Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Announce: release candidate dnsmasq-2.60rc1
On 01/03/12 00:30, /dev/rob0 wrote: On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 08:05:41PM +, Simon Kelley wrote: The DHCPv6 code is looking pretty good now (thanks all testers). So good, in fact, that I think it's time to start moving gently towards a release. I've just created 2.60rc1, available at Just a thought ... having added DHCPv6, perhaps this warrants a major release, i.e., 3.0? :) I've thought about this, and the reason I didn't go for it is that the addition of DHCPv6 has not changed any existing functionality. Unless I've made a mistake, 2.60 should slot into any existing dnsmasq configuration and just keep working. That's certainly the intention and deliberately so. I'd really like to do a non-backward-compatible 3.0 release and throw away the bad design decisions that have accumulated over the years. I may well do one at some point, but it won't be now, and I won't force users to re-build their installations to get DHCPv6. Cheers, Simon. ___ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Announce: release candidate dnsmasq-2.60rc1
On 29/02/12 03:18, Preston Crow wrote: I hit a Makefile issue (that wasn't there in dnsmasq-2.60test10): # pmake way to learn path of Makefile TOP != echo `pwd`/ # GNU make way to learn path of Makefile TOP ?= $(shell pwd) This leads to: Makefile:38: *** missing separator. Stop. Apparently it doesn't like the first TOP line. I might be building it wrong. I'm using Gentoo Linux, and I copied and tweaked the ebuild that I used for test10, which was copied and tweaked from the ebuild for the previous release. Sigh. Writing portable makefiles is a thankless task. I tested this on Gnu-make and BSD make. What flavour/version on make are you using. Related question: BSD people. Would you care if I gave up the fight and required GNU-make to build dnsmasq? Cheers, Simon. ___ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Announce: release candidate dnsmasq-2.60rc1
On 29/02/12 08:05, Vladislav Grishenko wrote: Same hit here, but due TOP variable is already exported from up-level Makefile I have source tree with packages and one general Makefile: src/dnsmasq/... src/Makefile export TOP := $(shell pwd) dnsmasq: $(MAKE) -C $@ So, had to change it to $(MAKE) -C $@ TOP=$(TOP)/$@. p.s Debian, GNU Make 3.81 Best Regards, Vladislav Grishenko Ah thanks for that clue. You've prompted me to tidy up the makefile and put all the internal variables in lower-case, as they should be. I hope that will solve the problems. Simon. ___ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Announce: release candidate dnsmasq-2.60rc1
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 08:05:41PM +, Simon Kelley wrote: The DHCPv6 code is looking pretty good now (thanks all testers). So good, in fact, that I think it's time to start moving gently towards a release. I've just created 2.60rc1, available at Just a thought ... having added DHCPv6, perhaps this warrants a major release, i.e., 3.0? :) -- http://rob0.nodns4.us/ -- system administration and consulting Offlist GMX mail is seen only if /dev/rob0 is in the Subject: ___ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Announce: release candidate dnsmasq-2.60rc1
Dnia 2012-02-29, o godz. 18:30:57 /dev/rob0 r...@gmx.co.uk napisał(a): On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 08:05:41PM +, Simon Kelley wrote: The DHCPv6 code is looking pretty good now (thanks all testers). So good, in fact, that I think it's time to start moving gently towards a release. I've just created 2.60rc1, available at Just a thought ... having added DHCPv6, perhaps this warrants a major release, i.e., 3.0? :) .0 is always broken - better 3.1 ;-) git, lua. And Linux-3. I would vote for major=3 too! The only reason not to do it is when Simon thinks about something really revolutionary. -- jasiu ___ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Announce: release candidate dnsmasq-2.60rc1
I hit a Makefile issue (that wasn't there in dnsmasq-2.60test10): # pmake way to learn path of Makefile TOP != echo `pwd`/ # GNU make way to learn path of Makefile TOP ?= $(shell pwd) This leads to: Makefile:38: *** missing separator. Stop. Apparently it doesn't like the first TOP line. I might be building it wrong. I'm using Gentoo Linux, and I copied and tweaked the ebuild that I used for test10, which was copied and tweaked from the ebuild for the previous release. ___ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
