Re: [DNG] mailing list software

2018-12-12 Thread Miles Fidelman
There's also Sieve.  Not a drop-in replacement to procmail, but pretty 
powerful.



On 12/12/18 5:08 PM, Joel Roth via Dng wrote:

Jim Jackson wrote:

Just an aside - what are the alternatives to procmail?
so far I've only found _maildrop_ as an in-line delivery filter.

I filter my incoming mail using perl script based on
https://metacpan.org/pod/Email::Filter. It is designed to
be a drop-in replacement for procmail, with a bit less
cryptic syntax.

cheers





--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is.   Yogi Berra

___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] About gnuinos ascii

2018-12-12 Thread Alessandro Selli
On 12/12/18 at 00:36, aitor wrote:
> Thanks for your attention, and merry christmas to all of you :)


  Thank you for your contribution, and Happy Christmas and Merry New
Year to you!  ☺



-- 
Alessandro Selli 
VOIP SIP: dhatarat...@ekiga.net
Chiave firma e cifratura PGP/GPG signing and encoding key:
  BA651E4050DDFC31E17384BABCE7BD1A1B0DF2AE



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Drive-by critique

2018-12-12 Thread Bruce Perens
Eric has never been the developer of a distribution, so there will be
things he doesn't understand. I am all for having as many users as
possible. I understand the problem of proprietary firmware and hope that
this is not a significant blocker for most people, especially since most
distribution installers do provide a way to download it (and we should
offer the choice even if we don't approve). This will not help people with
a network interface that requires proprietary firmware to run.

But IMO the main problems with developing a large user community are ease
of use and impedance mismatch between the developers and users. Many Debian
developers would not have been the best people to communicate with a naive
user, and Devuan does further distill that characteristic. IMO this is
self-defeating for Free Software.

Thanks

Bruce
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] mailing list software

2018-12-12 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Jim Jackson - 12.12.18, 15:33:
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2018, Rick Moen wrote:
> > Quoting Lars Nood??n via Dng (dng@lists.dyne.org):
> > > It's probably a time that Procmail be retired, and thus anything
> > > based on it.  There have been a lot of reports in recent years of
> > > serious, unsafe bugs in its processing.  However, there is this
> > > comment about it from a former Procmail maintainer to consider:
> > > 
> > > https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=141634350915839&w=2
> > 
> > Upon examination, it turns out that the known flaws in Procmail lack
> > any credible exploitation scenario.  The matter was covered on
> > LWN.net a few years ago, and I'm pretty sure nothing has changed
> > substantively.
> > 
> > (I've gone through this discussion several times since then on
> > mailing lists, and can dredge up details from those if necessary.)
> 
> Just an aside - what are the alternatives to procmail?
> so far I've only found _maildrop_ as an in-line delivery filter.

Postfix has built-in minimal lda, but I use "dovecot-lda" as 
"mailbox_command" in Postfix. I set it up for Sieve support which IMHO is 
a nice way to speficy rules for IMAP based mail accounts.

I still receive a copy of mail via POP3 and let KMail sort it locally. 
All mail it duplicated to IMAP account and "find -delete" removes older 
mail. This IMAP account is for accessing via K9-Mail on smartphone.

-- 
Martin


___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] mailing list software

2018-12-12 Thread Joel Roth via Dng
Jim Jackson wrote:
> 
> Just an aside - what are the alternatives to procmail?
> so far I've only found _maildrop_ as an in-line delivery filter.

I filter my incoming mail using perl script based on
https://metacpan.org/pod/Email::Filter. It is designed to
be a drop-in replacement for procmail, with a bit less
cryptic syntax.

cheers



-- 
Joel Roth
  

___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] /etc/aliases

2018-12-12 Thread Gonzalo Pérez de Olaguer Córdoba
Hi Haines,

El Wed, 12 Dec 2018 12:43:29 -0500
Haines Brown  escribió:

> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 02:10:24PM +0100, Gonzalo Pérez de Olaguer Córdoba 
> wrote:
> > Hi Haines,
> > 
> > El Wed, 12 Dec 2018 07:18:35 -0500
> > Haines Brown  escribió:
> >   
> > > In debian I had the file /etc/aliases with more or less standard 
> > > entries, but don't know how it got there [...]  
> > 
> > It is commony created during the installation by debian-installer
> > (and I see that devuan-installer does the same).  
> 
> The devuan installer of Jessie (later upgraded to Ascii) did not 
> do it in my case. 

I should have been more accurate: where I see /etc/aliases is in
ascii installs that include exim4. No idea what the jessie installer does.

And looking at an ascii install made some time ago, just
with ssh server and standard packages installed in the tasksel phase (IIRC),
there is no /etc/aliases nor exim4.

Now I see exim4 in Devuan is not standard priority anymore.

> > Try 'dpkg-reconfigure exim4-config', maybe it creates it.  
> 
> No, I've run that command several times.

I see code to do it in /var/lib/dpkg/info/exim4-config.* (perhaps it does
it just in some cases).


-- 
   Gonzalo Pérez de Olaguer Córdoba   s...@gpoc.es
  -=- buscando empleo desde 1988 -=-   www.gpoc.es 

PGP: 3F87 CCE7 8B35 8C06 E637  2D57 5723 9984 718C A614
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] mailing list software

2018-12-12 Thread Rick Moen
Quoting Jim Jackson (j...@franjam.org.uk):

> Just an aside - what are the alternatives to procmail?
> so far I've only found _maildrop_ as an in-line delivery filter.

Most-often mentioned alternative LDAs (local delivery agents) are 
Maildrop, sieve[1], sortmail, and Dovecot LDA.  (Me, I just persist in
using Procmail.)

The LWN.net article and comment thread (https://lwn.net/Articles/416901/)
covers some of this.

Note:  If you look on Wikipedia, there's some confusion between LDAs and
MDAs (mail delivery agents), things that do mail transport like IMAP and
POP3 to -fetch- the mail.  And, actually, LWN's Jon Corbet makes the
same regrettable category error.  (Damned kids.  Get off my lawn, and
don't kick my SMTP mail spool.  ;->  )

[1] A filtering language rather than a utility as such.  Specific
implementations are catalogued here:  http://sieve.info/
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] A concrete proposal [was: Re: Drive-by critique]

2018-12-12 Thread KatolaZ
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 11:39:49AM -0800, spiralofhope wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 12:37:36 +0100
> KatolaZ  wrote:
> 
> > If anybody is wondering "how can I help Devuan" and is ready to do
> > something concrete in that direction, putting together such a simple
> > webpage would be a valuable contribution. 
> 
> I don't know how much I believe this myself, but..
> 
> Anyone who is wondering how they can help but can't hunt to figure
> out the basics on their own is probably not going to contribute much or
> for long.

Literally anybody can help with putting that page up. There is no
needed specific knowledge. We just need to:

- identify a set of "features" or "use-cases" (architecture, live vs
  non-live, internet available at install time or not, desktop vs
  server, expert vs novice, multiple vs single installs, customised vs
  "standard", etc);

- assign those use-cases to each of the images;

- formulate a question for each "feature" which is used to narrow down
  the set of choices;

- write the actual webpage (keeping it as simple as possible: this is
  the only strictly technical part);

- Ask people to take the "survey" and report feedback.


I am sure any Devuaner can help with one or more of those tasks.

My2Cents

KatolaZ

-- 
[ ~.,_  Enzo Nicosia aka KatolaZ - Devuan -- Freaknet Medialab  ]  
[ "+.  katolaz [at] freaknet.org --- katolaz [at] yahoo.it  ]
[   @)   http://kalos.mine.nu ---  Devuan GNU + Linux User  ]
[ @@)  http://maths.qmul.ac.uk/~vnicosia --  GPG: 0B5F062F  ] 
[ (@@@)  Twitter: @KatolaZ - skype: katolaz -- github: KatolaZ  ]


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] A concrete proposal [was: Re: Drive-by critique]

2018-12-12 Thread spiralofhope
On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 12:37:36 +0100
KatolaZ  wrote:

> If anybody is wondering "how can I help Devuan" and is ready to do
> something concrete in that direction, putting together such a simple
> webpage would be a valuable contribution. 

I don't know how much I believe this myself, but..

Anyone who is wondering how they can help but can't hunt to figure
out the basics on their own is probably not going to contribute much or
for long.
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Drive-by critique

2018-12-12 Thread spiralofhope
On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 03:14:39 -0800
Rick Moen  wrote:

>   If you want to have more devs, you need to attract a larger
> userbase.
> 
> I'm surprised to see Eric advance this non-sequitur.  Open source
> projects attract developers because their needs and objectives (or the
> needs and objectives of their employers, which amounts to the same
> thing) are met and served.

Sure, some users will help in their own way, if only to encourage, but
signal:noise increases.

Hell, sometimes having more users will _drive away_ devs, because of
real or perceived pressures.

___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Drive-by critique

2018-12-12 Thread golinux

On 2018-12-12 09:22, KatolaZ wrote:


And please find below a more detailed explanation on the motivations
behind each image:

- netinst exist because it's the preferred way of installing minimal
  systems and servers;

- the install DVD ISO exists because there are many users asking for a
  single medium that they can download once and install many times
  (e.g., due to bandwidth restrictions), and supports more than just
  XFCE;

- the 3-cdrom set exists because we had many users asking for a
  smaller footprint (again, bandwidth is not cheap everywhere) set of
  images that they could use to install offline with a minimal XFCE
  desktop;

- desktop-live exists because many people asked for a live Devuan
  version which could be easily tried and installed. This is also the
  preferred Devuan flavour used in reviews;

- minimal-live was thought as a recovery tool and has a specific focus
  on accessibility (especially regarding visually-impaired and blind
  users), and provides a full-featured console-based setup;

- so many embedded images exist because ARM vendors have not agreed on
  a common standard;

- qcow, vagrant, and vcox images exist because many Devuan users like
  to have ready-to-use images for their VMs;

- on top of those, there are also the usual mini.iso and netboot
  images, although not advertised on files.devuan.org.


Quite likely, each single user would just prefer one of those images
and ask themselves "oh why on Earth there are so many, indeed?". I
actually use almost exclusively the mini.iso or the netboot
images.

The answer is that there is no single Devuan user, and no single
Devuan use-case, as the statistics above confirm. What is perfect for
somebody, is dumb or useless for somebody else, and vice-versa. The
whole point is to make an effort to look at the bigger picture:

Since Devuan is one of the few dpkg-based systemd-free distributions
around, we have the *obligation* to cater for as many use cases as
possible.

HTH

KatolaZ




There is already a page on the website that covers much of this 
material: https://devuan.org/os/install


It is already the very first link on the Download page in this section:

Getting started


Short install instructions for various platforms <<<

Comprehensive upgrade and installation guides on dev1fanboy’s wiki
Devuan ASCII release notes to help with the upgrade

Perhaps a slight rewrite of that page and higher visibility - top of the 
page and big red letters -

would suffice?

golinux


___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] /etc/aliases

2018-12-12 Thread Haines Brown
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 02:10:24PM +0100, Gonzalo Pérez de Olaguer Córdoba 
wrote:
> Hi Haines,
> 
> El Wed, 12 Dec 2018 07:18:35 -0500
> Haines Brown  escribió:
> 
> > In debian I had the file /etc/aliases with more or less standard 
> > entries, but don't know how it got there [...]
> 
> It is commony created during the installation by debian-installer
> (and I see that devuan-installer does the same).

The devuan installer of Jessie (later upgraded to Ascii) did not 
do it in my case. 

> AFAIK, if you have exim installed you should have that file.
> I can see it in installlations of devuan-ascii made using the
> netboot iso.

Agiain, my installation of exim4 did not do it.

> Try 'dpkg-reconfigure exim4-config', maybe it creates it.

No, I've run that command several times.

> > Is this file a good thing to have or does devuan provide its 
> > functionality elsewhere?
> 
> It redirects all system emails to root, and all root emails to
> the user created during installation.

I believe I'd best create the file manually. 

Haines
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Drive-by critique

2018-12-12 Thread g4sra via Dng
On 12/12/2018 15:22, KatolaZ wrote:
[snip]
> 
> Please find below the stats of the actual number of downloads of each
> ASCII image according to https://files.devuan.org in the last 14 days
> (without taking into account the other 24 ISO mirrors):
> 
> - netinst: 149
> - DVD ISO: 135
> - CDROM ISO  :  99
> - desktop live   : 180
> - minimal-live   :  77
> - embedded (ARM) : 283
Interesting 
> - virtual:  72
> --
> Total: 995
[snip]

Could I have a breakdown by ARM platform please ?
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Drive-by critique

2018-12-12 Thread KatolaZ
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 02:40:11PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:

[cut]

> installation methods.  Looking at
> https://mirror.netzspielplatz.de/devuan/devuan_ascii_rc/installer-iso/ for
> example.  Do the separate CD and DVD images have much value given that they
> only hold the tiniest fraction of the whole archive?  Or is just one netinst
> or dvd image sufficient for all needs (perhaps combined with a local mirror
> or caching proxy server if you are doing multiple installations)?  Could the
> live images be further combined with the install images like Ubuntu does? If
> you look at http://releases.ubuntu.com/18.04.1/ and
> http://releases.ubuntu.com/18.04.1/ you can see that there's just one server
> and desktop iso image per platform per release.  It's pretty simple when
> there's a single obvious choice to make, and they clearly thought how to
> reduce the complexity as much as possible.  (Note: none of this is a
> criticism of the Devuan ascii images; the collection is quite impressive.)
>

Please find below the stats of the actual number of downloads of each
ASCII image according to https://files.devuan.org in the last 14 days
(without taking into account the other 24 ISO mirrors):

- netinst: 149
- DVD ISO: 135
- CDROM ISO  :  99
- desktop live   : 180
- minimal-live   :  77
- embedded (ARM) : 283
- virtual:  72
--
Total: 995

(yes, these are actual downloads not "file peeks", i.e., return code
"200" with matching size).


And please find below a more detailed explanation on the motivations
behind each image:

- netinst exist because it's the preferred way of installing minimal
  systems and servers;

- the install DVD ISO exists because there are many users asking for a
  single medium that they can download once and install many times
  (e.g., due to bandwidth restrictions), and supports more than just
  XFCE;

- the 3-cdrom set exists because we had many users asking for a
  smaller footprint (again, bandwidth is not cheap everywhere) set of
  images that they could use to install offline with a minimal XFCE
  desktop;

- desktop-live exists because many people asked for a live Devuan
  version which could be easily tried and installed. This is also the
  preferred Devuan flavour used in reviews;

- minimal-live was thought as a recovery tool and has a specific focus
  on accessibility (especially regarding visually-impaired and blind
  users), and provides a full-featured console-based setup;

- so many embedded images exist because ARM vendors have not agreed on
  a common standard;

- qcow, vagrant, and vcox images exist because many Devuan users like
  to have ready-to-use images for their VMs;

- on top of those, there are also the usual mini.iso and netboot
  images, although not advertised on files.devuan.org.


Quite likely, each single user would just prefer one of those images
and ask themselves "oh why on Earth there are so many, indeed?". I
actually use almost exclusively the mini.iso or the netboot
images.

The answer is that there is no single Devuan user, and no single
Devuan use-case, as the statistics above confirm. What is perfect for
somebody, is dumb or useless for somebody else, and vice-versa. The
whole point is to make an effort to look at the bigger picture:

Since Devuan is one of the few dpkg-based systemd-free distributions
around, we have the *obligation* to cater for as many use cases as
possible.

HTH

KatolaZ

-- 
[ ~.,_  Enzo Nicosia aka KatolaZ - Devuan -- Freaknet Medialab  ]  
[ "+.  katolaz [at] freaknet.org --- katolaz [at] yahoo.it  ]
[   @)   http://kalos.mine.nu ---  Devuan GNU + Linux User  ]
[ @@)  http://maths.qmul.ac.uk/~vnicosia --  GPG: 0B5F062F  ] 
[ (@@@)  Twitter: @KatolaZ - skype: katolaz -- github: KatolaZ  ]


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Drive-by critique

2018-12-12 Thread Roger Leigh

On 12/12/2018 11:14, Rick Moen wrote:

A key part of the basis of Eric's argument is irritatingly and obviously
untrue:

   If you want to have more devs, you need to attract a larger userbase.

I'm surprised to see Eric advance this non-sequitur.


I don't think it's a non sequitur, but I do think it's true as much as 
your points are true.  I agree with both, and don't find them incompatible.


Good, loyal developers are people who use your project and need more 
from it.  Attracting more users doesn't /necessarily/ attract 
developers, but it's still a /prerequisite/ to attracting developers. 
It increases the likelihood that out of the total userbase, some 
fraction of that userbase will have the desire to contribute something 
to the project, and it also increases the /value/ of contributions if 
they are widely used.


There are several reasons why this doesn't always hold true.  Some 
projects are hostile to outside contributions.  Others are so complex 
that there's a technical barrier to effective contributions.  Others 
have cliques which don't welcome outsiders, or baroque submission 
processes which sap the will of any potential contributor.  Or they lack 
the infrastructure and manpower to handle contributions effectively.  So 
in all these cases, increasing the number of users doesn't help much. 
But this is a self-inflicted failure.


But if a project is open to new contributors, welcomes and reviews 
patches in a timely manner, there's a positive reinforcement where new 
users are empowered and encouraged to do just this, and this both 
increases the number of users and developers at the same time.


GNOME is an example of the former.  I've had good quality, tested 
patches sit in its bugzilla for over a decade without review before they 
were summarily closed.  This is a project which did not value 
contributions from outsiders.  In the case of libgnomecanvas, they 
wasted the time of multiple developers writing at least six slightly 
different forks rather than review and apply contributed fixes to the 
canonical implementation to make it usable, featureful and performant. 
All of these forks, plus the original, are now basically dead with no 
users.  They did not foster contributions and this led directly to a 
decline in both contributions and use of the libraries.  It was issues 
like this that killed the prospects of GNOME for commercial software 
development in the mid 2000s, because we couldn't rely on it when issues 
couldn't be resolved in an effective and timely manner.


CMake is an example of the latter.  Turnaround time between submission 
and review is usually under 24 hours.  It's been as little as 20 
minutes.  After addressing reviewer's comments and waiting for CI 
testing to complete, typical time between submission and merging for me 
has been between 24-36 hours depending upon the complexity, and for 
simple fixes has been as little as 60 minutes.  This is a project which 
values code contribution from third parties, helps familiarise new 
developers with the project's codebase and policies, and this both 
encourages repeat contributions as well as grows the user base and 
developer base due to the utility of all this extra work going in over 
time.  As a developer, it means I get bugfixes and new features into my 
users' hands immediately from git, or by the next routine point release.


I and many other Debian developers got started because we needed new 
software packaging, or existing packages fixing or updating, and we got 
stuck in.  For myself, I started by packaging my own upstream software 
releases for projects I belonged to, and went on from there to do much 
much more.  We were users who became developers over time.  While the 
new maintainer process is somewhat lengthy, more users means more people 
who find unmet needs that becoming a developer can fulfill.  I started 
the process because other DDs were getting fed up of reviewing and 
uploading my work, and strongly encouraged it.  I do believe the same 
underlying needs and motivations hold true for Devuan or any other 
distribution.


I don't think Eric's points about ease of installation should be quite 
so trivially dismissed.  It's not like these points haven't been raised 
and discussed at length by the debian-installer team for many years. 
Any barrier which prevents a user doing an installation and getting a 
working system will result in lost users who can't get over that hurdle. 
 From difficulties finding the correct image, to making the bootable 
installation medium, to successfully completing the installation 
process.  They all matter.


This doesn't mean that you have to dumb things down to the lowest common 
denominator.  But it does mean that you have to look at what is 
unnecessary complexity vs necessary complexity, and try to minimise the 
former.  Reducing the number of installer images is beneficial so long 
as you don't sacrifice hardware support, as is having the most up to 
date

[DNG] What should be the tasks of the Devuan Installer

2018-12-12 Thread g4sra via Dng

Media partitioning, formatting
Configure mountpoints
Install Bootloader
Install Kernel, Modules & Firmware
Install Shell & package management software
Configure console
Configure network
Boot

Discuss...
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] mailing list software

2018-12-12 Thread Jim Jackson



On Wed, 12 Dec 2018, Rick Moen wrote:

> Quoting Lars Nood??n via Dng (dng@lists.dyne.org):
> 
> > It's probably a time that Procmail be retired, and thus anything based
> > on it.  There have been a lot of reports in recent years of serious,
> > unsafe bugs in its processing.  However, there is this comment about it
> > from a former Procmail maintainer to consider:
> > 
> > https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=141634350915839&w=2
>  
> Upon examination, it turns out that the known flaws in Procmail lack any
> credible exploitation scenario.  The matter was covered on LWN.net a few
> years ago, and I'm pretty sure nothing has changed substantively.
> 
> (I've gone through this discussion several times since then on mailing
> lists, and can dredge up details from those if necessary.)

Just an aside - what are the alternatives to procmail?
so far I've only found _maildrop_ as an in-line delivery filter.

Jim
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] /etc/aliases

2018-12-12 Thread Luciano Mannucci
On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 07:28:11 -0500
Haines Brown  wrote:

> Antony, its not in my /etc/mail/aliases. In your case, your sendmail 
> probably created it. But for those not using sendmail, is 
> the /etc/aliases file no longer userful or needed?
I'm running postfix that uses it. Maybe other mtas too...

Just my 2 cents,

Luciano.
-- 
 /"\ /Via A. Salaino, 7 - 20144 Milano (Italy)
 \ /  ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN / PHONE : +39 2 485781 FAX: +39 2 48578250
  X   AGAINST HTML MAIL/  E-MAIL: posthams...@sublink.sublink.org
 / \  AND POSTINGS/   WWW: http://www.lesassaie.IT/
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] ifstat.eth0 on Boot

2018-12-12 Thread Dr. Nikolaus Klepp
Am Mittwoch, 12. Dezember 2018 schrieb Didier Kryn:
> Le 12/12/2018 à 13:58, Dr. Nikolaus Klepp a écrit :
> > Am Dienstag, 11. Dezember 2018 schrieb Gonzalo Pérez de Olaguer Córdoba:
> >> Hi Michael K.
> >>
> >> El Fri, 7 Dec 2018 12:45:11 +0100
> >> "Michael K."  escribió:
> >>
> >>> After a Dev1 Setup on a Laptop (whit eth0), i have to wait a long time
> >>> for the eth0 on "cold boot".
> >>>
> >>> I "cold boot" my Laptop
> >>> I look to the "Boot Messages"
> >>> I see the following Msg:
> >>>
> >>> Configuring Network Interfaces ifup: Waiting for Lock on
> >>> /run/network/ifstat.eth0
> >>>
> >>> After 2 or 3 minutes to wait, the Laptop boot up,
> >> Just in case this could help, I've been having this same *symptom*
> >> on KVM virtual machines running ascii.
> >>
> >> My situation was eth0 being configured through DHCP and using the
> >> dhcp client from the isc-dhcp-client package, which sends (maybe buggy)
> >> DHCPDECLINE packets.
> >>
> >> My workaround was to replace isc-dhcp-client with pump.
> >>
> >> If you want more details, tell me and I will continue writing.
> >>
> >> Bye,
> >> Salo.
> >>
> > Now this is a neet tick! It also solves the issue that booting hangs on the 
> > said message when no network cable is attached to eth0.
> >
> > Nik
> >
>      Is it as simple as apt-get remove isc-dhcp-client; apt-get install 
> pump ?

Yes, but I first installed pump and then purged isc-dhcp-client.


-- 
Please do not email me anything that you are not comfortable also sharing with 
the NSA, CIA ...
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] ifstat.eth0 on Boot

2018-12-12 Thread Didier Kryn

Le 12/12/2018 à 13:58, Dr. Nikolaus Klepp a écrit :

Am Dienstag, 11. Dezember 2018 schrieb Gonzalo Pérez de Olaguer Córdoba:

Hi Michael K.

El Fri, 7 Dec 2018 12:45:11 +0100
"Michael K."  escribió:


After a Dev1 Setup on a Laptop (whit eth0), i have to wait a long time
for the eth0 on "cold boot".

I "cold boot" my Laptop
I look to the "Boot Messages"
I see the following Msg:

Configuring Network Interfaces ifup: Waiting for Lock on
/run/network/ifstat.eth0

After 2 or 3 minutes to wait, the Laptop boot up,

Just in case this could help, I've been having this same *symptom*
on KVM virtual machines running ascii.

My situation was eth0 being configured through DHCP and using the
dhcp client from the isc-dhcp-client package, which sends (maybe buggy)
DHCPDECLINE packets.

My workaround was to replace isc-dhcp-client with pump.

If you want more details, tell me and I will continue writing.

Bye,
Salo.


Now this is a neet tick! It also solves the issue that booting hangs on the 
said message when no network cable is attached to eth0.

Nik

    Is it as simple as apt-get remove isc-dhcp-client; apt-get install 
pump ?



                Didier


___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] /etc/aliases

2018-12-12 Thread Gonzalo Pérez de Olaguer Córdoba
Hi Haines,

El Wed, 12 Dec 2018 07:18:35 -0500
Haines Brown  escribió:

> In debian I had the file /etc/aliases with more or less standard 
> entries, but don't know how it got there [...]

It is commony created during the installation by debian-installer
(and I see that devuan-installer does the same).

Appart from some default aliases, it places one from root to
the 'normal user' created during installation, so she receives
all mail addressed (and aliased) to root.

> (I didn't run sendmail or 
> procmail, but did run exim4). I now see that the file is missing in 
> devuan ASCII (where I also run exim4).

AFAIK, if you have exim installed you should have that file.
I can see it in installlations of devuan-ascii made using the
netboot iso.
Try 'dpkg-reconfigure exim4-config', maybe it creates it.

> Is this file a good thing to have or does devuan provide its 
> functionality elsewhere?

It redirects all system emails to root, and all root emails to
the user created during installation.

-- 
   Gonzalo Pérez de Olaguer Córdoba   s...@gpoc.es
  -=- buscando empleo desde 1988 -=-   www.gpoc.es 

PGP: 3F87 CCE7 8B35 8C06 E637  2D57 5723 9984 718C A614
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] ifstat.eth0 on Boot

2018-12-12 Thread Dr. Nikolaus Klepp
Am Dienstag, 11. Dezember 2018 schrieb Gonzalo Pérez de Olaguer Córdoba:
> Hi Michael K.
> 
> El Fri, 7 Dec 2018 12:45:11 +0100
> "Michael K."  escribió:
> 
> > After a Dev1 Setup on a Laptop (whit eth0), i have to wait a long time
> > for the eth0 on "cold boot".
> > 
> > I "cold boot" my Laptop
> > I look to the "Boot Messages"
> > I see the following Msg:
> > 
> > Configuring Network Interfaces ifup: Waiting for Lock on
> > /run/network/ifstat.eth0
> > 
> > After 2 or 3 minutes to wait, the Laptop boot up,
> 
> Just in case this could help, I've been having this same *symptom*
> on KVM virtual machines running ascii.
> 
> My situation was eth0 being configured through DHCP and using the
> dhcp client from the isc-dhcp-client package, which sends (maybe buggy)
> DHCPDECLINE packets.
> 
> My workaround was to replace isc-dhcp-client with pump.
> 
> If you want more details, tell me and I will continue writing.
> 
> Bye,
> Salo.
> 

Now this is a neet tick! It also solves the issue that booting hangs on the 
said message when no network cable is attached to eth0.

Nik

-- 
Please do not email me anything that you are not comfortable also sharing with 
the NSA, CIA ...
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] /etc/aliases

2018-12-12 Thread KatolaZ
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 07:28:11AM -0500, Haines Brown wrote:

[cut]

>  
>  
> Antony, its not in my /etc/mail/aliases. In your case, your sendmail 
> probably created it. But for those not using sendmail, is 
> the /etc/aliases file no longer userful or needed?
>

Dear Haines,

as you know, /etc/aliases is normally used by MTAs. Now, there is no
"preferred" MTA in Devuan[*], so /etc/aliases is useful only if your
preferred MTA uses it/honour its content. The original sendmail did,
postfix does, and IIRC opensmtpd does as well. On the other hand,
qmail does not (it uses a series of separate files instead). In a
word, it's up to you to decide if you need an /etc/aliases, and up to
your preferred MTA to agree with you or not ;)

My2Cents

KatolaZ

[*] I know that for some arcane reason Debian seems to be recommending
exim4, but seriously, I think that exim4 is far larger and far more
complex to admin and maintain that postfix or qmail, for no apparent
gain.

-- 
[ ~.,_  Enzo Nicosia aka KatolaZ - Devuan -- Freaknet Medialab  ]  
[ "+.  katolaz [at] freaknet.org --- katolaz [at] yahoo.it  ]
[   @)   http://kalos.mine.nu ---  Devuan GNU + Linux User  ]
[ @@)  http://maths.qmul.ac.uk/~vnicosia --  GPG: 0B5F062F  ] 
[ (@@@)  Twitter: @KatolaZ - skype: katolaz -- github: KatolaZ  ]


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] /etc/aliases

2018-12-12 Thread Haines Brown
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 01:21:46PM +0100, Antony Stone wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 December 2018 at 13:18:35, Haines Brown wrote:
> 
> > In debian I had the file /etc/aliases with more or less standard
> > entries, but don't know how it got there (I didn't run sendmail or
> > procmail, but did run exim4). I now see that the file is missing in
> > devuan ASCII (where I also run exim4).
> 
> I'm running Ascii with sendmail, and /etc/aliases does exist.
> 
> > Is this file a good thing to have or does devuan provide its
> > functionality elsewhere?
> 
> Have you checked to see whether it's under /etc/mail/aliases instead?
 
 
Antony, its not in my /etc/mail/aliases. In your case, your sendmail 
probably created it. But for those not using sendmail, is 
the /etc/aliases file no longer userful or needed?

Haines
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] /etc/aliases

2018-12-12 Thread Antony Stone
On Wednesday 12 December 2018 at 13:18:35, Haines Brown wrote:

> In debian I had the file /etc/aliases with more or less standard
> entries, but don't know how it got there (I didn't run sendmail or
> procmail, but did run exim4). I now see that the file is missing in
> devuan ASCII (where I also run exim4).

I'm running Ascii with sendmail, and /etc/aliases does exist.

> Is this file a good thing to have or does devuan provide its
> functionality elsewhere?

Have you checked to see whether it's under /etc/mail/aliases instead?


Antony.

-- 
Is it venison for dinner again?  Oh deer.

   Please reply to the list;
 please *don't* CC me.
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


[DNG] /etc/aliases

2018-12-12 Thread Haines Brown
In debian I had the file /etc/aliases with more or less standard 
entries, but don't know how it got there (I didn't run sendmail or 
procmail, but did run exim4). I now see that the file is missing in 
devuan ASCII (where I also run exim4).

Is this file a good thing to have or does devuan provide its 
functionality elsewhere?

Haines Brown
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] ifstat.eth0 on Boot

2018-12-12 Thread Gonzalo Pérez de Olaguer Córdoba
Hi Michael K.

El Fri, 7 Dec 2018 12:45:11 +0100
"Michael K."  escribió:

> After a Dev1 Setup on a Laptop (whit eth0), i have to wait a long time
> for the eth0 on "cold boot".
> 
> I "cold boot" my Laptop
> I look to the "Boot Messages"
> I see the following Msg:
> 
> Configuring Network Interfaces ifup: Waiting for Lock on
> /run/network/ifstat.eth0
> 
> After 2 or 3 minutes to wait, the Laptop boot up,

Just in case this could help, I've been having this same *symptom*
on KVM virtual machines running ascii.

My situation was eth0 being configured through DHCP and using the
dhcp client from the isc-dhcp-client package, which sends (maybe buggy)
DHCPDECLINE packets.

My workaround was to replace isc-dhcp-client with pump.

If you want more details, tell me and I will continue writing.

Bye,
Salo.

-- 
   Gonzalo Pérez de Olaguer Córdoba   s...@gpoc.es
  -=- buscando empleo desde 1988 -=-   www.gpoc.es 

PGP: 3F87 CCE7 8B35 8C06 E637  2D57 5723 9984 718C A614


pgph5Fg7tqZFG.pgp
Description: Firma digital OpenPGP
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] A concrete proposal [was: Re: Drive-by critique]

2018-12-12 Thread Rick Moen
Quoting KatolaZ (kato...@freaknet.org):

> I would really like to avoid starting yet-another-lengthy-flame which
> has little chance of being useful at all. Writing 150 emails about
> which points of that post are good and which are bad might possibly be
> useful to sharpen our own rhetoric weapons, but will not further the
> achievement of Devuan's mission by a single bit.

Fortunately, that's _not_ going to happen here, because the rant in
question just is out of touch with Devuan and with the realities of
maintaining a distribution.

> I have a concrete proposal instead, actually coming from a reply by
> Centurion_Dan to that thread on Dev1Galaxy. The proposal is as
> follows:
> 
>   it would be probably good to have a simple webpage for Devuan
>   newcomers that asks a couple of questions about the user
>   intentions/use-case and suggests the most appropriate install image
>   to use among the available ones.

I see now that Centurion-Dan posted this to
https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=13190#p13190, where his full
comments can be read.

It's a tribute to the high quality and dedication of Devuan Project's
contributors that so much useful and creative material ends up on its
Web forum.  I'll confess that I consider this so vanishingly rare that 
until this past evening I'd not plowed through Eric's drive-by comments
much, and hasn't read others' follow-on comments there at all.

> If anybody is wondering "how can I help Devuan" and is ready to do
> something concrete in that direction, putting together such a simple
> webpage would be a valuable contribution. Discussions are good and can
> be entertaining sometimes, but actions are the only way to improve
> things.

Hear, hear.

___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


[DNG] A concrete proposal [was: Re: Drive-by critique]

2018-12-12 Thread KatolaZ
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 03:14:39AM -0800, Rick Moen wrote:

[cut]

> 
> What Eric left for us:
> https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=13144#p13144
>

Dear Rick,

I would really like to avoid starting yet-another-lengthy-flame which
has little chance of being useful at all. Writing 150 emails about
which points of that post are good and which are bad might possibly be
useful to sharpen our own rhetoric weapons, but will not further the
achievement of Devuan's mission by a single bit.

I have a concrete proposal instead, actually coming from a reply by
Centurion_Dan to that thread on Dev1Galaxy. The proposal is as
follows:

  it would be probably good to have a simple webpage for Devuan
  newcomers that asks a couple of questions about the user
  intentions/use-case and suggests the most appropriate install image
  to use among the available ones.

If anybody is wondering "how can I help Devuan" and is ready to do
something concrete in that direction, putting together such a simple
webpage would be a valuable contribution. Discussions are good and can
be entertaining sometimes, but actions are the only way to improve
things.

My2Cents

KatolaZ

-- 
[ ~.,_  Enzo Nicosia aka KatolaZ - Devuan -- Freaknet Medialab  ]  
[ "+.  katolaz [at] freaknet.org --- katolaz [at] yahoo.it  ]
[   @)   http://kalos.mine.nu ---  Devuan GNU + Linux User  ]
[ @@)  http://maths.qmul.ac.uk/~vnicosia --  GPG: 0B5F062F  ] 
[ (@@@)  Twitter: @KatolaZ - skype: katolaz -- github: KatolaZ  ]


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] mailing list software

2018-12-12 Thread Lars Noodén via Dng
On 12/12/18 1:25 PM, Rick Moen wrote:
> I wrote:
> 
>> Upon examination, it turns out that the known flaws in Procmail lack any
>> credible exploitation scenario.  The matter was covered on LWN.net a few
>> years ago, and I'm pretty sure nothing has changed substantively.
>>
>> (I've gone through this discussion several times since then on mailing
>> lists, and can dredge up details from those if necessary.)
> 
> One was a year ago on this mailing list:
[...]

Got it.

https://lists.dyne.org/lurker/message/20180710.164111.458c1663.en.html

Thanks.

/Lars

___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] mailing list software

2018-12-12 Thread Rick Moen
I wrote:

> Upon examination, it turns out that the known flaws in Procmail lack any
> credible exploitation scenario.  The matter was covered on LWN.net a few
> years ago, and I'm pretty sure nothing has changed substantively.
> 
> (I've gone through this discussion several times since then on mailing
> lists, and can dredge up details from those if necessary.)

One was a year ago on this mailing list:


Quoting Adam Borowski (kilob...@angband.pl):

> Note: there indeed was one security vulnerability, but it was
> discovered in
> 2014, while all the "it's dead" brouchacha happened years before.

https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2014-3618

It's a heap-based buffer overflow in /usr/bin/formail (specifically in
formisc.c).  The threat model is a bit far-fetched, IMO.  (Normally,
LDA handling only rarely involves formail, which is a filter for munging
messages.)

Distros immediately patched it.  AFAIK, basically instead of a
single upstream, there is timely maintenace by various distributions.
Which makes the 'Oh noes!  procmail isn't safe!' noises a bit
exaggerated.

https://serverfault.com/questions/876336/is-it-safe-to-use-procmail-in-2017



And then again in July 2018:

Quoting KatolaZ (kato...@freaknet.org):

> Again, links before opinions:
>
>   https://sourceforge.net/p/net-tools/code/ci/master/tree/
>
> net-tools might be obsolete for many functions, but it's still
> developed, and is surely not "unmaintained" since 17 years ago.

Argue with Jon Corbet, then:
https://lwn.net/Articles/710533/

That was last year.  I don't believe there's been a substantial
turnaround despite some checkins.  (If I'm mistaken, I'lll find out when
I hear people whose judgment I trust say 'A miracle happened and
net-tools has been fully made reasonable to rely on, again.')

> Let's make another example. procmail

Sure, let's discuss procmail.  Unlike net-tools, it's a very modestly
scoped codebase and not central to system security.  Since being
orphaned, it's accumulated only two unfixed bugs with alleged security
implications that informed observers consider seriously farfetched, not
to mention actually being bugs in an Email Sanitizer project and Horde,
not procmail itself.  So, many including me consider it 'completed' more
than it is 'orphaned', and continue to happily use it rather than
aspiring replacement such as Maildrop, sieve, and sortmail.

Jon Corbet was on the glass-half-empty side of the discussion when he
covered procmail's status, but be sure to read the comment thread.
https://lwn.net/Articles/416901/

> Is anybody here ready to claim that procmail is useless and we should
> replace it just because its development ended 17 years ago, producing
> a damn virtually perfect piece of software, that does *one* thing and
> does it *well*, has been included in all the Linux and *BSD
> distributions in the last 25 years, and did not require any
> maintenance at all for 17 long years? o_O

Certainly not me.  But that didn't stop you from pretending as if I'd
advanced that argument.  Which was a waste of time on your part, but I
hope you enjoyed the typing practice.


___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] mailing list software

2018-12-12 Thread Lars Noodén via Dng
On 12/12/18 1:13 PM, Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting Lars Nood??n via Dng (dng@lists.dyne.org):
> 
>> It's probably a time that Procmail be retired, and thus anything based
>> on it.  There have been a lot of reports in recent years of serious,
>> unsafe bugs in its processing.  However, there is this comment about it
>> from a former Procmail maintainer to consider:
>>
>> https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=141634350915839&w=2
>  
> Upon examination, it turns out that the known flaws in Procmail lack any
> credible exploitation scenario.  The matter was covered on LWN.net a few
> years ago, and I'm pretty sure nothing has changed substantively.
> 
> (I've gone through this discussion several times since then on mailing
> lists, and can dredge up details from those if necessary.)

I found only this one on LWN:

"Reports of procmail's death are not terribly exaggerated"
https://lwn.net/Articles/416901/

I liked Procmail back when I was using it, but that was a long time ago.
 Neither now nor then could I look under the hood so I defer to others
on that.

/Lars
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


[DNG] Drive-by critique

2018-12-12 Thread Rick Moen
A very odd thing happened on #devuan, and then an incrementally odder
thing on dev1galaxy, on the day before Pearl Harbour Day.Both 
involved a whirlwind visit by Eric Raymond -- who came and went with
some quite ranty opinions.   Being sleepy at the time, I good-naturedly
promised Eric I'd raise his points on Devuan's mailing list.  Mulling
over same, though, I've had to have second thoughts -- and to my regret
can't keep that promise, but will post some observations.

What Eric left for us:
https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?pid=13144#p13144

The big problem is that Eric wants to hector Devuan into being things it
isn't, that its careful four years of planning have not aimed towards.
I doubt tat he took the trouble to properly understand Devuan's chosen
mission and strategy.  (I think I basically understand it, tough I'm a
newcomer.)

A key part of the basis of Eric's argument is irritatingly and obviously
untrue:

  If you want to have more devs, you need to attract a larger userbase.

I'm surprised to see Eric advance this non-sequitur.  Open source
projects attract developers because their needs and objectives (or the
needs and objectives of their employers, which amounts to the same
thing) are met and served.  Moreover, that is a truth that has long
been advanced by Open Source Initiative, which Eric co-founded, and I'm
pretty sure it's also an insight in Eric's own writings.

Anyway, in effect, Eric wishes a systemd-free distro existed, one he
didn't realise can't be Devuan, that has only _one_ installer image (per
supported CPU architecture), not several to choose among, that merges in
all possible proprietary firmware BLOBs, and that consistently uses a
cutting-edge installer kernel and installed kernel (hence, maximum
possible new-hardware support).  

I don't think Eric has any clue about the developer cost of maintaining
bespoke installer images, or about the weird bugs and instability that
can come with bleeding-edge kernel instead of (as Devuan and Debian use)
stable kernel versions with backported fixes.  Also, he may not know
about the developer cost of too many avoidable differences from Debian,
our sister distro whose work Devuan is smart enough not to duplicate if
possible, and where possible works with.

Someone advocating views like Eric's might be able to make a case for
them if he/she were willing to stick around and pitch in to make them
happen, but in that area one finds the other problem:  His advice
appears to have been on a drive-by basis, near as I can tell.  

I'm put in mind of one of the traditional Debian answers when a visitor
gets demanding and wants to know when something will be fixed or
released:  'Sooner if you help.'
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] mailing list software

2018-12-12 Thread Rick Moen
Quoting Lars Nood??n via Dng (dng@lists.dyne.org):

> It's probably a time that Procmail be retired, and thus anything based
> on it.  There have been a lot of reports in recent years of serious,
> unsafe bugs in its processing.  However, there is this comment about it
> from a former Procmail maintainer to consider:
> 
> https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=141634350915839&w=2
 
Upon examination, it turns out that the known flaws in Procmail lack any
credible exploitation scenario.  The matter was covered on LWN.net a few
years ago, and I'm pretty sure nothing has changed substantively.

(I've gone through this discussion several times since then on mailing
lists, and can dredge up details from those if necessary.)
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] mailing list software

2018-12-12 Thread Lars Noodén via Dng
On 12/12/18 1:14 AM, Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting Martin Steigerwald (mar...@lichtvoll.de):
[...]
>> Ah, I found it: smartlist. It appears to be a small, lightweight C 
>> application. Debian is using this.
> 
> Nicely summarised.  Yes, SmartList seems to have carved out a neat
> little niche of modest functionality.  It's built atop Procmail, and
[...]

It's probably a time that Procmail be retired, and thus anything based
on it.  There have been a lot of reports in recent years of serious,
unsafe bugs in its processing.  However, there is this comment about it
from a former Procmail maintainer to consider:

https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=141634350915839&w=2

/Lars
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] About gnuinos ascii

2018-12-12 Thread KatolaZ
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 12:36:23AM +0100, aitor wrote:

[cut]

> 
> Here you are the resulting image generated by the live-sdk, including
> debian-installer:
> 
> http://gnuinos.org/gnuinos%20ascii/
>

Great job aitor!

HND

KatolaZ

-- 
[ ~.,_  Enzo Nicosia aka KatolaZ - Devuan -- Freaknet Medialab  ]  
[ "+.  katolaz [at] freaknet.org --- katolaz [at] yahoo.it  ]
[   @)   http://kalos.mine.nu ---  Devuan GNU + Linux User  ]
[ @@)  http://maths.qmul.ac.uk/~vnicosia --  GPG: 0B5F062F  ] 
[ (@@@)  Twitter: @KatolaZ - skype: katolaz -- github: KatolaZ  ]


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng