[dmarc-discuss] DMARC reports from Trustwave SEG
Hi, Is anyone from Trustwave on this list? Their SEG software don’t know how to spell "Content-Type”. It’s spelled without dash: =c5c709ca-bc35-4c5e-aca0-da12cbc9280f ContentType: application/gzip; name=“receiver.co.uk!sender.com!1523433708!1523522202!4344.xml.gz" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=“receiver.co.uk!sender.com!1523433708!1523522202!4344.xml.gz" I noticed this already a year ago. It would be nice if they fixed it. It’s already a challenge to handle the many variations in mime encoding and compression. Thanks, Maarten Oelering Postmastery ___ dmarc-discuss mailing list dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
[dmarc-discuss] DMARC reports from TrustWave SEG
Is anyone from Trustwave SEG on this list? They should check the spelling of Content-Type in their DMARC reports: =6777a7f7-be29-40d4-ba25-6d03af8ce8d1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit This is a DMARC report generated by Trustwave SEG. =6777a7f7-be29-40d4-ba25-6d03af8ce8d1 ContentType: application/gzip; name="marshal.com!waternet.nl!1488397305!1489051603!281.xml.gz" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="marshal.com!waternet.nl!1488397305!1489051603!281.xml.gz" Thanks, Maarten Oelering Postmastery ___ dmarc-discuss mailing list dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
