Re: [dnsdist] Dnsdist dynamic backend selection between AUTH and RECURSOR

2023-01-07 Thread bernd--- via dnsdist
Hello!

I am aware that the solution I am aiming for is not the optimum.

However, I use fly.io as a platform where I have already distributed DNSDIST 
containers to over 20 locations with Anycast IP.
The problem comes with the limitations of the fly - one app is bound to a set 
of IPs. You can not distinguish within the app between different IPs on the 
same app.
This means, I would have to start another 20 Instances of dnsdist 

May I can code an Pub/Sub solution or make use of the KV Store... I still have 
to think my way into it.

If someone is interested in my fly.io solution (Alpha State, testing only, no 
warranty!):

https://github.com/Berndinox/flyio-powerdns-dnsdist
https://github.com/Berndinox/flyio-powerdns-pg


BR
Bernd


-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Chris Hofstaedtler | Deduktiva  
Gesendet: Samstag, 7. Januar 2023 12:50
An: Bernd KLAUS 
Cc: dnsdist@mailman.powerdns.com
Betreff: Re: [dnsdist] Dnsdist dynamic backend selection between AUTH and 
RECURSOR

Hello Bernd,

* Bernd KLAUS via dnsdist  [230107 11:01]:
> Regarding:
> „ My first suggestion would be to not need to do the name based 
> forwarding by separating the incoming recurosr and auth traffic on ip 
> address or port“
> 
> So i should forward all querys to the recursor?

I believe the best practice is to have a dedicated IP for auth services, and 
another dedicated IP for recursive.

I'd expect Otto's suggestions to be that ^.

Best,
--
Chris Hofstaedtler / Deduktiva GmbH (FN 418592 b, HG Wien) www.deduktiva.com / 
+43 1 353 1707

___
dnsdist mailing list
dnsdist@mailman.powerdns.com
https://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/dnsdist


Re: [dnsdist] Dnsdist dynamic backend selection between AUTH and RECURSOR

2023-01-07 Thread Chris Hofstaedtler | Deduktiva via dnsdist
Hello Bernd,

* Bernd KLAUS via dnsdist  [230107 11:01]:
> Regarding:
> „ My first suggestion would be to not need to do the name based
> forwarding by separating the incoming recurosr and auth traffic on ip
> address or port“
> 
> So i should forward all querys to the recursor?

I believe the best practice is to have a dedicated IP for auth
services, and another dedicated IP for recursive.

I'd expect Otto's suggestions to be that ^.

Best,
-- 
Chris Hofstaedtler / Deduktiva GmbH (FN 418592 b, HG Wien)
www.deduktiva.com / +43 1 353 1707
___
dnsdist mailing list
dnsdist@mailman.powerdns.com
https://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/dnsdist


Re: [dnsdist] Dnsdist dynamic backend selection between AUTH and RECURSOR

2023-01-07 Thread Bernd KLAUS via dnsdist
Hy Otto,

Thanks for your Feedback.
I will look into the KV thing.

Regarding:
„ My first suggestion would be to not need to do the name based
forwarding by separating the incoming recurosr and auth traffic on ip
address or port“

So i should forward all querys to the recursor?

BR Bernd 

> Am 07.01.2023 um 10:40 schrieb Otto Moerbeek :
> 
> Hi,
> 
> My first suggestion would be to not need to do the name based
> forwarding by separating the incoming recurosr and auth traffic on ip
> address or port. If that is not feasible, take a look at
> 
> https://dnsdist.org/reference/kvs.html
> 
> Have a process update the kv-database and dnsdist can use that to make
> its decisions.
> 
>-Otto
>
> 
>> On Sat, Jan 07, 2023 at 10:14:17AM +0100, bernd--- via dnsdist wrote:
>> 
>> Hello!
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> I have a question regarding the architecture of DNSDIST in front of an
>> authorative pdns instance as well as an recursor.
>> 
>> I`ve looked at: https://doc.powerdns.com/authoritative/guides/recursion.html
>> - however, the solutions described are kind of static.
>> 
>> Eg. Domains send to the auth-instance have to be specified manually in the
>> config.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> What I love to achieve is:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Let DNSDIST dynamicly select if a Request should be send to AUTH or
>> RECURSOR.
>> 
>> For Latency, the list of AUTH-Domains should be somehow synced locally to
>> the DNSDIST-Instance itself.
>> 
>> DNSDIST should not ask AUTH always and if it fails forward the request to
>> the Recursor.
>> 
>> Also if another Domain is added to the AUTH-Instance, this domain should be
>> added to the DNSDIST Config.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> I tought about getting the Domain List via API on Startup and adding new
>> records via Control-Socket.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Has someone done a similar thing already?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> PS: Sorry for some potential false spellings - i`m not native.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> BR
>> 
>> Bernd
>> 
>> https://berndklaus.at
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
>> ___
>> dnsdist mailing list
>> dnsdist@mailman.powerdns.com
>> https://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/dnsdist
> 

___
dnsdist mailing list
dnsdist@mailman.powerdns.com
https://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/dnsdist


Re: [dnsdist] Dnsdist dynamic backend selection between AUTH and RECURSOR

2023-01-07 Thread Otto Moerbeek via dnsdist
Hi,

My first suggestion would be to not need to do the name based
forwarding by separating the incoming recurosr and auth traffic on ip
address or port. If that is not feasible, take a look at

https://dnsdist.org/reference/kvs.html

Have a process update the kv-database and dnsdist can use that to make
its decisions.

-Otto


On Sat, Jan 07, 2023 at 10:14:17AM +0100, bernd--- via dnsdist wrote:

> Hello!
> 
>  
> 
> I have a question regarding the architecture of DNSDIST in front of an
> authorative pdns instance as well as an recursor.
> 
> I`ve looked at: https://doc.powerdns.com/authoritative/guides/recursion.html
> - however, the solutions described are kind of static.
> 
> Eg. Domains send to the auth-instance have to be specified manually in the
> config.
> 
>  
> 
> What I love to achieve is:
> 
>  
> 
> Let DNSDIST dynamicly select if a Request should be send to AUTH or
> RECURSOR.
> 
> For Latency, the list of AUTH-Domains should be somehow synced locally to
> the DNSDIST-Instance itself.
> 
> DNSDIST should not ask AUTH always and if it fails forward the request to
> the Recursor.
> 
> Also if another Domain is added to the AUTH-Instance, this domain should be
> added to the DNSDIST Config.
> 
>  
> 
> I tought about getting the Domain List via API on Startup and adding new
> records via Control-Socket.
> 
>  
> 
> Has someone done a similar thing already?
> 
>  
> 
> PS: Sorry for some potential false spellings - i`m not native.
> 
>  
> 
> BR
> 
> Bernd
> 
> https://berndklaus.at
> 
>  
> 

> ___
> dnsdist mailing list
> dnsdist@mailman.powerdns.com
> https://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/dnsdist

___
dnsdist mailing list
dnsdist@mailman.powerdns.com
https://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/dnsdist


[dnsdist] Dnsdist dynamic backend selection between AUTH and RECURSOR

2023-01-07 Thread bernd--- via dnsdist
Hello!

 

I have a question regarding the architecture of DNSDIST in front of an
authorative pdns instance as well as an recursor.

I`ve looked at: https://doc.powerdns.com/authoritative/guides/recursion.html
- however, the solutions described are kind of static.

Eg. Domains send to the auth-instance have to be specified manually in the
config.

 

What I love to achieve is:

 

Let DNSDIST dynamicly select if a Request should be send to AUTH or
RECURSOR.

For Latency, the list of AUTH-Domains should be somehow synced locally to
the DNSDIST-Instance itself.

DNSDIST should not ask AUTH always and if it fails forward the request to
the Recursor.

Also if another Domain is added to the AUTH-Instance, this domain should be
added to the DNSDIST Config.

 

I tought about getting the Domain List via API on Startup and adding new
records via Control-Socket.

 

Has someone done a similar thing already?

 

PS: Sorry for some potential false spellings - i`m not native.

 

BR

Bernd

https://berndklaus.at

 

___
dnsdist mailing list
dnsdist@mailman.powerdns.com
https://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/dnsdist