Re: [dmarc-discuss] Use of in DMARC aggregate reports
It's not yet fixed in OpenDMARC, unfortunately. I've reported it again into Github at https://github.com/trusteddomainproject/OpenDMARC/issues/199. On 12/20/21 08:30, Juri Haberland via dmarc-discuss wrote: > On 02.12.21 13:34, Maarten Oelering via dmarc-discuss wrote: >> Hi list members, >> >> We see many aggregate reports where is a >> subdomain which does not publish a DMARC record. The DMARC record is on the >> organisation domain. >> It’s so widespread it looks like some DMARC reporting software is broken. In >> one of the reports I saw "X-Mailer: opendmarc-reports v1.3.2". > Yes, see https://sourceforge.net/p/opendmarc/tickets/207/ > The development has silently moved to Github, maybe it is fixed now... > >> Do others notice this as well? And how do you treat these reports, drop them >> or fix them? > Just accepting as-is seems the best way IMHO. > > > Regards, > Juri > ___ > dmarc-discuss mailing list > dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org > http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss > > NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms > (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html) >___ dmarc-discuss mailing list dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Use of in DMARC aggregate reports
On 02.12.21 13:34, Maarten Oelering via dmarc-discuss wrote: > Hi list members, > > We see many aggregate reports where is a subdomain > which does not publish a DMARC record. The DMARC record is on the > organisation domain. > It’s so widespread it looks like some DMARC reporting software is broken. In > one of the reports I saw "X-Mailer: opendmarc-reports v1.3.2". Yes, see https://sourceforge.net/p/opendmarc/tickets/207/ The development has silently moved to Github, maybe it is fixed now... > Do others notice this as well? And how do you treat these reports, drop them > or fix them? Just accepting as-is seems the best way IMHO. Regards, Juri ___ dmarc-discuss mailing list dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
Re: [dmarc-discuss] Use of in DMARC aggregate reports
Maarten Oelering via dmarc-discuss wrote on 2021-12-02 13:34: We see many aggregate reports where is a subdomain which does not publish a DMARC record. The DMARC record is on the organisation domain. [...] It’s so widespread it looks like some DMARC reporting software is broken. In one of the reports I saw "X-Mailer: opendmarc-reports v1.3.2". Do others notice this as well? And how do you treat these reports, drop them or fix them? Now that you mention it: yes, we're seeing a lot of these. We just ignore it. Dropping seems a bit excessive for what I consider a minor error. I've noticed other inconsistencies or discrepancies from the XML Schema by looking at lots of reports. To me it's not worth to chase each of them. Regards, Matt ___ dmarc-discuss mailing list dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
[dmarc-discuss] Use of in DMARC aggregate reports
Hi list members, We see many aggregate reports where is a subdomain which does not publish a DMARC record. The DMARC record is on the organisation domain. The specification (RFC 7489 appendix C) says this should be the domain at which the DMARC record was found, not the RFC5322 From domain: It’s so widespread it looks like some DMARC reporting software is broken. In one of the reports I saw "X-Mailer: opendmarc-reports v1.3.2". Do others notice this as well? And how do you treat these reports, drop them or fix them? Thanks, Maarten Oelering Postmastery ___ dmarc-discuss mailing list dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
