
> Subject: [dmarc-ietf] Multiple SPF in a single auth_results
> 
> I'm seeing a report where the XML contains two SPF records within a single
> auth_results entity.  This doesn't seem correct.  I found this thread:
> https://stack01.cloud.nospamproxy.com/link?id=BAgfpHeh4JGMq5wA
> AABTUQz3QBhcskBhLXvN_sPByIkTUJ_191QbNMs1tjGZXePYW51PlsXJiHzgxa
> 2k95gYKyEvascW0xCd7vkfXGIcW-SMik1X4yMySldQ-
> qHoCA66NmA7TaPPuwEtF7ZPQYLlZqdD7I5R3KNSFh2RaMp6bqp2L8XhNLlAJK
> uMYUKvKSh3RMIePwJj3aMWZVgoSUPgaHbNCkaiscGIUps1  and it says it's a
> bug, though, I'm a bit surprised (guess I probably shouldn't be) that this is 
> still
> happening.  Is there some part of the RFC that makes this appear like it's a
> legitimate report that could be misconstrued?  Is this something that should
> perhaps be clarified?
> 
>   
>  
> email.peacocktv.com
> pass
>  
>  
> bounce.email.peacocktv.com
> pass
>  
>  
> mta-218-134.sparkpostmail.com.
> none
>  
>   
> 
> Thanks
> 
> --
> Alex Brotman
> Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse & Messaging Policy Comcast
> 
> ___
> dmarc mailing list
> dmarc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

___
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc


Re: [dmarc-ietf] Multiple SPF in a single auth_results

2020-12-14 Thread John Levine
In article 

 you write:
>I'm seeing a report where the XML contains two SPF records within a single 
>auth_results entity.  This doesn't seem correct.

It's specifically allowed in the XML schema. In this case I'd guess it
is checking the From header domain, the org domain, and the bounce
address. I see that bounce.email.peacocktv.com is a CNAME for
sparkpostmail.com so it's plausible.

Checking all those things seems useless but that doesn't mean it's forbidden.

R's,
John

>  
> 
>email.peacocktv.com
>pass
> 
> 
>bounce.email.peacocktv.com
>pass
> 
> 
>mta-218-134.sparkpostmail.com.
>none
> 
>  

___
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc


Re: [dmarc-ietf] Multiple SPF in a single auth_results

2020-12-14 Thread Todd Herr
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 11:10 AM Henning Krause  wrote:

> Perhaps the first one is for the mail-from-domain and  the other is for
> the EHLO host?
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: dmarc [mailto:dmarc-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brotman, Alex
>
>
> >  
> > bounce.email.peacocktv.com
> > pass
> >  
> >  
> > mta-218-134.sparkpostmail.com.
> > none
> >  
>

 I would tend to agree with Herr Krause, based on what I remember about
SparkPost's host naming convention and such.

-- 

*Todd Herr* | Sr. Technical Program Manager
*e:* todd.h...@valimail.com
*p:* 703.220.4153


This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or
proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s)
authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized
recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or
distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited
and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to
this email and then delete it from your system.
___
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc


Re: [dmarc-ietf] Multiple SPF in a single auth_results

2020-12-15 Thread Alessandro Vesely

On Mon 14/Dec/2020 20:17:37 +0100 John Levine wrote:

In article 

 you write:

I'm seeing a report where the XML contains two SPF records within a single 
auth_results entity.  This doesn't seem correct.


It's specifically allowed in the XML schema.



Yup:

   



In this case I'd guess it is checking the From header domain, the org
domain, and the bounce address. I see that bounce.email.peacocktv.com is a
CNAME for sparkpostmail.com so it's plausible.


One has to guess because the snippet misses the scope of the checked domains:

   
   

In that sense, it is not correct.  It should have been:



 

   email.peacocktv.com
   pass


   bounce.email.peacocktv.com

  mfrom

   pass


   mta-218-134.sparkpostmail.com.

  helo

   none

 



Best
Ale
--
















___
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc