Re: [dmarc-discuss] Metrics on policy actions

[Anthony Purcell via dmarc-discuss]

Hi John,

I'm looking for something simpler. A breakdown of how much mail was 
p=reject,accept,quarantine

10% accept 
40% quarantine 

Make sense?

Thanks,
🐜

> On Apr 24, 2017, at 17:12, John Wilson  wrote:
> 
> Anthony,
> 
> Do you mean "versus local policy-overrides"?
> 
> John
> 
>> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Anthony Purcell via dmarc-discuss 
>>  wrote:
>> Hello,
>> 
>> I was wondering if any dmarc implementors had any stats on what percentage 
>> of your mail stream matches the various polices? Or if there is a maawg doc 
>> out there someone could point me to that would be great.
>> ___
>> dmarc-discuss mailing list
>> dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
>> http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
>> 
>> NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well 
>> terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
> 
___
dmarc-discuss mailing list
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss

NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms 
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)

Re: [dmarc-discuss] Metrics on policy actions

[A. Schulze via dmarc-discuss]

Am 25.04.2017 um 15:23 schrieb Anthony Purcell via dmarc-discuss:

> I'm looking for something simpler. A breakdown of how much mail was 
> p=reject,accept,quarantine

ISP in Germany 500k messages per day
 - 10 ... 20% pass
 - up to 1% fail
 - majority from domains not providing a DMARC record
 - quarantine count as pass but that may be overwritten

The values are stable since ~ two years.
But I've to admit, my users are somehow special: they use almost no 
mailinglists...

Andreas
___
dmarc-discuss mailing list
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss

NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms 
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)

Re: [dmarc-discuss] Metrics on policy actions

[Brandon Long via dmarc-discuss]

Are you looking for the policy applied or the policy requested?  Also, I
would imagine this is heavily different depending on the receiver.

Brandon

On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 6:23 AM, Anthony Purcell via dmarc-discuss <
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org> wrote:

> Hi John,
>
> I'm looking for something simpler. A breakdown of how much mail was
> p=reject,accept,quarantine
>
> 10% accept
> 40% quarantine
>
> Make sense?
>
> Thanks,
> 🐜
>
> On Apr 24, 2017, at 17:12, John Wilson  wrote:
>
> Anthony,
>
> Do you mean "versus local policy-overrides"?
>
> John
>
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Anthony Purcell via dmarc-discuss <
> dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I was wondering if any dmarc implementors had any stats on what
>> percentage of your mail stream matches the various polices? Or if there is
>> a maawg doc out there someone could point me to that would be great.
>> ___
>> dmarc-discuss mailing list
>> dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
>> http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
>>
>> NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well
>> terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
>>
>
>
> ___
> dmarc-discuss mailing list
> dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
> http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
>
> NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well
> terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
>
___
dmarc-discuss mailing list
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss

NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms 
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)

Re: [dmarc-discuss] Metrics on policy actions

[Anthony Purcell via dmarc-discuss]

Numbers on policy requested is what I’m after. 

Thanks,
Anthony

> On Apr 25, 2017, at 9:52 AM, Brandon Long  wrote:
> 
> Are you looking for the policy applied or the policy requested?  Also, I 
> would imagine this is heavily different depending on the receiver.
> 
> Brandon
> 
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 6:23 AM, Anthony Purcell via dmarc-discuss 
> mailto:dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org>> wrote:
> Hi John,
> 
> I'm looking for something simpler. A breakdown of how much mail was 
> p=reject,accept,quarantine
> 
> 10% accept 
> 40% quarantine 
> 
> Make sense?
> 
> Thanks,
> 🐜
> 
> On Apr 24, 2017, at 17:12, John Wilson  > wrote:
> 
>> Anthony,
>> 
>> Do you mean "versus local policy-overrides"?
>> 
>> John
>> 
>> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Anthony Purcell via dmarc-discuss 
>> mailto:dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org>> wrote:
>> Hello,
>> 
>> I was wondering if any dmarc implementors had any stats on what percentage 
>> of your mail stream matches the various polices? Or if there is a maawg doc 
>> out there someone could point me to that would be great.
>> ___
>> dmarc-discuss mailing list
>> dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org 
>> http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss 
>> 
>> 
>> NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well 
>> terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html 
>> )
>> 
> 
> ___
> dmarc-discuss mailing list
> dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org 
> http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss 
> 
> 
> NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms 
> (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html )
> 

___
dmarc-discuss mailing list
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss

NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms 
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)